T A B L E++T A L K Is it better to have just one child, or two or more? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of raising siblings in the Mothers area of Table Talk - - - - - - - - - - R E C E N T L Y Ask Dr. Love Turning the tables on Terry Gross Don't complain. Don't explain. Don't call me Mom Are we there yet? BROWSE THE MOTHERS WHO THINK FEATURE ARCHIVES - - - - - - - - - - Mamafesto
- - - - - - - - - -
|
BY ANNE S. LEWIS | On a Thursday morning, two months before my 40th birthday, the test strip on my ovulation predictor kit registered a bright blue. That meant that the upcoming Saturday would be the likeliest time for conception. Unfortunately, while running a few days earlier, I'd taken a spill. Besides severely scraping both knees, shoulders and arms, I'd somehow managed to break my nose, which I was scheduled to have reset that very afternoon. Ordinarily, the worst would have been over when my nose was audibly snapped back into place. But given the timing, there was a need for further damage control. I perfunctorily nodded my assent when the doctor informed me that my nose could not be touched for two weeks and that I must sleep in a reclining chair for that period of time. But I adamantly drew the line when he proposed a precautionary round of two medications that I knew were contraindicated for pregnancy. Relieved at having narrowly averted a derailment of my urgent agenda, I drove home, the throbbing in my nose increasing as the anesthetic wore off. Later, surveying the damage in the bathroom mirror, I snapped at my husband when he suggested that with all my injuries perhaps we'd best just skip this month. It was only when a friend joked that she'd like to be a fly on the wall during the weekend baby-making session -- with the prospective mother mercifully free of zygote-imperiling pharmaceuticals but racked with pain from knee to untouchable nose -- that I realized how obsessed I'd become on the eve of my 40th birthday. That ovulation kit was a dangerous technology in the hands of a woman who had hit the snooze-control button on her biological clock once too often. Some women use the conventional wisdom that there is no good time to have a baby to justify taking the plunge sooner rather than later. Not me. When my life took a turn for the interesting in my mid-30s, the time I'd penciled in for starting a family, I simply rescheduled it -- indefinitely. When 39 tapped me on the shoulder -- 40 was the absolute deadline I'd set for myself -- I dutifully cleared my desk and joined the ranks of women whose ambivalence about motherhood magically resolves at the moment that an alternative turns into a last chance. Now we would go after it with a vengeance. And were we systematic -- not only in our attempts to get pregnant but, once that mission was achieved, in flawlessly navigating the perfect gestation. The last time I had taken the pulse of this group, we were in our early 30s -- many of us between marriages, others fearful of growing old alone -- and consumed with the day-to-day Sturm und Drang of relationships with men whose emotional baggage often exceeded the customary allowance. Curiously, though, upon entering our mid-30s, we either promptly met the perfect man or laid down our swords with our longtime partners in combat. At 35-plus, we were no longer talking on the phone about dating strategies; now we exchanged information about amniocentesis and laparoscopy. N E X T+P A G E: "It looked pretty blue today, John."
|
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.