<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Beautiful white people hit by tsunami!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extreme weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewan McGregor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: Naomi Watts and Ewan McGregor see their Euro-privilege swept away in "The Impossible"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using natural disaster – or manmade apocalypse, ecological catastrophe, alien invasion – as the backdrop for human drama goes clear back to the invention of cinema as spectacle, and arguably a long way before that. Of course we’re not supposed to think that the big, dramatic flood is the main point of the Noah story in the Book of Genesis, or in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh">Epic of Gilgamesh.</a> But it certainly helped hold the audience’s attention. Given that, it’s surprising that mainstream filmmakers have all but ignored the devastating <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami">Indian Ocean tsunami</a> of 2004, an event that killed almost 100 times more people than the 9/11 attacks and may well have been the worst natural disaster in recorded history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/pick_of_the_week_beautiful_white_people_hit_by_tsunami/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Atlantic takes on the Atlantic&#8217;s take on online dating</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not that complicated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the Atlantic <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/" target="_blank">said</a> that online dating is ruining traditional marriage. Then, a day later, they <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">said</a> that it wasn't.</p><p>Confused? Of course you are.</p><p>Journalist Dan Slater wrote a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/2/" target="_blank">piece</a> for the Atlantic print edition about a man named Jacob who, through the magic of online dating, has been able to meet and sleep with many women and he is no longer interested in getting married.  In response, Atlantic editor Alexis Madrigal took to the Atlantic's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">website</a> to refute Slater and his "spineless" argument with <em>a lot of data </em>and somewhere around 1,800 words.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives don&#8217;t hold a monopoly on science</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Mooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative co-author of a book on partisan science answers his critic from Pacific Standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Any book that touches upon politics almost automatically angers half of the American public, regardless of what is written inside of it. It takes a special person—an objective, open-minded and self-critical one—to read and learn from a science book that criticizes people with whom the reader likes and agrees with politically.</p><p>Recently, <em>Pacific Standard</em> published a review (<a href="http://www.psmag.com/magazines/january-february-2013/republican-brain-science-left-behind-chris-mooney-alex-berezow-hank-campbell-50439/">“Red Science, Blue Science,”</a>January/February 2013) by Wray Herbert, a pop psychology writer,of political writer Chris Mooney’s book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Republican-Brain-Science-Science-/dp/1118094514/">The Republican Brain</a></em> and my new book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Science-Left-Behind-Feel-Good-Anti-Scientific/dp/1610391640/">Science Left Behind</a></em>, which I co-authored with Hank Campbell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann again tries to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the 34th time, legislation has been introduced into Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently still unfazed by the Supreme Court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/roberts_wrote_both_obamacare_opinions/">ruling</a>, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., announced today that she introduced legislation into the new Congress to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act.</p><p>Bachmann tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="286909118814511104"]</p><p>According to a report by <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57470643/health-care-repeal-effort-worth-the-time/?tag=stack">CBS News</a> in July, the then-33 unsuccessful attempts by House Republicans to repeal the law had used up around 80 hours of time in Congress, or two full work weeks, at a cost of around $48 million.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare San Francisco river otter stumps researchers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[otters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first river otter seen in the city in decades has become a local celebrity -- and harbinger of cleaner water ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A rapt crowd followed a trail of bubbles that zipped over the surface of a seaside pond in the ruins of a 19th century bath in San Francisco.</p><p>San Francisco's newest star — the first river otter seen in the city in decades — surfaced its whiskery head furtively, a mouth full of sea grass. The crowd oohed as large waves pounded rocks just offshore, a briny smell and chill in the air.</p><p>The otter ducked back under water and took the sea grass underneath a concrete remnant of the historic baths, where the animal was building a nest.</p><p>"We came here to see the baths and this was just a bonus," said Eliza Durkin, who brought her son Jonathan to the site for a school project on historic places.</p><p>Beyond tourists, the otter has mystified and delighted conservationists, who are piecing together clues to figure out how he got there. The whiskery creature was first spotted by birdwatchers in September and has since settled into the City by the Bay.</p><p>River otters once thrived in the San Francisco Bay area, but development, hunting and environmental pollution in the 19th and 20th centuries has taken its toll on the once thriving local population.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/rare_san_francisco_river_otter_stumps_researchers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vince Gilligan on last episodes of &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: &#8220;It’s going to be polarizing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Gilligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The show's creator admits that even he is not sure how the series is going to end]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince Gilligan and his writers are about two episodes away from writing the series finale of one of the best shows on television, "Breaking Bad," whose final half-season will air this summer on AMC.</p><p><a href="http://www.vulture.com/2013/01/vince-gilligan-on-writing-breaking-bad-finale.html">Vulture interviewed Gilligan</a> to find out what the writing team is thinking about in this "schizophrenic" time. “It’s going to be polarizing no matter how you slice it," he said. "But you don’t want 10 percent to say it was great and 90 percent to say it sucked ass. You want those numbers to be reversed.”</p><p>Gilligan didn't reveal any plot twists, but he did share what the writers are thinking about when writing the show's final episodes:</p><p>1. Even Gilligan doesn't know how the show is going to end, yet, but he's hoping to create something that will mix the element of surprise with a sense of inevitability:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tween booted off Facebook starts his own social network</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too young for Facebook, an 11-year-old takes the Internet into his own hands. The rest is Web history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though he was two years too young to join the social network, 11-year-old Zachary Marks signed up for Facebook, anyway. Less than a week later, this happened:</p><blockquote><p>I spent all my time on the computer chatting with friends. Then, I made mistakes. One of my adult friends cursed and posted something inappropriate, and I cursed back. Also, I friend-requested grownups who I did not know. About a day later, my dad found out. He was really mad. I had to deactivate my account.</p></blockquote><p>And so begins the story of <a href="http://www.gromsocial.com/" target="_blank">Grom Social</a>, the social networking site for the 15 and under set that Marks founded after being summarily booted from Facebook. Even though there are other kid-friendly networks he could have joined, none really appealed to the preteen. "They were all childish," he <a href="http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2013/01/02/16307382-kicked-off-facebook-pre-teen-creates-his-own-social-network" target="_blank">told</a> the "Today" show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake-ish singer shills for fake college</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fake_ish_singer_shills_for_fake_college/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fake_ish_singer_shills_for_fake_college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to lure hipsters, University of Phoenix uses a Lana Del Rey song in its ad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're nearing the anniversary mark for last winter's great authenticity wars over the life and work of Lana Del Rey. For those who've forgotten, Del Rey is a singer, styled to seem whatever "indie" means in the early 2010s, who burst onto the scene with a "Saturday Night Live" performance last January so wan and disoriented that it prompted endless and wearying debate over whether this person could possibly be putting her audience on. Everything from her possibly medically enhanced face to her authorship of her music came in for questioning online, <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2012/02/06/120206crmu_music_frerejones">as documented by Sasha Frere-Jones at the New Yorker</a>. The performance also got her the sort of mainstream attention that viral Internet fame hadn't quite merited. NBC anchor Brian Williams knew who she was — <a href="http://gawker.com/5876450/">and couldn't stand her</a>!</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/W2sidi582aA" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fake_ish_singer_shills_for_fake_college/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/fake_ish_singer_shills_for_fake_college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: Colin Powell or Simon Cowell?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon cowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb tweet of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mistake anybody could make]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="286933985903398912"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_colin_powell_or_simon_cowell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Hollywood ruined Tolkien?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson's ridiculous CGI has stripped "The Hobbit" of its poetry. Maybe some images are better left unseen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a>  HOW KIND OF Peter Jackson: for the price of one movie, he gave us <em>two</em>. One of these movies is about a heroic warrior prince fighting for his lost homeland, and some political intrigue with elves and wizards; the other, much shorter, movie concerns a hobbit.</p><p>Written by J.R.R. Tolkien as a book for children, <em>The Hobbit </em>is widely regarded as a prelude to the darker and more complex <em>Lord of the Rings </em>trilogy. The One Ring that is the focus of <em>The Lord of the Rings, </em>and which threatens to destroy Tolkien’s world of Middle Earth, is first discovered in <em>The Hobbit </em>by the protagonist Bilbo Baggins. The true nature of the ring is never revealed in <em>The Hobbit </em>—<em> </em>it is depicted simply as a magic ring that conveniently endows Bilbo with the ability to become invisible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/has_hollywood_ruined_tolkien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana DeGette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Diana DeGette represents the Colorado district that includes Columbine High School]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., introduced a ban on high-capacity magazines in the House earlier today, the first day of the new session of Congress.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22304452/degette-introduces-bill-ban-large-magazines">AP</a>, DeGette introduced the bill with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., whose husband was killed in a 1993 mass shooting on the Long Island Rail Road in New York. From the AP:</p><blockquote><p>[DeGette]'s district includes the site of the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School. It is also adjacent to last year's Aurora movie theater shooting site. In both of those attacks, the shooters' rifles were modified with high-capacity magazines. Those devices allow attackers to fire dozens of bullets without pausing to reload.