Search Salon

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon News

The myth weavers
Three leading leftist figures have been exposed this year as having lied about their backgrounds. Has the failure of their ideology forced them to fictionalize?
By David Horowitz
[09/27/99]

Columbine: We stand behind the story
Although sheriff's officials have downplayed their role in revealing details about the Columbine investigation, no one has challenged a single fact reported.

[09/25/99]

Political circus
While other parties talk about the Big Tent, the Reform Party constructs the Big Top.
By Micah L. Sifry and Doug Ireland
[09/25/99]

Capital crusader
The World Bank's Joseph Stiglitz is articulating a new philosophy for global economic reform, and ruffling feathers at the International Monetary Fund.
By David Moberg
[09/25/99]

He vs. she, part 1
Even new resident Monica can't handle this one, as Rudy and Hillary prepare to take their fearsome domestic quarrel to upstate New York.
By Jake Tapper
[09/24/99]

Complete archives for News

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Indeed, some of the most inflammatory statements that have been made in recent weeks about the discovery of the incendiary devices and sniper cartridges have come from James B. Francis Jr. -- chairman of the Texas Department of Public Safety commission that oversees the Rangers. In late July, Francis told the Dallas Morning News that the DOJ's years-long efforts to prevent the public from seeing the evidence was "in effect a cover-up. It is not intended to be, but in effect it is. It is a complete stonewall."

Last month, after a former FBI agent told reporters that the FBI fired two incendiary tear gas grenades into the Davidian compound on the final day of the siege, Francis told reporters that the revelation "goes a long way toward confirming why I say that some of the evidence that DPS has or had in its possession is problematical and needs to be evaluated by independent experts. A fair-minded person who looks at this evidence would see that there is a problem with some of the things that the federal government has said happened that day."

Dick J. Reavis, author of "The Ashes of Waco: An Investigation," one of the most thorough treatments of the siege and its aftermath, says the motivation for the DPS investigation and Francis' statements is clear. "I think the Rangers are trying to get even. It's the Rangers saying to the Feds, 'Fuck you guys,'" Reavis said.

Both the Rangers and the FBI are reluctant to discuss the friction between the law enforcement agencies, which stems from a territorial struggle during the confrontation at the Branch Davidian compound. "There's nothing to it," said one FBI source. Mike Cox, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Public Safety, also refused to address the issue: "We work with the FBI every day all across the state of Texas. We are just responding to a subpoena from the House government oversight committee," Cox said.

Perhaps. But it's clear that over the past year or so, the Rangers have lost their patience with federal authorities. As the caretakers of 12 tons of evidence collected from the Branch Davidian site, the Rangers were caught between members of the public who wanted to look at the evidence and the Department of Justice, which apparently wanted to keep the evidence away from critical eyes. When members of the public asked to see the evidence, the DOJ told them the evidence was being held by the DPS. When those same people went to the DPS, they were told they had to get approval from the DOJ.

After years of being stuck in the middle, the DPS decided it wanted out. Francis asked U.S. District Judge Walter Smith of Waco, who is handling the lawsuit against the government, to take custody of the evidence. Smith agreed. But before the DPS turned over the evidence, it decided to do its own analysis of the materials it has held since April 19, 1993, when the standoff came to its fiery conclusion. The work also provided a forum in which it could take a few shots at the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the DOJ.

Next page | There will always be a difference of opinion