Broadsheet

Publishers think women are stupid?

Today, columnist Karen Heller rejects one of librarians' most beloved maxims -- second only to "Shh!" -- and judges a book by its cover. In fact, she broadly judges the jackets of books written by female authors and observes a theme: "Disjointed body parts." Is Heller on to something here or is she overstating this cover conspiracy? You decide:

Publishers are also fond of blurry photos featuring the backs of women, often in fluttery summer dresses. No faces, please, we're women ... Without effort, you can find a dozen similar covers on your local bookstore's shelves. They all blur into so much Lifetime fuzz.

These covers scream to men "Please don't read me!" while to women they coo "Here's more of the same!"

The thinking, or so I imagine, is that readers will look at these women's body parts or backs and identify. "Why that's me!" or "That looks just like my old friend Susie!" In other words, they think we're stupid.

(Via Mediabistro.)

Miley Cyrus: Too young for "hooker boots"?
The teen is stirring controversy with another raunchy photo shoot
O. is for orgasm
Oprah's magazine enters the fascinating world of adult sex education
Another day, another abortion party
An essayist caricatures pro-choicers drinking and dancing on a fetus' grave
Will Obama's healthcare plan cover abortion?
Some legislators -- including Democrats -- don't want it to

Recent Posts

O. is for orgasm
Oprah's magazine enters the fascinating world of adult sex education
Another day, another abortion party
An essayist caricatures pro-choicers drinking and dancing on a fetus' grave
Will Obama's healthcare plan cover abortion?
Some legislators -- including Democrats -- don't want it to

Full Archive

RSS Feed

Posts by date

July 2009
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

Tips or Comments?

E-mail us at broadsheet@salon.com.