<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
        <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
        <channel>
            <link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" href="http://www.salon.com/rss/v2/joan_walsh.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
            <title>Joan Walsh</title>
            <link>http://www.salon.com/rss/joan_walsh.rss</link>
            <description>Stories from Salon.com's Joan Walsh topic.</description>
            <language>en_US</language>
            <copyright>Copyright 2010, Salon.com</copyright>
            
			<item>
				<title>Ken Starr vs. Liz Cheney</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:09:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/08/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/08/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/08/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Right now I'm watching Kenneth Starr denounce Liz Cheney on MSNBC's "Countdown," and it's very disorienting. Starr was one of the villains of Clinton's impeachment, dragging his investigation far beyond the Whitewater questions that triggered it, leading the nation through a tale of stained blue dresses, sad Oval Office trysts and more than we ever needed to know about cigars. But he's delivering sense about our justice system tonight on MSNBC. Saying something nice about Ken Starr on Salon might cause our servers to meltdown &#8211; but I'm going to have to. Liz Cheney made it happen.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/03/08/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Ken Starr vs. Liz Cheney</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Are 2010 Dems as corrupt as the 2006 GOP?</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:20:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/05/false_equiv_scandal/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/05/false_equiv_scandal/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/03/05/false_equiv_scandal/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I predicted Wednesday that Republicans and the mainstream media would soon have a new but typically simplistic partisan line: that recent scandals involving Democratic Reps. Eric Massa and Charlie Rangel and New York Gov. David Paterson would make 2010 what 2006 was for Republicans -- the year voters punished the party for its corruption. Throw in oldies but goodies like former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, both Democrats, and I foresaw an avalanche of 2006-2010 comparisons. And I was right.&#160;</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/03/05/false_equiv_scandal/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Are 2010 Dems as corrupt as the 2006 GOP?</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Breitbart&#x27;s side of the story</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:29:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/28/breitbart_responds/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/28/breitbart_responds/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/28/breitbart_responds/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I learned on Saturday that Andrew Breitbart's Big Government site had directly responded to my blog post from last weekend: <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/21/breitbart_cpac/index.html">"Breitbart's breakdown: A video tour."</a> Fairness requires that we share Breitbart's side of the story.</p>]]></description>
				
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Democrats&#x27; next big step on healthcare reform</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:25:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/24/next_steps_for_dems/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/24/next_steps_for_dems/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/24/next_steps_for_dems/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Maybe Mike Madden caught Sen. Tom Harkin at a low moment Wednesday, when Harkin told Madden <a href="http://salon.com/news/healthcare_reform/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/02/24/public_option">he couldn't see the healthcare public option passing the Senate right now</a>. A passionate public option promoter, if Harkin thinks the game is over, it's hard for me to argue otherwise -- but I'm still watching Adam Green's effort to get Senate Democrats to sign onto the public option (they're up to 23). Maybe if Thursday's bipartisan healthcare summit is a (predictable) bust, more Democrats will grow a spine and return to the public option.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/24/next_steps_for_dems/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">The Democrats&#x27; next big step on healthcare reform</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why so little attention to Vernon Hunter?</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:23:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/22/vernon_hunter/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/22/vernon_hunter/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/22/vernon_hunter/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I traveled this weekend and missed the identification of the only person killed by Joe Stack in his unsettling attack on the Internal Revenue Service office in Austin last week (h/t <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/logan-murphy/meet-real-victim-last-weeks-terror-at">Crooks and Liars</a>, <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/American_hero.html">Will Bunch</a>). He is Vietnam veteran and IRS worker Vernon Hunter.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/22/vernon_hunter/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Why so little attention to Vernon Hunter?</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Breitbart&#x27;s breakdown: A video tour</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:21:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/21/breitbart_cpac/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/21/breitbart_cpac/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/21/breitbart_cpac/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>We'll get Mike Madden some kind of hazard pay for spending the weekend at the Conservative Political Action Committee. He captured Dick Cheney's calling Barack Obama a one-term president (as Cheney was, after George W.&#160;Bush shook him off a bit in his second term) and 2012 wannabe Tim Pawlenty making a poor-taste Elin Woods joke on the same morning Tiger Woods made a relatively moving apology (within the tired genre) for his transgressions. He&#160; caught Human Events editor Jed Babbin making a joke about the IRS bomber Joseph Stack.&#160; Madden even had to stay for Glenn Beck's Saturday night hysterical meltdown.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/21/breitbart_cpac/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Breitbart&#x27;s breakdown: A video tour</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Who&#x27;s to blame for Joe Stack?