Search..Archives..Contact Us..Table Talk..Ad Info..Investors

____Salon.comSalon Politics2000 Salon Search


Only Politics2000
All of Salon.com

  
Advanced Search  |  Help

___


From the Wires

Politician expects Giuliani to run (AP)

Nancy Reagan endorses Bush (AP)

Gore backs domestic violence bill (AP)

Gore knocks Bush on Social Security (AP)

Bush daughters going to Yale, UT (AP)

Gores celebrate wedding anniversary (AP)

Democrats prepare ad campaign (AP)

Bush adds upper level staff (AP)

Keyes continues run for president (AP)




Arts & Entertainment
Books
Comics
Health & Body
Media
Mothers Who Think
News
People
.Politics2000
Technology
Travel & Food
_______
Columnists


Current articles

"Scam" ads the norm
NYU study shows how campaign ad loopholes are exploited ruthlessly.
By Jake Tapper [05/18/00]

Trail Mix: Hillary haters spam cyberspace
Court calls for first lady's phone records. Giuliani to give a final answer, but either way he keeps the cash. Keyes continues crusading on the sidelines.
By Alicia Montgomery [05/18/00]

Gunning for the center
George W. Bush is trying to modify and moderate his perceived positions on guns.
By Jake Tapper [05/17/00]

Democrats make Hillary legit
New York's party convention officially nominates the first lady for the U.S. Senate while a certain mayor goes unmentioned.
By Jesse Drucker [05/17/00]

The blundering pundit
Dick Morris' predictions about the New York Senate race have all been off the mark.
By Eric Boehlert [05/16/00]

Don Giuliani
A masterwork given new meaning.
By Jake Tapper [05/16/00]

Campaign video:
George W. Bush talks about why John McCain's endorsement is important to him.



Down but not out
Bill Bradley may have lost to Al Gore in New Hampshire, but not by enough to convince the former New Jersey senator to give up his challenge.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Joshua Micah Marshall

Feb. 2, 2000 | Despite a last-minute surge in support for former New Jersey Sen. Bill Bradley, Vice President Al Gore racked up a slim but discernible victory Tuesday night in the New Hampshire primary.

On Monday, as Gore and his mammoth entourage of press and security wound along New Hampshire's highways, making impromptu stops for little bouts of retail politicking, Gore and his staff seemed to brim with confidence. And in his appearances Tuesday morning, the vice president seemed even more certain of his prospects. Conversely, by late in the day, Bradley staffers had begun shifting gears, looking past New Hampshire and toward their prospects on March 7, when New York, California and a host of other states hold their elections -- a sure sign they anticipated defeat.

But Bradley's last-minute, lacerating attacks on Gore's character clearly energized his committed supporters, though they also may have repelled some of the waverers he needed to claim if he was to overcome Gore's advantage. In addition, editorial opinion clearly tilted against Bradley once he went negative. Monday morning, before the Gore bus left for the day, his campaign circulated Xerox copies of Bob Herbert's New York Times column whacking Bradley for his turnabout on negative campaigning. And many reporters seemed unconvinced that Bradley could turn on a dime and successfully make the switch from high-road campaigner to election street fighter.



.More news on Gun Control


_

Print story


E-mail story



Nevertheless, Bradley's senior staffers seemed to believe that Bradley's switch to the negative was turning the tide in their favor. When Bradley took off the gloves in last Wednesday night's New Hampshire debate, they believed, the campaign had reached a turning point. And late last week a smattering of polls seemed to add real credence to their gut feeling. One CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll in particular showed Bradley drawing even with Gore. But the subsequent results released late Sunday evening had Gore back up by six points, making it seem that Bradley's movement was just a blip and not a trend. And a host of subsequent numbers released Monday and Tuesday seemed to confirm that trend.

Now that the voting has come to a conclusion and the primary march moves on to big states like California and New York, one question is how the media will spin Gore's win. Gore clearly fell well short of the decisive win he needed to knock Bradley out of the race. But the real story of who won and who lost in New Hampshire is a matter of perception -- particularly the media's perception. And the close numbers at the beginning of the night combined with the meagerness of the victory in comparison to McCain's whipping of Bush makes it less of a victory for Gore than the numbers might otherwise indicate. As Bradley made clear in his concession statement Tuesday night, he's not about to drop out of the race. The central irony of Bradley's campaign is that for a candidate who made campaign-finance reform a centerpiece of his appeal, he has been able to raise so much money that he can now stay in the race as long as he wants.

Still, one thing that makes even his small New Hampshire victory important for Gore is that the state is ideally suited for the kind of campaign Bradley is waging. New Hampshire is flush with independents; it's in Bradley's strongest region, the Northeast; it likes insurgent candidates; and its Democratic Party is overwhelmingly white and generally affluent -- precisely the demographic that is the strongest for Bradley in most polls. If Bradley can't win here, Gore's campaign can reasonably argue, it's hard to figure where he can win.

By making it close, Bradley will be able to hold off calls from the party establishment that he should get out of the race. But Bradley has never been much of a party man anyway, so those pleas and demands would likely have fallen on deaf ears. In any case, the way the campaign has played itself out thus far has already deeply isolated the Bradley camp from the rest of the Democratic Party establishment. For better or worse, the lifespan of the Bradley campaign will be almost entirely up to Bradley himself. And Bradley actually has one more thing in his favor. Unlike the Republicans, the Democrats have no major contests until March 7. Like nature, the media abhors a vacuum. And with more than five weeks to kill, the press will certainly start hunting for ways to make the Democratic contest look interesting again.
salon.com | Feb. 2, 2000

 

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Joshua Micah Marshall is Washington editor of the American Prospect.

Sound off
Send us a Letter to the Editor

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Print this story  Get a printer-friendly version

Email this story  E-mail a friend about this article

Backflip This Story  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help




Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.