<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can you identify?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science shows that the only way around some readers' prejudices is to trick them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news of recent research documenting how readers identify with the main characters in stories has mostly been taken as confirmation of the value of literary role models. Lisa Libby, an assistant professor at Ohio State University and co-author of a study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, explained that subjects who read a short story in which the protagonist overcomes obstacles in order to vote were more likely to vote themselves several days later.</p><p>The suggestibility of readers isn't news. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's novel of a sensitive young man destroyed by unrequited love, "The Sorrows of Young Werther," inspired a rash of suicides by would-be Werthers in the late 1700s. Jack Kerouac has launched a thousand road trips. Still, this is part of science's job: Running empirical tests on common knowledge -- if for no other reason than because common knowledge (and common sense) is often wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To do or not to do?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/to_do_or_not_to_do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/to_do_or_not_to_do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Mr. Tennis,</strong></p><p><strong>I'm on the cusp of my 30s, in a life partnership and polyamorous. My personal history involves a graduate-school education, a grade-skipping, semi-home-schooled childhood and several coming-out stories. So I'll ask you to picture me as I am right now. I have crazy hair and clothes. I'm finally allowing myself to feel young after many years of trying to look mature and serious; I am secure enough in my spiritual and political beliefs to remain quietly confident about them, but I used to be quite the crusader. There's a strong creative vein that runs through my family. I learned the hard way that to repress my artistic impulses makes me go quite mad. I make music, perform and dress up whenever I can. I get hooked on things and experiences very easily, but I have enough self-awareness to unhook myself before I get too damaged. I used to drink too much and get in fights, I used to have a really haphazard, risky sex life -- till I laid out rules, got some help and learned to watch my moods and habits. Mostly I get by. I read a lot of philosophy, I meditate, I do the spiritual stuff and try not to live in my head all the time. I still get a bit obsessed with ideas and concepts and lifestyles, and of course, I get hung up on wonderful people.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/to_do_or_not_to_do/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/to_do_or_not_to_do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selling Zionism in the 1920s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/selling_zionism_in_the_1920s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/selling_zionism_in_the_1920s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Palestine Poster Project reveals attempts to entice settlers into what is now Israel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>Dan Walsh's incredibly rich <a href="http://www.palestineposterproject.org/">Palestine Poster Project Archives</a> includes much in the way of protest, but it also contains a trove of rare Zionist/Israeli posters from the 1920s through the '50s, largely before partition. The ones excerpted here are from the Mahmoud Darwish Memorial Gallery, which includes a collection of Zionist Worker agency posters calling for increased development of Palestine.</p><p>[caption id="attachment_318721" align="aligncenter" width="492" caption="The affairs of the workers of Eretz Israel should be in the hands of the workers of Eretz Israel, 1935."]<a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/mapai_shamir.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-318721" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/mapai_shamir.jpg" alt="" width="492" height="719" /></a>[/caption]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/selling_zionism_in_the_1920s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/selling_zionism_in_the_1920s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Battleship&#8221;: Dumbest military spectacle ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/battleship_dumbest_military_spectacle_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/battleship_dumbest_military_spectacle_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aliens invade a Navy recruitment video and turn back the gender-politics clock in this moronic blockbuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great marketing constants of contemporary Hollywood is the idea of appealing to the 11-year-old boy within every moviegoer (whatever gender that person may manifest on the surface). Almost every American movie released during the summer season has that squirmy pre-adolescent id in view, and about two-thirds of the movies made the rest of the year. But what about a movie as baffling and incoherent and flat-out stupid as <a href="http://www.battleshipmovie.com/">"Battleship"</a> -- an alien-invasion adventure by way of a Hasbro game, or maybe the other way round -- a movie that would make your inner 11-year-old stomp out of the theater in disgust?</p><p>It's undoubtedly gilding the lily to claim that "Battleship" is the dumbest movie I've ever seen -- for all that I front as someone who only likes Turkish films where people stare at the landscape without talking, I've seen a <em>lot</em> of dumb movies -- but it's definitely up there. Over and above its extraordinary, mind-melting level of stupidity, "Battleship" (which is directed by actor-turned-filmmaker Peter Berg, of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/07/01/hancock/">"Hancock"</a> and "Friday Night Lights," and written by action-flick brothers Erich and Jon Hoeber) is also extremely weird. Its shameless and nonsensical combination of ingredients finally won me over, after a fashion, when I realized that its gung-ho Navy-recruitment propaganda and retrograde gender politics shouldn't be taken any more seriously than the ZZ Top, AC/DC and Billy Squier songs on the soundtrack. The only point of the whole exercise is to make small boys whoop and holler.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/battleship_dumbest_military_spectacle_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/battleship_dumbest_military_spectacle_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The disappearing slowdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_disappearing_slowdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_disappearing_slowdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not dead yet: New data suggests the U.S. economy is shaking off spring doldrums]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a difference a couple of days of reasonably encouraging economic data makes! On Monday, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/a_glint_of_economic_hope/singleton/">I wrote</a> that we would this week would tell us  a lot about the direction the U.S. economy was headed. The data are now in, and it's not too shabby. Wednesday, in particular, delivered strong readings on industrial activity and home construction that are swiftly making March's slowdown look like a blip, instead of a relentless slide back into recession. Combined with a drop in oil prices to <a href="http://business.time.com/2012/05/15/oil-drops-to-lowest-level-in-6-months/">a six month low,</a> it is suddenly possible to construct a narrative about the economy that is far more encouraging than what seemed possible as recently as last week.</p><p>A few highlights:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_disappearing_slowdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_disappearing_slowdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did this parent end up in jail?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/how_did_this_parent_end_up_in_jail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/how_did_this_parent_end_up_in_jail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorlines.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kelley Williams-Bolar just wanted her kids to go to a safer school -- then her story took an unexpected turn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelley Williams-Bolar is giving a speech in the dark. The Ohio mom is rattling off the standard remarks she’s delivered in public appearances since being catapulted onto the national stage last year. It’s an unseasonably warm day and the lights in the room are off, her face lit only by the glow of the computer screen in her father’s home. The address on the door outside is the one she used on her now-famous falsified documents—the ones that landed her in jail for nine days for illegally enrolling her daughters in a neighboring public school district.</p><p><a href="http://www.colorlines.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://arc.org/images/stories/logos_pr_kit/colorlines_logo_screen_rez.gif" alt="Colorlines.com" width="150" align="left" /></a>“First, I talk about how I received my indictments, and then I give the laundry list of stipulations for my probation,” says Williams-Bolar, who is halfway through her two-year sentence. The 42-year-old single mother, with an otherwise spotless criminal record, is not allowed to drink, must submit to drug tests and reports monthly to a probation officer. She had to perform 80 hours of community service and pay $800 in restitution, as well as the cost of Summit County’s prosecution against her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/how_did_this_parent_end_up_in_jail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/how_did_this_parent_end_up_in_jail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court enjoins NDAA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Obama-appointed judge rules its indefinite detention provisions likely violate the 1st and 5th Amendments ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p>A federal district judge today, the newly-appointed <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/correction-ex-cravath-partner-nominated-to-s-d-n-y-is-pretty-stinking-rich/">Katherine Forrest</a> of the Southern District of New York, issued <a href="http://sdnyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/12-Civ.-00331-2012.05.16-Opinion-Granting-PI.pdf">an amazing ruling</a>: one which preliminarily enjoins enforcement of the highly controversial indefinite provisions of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_about_the_detention_bill/">the National Defense Authorization Act</a>, enacted by Congress and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/obama_to_sign_indefinite_detention_bill_into_law/">signed into law</a> by President Obama last December. This afternoon's ruling came as part of a lawsuit brought by seven dissident plaintiffs -- including Chris Hedges, Dan Ellsberg, Noam Chomsky, and Brigitta Jonsdottir -- alleging that the NDAA violates "both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/federal_court_enjoins_ndaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beating back obesity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/beating_back_obesity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/beating_back_obesity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's weight problem is only getting worse. Here's how we can fix it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Benjamin Franklin was writing his famous letter to Jean-Baptiste Leroy today, his famous aphorism might read: "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the obesity crisis." It seems no matter the year or the season, that crisis inexorably continues, with experts now saying <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-05-08/news/31630229_1_obesity-related-eric-finkelstein-people-with-severe-obesity">42 percent of Americans will be obese by 2030</a>. And whether you are one of the 42 percent or not, that trend is going to affect you, because it is expected to cost the country roughly half a trillion (yes, <em>trillion</em>) in additional healthcare costs.