Broadsheet

Rewriting Japan's sex slave past

This is more than a little crazy-making: Dogged pressure on the Japanese government to cough up compensation for women who survived sexual enslavement to members of the country's military during WWII has led to an all-out denial that the atrocities ever happened. (Never mind that the government offered an apology in 1993 for the crimes, thereby acknowledging that they happened.) Yesterday, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, "The fact is, there is no evidence to prove there was coercion."

Oh, but historians disagree. They estimate that up to 200,000 women were forced to work at "comfort stations" -- brothels run by the Japanese military. There's testimony from "comfort women," their families and Japanese soldiers that corroborate that fact, reports the Associated Press. There are also historical documents that detail the relationship between Japanese authorities and "contractors" who acquired the women.

There shouldn't be any surprise over Abe's personal rewriting of history -- especially when it comes to chronicling how women were forced into sexual slavery by Japanese troops. Earlier, we reported that as deputy chief cabinet secretary, he successfully "urged" a Japanese television station to tone down its report about "comfort women" after he deemed it "biased."

The House Committee on International Relations' resolution in September asking Japan to acknowledge the atrocities and stop efforts to rewrite history through favorable accounts in textbooks couldn't prompt an official avowal. So it's unlikely that a statement today from 50 lawmakers ordering that Abe retract his recent remark will accomplish much of anything.

But we would love to be proved wrong.

Britain to ban sexist ads?
That's what the media implies, but sexism isn't dead just yet.
What do we want? Firepits!
A Texas real estate developer actually thinks to ask women what they want in a mall.
Your daily Palin
She's still dominating the lady news, so we're still writing about her.
DNA testing your fiancé?
Coverage of a new study blames a single gene for marital discord. The researchers disagree.

Recent Posts

What do we want? Firepits!
A Texas real estate developer actually thinks to ask women what they want in a mall.
Your daily Palin
She's still dominating the lady news, so we're still writing about her.
DNA testing your fiancé?
Coverage of a new study blames a single gene for marital discord. The researchers disagree.

Full Archive

RSS Feed

Posts by date

September 2008
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930

Tips or Comments?

E-mail us at broadsheet@salon.com.