<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beating back obesity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/solving_the_obesity_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/solving_the_obesity_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's weight problem is only getting worse. Here's how we can fix it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Benjamin Franklin was writing his famous letter to Jean-Baptiste Leroy today, his famous aphorism might read: "In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the obesity crisis." It seems no matter the year or the season, that crisis inexorably continues, with experts now saying <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-05-08/news/31630229_1_obesity-related-eric-finkelstein-people-with-severe-obesity">42 percent of Americans will be obese by 2030</a>. And whether you are one of the 42 percent or not, that trend is going to affect you, because it is expected to cost the country roughly half a trillion (yes, <em>trillion</em>) in additional healthcare costs.</p><p>And yet, as relentless as the obesity crisis appears to be, it's expansion doesn't have to be a foregone conclusion. That's because, unlike a naturally occurring epidemic, it's almost completely human created -- a reality that allows for the possibility of a human-directed reversal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/solving_the_obesity_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/solving_the_obesity_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Pacquiao loses his crown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pacquiao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The boxer's anti-gay remarks lead us to take an unprecedented step: We're revoking his Salon Sexiest Man title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're all relieved around here that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/">Manny Pacquiao is not really some Leviticus-quoting loon</a> who says that gays "must be put to death" – even if that may have something to do with the fact that he admits "I haven't read the Book of Leviticus yet."</p><p>But it's nonetheless disappointing that a man we at Salon bestowed our highest honor to just six months ago has proven himself so terribly unenlightened. In an interview for Examiner.com last week, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/salons_sexiest_men_of_2011/slide_show/6">one of our 2011 Sexiest Men </a>declared of marriage, "It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old." Oh dear. Winning lots of fights? Sexy. Getting elected to the Filipino Congress? Sexy. "Donating millions to improve living conditions in his poverty-stricken nation"? Super hot. Not being down with civil rights? <em>Bzzzzzzt!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPIN METER: Rivals airbrush anti-Romney words</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the nastiness of the Republican primary race, former candidates have collective amnesia about Romney disses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Remember Newt Gingrich calling Mitt Romney a liar? Michele Bachmann saying Romney's unelectable? Rick Santorum calling Romney "the worst Republican in the country" to run against President Barack Obama?</p><p>They're hoping you don't. And acting like it never happened (even though most of their words are just clicks away online.)</p><p>One by one — with the exception of holdout Ron Paul — the GOP also-rans have coughed up endorsements of their onetime rival. And as they do, they're pulling rhetorical backflips to distance themselves from their former harsh assessments of Romney.</p><p>Don't try this at home, folks. It takes a professional politician to pull it off with a straight face.</p><p>A sampling of the also-rans' anti-Romney rhetoric when they were candidates and their obligatory niceness after endorsing Romney.</p><p>___</p><p>RICK SANTORUM</p><p>The former Pennsylvania senator still doesn't have trouble curbing his enthusiasm for Romney. He waited a month after dropping out of the race to endorse Romney, then emailed his tepid endorsement in the dead of night. He finally got out the E-word in the 13th paragraph of his 16-paragraph statement.</p><p>THEN:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/spin_meter_rivals_airbrush_anti_romney_words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul sets up Rand for 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cult libertarian hero keeps his campaign alive, barely, as he prepares to hand the reins to his son]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ron Paul says <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/ron-paul-suspends-campaign-revolution-rnc-tampa-republican.php">he is going to stop actively campaigning</a>, but his supporters will continue to rack up delegates by storming state conventions. What will he do with these delegates? <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/so-what-will-ron-pauls-delegates-do-at-the-rnc-convention.php?ref=fpb">That is still unclear.</a> (Barter them for gold?) What is the point of this strategy, exactly? Also unclear, but <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/15/ron-paul-s-sneaky-maneuver-why-he-s-scaling-back-his-campaign.html">the Daily Beast's Ben Jacobs today</a> says it's part of a "sneaky maneuver" to help his son Rand out. Ron will continue to consolidate power but will not appear to be actively sabotaging the party's nominee. <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/05/14/the_ron_paul_campaign_is_done_with_primaries_thanks.html">Dave Weigel says</a> the maneuver is less sneaky and barely a maneuver: He doesn't want it to be a huge embarrassment when he loses Kentucky, the state his son represents in the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Tea Party targets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After conservative upsets in Indiana and Nebraska, these GOP senators should fear primary challenges in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What may be most notable about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%E2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/">surprise triumph</a> yesterday of a Sarah Palin-backed insurgent in Nebraska’s Republican Senate primary is how routine these sorts of things are becoming.