Join Salon.com today | Help
Benefits of membership

Female trouble

You won't hear about them on "Lipstick Jungle," but uterine fibroids plague a surprising number of women, especially those waiting to have children until later in life.

By Rebecca Traister

Pages 1 2

Read more: Menstruation, Rebecca Traister, Life

Life

Feb. 27, 2008 | In a post-Isadora Wing, post-Carrie Bradshaw universe, women discuss many previously unmentionable things about their bodies: orgasms and bikini waxes and Keigels and stretch marks. But when it comes to the medical maladies of their insides -- the plumbing problems that used to be written off simply as "female trouble" -- there often remains a deep, dark silence.

"Uterine fibroids" are not words likely to be uttered anytime soon on either "Lipstick Jungle" or "The L Word." But it's a condition that affects one in four women, and nearly three in four black women, beginning as early as their 20s. Knots of smooth muscle that grow in the uterine wall, fibroids can be tiny or as big as grapefruits; women can have one or several. And symptoms can be nasty: heavy (heavy, heavy) bleeding, back pain, the look of early pregnancy even in those who are not having any sex. For women whose fibroids grow early and in particular spots on their womb, there is a risk of trouble getting or staying pregnant. Fibroids are the leading cause of hysterectomy, and when surgery is used to remove the tumors individually, they will often grow back. But as common as fibroids are, they have not gotten a lot of conversational airtime in social or medical circles.

Now, however, as more women postpone childbearing into their 30s, the little buggers are becoming a lot more troublesome, and simply removing the womb -- who needs it, anyway? -- is no longer the go-to option for women who'd prefer to keep working and having kids, or just keep their uterus, thank you very much.

Enjoy this story?Thanks for
your support.

And so, after decades in the medical closet, the condition is finally getting some respect from doctors like Elizabeth Stewart, a senior associate consultant at the Mayo Clinic, who has published "Uterine Fibroids: The Complete Guide," in which she addresses the newest research into fibroids and their treatment. She recently spoke to Salon about what fibroids are and what women can do about them.

What causes fibroids?

No one knows. For many years we've just relied on surgery to take them out, and no one thought it was important enough to understand why they formed. But now we're searching for more treatments, because as women have increasing roles in the workplace, and are major wage earners in the family, the solution of surgery is much less attractive.

Are they cancerous?

They're not cancerous, and they're not pre-cancerous, but they're the leading cause of hysterectomy. It is much more common to have a hysterectomy for uterine fibroids than it is to have a hysterectomy for any kind of gynecologic cancer.

What are some of the symptoms?

Symptoms fall into three big categories. The first is heavy menstrual bleeding. Women can have long menstrual periods lasting seven to 14 days, or regular-length periods that are excessively heavy, so they can't go even an hour before they have problems and end up with socially embarrassing side effects.

The second major category is size. Fibroids can get to be quite large, the size of an orange or grapefruit, so if it's pressing on your bladder you can have urinary frequency and have to get up at night to urinate. Some women have difficulty emptying the bladder, and they can cause back pain.

The third category is that some fibroids can cause problems with women getting pregnant or having complications during pregnancy, but that isn't a given. There are many women who can get pregnant and have perfectly normal pregnancies.

How many women have fibroids?

It's estimated that at least 25 percent of all women will have a fibroid big enough to feel or see on an ultrasound. In African-American women, that number gets up to 75 percent.

One of the things that I've heard about fibroids is that more childless women in their 30s are getting them because they tend to grow when you don't have anything else growing in the womb. Is there any truth in that rather macabre diagnosis?

What an awful way to put it. But there is some truth in it, in that having a term pregnancy seems to decrease your risk. After the uterus remodels itself after a pregnancy, and gets back to its normal size, it may clear some of the fibroids. But "Just have a baby and everything will be fine" is old-fashioned advice. I think women deserve to have therapies for problems, whether or not they want to bear children.

Is there an age at which fibroids tend to strike?

In pre-menopausal women. Typically we think of women in their 40s having fibroids, but some recent data suggests that African-American women tend to develop fibroids five or six years earlier, so late 20s and early 30s is not uncommon.

The good thing about fibroids is that if you can get to menopause, many times your symptoms are substantially decreased. It's during women's reproductive years that they run into the most severe symptoms.

Next page: "Many women have fibroids that may be a problem for getting pregnant or safely carrying a pregnancy"

Pages 1 2

Related Stories

Streams of consciousness
When my doctor sliced a hole deep inside me, a lot more changed than just my sex life.
By Abby Frucht

The end of menstruation
The drug Lybrel promises to free women from their monthly curse. But today it's a sales pitch that seems hopelessly outdated.
By Tracy Clark-Flory

Ricki Lake's "awesome" vagina
The actress and former talk show host takes us on a magical mystery tour through natural childbirth in her new documentary.
By Rebecca Traister