</p></blockquote><p>Though it's still unclear whether a ban can pass the Republican-controlled House, there were some promising signs from at least one Republican earlier today.</p><p>Rep. Peter King, also from New York, <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/peter-king-i-really-dont-know-why-people">said</a> on "Morning Joe": "I voted for the assault weapon ban back in 1994. My father was a police officer. I really don't know why people need assault weapons."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Far right loses its collective mind over possible gun legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three weeks after Sandy Hook, Tea Partyers and right-wing bloggers are hinting at civil war if the government acts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> Whether the massacre of 20 Connecticut first-graders and six educators by a madman armed with an assault rifle in December will lead to meaningful gun control legislation is far from certain.</p><p>But nearly three weeks after the Dec. 14 bloodbath, the American far right – from elements of the Tea Party to bigoted bloggers to conspiracy theorists – is working itself into an absolute frothy uproar at even the possibility that it may become more difficult to purchase a military-style assault rifle or a magazine that carries dozens of bullets.</p><p>It’s reminiscent of the reaction that surrounded the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired in 2004. That legislation, which applied only to newly manufactured guns, helped fuel a powerful militia movement – one that has been eclipsed by the recent surge in the anti-government “Patriot” movement, which includes armed militias.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/far_right_loses_its_collective_mind_over_possible_gun_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS drama &#8220;Hawaii Five-0&#8243; plans choose-your-own ending episode</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cbs_drama_hawaii_five_0_plans_choose_your_own_ending_episode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cbs_drama_hawaii_five_0_plans_choose_your_own_ending_episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii five-0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viewers will vote one of three culprits guilty in a whodunit murder mystery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reimagination of the 1968-1980 show "Hawaii Five-O," called "Hawaii Five-0" (zero), has announced that, for the first time ever, a prime-time drama will allow audiences to decide how an episode ends in real time.</p><p>On Jan. 14, viewers will log into CBS and Twitter to vote for one of three alternate endings in an episode that investigates the death of an Oahu State University professor. “I've always felt the most fun aspect of watching a mystery is trying to figure out ‘whodunit,’” executive producer Peter Lenkov said.  “Now the 'Hawaii Five-0' viewers will actually get the chance to tell us who they think committed the crime and we will listen. I love that our dedicated and attentive fans will actually play a part in resolving our story.”</p><p>But wait -- isn't the best part of a murder mystery being <em>surprised</em> by the reveal? Well, let's hope that the move to involve the audience is not part of a wider social experiment that results in a twisted new genre of <del>scripted reality TV shows</del> reality scripted TV shows.</p><p>CBS plans to publish all three alternate endings on CBS.com after the episode airs. Watch the promo below:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cbs_drama_hawaii_five_0_plans_choose_your_own_ending_episode/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/cbs_drama_hawaii_five_0_plans_choose_your_own_ending_episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Senate delays gay marriage floor vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats say the bill does not yet have enough Republican support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) -- Illinois Senate Democrats are delaying a vote on a plan that would make the state the 10th in the nation to legalize gay marriage.</p><p>A spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton tells The Associated Press the proposal to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples will get a committee hearing Thursday but there aren't currently enough votes to pass it on the floor.</p><p>Spokeswoman Rikeesha Phelon (rih-KEE'-shuh ful-AHN') says she doesn't know how many votes there are for the plan or when it might be called. Some Democrats were not in attendance Thursday. Phelon says no Republicans supported it.</p><p>Cullerton's Democrats have 35 seats in the Senate - five more votes than needed for passage.</p><p>The Legislature is in lame-duck session until Jan. 9, when the new session is sworn-in.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/illinois_senate_delays_gay_marriage_floor_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adrian Lamo opens up about life after turning in Bradley Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adrian lamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an IM chat with the Guardian, Lamo defends informing on the soldier, ponders the impossibility of hindsight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian Thursday <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/03/adrian-lamo-bradley-manning-q-and-ahttp://">published a fascinating IM interview </a>with Adrian Lamo, the hacker-turned-journalist and minister who famously turned Bradley Manning in to the Department of Defense after the young soldier confided in Lamo through online chats.</p><p>Lamo's elegant responses show a man attempting to detach himself from the realities of Manning's harsh detention and worrying legal prospects. They also show a man with enough philosophical soundness to reject questions about acting with hindsight.</p><p>Lamo told the Guardian's Ed Pilkington that he has not closely followed Manning's recent pretrial hearings:</p><blockquote><p>It's not because I take it lightly, but because I take it as seriously as I do. Making the choice to interdict a man's freedom knowing it could mean his life, is something that's easy to judge but can only really be understood by living it. You either fold it into your character, come to terms and go on with your life, or you get stuck in that moment forever. For a while I thought I would be. I took it badly. But I came to terms and continued my life some time ago. It has, after all, been two years.