| ||||
|
Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think News People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Project Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon Letters
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the editor
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Letters to the Editor | page 1, 2, 3
Education president? It would be more of a surprise if Bush were the "education governor." All standardized testing has done for Texas schools is to insure that
children are educated in how to pass the standardized test. It's not
education, it's training in "multiple guess." Charter schools (another idea Bush champions) are more
a disgrace than a success here. The one
way in which schools might actually have been improved -- equalization of
funding , which separates school funding from local property taxes, or forces
the state to spread that money around so poor districts can afford
buildings that don't leak and textbooks that aren't 25 years old -- seems
to have died with Bush AWOL from the fight. Bush may impress someone with his personal bearing; but his actions
speak louder than his charm. If Bush is the best hope we have of an
"education president," we have no hope at all. -- Robert M. Jeffers How can you reconcile that with the fact that a huge number of Bush's
charter schools in Texas are failures, and that Texas has recently been
named 48th-best state in the United States to be a child? If what you want to teach kids is how to take tests, the Texas schools
are doing a great job...if you want to teach them how to think, on the
other hand, you better take them somewhere else. -- Mike Switzer
The Teflon governor meets the national media Jerry Politex concludes that what the country really needs is 14 months of
news writers playing "Gotcha" every time George W. commits the "national
embarrassment" of saying "Timorians" when he should say "Timorese." I
personally can think of no more banal or witless an exercise. -- Robert Anderson
From a progressive's point of view, the George W. Bush boomlet may be a
hopeful sign, since it illustrates the desperation of the GOP
establishment. Over the last 5 years, the radical-right extremists of the
congressional GOP have made themselves deeply unpopular with the general
public. My guess is that a majority of the electorate supported Clinton
during the impeachment jihad mainly out of revulsion toward his attackers. Before Bush announced, it appeared well within the realm of possibility
that someone like Steve Forbes, who has become a standard-bearer of the extreme right, could make a
serious run at the nomination. It is crystal clear that any nominee
visibly beholden to the hard right would be unelectable in a presidential
race, and might sink the GOP's razor-thin Congressional majority as well.
Therefore, the Republican Party, in desperate need of an
alternative to the other contenders, is feverishly promoting the Texas governor. Bush's phony "compassionate conservatism" is supposed to
reassure the general electorate, while Bush's pronouncements on many issues
signal to the party's right-wing "base" that Dubya is really with them.
The fact that this empty suit is the best they could come up with must
mean that the GOP talent pool is shallow indeed. Jerry Politex's article
shows up Bush for what he is: a thin-skinned lightweight who is going to
self-destruct once the big show gets under way. -- Jacob Conrad How can
anyone with level judgment compare a gaffe concerning the proper name to call
persons from East Timor with Quayle's gaffes? Jerry Politex is going to have to come up with something voters actually care about if he is going to successfully derail the Bush campaign.
President Reagan wasn't considered the brightest of our presidents, but the people loved him and he restored our national pride. Gov. Bush may be no Reagan, but he has a better chance than anyone to govern effectively and restore some semblance of decency and honor to the presidency. -- Edward C. Sweeney
When will the GOP court blacks? When will the GOP court blacks? When it gets back to its roots and realizes what it
was founded for. Republicans seem to forget that theirs is the party
formed to abolish slavery. They also seem to forget
that promoting the equality and ability of a race that
has been implicitly told "you aren't good enough to
make it on your own" by affirmative action laws should
be a strong draw for blacks who are sick of being "not
good enough." The Republicans have a candidate with which to win the
black vote. His name is Alan Keyes. There is not a
more articulate candidate in the party and if the
Republicans were smart, they would be promoting this
black leader as their candidate. Instead, they are
playing "safe" with a white candidate who rakes in the
corporation money. The GOP can win the black vote, but only when they
find their anti-slavery roots and lose the fear of
promoting a black candidate. -- Ian Rutherford
- - - - - - - - - - - - Table Talk Sound off - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon | |||
|
|
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.