What's missing from this picture? Dollars and cents. That's not to say there are no business models in the land of decentralization: Nick Denton talked about his Gizmodo weblog, which tracks new technogadgets, as an already profitable niche media enterprise. And Dave Sifry's Technorati -- which keeps bloggers au courant on who's linking to them -- has a $5-a-year-premium mode that's a good deal and that, given the operation's low overhead, is likely to earn Sifry some spare change.

But, as their creators readily admit, those are not the kinds of enterprises to make venture capitalists salivate. By any rational view, the decentralized technology world Supernova envisioned is one in which small operators can make a living, but nobody is going to make a killing.

That sounds all right to me. But it doesn't mean the venture capital money will stay away. (Talk about "stupid networks"!) There are alarming indications here and there that some of the technologies championed at Supernova are already heading down the same path that the Web itself traveled in the mid-'90s -- as investors began to pile in, claiming market share today and putting off till tomorrow figuring out how to earn money. Cometa, the Wi-Fi provider that plans to sell a nationwide network as a wholesaler to ISPs, is one venture whose recent launch certainly had a "build first, improvise a revenue model later" feeling.

Should the geeks care? After all, the Web got built, even if the landscape is littered with defunct Web companies. If investors throw money at good technologies, does it matter whether the companies that are the money's conduit flame out?

I think it does. When a technology begins small and has time to evolve, find its uses and build a following, it has staying power. (Look at the Net itself, whose protocols were two decades old before it became popular. Or look at how Linux, which had spent most of a decade emerging, was able to survive the hurricane of an infatuated Wall Street that swept over it two years ago and then abandoned it just as fast.)

The danger here is that the dynamo of the Silicon Valley boom-bust cycle, in its hunger for Next Big Thing fuel, will seize upon Wi-Fi, blogs and Web services and then spit them out, chewed-up and spent -- before they've ever had a chance to mature and show off their potential. At Supernova, Microsoft's Dan'l Lewin described the near future as "a massive build-out opportunity," and in many areas Microsoft is barreling ahead with that construction project. Just remember that the last "massive build-out opportunity" was the telecommunications industry's optical-fiber boom, whose backers are now largely bankrupt and whose byproducts lie fallow.

Still, whether we do it intelligently or through market-crashing overkill, sooner or later we're likely to be living in the kind of world Supernova's agenda envisioned -- full of portable wireless devices supercharged by smart software.

Howard Rheingold, whose new book, "Smart Mobs," crystal-balls the impact of many of these trends, asked the central question: "What happens when we have billions of these mobile devices, thousands of times more powerful than what we have now, connected at far faster speeds?" Rheingold is fascinated by the "new possibilities for social action" in such a future -- both positive and negative -- and indeed they're captivating. Equally important are the new probabilities of government action that such waves of change are likely to evoke.

Cory Doctorow of the Electronic Frontier Foundation reminded the conference that, while we sat there envisioning decentralized utopia, the Federal Communications Commission was rolling forward with a plan called the Broadcast Flag Initiative that, under an anti-piracy banner, would enforce a technology-crippling video copyright-control scheme. The sputtering war between Hollywood's "content industry" and the Internet's peer-to-peer-loving masses loomed over nearly every discussion at Supernova. The "end to end" freedoms of expression and innovation that this crowd cherishes can't survive if there's a hulking legal troll squatting at the center of the network, demanding tolls and blocking new experiments.

Appropriately, then, Werbach has pitched the tent of his next conference, planned for next summer, in Washington -- ground zero for the battle for the Net's heart and soul.

Recent Stories

Ask the pilot
The gut-churning trials and tribulations of making the grade with an airline.
Ask the pilot
Who cares what planes look like? I do! Why do they have to look so ugly and boring?
Ask the pilot
Avoiding speculation, the pilot weighs in on the Madrid plane crash.
Ask the pilot
What do U.S. carriers need to do to regain their status as world-class players? Wi-Fi would help.
Ask the Pilot
The safe landing of the damaged Qantas 747 was no miracle. Plus: If a plane loses pressure, will your eyes pop out?

Daily Newsletter

Get Salon in your mailbox!