| ||||
|
Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Travel & Food ![]() Columnists
Current Click here to read the latest stories from the wires. - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon News stories, go to the
News home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon News
Send in the clowns
The great straddler
The three horsemen of globalization
What's really at stake in Seattle
And then there were four ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Sustainable agriculture or Shakespeare? | page 1, 2
At the same time, most also recognize that free trade is a risky proposition
for countries that have long relied on protectionism to nurture fragile
local businesses. Malawi education minister Ken Lipenga, intently following the WTO crisis from Malawi, explains how
free trade can enter such an economy like a wrecking ball. Malawi, a southern
African country so poor that even construction workers go barefoot, recently lowered tariffs
in order to comply with a regional agreement. The result: Several British
companies who had long maintained subsidiaries there, like soap
manufacturer Lever Brothers, closed up shop and started bringing products in
from its larger operation in nearby Zimbabwe. Lipenga and others worry that a similar phenomenon will occur on a larger
scale with the WTO. Local businesses (even subsidiaries of Western
multinationals) will die as markets are flooded with cheap goods made by
companies that enjoy access to capital and economies of scale. Thus, in the
weeks leading up to WTO, a Ford subsidiary in India held a press conference
to warn against removing tariffs in the automobile industry. Yet the protest movement, which gives the impression that Western companies
have no business in developing countries, focuses less on this basic dynamic
than on the specter of Third World "sweatshops" run by greedy,
environment-wrecking multinationals. And indeed, they exist. El Salvadorian
union leader Manuel Vasquez came to protest events in Seattle to speak about
Western-owned factories that pay workers less than $8 a day and that have
doled out beatings so severe that some pregnant workers have lost their
babies. The American oil industry’s savaging of the Nigerian countryside is
well known. But particularly on the question of working conditions, the picture is not
so simple. Probably far more typical than sweatshops are Western-owned
companies offering salaries that are high by local standards but abysmally
low by American ones. While this imbalance seems inherently offensive, especially when American companies lay off workers here to chase after
cheap labor, these companies provide decent jobs in countries where
unemployment rates run at 30, 40, even 50 percent, and where
unemployment sometimes means going back to subsistence farming. In the very
best of cases, it brings technology, energy and a new market that will
attract local entrepreneurs. A shining example is India’s billion-dollar
high-tech industry that emerged after Microsoft, IBM and other American
firms laid a foundation there. That’s why Lipenga and others say, "We want
foreign investment. We need it." To get it, developing countries recognize that what they offer is cheap
labor. "That is our only weapon and we have to use it," says Senegalese
Minister of Planning Ibrahim Sall. "They [Western countries] have
high-technology, we have cheap labor." Developing countries fear that labor and environmental standards could raise
the bar to unrealistic Western expectations as a way to slow foreign
investment (and save jobs in the West), as well as blocking imports from
struggling Third World entrepreneurs (eliminating competition for Western
entrepreneurs in the same market). Hence India’s Commerce Minister Murasloi
Maran labels such standards a "Trojan horse for proctectionism." How is it that a protest movement preaching international solidarity has
brought about this conflict? It seems to have been blinded by sloganeering
over easy-to-hate sweatshops, as well as factions with agendas that don’t
necessarily coincide with Third World development. Most crucially, the unions that poured the vast majority of people onto the
streets last week have an obvious challenge in dealing with the issue of
cheap labor. Their cruel dilemma is that what’s good for American workers is
not always good for the poorest workers overseas, a dilemma that organized
labor does not seem to have fully faced. AFL-CIO international affairs director Barbara Shailor, who also spoke at
last weekend’s teach-in, used her platform to refute charges of
protectionism. The country’s biggest union, she says, merely wants to ensure
that workers overseas have the right to organize. As if to prove her point,
she shared the stage with union leaders from Africa and Brazil. But after her speech, I asked her if that meant she would be okay with jobs
going overseas if they were going to union workers who would inevitably
still earn far less than their American counterparts. She answered vaguely
that she was not "technically equipped" to answer, but that she was sure
there was a way to create a "virtuous circle" with plenty of jobs to
go around for everyone. And maybe there is. Maybe, as one Indian here suggests, workers all over the
world could somehow meet and discuss solutions to their different needs. But
I wonder, is such a dialogue more or less likely to happen after this
week’s events in Seattle?
- - - - - - - - - - - - Sound off Related Salon stories What's really at stake in Seattle Economists speak out on the issues behind the World Trade Organization summit and the street protests. Bare breasts, green condoms and rubber bullets The WTO has united labor and the radical, countercultural left in a way the anti-war movement never could.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon | |||
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.