</p><p>And yet, as relentless as the obesity crisis appears to be, its expansion doesn't have to be a foregone conclusion. That's because, unlike a naturally occurring epidemic, it's almost completely human created -- a reality that allows for the possibility of a human-directed reversal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/beating_back_obesity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/beating_back_obesity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neocons vs. Islamophobes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/neocons_v_islamophobes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/neocons_v_islamophobes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's an ongoing war for the future of Republican foreign policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Muslim Brotherhood, a group that was once thought virtually extinct in Syria, has surprised everyone by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/syrias-muslim-brotherhood-is-gaining-influence-over-anti-assad-revolt/2012/05/12/gIQAtIoJLU_story.html" target="_blank">staging a comeback</a>.  The Islamist group is, according to Reuters, a "<a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-05-06/business/sns-rt-syria-brotherhoodfeaturel5e8g37c5-20120506_1_brotherhood-leader-rule-of-hafez-al-assad-president-bashar" target="_blank">dominant force</a>" in the Syrian opposition. Similarly, in Egypt, the MB <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/05/13/152609630/for-egyptian-candidate-broad-appeal-and-expectations">has become</a> perhaps the most powerful group in the wake of the Revolution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/neocons_v_islamophobes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/neocons_v_islamophobes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney giving up on home state of Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romney_giving_up_on_home_state_of_massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romney_giving_up_on_home_state_of_massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/romney_giving_up_on_home_state_of_massachusetts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney advisers admit that an attempt to win the candidate's home state is out of the question]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BELMONT, Mass. (AP) — Don't bet on Mitt Romney winning his home state. Or even trying.</p><p>"That's not been a topic of discussion," Romney campaign adviser Kevin Madden said when asked if the Republican former Massachusetts governor would compete in the heavily Democratic state.</p><p>Romney was never a hero in the liberal bastion, and aides say there are other ways he can win the White House and deny President Barack Obama a second term without the 11 electoral votes Massachusetts offers.</p><p>The fact that Romney likely cannot win Massachusetts — and probably won't even try to — illustrates the degree to which his currying favor with conservative Republicans in GOP presidential primaries has alienated the moderate base that launched his political career.</p><p>If Romney defeats Obama while losing Massachusetts, he would be the first presidential candidate elected without carrying his home state since before the Civil War. James K. Polk lost Tennessee en route to the White House — 168 years ago.</p><p>In 2000, Democrat Al Gore, who had spent years in Washington as a senator and vice president, fell short of winning Tennessee in his losing White House bid. Other notable home-state losers include Democrats Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota in 1968 and Adlai Stevenson of Illinois in 1952 and 1956. Republicans need to go back to 1936 to find a nominee who didn't carry his home state: Kansas Gov. Alf Landon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romney_giving_up_on_home_state_of_massachusetts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romney_giving_up_on_home_state_of_massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona man suing Flagstaff is now its mayor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/arizona_man_suing_flagstaff_is_now_its_mayor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/arizona_man_suing_flagstaff_is_now_its_mayor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/arizona_man_suing_flagstaff_is_now_its_mayor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. (AP) — A Flagstaff, Ariz., man who is suing the city is now its mayor. The Arizona Daily Sun reports (http://bit.ly/JrL3zQ ) 63-year-old Jerry Nabours was elected mayor Tuesday night. The retired attorney beat City Councilman Al White by 320 votes in the vote-by-mail election. With more than 10,000 votes cast, turnout was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FLAGSTAFF, Ariz. (AP) — A Flagstaff, Ariz., man who is suing the city is now its mayor.</p><p>The Arizona Daily Sun reports (http://bit.ly/JrL3zQ ) 63-year-old Jerry Nabours was elected mayor Tuesday night.</p><p>The retired attorney beat City Councilman Al White by 320 votes in the vote-by-mail election.</p><p>With more than 10,000 votes cast, turnout was about 39 percent.</p><p>Nabours says his victory is a validation of his conservative fiscal vision for Flagstaff. He has criticized White's policies as a waste of taxpayer money as well as the city's public-private partnerships.</p><p>Nabours is suing Flagstaff over an ordinance that requires property owners to pay for repairs of city-owned sidewalks. He initiated the suit in 2009 after receiving a $5,000 bill for a sidewalk in front of an apartment building he co-owns.</p><p>The case is awaiting review in the Arizona Supreme Court.