Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

Salon.com
Multimedia
[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Business ][ Comics ][ Health & Body ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ]

Article Finder
Mothers Who Think


 


Daddy Dearest: A Look at Fatherhood
- - - - - - - - - - - -

mwt


My father's legacy
He left me a reading list and a chaste warning about self-abuse. I devoured one, ignored the other and, eventually, became acquainted with the total literary experience.

Editor's note: The following essay is adapted from George Packer's new book, "Blood of the Liberals," to be published in August by Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By George Packer

June 15, 2000 | The summer before he killed himself, my father assigned me a reading list that was fairly daunting for a 12-year-old. "Catcher in the Rye" was on it, and some Frost poems, and a short history of the Civil War, and Kenneth Clark's "Civilization," which I still haven't finished. "Julius Caesar" was the highlight. The list was my initiation into the high-ceilinged sanctum of my parents' study, the grown-up world of books and ideas. Then it became my father's legacy. In despair over his paralysis from a stroke, he left the house one Monday in December and never came back.

In the months after his suicide I became obsessed by the idea that I now had to read every book in the world, because my father was no longer there to assign me some and not others. This prospect sent my head spinning. Sometimes, lying on my bed, I would become aware of my thoughts as if I were reading them in a book and then imagine (I was taking a typing class at school) my fingers hitting the keys that spelled out my ideas as I thought them.




Daddy Dearest: A Look at Fatherhood
A full list of articles in our special Father's Day package
 



Print story


E-mail story


Backflip This Story  Backflip this article to find it again


I needed order, and it came from an unexpected place -- the list of titles on the back of the Cliffs Notes guide to "Julius Caesar," which I'd bought for advice in staging a backyard theatrical. This black-and-yellow friend of delinquent college students became my highest authority on great literature, and the number of books that had to be read suddenly dwindled to about two hundred: "Ivanhoe," for example, and "Black Like Me" (but not "Remembrance of Things Past"). I sat down and assigned myself four listed titles a month, calculating that by the age of eighteen I would have read everything worth reading.

Almost immediately I fell behind (the Aeneid was heavy going), but the list itself wasn't discredited by this failure -- only I was. My father's death had warped my relation to books -- a love affair ever since "Where the Wild Things Are," when I walked around the house for days believing I was Max -- into something systematic and compulsory. I anesthetized the part of myself that was alive to literature's capacity for shock, delight, terror. The simple telling of a story no longer held any value; now I had to master each book, which meant wrestling its theme down to a single sentence. This sentence was often buried somewhere in the text, and I would spend tormented hours digging it up -- unless it was available on the Modern Library jacket, which, for example, told me that the theme of "Crime and Punishment" is that crime is its own punishment. Once I had the theme under control, I would underline the title on the Cliffs Notes list and move on.

It was as if, by plowing through the world's great literature, I could keep the world itself at bay and stop the spinning in my head.

Ideally, reading means getting lost. The process of surrendering and then recovering the self might be the essence of growing up -- being exposed to an alien world and, instead of being broken down and destroyed, absorbing it, making it your own. But that year, the thought of losing myself was quite real and frightening. I might plunge into the depths of a book and never come back up. "If phantasies become over-luxuriant and over-powerful," Freud wrote, "the conditions are laid for an onset of neurosis or psychosis." He added, ominously, "Here a broad by-path branches off into pathology."

So I read and read, checking off titles and hoarding themes, without letting a germ enter my bloodstream.

. Next page | Brief escape from my classics-mongering self
1, 2, 3




 

Visit Salon Shop for recommended toys.




More great offers in
Salon Plus

____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • I believe in UFOs. Am I crazy? My daughter saw one and I looked into it, and I found there's something to it!
    By Cary Tennis
  • How the election ate daytime television Why talk shows like "The View" are showcasing some of the most sophisticated (and mind-numbingly stupid) conversations about the presidential race.
    By Rebecca Traister
  • I graduated, and I'm bored with beer pong, '80s playlists and Judd Apatow. So what's next? I'm not sure I want to spend the next 10 years doing bong hits and playing video games. Nor do I want to join a book discussion group.
    By Cary Tennis
  • OK, I get it, my husband's a verbal abuser It's taken me a long time to accept what my therapist has been pushing at -- but I think I'm ready to act in my own interest.
    By Cary Tennis
  •  

    Order "Mothers Who Think: Tales of Real-Life Parenthood" from the editors of Mothers Who Think.



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Business | Comics | Health | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Technology and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright © 2000 Salon.com
    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy