|
|
T A B L E+T A L K Size-ism: How big a problem is it? Discuss discrimination experienced by overweight people in the Social Issues area of Table Talk R E C E N T L Y Who's behind ethnic violence in Indonesia? "Black people must be stupid" A conversation with Jonathan Pollard One big happy family The "young lady" who got under Kenneth Starr's skin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Browse the - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
DEBUNKING THE "ETHNO-BOMB" | PAGE 1, 2
"I have no doubt that Israel has worked on both chemical and biological offensive things for a long time," Richardson said. "I don't think you'll find much on it. We've always seemed to have a double standard on Israel, compared to talking about the threats from other countries. There's no doubt they've had stuff for years, but getting anybody to say anything publicly about it is going to be pretty hard." Yoram Shapira, a scientific attaché at the Israeli embassy in Washington, said he hadn't read the story and wouldn't comment on it. Richardson and others said Israel's biotechnology industry is as good as, if not better than, that of the United States, having pioneered such devices as pregnancy tests and means of detecting an anthrax attack. "Basically, that's pretty much state of the art in biological detection right now, little tickets or strips that change color, or a tape that goes through a machine and changes color when it detects anthrax," Richardson said. Dr. Victor Delvecchio, a University of Scranton (Pa.) scientist who has developed means for detecting poisonous gases, said the "ethno-bomb" was "theoretically possible, but I don't know if it's been done yet. I don't think we know enough about the human genome yet to say that one particular race has a particular gene that could be targeted by these organisms. But again, theoretically, it's possible." White scientists in South Africa tried for years to develop a "pigmentation weapon" targeting blacks but failed, according to Dr. Daan Goosen, who ran one of the apartheid regime's chemical and biological warfare plants. The regime did produce a wide variety of poisons and assassination devices, such as a lipstick injected with the drug ecstasy, but the program was more Keystone Kops than Frankenstein, according to many analysts. Reacting to the London Times story in November, a leading South Africa weekly, the Mail & Guardian, ridiculed Israel if it was depending on any South African expertise for its "ethno-bomb." "I don't want to say it's not possible," said Kamely. "They have [research institutes], they're capable of doing research that's equivalent to ours if not further ahead of ours. [But] you're talking about producing a complex immunological reaction in an entire population. It doesn't sound possible." Delvecchio was only slightly less dismissive. "Yeah, you could probably do it," he said. "Again, it's theoretically possible, but we don't have the database of human genes to do this yet, as far as I'm concerned." Deploying such a weapon also holds mind-boggling challenges, pointed out Louis Toscano, a former Jerusalem bureau chief for United Press International and author of "Triple Cross," a 1990 book on the leaking of Israel's nuclear secret. "I've never had much doubt that they were producing a limited arsenal of chemical weapons. In fact, it was widely rumored that a chemical factory was operating under the guise of a university research center around Haifa," Toscano said. "What makes it all the more dangerous is that they, unlike Saddam or any of the other Middle East bogeymen, have developed weapons systems capable of delivering such weapons. "Of course, the close proximity [to Israel] of potential targets would very likely make them think long and hard about using such weapons."
Jeff Stein covers national security issues for Salon. Remember Halabja If the U.S. really is concerned about Iraq's
"weapons of mass destruction," it has a funny way of showing it. Purveyor of
catastrophe Now that land mines have been banned, argues the author
of a new book on U.S. arms sales, it's time to go after the larger
weapon systems -- and their chief purveyor, the United States. |
|
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.