</p> <p>... I knew my actions might cost him his life. In that respect, any other outcome is preferable.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adrian_lamo_opens_up_about_life_after_turning_in_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British xenophobia on the rise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whites are now one of London's minorities. And with the economy in turmoil, many are lashing out at immigrants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> LONDON, <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/united-kingdom">UK</a> — At the Bestco International supermarket on central Edgware Road, British customers can stock up on staples of Twinings tea and HP sauce. Muslims can buy freshly butchered halal chicken, while homesick Poles can buy distinctly non-halal pork kielbasa imported from Silesia.</p><p>Browsing local store shelves offers a simple way to gauge the ethnic mix of any London neighborhood. With its eclectic range of East European and <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/middle-east">Middle Eastern</a> fare, Bestco is typical for catering to the various nationalities that have recently flocked here to forge new lives.</p><p>Unscientific as they are, such snapshots reflect a more detailed picture that emerged last month when the government published the results of its first census in a decade. It was a moment in which Britain looked at itself in the mirror — and barely recognized what it saw.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/british_xenophobia_on_the_rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Recessions can be hazardous to kids&#8217; health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up with widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/onlineFirst.aspx" target="_blank">study</a> in the online edition of JAMA Psychiatry shows that growing up during periods of widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids. Researchers found that babies born during the two great recessions of the 1980s were more likely to develop behavioral problems later in life than those born during boom times.</p><p>The study confirms what largely seems like common sense: Financial insecurity is stressful, and anxiety associated with unemployment and low household income can affect how well parents parent. It's easy enough to understand how more time worrying about keeping the lights on could mean less time to focus on helping with homework and strengthening family bonds.</p><p>Led by Dr. Seethalakshmi Ramanathan of the State University of New York’s Upstate Medical University, researchers used information about 8,984 youth born between Jan. 1, 1980, and Dec. 31, 1984, as a sample group. As Time magazine <a href="http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/03/lasting-legacy-of-recessions-behavior-problems-among-teens/?iid=hl-main-lead" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No one wants to see your C-section!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/meet_2013s_first_internet_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/meet_2013s_first_internet_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An image of a baby emerging from an operation goes viral. Can we please stop sharing our intimate moments?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's only fitting that the first viral star of the new year should be a newcomer. On Dec. 26, <a href="http://classicpinup.wix.com/aclassicpinup#!photographs-home">Arizona photographer Alicia Atkins</a> posted an arresting image on her business Facebook page. But it wasn't a photo she had taken.</p><p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=574138265946664&amp;set=a.222484704445357.77909.220633694630458&amp;type=1&amp;theater%C3%82%C2%ACif_t=photo_comment  ">"I can FINALLY share this!" </a>she wrote. "This was 10 weeks ago when I was having my C-section. Dr. Sawyer broke my water and my daughter reached up out of my stomach and grabbed the doctor's finger and my hubby caught this special moment. Truly amazing."</p><p>It is indeed a special moment. In the black-and-white photo, you can see an attending hand pushing Atkins' belly up as a small hand reaches past an umbilical cord and around the wet finger of the delivery doctor. It's an arresting image, one that captures baby Neveah – that's "heaven" spelled backward -- at precisely the instant she made her Oct. 9 entrance into the world. Her first human touch.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/meet_2013s_first_internet_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/meet_2013s_first_internet_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google antitrust claims dropped by FTC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulators found no evidence to claims that Google unfairly favors its own services in searches]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Google is agreeing to license certain patents to mobile phone rivals and stop a practice of including snippets from other websites in its search results as part of a settlement to end a 19-month investigation into the search leader's business practices, the Federal Trade Commission said Thursday.</p><p>U.S. antitrust regulators added that they have found no evidence to claims that Google unfairly favors its own services in search results.</p><p>Google did agree to license patents deemed to be "essential" for rival mobile devices such as Apple Inc.'s iPhone, Research in Motion Ltd.'s BlackBerry and smartphones running on a Microsoft Corp.'s Windows software. Some of the patents in question came as part of Google's $12.4 billion acquisition of device maker Motorola Mobility Holdings earlier this year.</p><p>Regulators say Google is also promising that upon request, it will exclude snippets copied from other websites in its summaries of key information, even though the company had insisted the practice is legal under the fair-use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Despite the fair-use practice, Google already had scaled back on the amount of cribbing, or "scraping," of online content after business review site Yelp Inc. lodged one of the complaints that triggered the FTC investigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/google_antitrust_claims_dropped_by_ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>