</p><p>Deb Fischer’s late charge to victory wasn’t really rooted in ideology. As Hotline’s Reid Wilson <a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/05/club-for-establ.php">points out</a>, she’s actually racked up a (somewhat) moderate record in the Nebraska legislature, and has some personal connections to the state’s leading GOP establishment figures.</p><p>But most GOP primary voters probably didn’t know this. Fischer came to the race with little money or name recognition and spent virtually all of the campaign toiling the shadows of her two better-known opponents. The Palin endorsement came just a week before the primary, giving Fischer a sudden jolt at just the right time. It may be that all Republican voters really knew about her was that she was a rancher and a conservative (per the ads she ran), that she had Palin’s support, and that she wasn’t her rivals. And that was enough to pull out a victory that no one saw coming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_next_republican_to_fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susana Martinez&#8217;s veep suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Mexico governor is an unlikely running mate for Romney after speaking out on immigration ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/13/susana-martinez-what-new-mexico-s-governor-can-teach-the-gop.html">Newsweek</a> touted New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez as a possible running mate for Mitt Romney, the erstwhile beneficiary of the hype all but killed her chances of getting the job by opening her mouth.</p><p>“I absolutely advocate for comprehensive immigration reform,” Martinez  told reporter Andrew Romano. “Republicans want to be tough and say, ‘Illegals, you’re gone.’ But the answer is a lot more complex than that.”</p><p>With those words, Martinez inflicted multiple wounds on whatever slender chance she had to join the national ticket. First, she indicated support for the immigration agenda that President Obama <a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/04/14/obama-promises-to-take-on-immigration-reform-in-first-year-of-second-term/">promises to pursue</a> if he defeats Romney in November. Second, the reforms the 43-year-old first-term Republican favors are opposed by every Republican member of the Senate (even those like John McCain, who used to support it) and a solid majority in the House. (In case there was any doubt, the same day Martinez's interview appeared, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76260.html" target="_blank">Politico</a> reported that the Romney campaign was seeking a "boring white guy" as a running mate.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s human shield</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaigns end this fall, but their flacks will never go away. Meet Eric Fehrnstrom, enforcer on the GOP side]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only honest line in "Inside the Circus," the recent Politico e-book in which millions of nauseating Republican operatives lacerate each other anonymously during primary season, should be mounted on the computers of all "political news readers": "It is sometimes unclear whether political campaigns are run for the benefit of the voters and office seekers or for the professional consultants who earn their living from politics." Every other line in the book mostly goes like, <em>and then the RNC flack whispered that the campaign flack didn't know what he was doing, </em>but that one sentence about the "professional consultants" would be enough to make Jane Austen envious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_human_shield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney oversimplifies debt &#8216;inferno&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the campaign trail, Romney has repeatedly ignored the actual causes of the nation's runaway debt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — When Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney decried the "prairie fire" of U.S. debt Tuesday, he ignored some of the sparks that set it ablaze.</p><p>One was the Great Recession that took hold before Barack Obama became president. That landmark event went unmentioned in Romney's speech. Another was a series of Bush-era tax cuts that Romney wants to follow with even lower rates.</p><p>Instead he laid the blame on Obama, a president who has certainly increased the nation's eye-popping debt — but not, as Romney claimed, by nearly as much as all other presidents combined.</p><p>A look at some of Romney's assertions and how they compare with the facts:</p><p>___</p><p>ROMNEY: "America counted on President Obama to rescue the economy, tame the deficit and help create jobs. Instead, he bailed out the public sector, gave billions of your dollars to the companies of his friends, and added almost as much debt as all the prior presidents combined."