Broadsheet

Maternity care is a money loser

I hardly claim to have a solution to the massive problems facing the American healthcare system, but this seems particularly messed up: According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, next month there will only be eight hospitals in Philadelphia that deliver babies, down from 19 a decade ago. Why? Because maternity care is a "money loser."

Yup. On May 31, Jeanes Hospital is closing its maternity ward, blaming "financial losses and a deluge of patients who previously might have gone to other, now-defunct, maternity wards." That makes 11 Philadelphia hospitals that have closed their maternity wards over the past decade.

Not to sound panicked or anything, but this seems pretty bad, no? As the Inquirer explains, "maternity care is a money loser for most hospitals, and there is no break-even point, hospital leaders and financial consultants say. Losses rise with the number of patients -- especially when those patients are poor. The culprits are high expenses for malpractice insurance and relatively low reimbursements from health insurers, the experts said."

Personally, I don't think the fault lies entirely with the hospitals (Jeanes claims to have lost close to $2 million this year on its obstetrics program, up from $200,000 five years ago). Insurance companies seem to be causing a bunch of the problems. But regardless of who's at fault, we still need to figure out a way to make obstetrics an appealing field for young doctors, lest today's financial problems scare off medical students who might otherwise have chosen that specialty. After all, maternity care may not be as sexy or lucrative as, say, plastic surgery, but it's also a business with a guaranteed demand -- women are always going to be having babies. I'm no businesswoman, but it seems as if there's an opportunity in there.

In the meantime, there are a couple of proposed solutions to Philadelphia's crisis. According to a briefing from the Kaiser Family Foundation, the Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania is lobbying for a state-supported "obstetrics stabilization fund" that would "increase Medicare reimbursements for intensive care for pregnant women and infants." The group also wants "state assistance in reducing malpractice insurance costs." And the Maternity Care Coalition is "urging Pennsylvania to identify hospitals that have shortages of obstetricians and provide them with extra funding."

Posted in: Catherine Price

Britain to ban sexist ads?
That's what the media implies, but sexism isn't dead just yet.
What do we want? Firepits!
A Texas real estate developer actually thinks to ask women what they want in a mall.
Your daily Palin
She's still dominating the lady news, so we're still writing about her.
DNA testing your fiancé?
Coverage of a new study blames a single gene for marital discord. The researchers disagree.

Recent Posts

What do we want? Firepits!
A Texas real estate developer actually thinks to ask women what they want in a mall.
Your daily Palin
She's still dominating the lady news, so we're still writing about her.
DNA testing your fiancé?
Coverage of a new study blames a single gene for marital discord. The researchers disagree.

Full Archive

RSS Feed

Posts by date

September 2008
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930

Tips or Comments?

E-mail us at broadsheet@salon.com.