Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

salon premiumfind out morelog in
Salon.com

[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Comics ][ Life ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder
Salon News


 


News



- - - - - - - - - - - -

Throw the SUVs overboard!
President Bush has been far too timid about asking Americans for wartime sacrifices. He should start by calling on patriots to wean themselves from foreign oil.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Jennifer Foote Sweeney

Nov. 14, 2001 | When he surfaced in Atlanta Friday to tell Americans the ways in which their lives as citizens could be different in the wake of the terrorist attacks, President Bush might as well have pulled up a tiny chair and read "The Very Hungry Caterpillar." His simplistic plan for a civic war effort suggested a response so remedial that it was hard not to be insulted, as well as disappointed.

The president's exhortations, which added up to a kindly prescription worthy of Mister Rogers, overlooked the complexity of our trauma, ignored the need of many Americans to actively express their patriotism, and failed to acknowledge the rare opportunity Bush now has to propose a national war effort that could tap our fear and anger in ways that cripple our enemies, unite hawks and doves, and preserve the foundation -- freedom, independence, ingenuity, resolve -- of America's power.

The great abyss between the gravity of the nation's crisis and the banality of Bush's address brought to mind the 1863 dispatch of American diplomat Charles Francis Adams to blue-blood Earl Russell: "It would be superfluous in me to point out to your Lordship that this is war."

It would be sad, but not surprising, to find that President Bush is unaware of his blunder. But it is frustrating to consider the truth: The national war effort with the greatest potential impact and the most lasting effect demands the kind of change and commitment that Americans are ready for, but it is precisely the one that the president and many of his closest advisors are most loath to suggest. And their silence does not reflect a wish to protect us; it belies a need to protect themselves. Because the civilian war effort that makes the most sense threatens the economic serenity of oil companies and their supporters in public office: It is a campaign to reduce energy consumption, a war on just one drug -- fossil fuel -- that could have a geopolitical impact that even bombing cannot achieve.
- - - - - - - - - - - -

premiumWant to read more? This article is Salon Premium content and only available to subscribers. Find out more or if you're already a member log in here.




Why should you join Salon Premium?

•  Exclusive content, including nearly all of our award-winning news and politics coverage, as well as other special features, like an expanded Friday edition of "Nothing Personal," weekly serials like "Nancy Chan: Diary of a Manhattan Call Girl" and more.

•  Exclusive services, like the option to view Salon without banners and pop-up ads and the ability to download a day's worth of Salon content as a simple text or PDF file.

•  Exclusive audio downloads like the audio book of "F. Scott Fitzgerald's Short Stories" (retail value: $35).

Find out more or subscribe now.


 

Salon Politics: Unflinching daily political news, analysis and commentary.



Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business and The Free Software Project | Audio
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Gear


Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
Copyright 2005 Salon.com


Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service