</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:19:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/18/stack_politics/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/18/stack_politics/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/18/stack_politics/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I admit that when I first heard reports that an angry tax protester flew his plane into a building housing the Internal Revenue Service in Austin, Texas, I thought: Was he a tea partier? We all jump to conclusions. Having read his manifesto several times, in all its ideological incoherence and self-pity, and watched the news all day, I don't see evidence for my conclusion-jumping and I'm glad I kept it to myself (even on Twitter).</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/18/stack_politics/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Who&#x27;s to blame for Joe Stack?</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>A new low for the Cheneys and their friends</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:16:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/15/cheney_attacks_again/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/15/cheney_attacks_again/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/15/cheney_attacks_again/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>An extraordinary array of Republicans have been bashing the administration for "Mirandizing" Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab over the last few days -- including Lindsey Graham, Kit Bond, Rudy Giuliani, Mitch McConnell and Michele Bachmann, to name a few -- even as the media admirably did its job reporting that the Bush administration had Mirandized every single terror suspect caught on its watch as well. Despite those facts, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-vice-president-dick-cheney/story?id=9818034">former Vice President Dick Cheney stepped up the attack</a> on Obama Sunday on ABC's "This Week" -- and also admitted he's a war criminal (but more on that later.)</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/15/cheney_attacks_again/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">A new low for the Cheneys</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>When elites bash elitism</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:19:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/11/sarah_palin/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/11/sarah_palin/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/11/sarah_palin/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>The same day the Washington Post released a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_021010.html?sid=ST2010021100035">poll</a> showing a staggering 71 percent of Americans -- and a majority of Republicans -- don't think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/10/AR2010021002451.html">the Post's David Broder</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/10/AR2010021002451.html">Time's Joe Klein</a> wrote columns proclaiming Palin a towering political force on the American landscape. It's rare that Beltway conventional wisdom gets proven false the very same day it surfaces. But that probably won't stop it from spreading.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/11/sarah_palin/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Elites bashing elitism</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The pitbull in lipstick is back!</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:07:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/06/palin_speaks/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/06/palin_speaks/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/06/palin_speaks/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Eric Hoffer didn't live to see Tea Party Nation, but I always think of his most famous quote when I'm forced to deal with it:&#160;""Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket."</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/06/palin_speaks/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">The pitbull in lipstick is back!</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Tea partiers just want my respect!</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:05:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/04/tea_party_and_george_wallace/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/04/tea_party_and_george_wallace/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/04/tea_party_and_george_wallace/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I was invited on "Hardball" to debate Pat Buchanan over whether Ronald Reagan would be "Reaganesque" enough for the modern Republican Party. (News hook: Florida Gov. Charlie Crist is trying to beat back a right-wing challenge for the state's open Senate seat by making that claim.)</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/04/tea_party_and_george_wallace/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Tea partiers just want my respect!</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>What won&#x27;t the GOP do to block Obama on security?</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:20:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/02/republicans_play_politics_with_national_security/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/02/republicans_play_politics_with_national_security/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/02/02/republicans_play_politics_with_national_security/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/terrorism/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/02/02/bush">Glenn Greenwald laid it out well today</a>: It's astonishing how many Republicans, and even some Democrats, have decided that controversial Bush-Cheney detention and interrogation policies, even some widely repudiated during the 2008 presidential campaign, didn't go far enough.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/02/02/republicans_play_politics_with_national_security/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">What won&#x27;t the GOP do to block Obama on security?</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The President Obama we voted for</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:30:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/29/obama_and_the_house_gop/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/29/obama_and_the_house_gop/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/29/obama_and_the_house_gop/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Like a lot of people I&#160;had to work Friday -- as in, do my job as editor here at Salon and not just watch television. But I kept my eye on President Obama's engagement with the House GOP at its annual retreat as best I could.</p>]]></description>
				