</p><p>THE FACTS. Hardly. Presidents from George Washington through George W. Bush ran the national debt up to $10.62 trillion, the amount it was on the day Obama took office. Today, it is $15.67 trillion, according to the Treasury Department's Bureau of Public Debt. So it has gone up by $5.05 trillion under Obama. That's roughly half of the amount amassed by all the other presidents combined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/fact_check_romney_oversimplifies_debt_inferno_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk-free Internet TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention, Hulu and Netflix: It's not TV, it's the Internet. Original programming needs to take more chances]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Fox Upfront on Monday afternoon, the head of programming “welcomed” Hulu and Netflix to the original programming game, with all the threatening good cheer of an amped-up high school senior getting ready to pound on an incoming freshman’s face. Sure, the more good original programming the better, Fox suggested, but making hit TV is hard and developing an audience is even harder -- these online upstarts should expect to get demolished by their network rivals for a long time to come. Or as the head of programming put it, “Welcome to the NFL.”</p><p>But just mentioning Netflix and Hulu, two companies that have thus far rolled out exactly one original scripted program each to not much fanfare, is a compliment of the “It's better to be talked about than not talked about at all” variety. Hulu and especially Netflix, which will begin airing new episodes of Fox’s former show “Arrested Development” sometime later this year, are on the playing field. Since one of the major distinctions between Hulu and Netflix and broadcast TV is that there’s no proper time to watch their shows, now seemed as good as any to catch up on the two existing series and see if Fox and its brethren have anything to worry about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/risk_free_internet_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Pacquiao doesn&#8217;t want you dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gross misquote gets out of hand -- but the iconic boxer still has a long way to go on the sensitivity front]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's get something straight, so to speak, right off the bat. There's no disputing that Manny Pacquiao is not the most enlightened guy to ever put on gloves and fight for a belt. In a story for Examiner.com this past weekend, blogger Granville Ampong wrote of how the boxing champ takes issue with Barack Obama's recent groundbreaking declaration of support for same-sex unions. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/pacquiao-rejects-counsels-obama-god-s-words-first">"God's words first ... obey God's law first before considering the laws of man," </a>Pacquiao told Ampong, in what the writer described as "an exclusive interview." Pacquiao was further quoted explaining that "God only expects man and woman to be together and to be legally married, only if they so are in love with each other… It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenwald on &#8220;Rachel Maddow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/greenwald_on_rachel_maddow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/greenwald_on_rachel_maddow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Frank VanderSloot's partnership with the Romney campaign deserve media scrutiny? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="msnbc4539cc" width="420" height="245" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=47438929&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="flashvars" value="launch=47438929&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /><embed id="msnbc4539cc" width="420" height="245" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" flashvars="launch=47438929&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/greenwald_on_rachel_maddow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/greenwald_on_rachel_maddow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sirota on &#8220;PoliticsNation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/sirota_on_politicsnation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/sirota_on_politicsnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Colorado's rejection of same-sex civil unions a moral or political issue? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object id="msnbc295528" width="420" height="245" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=47437735&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="flashvars" value="launch=47437735&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /><embed id="msnbc295528" width="420" height="245" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" flashvars="launch=47437735&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/sirota_on_politicsnation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/sirota_on_politicsnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe&#8217;s awkward couple</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/europes_awkward_couple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/europes_awkward_couple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande finally meet in person -- and it isn't exactly warm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BERLIN, Germany – It started with a handshake, not a kiss. When Chancellor Angela Merkel and new French President Francois Hollande finally met in person on Tuesday evening, there was little of the warmth that marked her meetings with Nicolas Sarkozy in recent years.</p><p>Aides had downplayed the rendezvous as simply aimed at getting to know one another rather than about hammering out any policy. Yet the future of Europe could hinge on whether these two leaders find a way to work well together.</p><p>Rarely have two people met for the first time with so much baggage. Merkel refused to meet with Hollande during his election campaign, and made the highly unusual step of publicly backing his rival, fellow conservative Sarkozy. Hollande for his part seemed to be campaigning as much against Merkel as the incumbent, pledging to renegotiate the fiscal pact that she had championed.