Salon Technology | New ethics for the new economy?


Arts & Entertainment Books Comics Health & Body Media Mothers Who Think News People Politics2000 Technology - Free Software Project Travel & Food Columnists Current Wire Stories Click here to read the latest stories from the wires. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - View From the Top Full list of profiles - - - - - - - - - - - - Also Today For a full list of today's Salon Technology stories, go to the Technology home page. - - - - - - - - - - - - Search Salon Advanced Search \| Help - - - - - - - - - - - - Recently in Salon Technology Life or death software A proposal for open-source anesthesia software heightens the drama of the question: Who's at fault when software fails? By Andrew Leonard [08/05/99] The yuks server Laff.net has crafted, copied and stolen 50,000 jokes. Soon it will unleash them on you. By Mark Gimein [08/04/99] Silicon Follies Silicon Follies Chapter 41: IPO -- where'd Paul's office go? By Thomas Scoville [08/04/99] For your information The Web has long been loaded with data, but nothing this helpful. Info markets promise specialized answers to your every question. By Christopher Ott [08/03/99] The $4 billion warehouse Silicon Valley investment titans finance dreams of grandeur, knowing they get rich even if the new business isn't a huge success. By Mark Gimein [08/02/99] Complete archives for Technology - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Technology by e-mail Sign up here to receive our weekly e-mail newsletter listing recent and upcoming articles and events in Technology. Unsubscribe - - - - - - - - - - - -		New ethics for the new economy? Technology journalists aren't supposed to own stock in the companies they cover. But to participate in the high-flying tech sector, some are writing a new definition of "conflict of interest." - - - - - - - - - - - - By Janelle Brown August 6, 1999 \| Full disclosure: Two weeks ago, I watched MP3.com go public and it pained me. It was one of the hottest IPOs of the year, from a company I'd been following for more than a year, and I couldn't buy even one share of the stock. Why? Because I abide by that holy grail of journalism, the church-and-state law of my profession: Avoid conflict of interest. Personally, I don't believe that ownership of MP3.com stock would prevent me from writing scathing reports about the company or affect my reporting on other technology companies, but that argument just doesn't float in journalism. Just look at what happened to Chris Nolan. The former Silicon Valley gossip queen for the San Jose Mercury News has been sent into exile, stripped of her popular "Talk is Cheap" column and moved to the newspaper's outlying Peninsula Bureau. Her cardinal sin: accepting discounted friends-and-family stock from the CEO of AutoWeb and selling it for a tidy profit of $9,000. The CEO is an old friend of hers, she says, and she had never mentioned AutoWeb in her column; still, she is paying dearly for that $9,000. Her editors, who failed to advise her against accepting the stock when she asked for their guidance, have also been reprimanded. Nolan's predicament has the technology journalism industry abuzz -- and not just about whether it was right or wrong for her to accept the stock. Like Nolan, many people in technology journalism have poked a finger into the entrepreneurial pie -- some own technology stocks or Internet-oriented mutual funds; others have moonlighted for tech companies, as consultants or writers of technical "white papers"; a few sit on the boards of tech companies, or of their own start-ups. Journalism, after all, is not where the big money is, and many technology writers would like to afford a life not too different from the lives of the entrepreneurs and technologists they write about. Some have begun to ask themselves if journalists must be barred from the profits the rest of society is making by investing in tech stocks. What if, they ask, the stocks are only tangentially related to their reporter's turf of Silicon Valley? As tech journalists dabble in entrepreneurship and investing, some are reinterpreting the traditional rules governing conflict of interest. What was once a matter of black-and-white ethics has lately turned a murky shade of gray. Next page \| If journalistic ethics are so important, why are they so poorly defined? Illustration by Val Mina


Search..Archives..Contact Us..Table Talk..Ad Info..Investors