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Finally, some spine</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:01:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/state_of_the_union/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/state_of_the_union/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/state_of_the_union/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>In case he wasn't fully aware that Republicans are impervious to his political charm, President Obama saw it early in his first State of the Union address. After ticking off a list of taxes he'd lowered, the chamber was in cheers -- except for the GOP side of the aisle, where traditionally tax-cutters have clustered. Obama smiled and ad-libbed, "I expected some applause for that one."</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/27/state_of_the_union/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Finally, some spine</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The State of the Union I&#x27;d like to see</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:28:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/sotu_setup/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/sotu_setup/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/27/sotu_setup/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Over the weekend, I had the good or bad fortune to pick up George Packer's "Interesting Times," a collection of his columns between 9/11 and the Obama election. I only suggest it was bad fortune because it put me in a deeper funk about Obama than I had been before. And if you've seen my recent blog posts, you'll know it was already pretty deep.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/27/sotu_setup/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">The State of the Union I&#x27;d like to see</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Is America ungovernable? Who&#x27;s to blame?</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:27:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/26/walsh_klein/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/26/walsh_klein/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/26/walsh_klein/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>I had a long bloggingheads.tv conversation with Time's Joe Klein. You can watch it all <a href="http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/25550">here.</a> We set ground rules; we would not talk about John Edwards, nor Glenn Greenwald, whom I worship and with whom Klein has, well, clashed. (We did discuss his telling the lefty blogosphere to "grow up.")</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/26/walsh_klein/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Is America ungovernable? Who&#x27;s to blame?</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Dead wrong, or deeply cynical</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:26:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/25/faux_freeze/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/25/faux_freeze/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/25/faux_freeze/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>
    <strong>(Updated with Paul&#160;Krugman's latest, below)</strong>
  </p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/25/faux_freeze/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Dead wrong -- or deeply cynical</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>David Axelrod and the &#x22;zeitgeist&#x22;</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:21:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/20/zeitgeist/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/20/zeitgeist/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/20/zeitgeist/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>My "Hardball" segment Wednesday ended with me ranting about Obama advisor David Axelrod using the word "zeitgeist," as Chris Matthews realized the show was over and had to cut me off quickly. It's pretty funny to watch, below. Lots of my Twitter friends asked me what I was going to say. To make sure "zeitgeist" doesn't become my "Rosebud," here's the point I was trying to make.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/20/zeitgeist/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">David Axelrod and the &#x22;zeitgeist&#x22;</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Learning the wrong lessons from Massachusetts</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:20:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/lessons_of_massachusetts/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/lessons_of_massachusetts/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/lessons_of_massachusetts/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Ah, Democrats must be loving this familiar old position: the circular firing squad. It's like a comfy sofa you&#8217;re your childhood home! Seriously, it was appalling that national Dems began carping at the Coakley campaign before the polls closed, and almost as silly (but understandable) that the campaign responded in kind, blaming lack of material party support, as well as President Obama's Wall Street friendly policies, for Coakley's impending loss. All this with at least 4 hours before the polls closed. If I was a Massachusetts Dem, I'm not sure that would have inspired me to brave the cold and go vote before coming home to make dinner.</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/19/lessons_of_massachusetts/lc.gif" type="image/gif" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">Learning the wrong lessons from Massachusetts</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>&#x22;He looks like the real candidate&#x22;</title>
				<dc:creator>Joan Walsh</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:20:00 PST</pubDate>
				<link>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/scott_brown_real_candidate/index.html</link>
				<guid>http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/scott_brown_real_candidate/index.html</guid>
				<comments>http://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2010/01/19/scott_brown_real_candidate/view/?source=rss&amp;aim=joan_walsh</comments>
				<description><![CDATA[
  <p>Just when I'm trying to stay focused on the issues behind Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown's likely victory over Attorney General Martha Coakley in today's race to succeed Sen. Ted Kennedy, Donny Deutsch, Mike Barnicle and Peggy Noonan showed up to remind me of the ugly intangibles behind the race. On "Morning Joe" this morning they chatted about one of Brown's primary assets: In Noonan's words, Brown "looks like an American."</p>]]></description>
				
                        <media:content url="http://images.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/01/19/scott_brown_real_candidate/mc.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="160" >
						<media:description type="plain">&#x22;He looks like the real candidate&#x22;</media:description></media:content>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>