</p><p>Now the two have finally met face-to-face and the encounter seemed cordial if hardly warm. Following the ceremonial reviewing of the guard of honor – during which Merkel had to gently nudge Hollande in the right direction on the red carpet – the two held an hour -long meeting. They then addressed the throng of international journalists in a joint press conference during which Merkel remained stony-faced during much of Hollande’s comments, interspersed with the odd smile.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/europes_awkward_couple/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/europes_awkward_couple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s new free speech threat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/obamas_new_free_speech_threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/obamas_new_free_speech_threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Executive order seeks to punish U.S. citizens even for "indirectly" obstructing dictatorial rule in Yemen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p><strong></strong>There is substantial opposition in both Yemen and the West to the new U.S.-backed Yemeni President, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi. Hadi was the long-time Vice President of the Yemeni dictator Ali Abdullah Saleh, and after Saleh finally stepped down last year, Hadi became President as part of an "election" in which <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/21/world/meast/yemen-elections/index.html">he was the only candidate</a> (that little fact did not prevent Hillary Clinton from congratulating Yemen "on today's successful presidential election" (successful because the U.S. liked the undemocratic outcome)). As it does with most U.S.-compliant dictators in the region, the Obama administration has since been propping up Hadi with large amounts of money and military assistance, but it is now <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/president-obama-executive-order-will-give-treasury-authority-to-freeze-us-based-assets-in-yemen/2012/05/15/gIQALWPUSU_story.html">taking a much more extreme step</a> to ensure he remains entrenched in power -- a step that threatens not only basic liberties in Yemen but in the U.S. as well:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/obamas_new_free_speech_threat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/obamas_new_free_speech_threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3-D printing&#8217;s radical new world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/3_d_printings_radical_new_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/3_d_printings_radical_new_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next generation of "Jetsons"-style machines could create guns, illegal keys, narcotics -- and even organs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D printing is a hot topic right now, especially with reports of this incredible technology entering the consumer marketplace. The <a href="http://www.inkpal.com/ink-news/how-much-does-a-3d-printer-cost/">prices are dropping</a> as more companies attempt <a href="http://www.3dsystems.com/press-releases/3d-systems-debuts-first-consumer-3d-printer">consumer-grade machines</a>. Is it time to start looking forward to a time when we all have a <a href="http://www.craveonline.com/videos/featured/183593-amazing-star-trek-style-3d-printer">Star Trek-like replicator</a> at home to produce everything we want, when we want it?</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>While the technology isn’t nearly as versatile or as user-friendly as the science fiction dream, the implications include the potential to provide the things we need in much greener, less-centralized, less resource-intensive way. But, as with any new technology, there are also potential negative effects to balance the scales. Over the long run, the human imagination will no doubt concoct new uses that appear grotesque to us now but may make sense as the technology becomes ubiquitous and famiiar.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/3_d_printings_radical_new_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/3_d_printings_radical_new_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bully pulpit is filling up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_bully_pulpit_is_filling_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_bully_pulpit_is_filling_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I read the news today, Oy vey!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullies, bullies and more bullies ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/42236726" frameborder="0" width="500" height="331"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_bully_pulpit_is_filling_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/the_bully_pulpit_is_filling_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems’ best friend: The GOP base</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%e2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%e2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative masses revolt again, this time in Nebraska's Senate primary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the very least, the Republican Party base’s revolt against its own establishment cost the GOP a 50-50 Senate tie in 2010, with primary voters forcing unelectable nominees on the party in three races that it had otherwise been on course to win. A decent case <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/tea_party_8/">can be made</a> that the uprising actually cost Republicans outright Senate control.</p><p>And now the same thing may be happening all over again, with Nebraska joining a growing list of unexpected 2012 Senate battlegrounds – at least for the moment.