Broadsheet

I now call to the witness stand ... your jeans

A South Korean court overturns a man's rape conviction because of the state of his alleged victim's pants.

You know how in Saudi Arabia's sharia courts, the testimony of one man equals the testimony of two women? Well, South Korea just upped the ante. The Seoul High Court has overturned a man's rape conviction, despite his presumed victim's "coherent testimony" in court and injuries that required 20 weeks of medical care, because of a new "witness" to the event: her jeans.

Here's the skinny: In 2006, the supposed victim was waiting for a friend in a motel as the friend checked in with a guy she'd met in a nightclub. When the friend turned down the guy's advances, he turned on the first woman and allegedly tried to rape her. Presumably in an attempt to escape, the woman then jumped from the sixth-floor room's window.

I don't know about you, but if I were trying to decide this case, I might rely pretty heavily on the woman's testimony, which the lower court said "left no grounds for doubt," according to the Korea Times. Then I might look at the fact that she leapt from a sixth-floor window -- which, unless she had a side career as a BASE jumper, seems like a pretty extreme move from someone who was just bored with the conversation.

But then, I didn't go to law school. Apparently, the high court focused on the fact that the woman's jeans -- "skinny" jeans, to be exact -- were found neatly folded by the bed, and overturned the lower court's ruling. "Lots of things point to the accused attempting the rape," said the judge in the latest ruling. "But a pair of skinny jeans and underwear found by the bedside neatly folded and the fact that such denims are hard for another to take off beg clearer evidence to prove him guilty." He then also said, according to the Korea Times, that the fact that the woman had a medical record of depression should be taken into account.

I'm not even sure where to start with this one, probably because any rebuttal requires buying in to the basic assumption that a pair of folded jeans should have more standing in court than a woman's testimony. Or that the fact that a woman has a history of depression means that she must be lying about being raped.

So instead, I'll just say this to the judge (and, for that matter, to the jeans): Rapists can fold laundry, too.

Feminism in the news

Loading...

Currently in Salon

  • The Democrats' lust to win at any cost stripped abortion from the healthcare bill. Can pro-choicers put it back?
  • Why the hopeless story of a ghetto teen is just the kind of movie black people need right now
  • The fall of the Berlin Wall, 9/11 and the collapse of Lehman Brothers: Each ushered in a new American era
  • Don Draper and the denizens of Sterling Cooper take drastic measures in the face of a brave new world
  • Inside the elaborate, disturbing and downright riveting world of child-beauty pageants
  • This just in from the Institute for the Advancement of Conservative Science: History began on 1/20/09!
  • A memoirist searches for the truth about a fatal shooting in 1960s Phoenix
  • The untold story of Johnny Cash, protest singer and Native American activist, and his feud with the music industry
  • My partner says he's just not attracted to me "right now"
  • The aftermath of Wall Street's meltdown reminds me of the aftermath of the Berlin Wall's fall. Not in a good way