How the World Works

Putting in a good word for the über-lobbyist

Thanks, Jack Abramoff, for all your hard work

Attentive readers of "How the World Works" may recall a posting I made shortly before Christmas about bio-piracy -- a term used to describe the patenting, by corporations in the developed world, of genetic data of plants and animals indigenous to developing nations. In my posting, I quoted one Susan Finston, the executive director of the American Bioindustry Alliance, who claimed that A) there wasn't a problem, and B) even if there was, the World Trade Organization wasn't the place to discuss it.

I expressed some skepticism about Finston's statements, but looking back, I should have been nastier. My gut reaction when spokespeople for industry alliances make claims is to not trust a word they say -- and if they happen to say, as Finston did, that there is no problem, then I tend to believe, even without evidence, that something is fishy.

Well, guess what, there is a problem, and it happens to be Susan Finston. An illuminating New York Times article published just before Christmas noted that Finston had authored "opinion pieces" in the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal on the topic of patent protection.

But she identified herself merely as a "research associate" for the Institute of Policy Research, a conservative think tank based in Texas. There was no mention at all that in August she had been registered as a lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or her service as executive director of the American Bioindustry Alliance.

Even though it might be hard to summon up the requisite outrage for the business-as-usual spectacle of paid lobbyists masquerading as "research associates" or "analysts," it's still our duty to do so. And it may be one more reason to thank super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff for all he's done to expose the inner workings of the seedy intersection between industry and government. The Times started paying attention to Finston after it was revealed that Abramoff was paying stipends to "analysts" at think tanks such as the Cato Institute.

Now everyone is getting a harder look. Thanks, Jack! We owe you!

About How the World Works

A conversation about globalization.

Globalization in the news

Loading...

Currently in Salon

  • From Balloon Boy to Sarah Palin's death panels, the media chased a lot of hoaxes in 2009 and called them news
  • Christopher Nolan's second feature scrambled my brain and expounded a bleak philosophy. But I forget what
  • Grab a partner. You have some cooking to do. Plus: Last week's winners
  • From cash-strapped polygamists to rogue lawn mowers at Sterling Cooper, the greatest shows dared to provoke
  • What the Democrats can learn from the Republicans about managing the ménage à trois within the party
  • At least, I was until now. Because in my circle, nothing is more embarrassing than being religious
  • Jacob Hacker breaks with fellow progressives, comes out in favor of the Senate's proposal
  • She never became Hollywood's It girl, but she was as daffy and heartbreaking as her A-list contemporaries
  • An extraordinary new memoir by a college jock whose brain began to bleed
  • It's spawned a VH1 show and an excuse for Tiger Woods. But some experts balk at the idea of being hooked on nooky

Other News