</p><p>The impetus is the <a href="http://electionresults.sos.ne.gov/resultsCTY.aspx?type=SW&amp;rid=651&amp;pty=REP&amp;osn=102&amp;map=CTY">surprise victory</a> of Deb Fischer, a little-known state legislator, over two seasoned opponents in Tuesday’s Nebraska Republican Senate primary. Fischer’s candidacy seemed dead in the water until about a week ago, when she was endorsed by Sarah Palin. A last-second ad blitz from a super PAC controlled by the founder of Ameritrade added to her momentum, and Fischer ended up beating out state Attorney General Jon Bruning, who had been the favorite, by 5 points.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%e2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/dems%e2%80%99_best_friend_the_gop_base/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet doomsday, explained</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to media reports, July 9 will be our online apocalypse. The better story is how this crazy rumor started]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apocalyptic story line was once reserved for truly apocalyptic events. Nuclear war. The return of Christ. Environmental or economic collapse. But it’s 2012, and the apocalypse has become the basis for everything from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxFYYP8040A">Super Bowl commercials </a>to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4fwCCVt9yk">summer romantic comedies </a>-- and no media story is too small to have an apocalyptic moniker attached to it. (Remember Snowmageddon?) If you want to get the world’s attention, simply proclaim that the world will soon end -- or the Internet. Just read coverage of the so-called Internet Doomsday virus, which will supposedly strike and shut down the Web on July 9.</p><p>Here's how the story got started. Back in October, the FBI announced that it had broken up an international crime ring when it arrested six Estonians in what was then heralded as <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8881382/FBI-Operation-Ghost-Click-raid-shuts-down-cyber-criminals.html">“the biggest cyber criminal takedown in history.”</a> The Estonians had, over the course of four years, hijacked more than 4 million computers in 100 countries through the use of malware known as DNSChanger. By redirecting the infected browsers of unwitting users, DNSChanger was able to send high volumes of traffic to the criminal ring’s rogue websites and servers, collecting more than $14 million in fraudulent advertising revenue and exposing their victims to information theft in the process.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s Bill Clinton gambit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_lamest_gambit_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_lamest_gambit_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's praising the former president to paint Obama as a liberal – and to court his devotees. Why it won't work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desperate Mitt Romney is not only taking credit for the auto bailout he opposed, and pretending to be a "job creator" rather than a Bain Capital job destroyer. Now he's regularly praising former President Bill Clinton as a centrist whose legacy has been betrayed by the "liberal" President Obama. Actual liberals laugh, but can Romney's gambit work?</p><p>Of course not, but Mitt's not giving up.</p><p>In Lansing, Mich., last week, <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/08/romney-paints-obama-to-the-left-of-clinton/comment-page-1/">Romney derided Obama</a> as an "old school liberal" compared to Clinton, whom he called a "new Democrat." Where Clinton "said the era of big government was over, President Obama brought it back with a vengeance," Romney told a crowd of college students. A campaign official told CNN that Obama "really turned his back" on Clinton's policies, including welfare reform and middle-class tax cuts.</p><p>Huh? Of course Obama cut taxes for the middle class in the 2009 Recovery Act, which Republicans consistently lie about, and Clinton controversially raised taxes on high earners (Romney would lower them) to cut the deficit in 1993. Meanwhile, Obama has left President Clinton's welfare reform alone, despite rising rates of poverty and unemployment in the recession.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_lamest_gambit_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/romneys_lamest_gambit_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As &#8216;SNL&#8217; season ends, signs of a coming shift</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With election season looming, SNL will have to quickly replace several departing regulars ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — How can "Saturday Night Live" possibly replace (fill in the blank)?</p><p>How many times have we asked that question across nearly four decades?</p><p>"Impossible!" said some in 2006 when Tina Fey, Chris Parnell, Horatio Sanz and Rachel Dratch headed for the door, only to be followed two years later by her friend and "Weekend Update" co-host Amy Poehler.</p><p>But in their wake grew one of the most versatile, multi-threat casts in "SNL" history, one that firmly established its own "SNL" era. Kristen Wiig, Andy Samberg, Bill Hader and Jason Sudeikis all became cast members in the 2005-2006 season, joining a group that already included Seth Meyers, Fred Armisen and Kenan Thompson.</p><p>At the time, "SNL" creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels pronounced them "the wave of the future" and Fey likened herself to a senior seeing "exciting freshmen" arrive. But as this latest season of the sketch institution comes to a close this Saturday night (with host Mick Jagger, and musical guests Arcade Fire and the Foo Fighters), there's a growing sense that another "SNL" class is nearing graduation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