</p><p>___</p><p>Information from: Arizona Daily Sun, http://www.azdailysun.com/</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/arizona_man_suing_flagstaff_is_now_its_mayor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/arizona_man_suing_flagstaff_is_now_its_mayor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Pacquiao loses his crown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pacquiao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The boxer's anti-gay remarks lead us to take an unprecedented step: We're revoking his Salon Sexiest Man title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're all relieved around here that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/">Manny Pacquiao is not really some Leviticus-quoting loon</a> who says that gays "must be put to death" – even if that may have something to do with the fact that he admits "I haven't read the Book of Leviticus yet."</p><p>But it's nonetheless disappointing that a man we at Salon bestowed our highest honor to just six months ago has proven himself so terribly unenlightened. In an interview for Examiner.com last week, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/salons_sexiest_men_of_2011/slide_show/6">one of our 2011 Sexiest Men </a>declared of marriage, "It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old." Oh dear. Winning lots of fights? Sexy. Getting elected to the Filipino Congress? Sexy. "Donating millions to improve living conditions in his poverty-stricken nation"? Super hot. Not being down with civil rights? <em>Bzzzzzzt!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPIN METER: Rivals airbrush anti-Romney words</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Remember Newt Gingrich calling Mitt Romney a liar? Michele Bachmann saying Romney's unelectable? Rick Santorum calling Romney "the worst Republican in the country" to run against President Barack Obama?</p><p>They're hoping you don't. And acting like it never happened (even though most of their words are just clicks away online.)</p><p>One by one — with the exception of holdout Ron Paul — the GOP also-rans have coughed up endorsements of their onetime rival. And as they do, they're pulling rhetorical backflips to distance themselves from their former harsh assessments of Romney.</p><p>Don't try this at home, folks. It takes a professional politician to pull it off with a straight face.</p><p>A sampling of the also-rans' anti-Romney rhetoric when they were candidates and their obligatory niceness after endorsing Romney.</p><p>___</p><p>RICK SANTORUM</p><p>The former Pennsylvania senator still doesn't have trouble curbing his enthusiasm for Romney. He waited a month after dropping out of the race to endorse Romney, then emailed his tepid endorsement in the dead of night. He finally got out the E-word in the 13th paragraph of his 16-paragraph statement.</p><p>THEN:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul sets up Rand for 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cult libertarian hero keeps his campaign alive, barely, as he prepares to hand the reins to his son]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ron Paul says <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/ron-paul-suspends-campaign-revolution-rnc-tampa-republican.php">he is going to stop actively campaigning</a>, but his supporters will continue to rack up delegates by storming state conventions. What will he do with these delegates? <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/so-what-will-ron-pauls-delegates-do-at-the-rnc-convention.php?ref=fpb">That is still unclear.</a> (Barter them for gold?) What is the point of this strategy, exactly? Also unclear, but <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/15/ron-paul-s-sneaky-maneuver-why-he-s-scaling-back-his-campaign.html">the Daily Beast's Ben Jacobs today</a> says it's part of a "sneaky maneuver" to help his son Rand out. Ron will continue to consolidate power but will not appear to be actively sabotaging the party's nominee. <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/05/14/the_ron_paul_campaign_is_done_with_primaries_thanks.html">Dave Weigel says</a> the maneuver is less sneaky and barely a maneuver: He doesn't want it to be a huge embarrassment when he loses Kentucky, the state his son represents in the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Tea Party targets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After conservative upsets in Indiana and Nebraska, these GOP senators should fear primary challenges in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What may be most notable about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%E2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/">surprise triumph</a> yesterday of a Sarah Palin-backed insurgent in Nebraska’s Republican Senate primary is how routine these sorts of things are becoming.</p><p>Deb Fischer’s late charge to victory wasn’t really rooted in ideology. As Hotline’s Reid Wilson <a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/05/club-for-establ.php">points out</a>, she’s actually racked up a (somewhat) moderate record in the Nebraska legislature, and has some personal connections to the state’s leading GOP establishment figures.</p><p>But most GOP primary voters probably didn’t know this. Fischer came to the race with little money or name recognition and spent virtually all of the campaign toiling the shadows of her two better-known opponents. The Palin endorsement came just a week before the primary, giving Fischer a sudden jolt at just the right time. It may be that all Republican voters really knew about her was that she was a rancher and a conservative (per the ads she ran), that she had Palin’s support, and that she wasn’t her rivals. And that was enough to pull out a victory that no one saw coming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susana Martinez&#8217;s veep suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Mexico governor is an unlikely running mate for Romney after speaking out on immigration ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/13/susana-martinez-what-new-mexico-s-governor-can-teach-the-gop.html">Newsweek</a> touted New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez as a possible running mate for Mitt Romney, the erstwhile beneficiary of the hype all but killed her chances of getting the job by opening her mouth.</p><p>“I absolutely advocate for comprehensive immigration reform,” Martinez  told reporter Andrew Romano. “Republicans want to be tough and say, ‘Illegals, you’re gone.’ But the answer is a lot more complex than that.”</p><p>With those words, Martinez inflicted multiple wounds on whatever slender chance she had to join the national ticket. First, she indicated support for the immigration agenda that President Obama <a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/04/14/obama-promises-to-take-on-immigration-reform-in-first-year-of-second-term/">promises to pursue</a> if he defeats Romney in November. Second, the reforms the 43-year-old first-term Republican favors are opposed by every Republican member of the Senate (even those like John McCain, who used to support it) and a solid majority in the House. (In case there was any doubt, the same day Martinez's interview appeared, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76260.html" target="_blank">Politico</a> reported that the Romney campaign was seeking a "boring white guy" as a running mate.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s human shield</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaigns end this fall, but their flacks will never go away. Meet Eric Fehrnstrom, enforcer on the GOP side]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only honest line in "Inside the Circus," the recent Politico e-book in which millions of nauseating Republican operatives lacerate each other anonymously during primary season, should be mounted on the computers of all "political news readers": "It is sometimes unclear whether political campaigns are run for the benefit of the voters and office seekers or for the professional consultants who earn their living from politics." Every other line in the book mostly goes like, <em>and then the RNC flack whispered that the campaign flack didn't know what he was doing, </em>but that one sentence about the "professional consultants" would be enough to make Jane Austen envious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney oversimplifies debt &#8216;inferno&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the campaign trail, Romney has repeatedly ignored the actual causes of the nation's runaway debt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — When Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney decried the "prairie fire" of U.S. debt Tuesday, he ignored some of the sparks that set it ablaze.</p><p>One was the Great Recession that took hold before Barack Obama became president. That landmark event went unmentioned in Romney's speech. Another was a series of Bush-era tax cuts that Romney wants to follow with even lower rates.</p><p>Instead he laid the blame on Obama, a president who has certainly increased the nation's eye-popping debt — but not, as Romney claimed, by nearly as much as all other presidents combined.</p><p>A look at some of Romney's assertions and how they compare with the facts:</p><p>___</p><p>ROMNEY: "America counted on President Obama to rescue the economy, tame the deficit and help create jobs. Instead, he bailed out the public sector, gave billions of your dollars to the companies of his friends, and added almost as much debt as all the prior presidents combined."</p><p>THE FACTS. Hardly. Presidents from George Washington through George W. Bush ran the national debt up to $10.62 trillion, the amount it was on the day Obama took office. Today, it is $15.67 trillion, according to the Treasury Department's Bureau of Public Debt. So it has gone up by $5.05 trillion under Obama. That's roughly half of the amount amassed by all the other presidents combined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk-free Internet TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention, Hulu and Netflix: It's not TV, it's the Internet. Original programming needs to take more chances]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Fox Upfront on Monday afternoon, the head of programming “welcomed” Hulu and Netflix to the original programming game, with all the threatening good cheer of an amped-up high school senior getting ready to pound on an incoming freshman’s face. Sure, the more good original programming the better, Fox suggested, but making hit TV is hard and developing an audience is even harder -- these online upstarts should expect to get demolished by their network rivals for a long time to come. Or as the head of programming put it, “Welcome to the NFL.”</p><p>But just mentioning Netflix and Hulu, two companies that have thus far rolled out exactly one original scripted program each to not much fanfare, is a compliment of the “It's better to be talked about than not talked about at all” variety. Hulu and especially Netflix, which will begin airing new episodes of Fox’s former show “Arrested Development” sometime later this year, are on the playing field. Since one of the major distinctions between Hulu and Netflix and broadcast TV is that there’s no proper time to watch their shows, now seemed as good as any to catch up on the two existing series and see if Fox and its brethren have anything to worry about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Pacquiao doesn&#8217;t want you dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gross misquote gets out of hand -- but the iconic boxer still has a long way to go on the sensitivity front]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated below</strong></p><p>Let's get something straight, so to speak, right off the bat. There's no disputing that Manny Pacquiao is not the most enlightened guy to ever put on gloves and fight for a belt. In a story for Examiner.com this past weekend, blogger Granville Ampong wrote of how the boxing champ takes issue with Barack Obama's recent groundbreaking declaration of support for same-sex unions. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/pacquiao-rejects-counsels-obama-god-s-words-first">"God's words first ... obey God's law first before considering the laws of man," </a>Pacquiao told Ampong, in what the writer described as "an exclusive interview." Pacquiao was further quoted explaining that "God only expects man and woman to be together and to be legally married, only if they so are in love with each other… It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

