Updated: Today
Topic:

Globalization

The population neutron bomb

In countries where populations are in decline, small towns are the big losers. The city takes all.

A specter is haunting Europe: small-town underpopulation.

It might seem strange to be worrying about underpopulation in a world headed toward 9 billion humans by 2050. But during that same time period, some 45 countries are likely to see their populations decrease, some by rather large margins. A chart at VoxEu provides the gory details. Bulgaria is projected to lose 35 percent of its population by 2050; Ukraine, 33 percent; Belarus, 28 percent. Also on the list, Japan, German, Portugal, Italy and Greece.

Within individual nations, write German researchers Benny Geys, Friedrich Heinemann and Alexander Kalb, there are also marked rural-urban disparities. In Germany, even as relatively rural regions experience significant population drops, larger urban areas are growing. And there's a reason for this: It's harder for smaller towns to adjust, creating a downward spiral. The number of people in a smaller city may go down, but the costs of providing services are not so flexible, or "elastic," as the economists like to say.

For municipalities up to a size of 6000 inhabitants, the costs for providing public goods fall underproportionally with population size ... As such, a significant strain on local public budgets is to be expected for these entities with population decline. In contrast, larger municipalities are less confronted with the fixed cost problems and should, therefore, be more able to cut costs in proportion with falling population...If the above-mentioned results prove to be robust, demographic change in Europe could bring a further push for the growth of cities and agglomerations (at the detriment of rural areas) ... Already today the agglomerations are the growth leaders and migration magnets all over Western and Eastern Europe (European Commission, 2007). When municipalities in the rural areas find themselves in the population shrinkage-cost trap in the future, this tendency will accelerate. In this sense, cities and agglomerations are likely to be the "winners" of demographic change.

The odd thing about this conclusion is that cities are also "winning" in nations where the population is growing. Cities are winning everywhere; 2007 was the first year in which more than half the humans on the planet lived in metropolitan areas. Agglomerations rule.

Globalization in the news

Loading...

Currently in Salon

  • The Democrats' lust to win at any cost stripped abortion from the healthcare bill. Can pro-choicers put it back?
  • Why the hopeless story of a ghetto teen is just the kind of movie black people need right now
  • The fall of the Berlin Wall, 9/11 and the collapse of Lehman Brothers: Each ushered in a new American era
  • Don Draper and the denizens of Sterling Cooper take drastic measures in the face of a brave new world
  • Inside the elaborate, disturbing and downright riveting world of child-beauty pageants
  • This just in from the Institute for the Advancement of Conservative Science: History began on 1/20/09!
  • A memoirist searches for the truth about a fatal shooting in 1960s Phoenix
  • The untold story of Johnny Cash, protest singer and Native American activist, and his feud with the music industry
  • My partner says he's just not attracted to me "right now"
  • The aftermath of Wall Street's meltdown reminds me of the aftermath of the Berlin Wall's fall. Not in a good way