| |||
|
Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Mothers Who Think News People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Project Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
Current Click here to read the latest stories from the wires. - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon Media stories, go to the
Media home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon Media Brand X Alt Media Media Alt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Dec. 2, 1999 |
Preposterous, ludicrous, Brown said of the Times piece and its
question. Cool and congenial in her nearly bare, 56th-floor Manhattan office,
Brown seemed animated by the bad press and, in fact, looked sleepier
when conversation turned elsewhere. She hailed Martha Stewart,
apparently because the Living editor, too, has taken a great beating
in the press, and lived to tell the tale. Are you having fun? Yes, I am. You can't be happy with the press Talk has gotten. You're good at
turning magazines around. What do you have in mind for Talk? I did expect this. In June, actually, I called my staff around for
lunch and I said to them, we've all had a great time together for the
last eight months, but you're about to enter a tunnel. When you come
out the other end, everyone is going to be slinging mud. I hope you
are going to be tough enough for it. I hope you can withstand it.
Some of you won't be here at the end of it. It's true. It has gone down exactly as I expected. I guess with one
difference: The incredible success of the first issue and the launch
and the strength of the business side, which has remained incredibly
strong throughout and continues to build which tells me that the
criticism in time will turn around. Just as it always has in my
career. I have always operated in a sea of controversy. I have not
taken over magazines and had instant acclaim for doing what I have
done. The first year and a half at Vanity Fair nobody liked what I was
doing. I got nothing but abuse for it. In fact, I was constantly in
the middle of articles about the closing of the magazine and the fact
that it was a major disaster. At the New Yorker it really never ceased, the constant baying of
the dogs. So I am used to that. I think that what I've learned -- after being in the middle of
controversy for 20 years -- is that the dogs bark and the caravan
moves on. Of all the criticism leveled against Talk, has any rung true? It washes over you, quite frankly. I don't read a great deal of it
because there's so much of it. I just check out the angle. If it's
the same angle I've seen before I don't bother to continue. Ultimately, I know what I'm doing. We're evolving a magazine
gradually. I never said it would come out of the box perfectly. It is
a work in progress. It's a show that's getting done. You retool and
you evolve, you change and you shape; you bring on elements and you
throw out elements and some elements don't work. Something you
totally believed in doesn't seem to work, so you do something else.
That's what the process is. Nothing is given birth to without that. What have you believed in that hasn't worked? It's too early to talk about. It's too early to say what has or
hasn't worked. With a monthly, you are always operating in a
strangely dissonant universe because you are way ahead of your
critics. The critics start to stumble on things they don't like --
you've already seen that that's not quite right. You're already
ahead. In some ways, it's encouraging because you know what you
think, most of time. I certainly feel that I know what's wrong ... What is wrong? I think we were understaffed at the beginning. We really went into
a major launch with a very small and quite young staff -- all of whom
have been fantastic -- but we needed some more seasoned and
additional people to get things done. Anything you'd like to say about staff defections? There were some people who weren't going to make the cut, quite
honestly. You have to have courage, commitment and character to do a
launch. It's hard. If you ask anyone who's launched -- Entertainment
Weekly or any of Jann Wenner's magazines -- if you talk to Jann Wenner
about launching, it's a war. A launch is a war. You're in a very
competitive environment and no one is going to give you any breaks.
Why should they? You have to get it right in the full glare of attention. It's
very, very hard. Some people find it too hard. Out of a staff of 50,
four people have left. That's OK. It's fine. It was hard work. Some
people don't like hard work. Some people are too inexperienced to
handle it. Some people are out of their depth. Would you say that about [Talk's
second-in-command, vice president and executive editor] David Kuhn? No, I wouldn't say that about David. Some people left. It's OK.
There's no bad feeling between me and any of the people who left. [After our conversation, Tina Brown phoned to say she'd like to
add the following to her remarks about Talk staff members who left
the magazine] The editors who left had all worked incredibly hard under a lot of
pressure because our staff was so small. They contributed an enormous
amount to the magazine's launch. I appreciate the efforts they made
on the ground floor and I understand if they didn't want to sign up
for the long haul. Over the course of a year, private lives and
priorities can change and a shake-out is inevitable. I think David
Kuhn will be great at Brill's online venture. He has the right
energy and enterprise for a start-up, as I discovered. I am glad
[managing editor] Howard Lalli got the top job in Atlanta. He deserved the promotion,
and I think the change of lifestyle will be terrific for him. | ||
|
|
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.