Search Salon

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon Technology

Frequently asked questions to end the millennium
Uncertainty surrounds a bug that could cause computers to confuse the year 2000 with 1900. This FAQ will do nothing to change that.
By Scott Kirsner
[12/27/99]

Saint Nick sells out
In the year of e-Christmas what would you expect?
By Joe Kelleher
[12/24/99]

Can Linux billionaires carry the free-software torch?
As dot-com mania sends shares in open-source companies soaring, the movement searches its soul.
By Andrew Leonard
[12/23/99]

Naked eye
A prudish hacker caught me surfing porn and turned the image on my monitor, and my world, upside down.
By Daniel Sieberg
[12/22/99]

The real Y2K crash
Why did stocks that skyrocketed on the promise of "silver bullet" millennium bug solutions fall back to earth?
By Mark Gimein
[12/21/99]

Complete archives for Technology

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Then it was time to start editing. This is the fun part, where you get to cut all the dull bits out and add cool special effects like a whirling newspaper that says "Gangster Murdered!" You can get a competent editing program, such as Ulead VideoStudio or MGI's VideoWave, for around $100. The software lets you pick out the footage you want to use, mix and match your clips and add special effects and titles for a smashing final product.

And the winner is ...

I was prepared to give my heart to the Sony. It was the only 3-CCD (Charged Coupled Device) camera I looked at. (CCDs account for the $1,000 gap between similar cameras. They are the digital eyeballs with light-sensitive pixels that capture the picture. Three-CCD cameras have one for each primary color: red, green, and blue. The single-chip cameras register all three colors on one chip. So you get more accurate colors with three CCDs.)

Of the three, the Sony is hands-down the easiest to pick up and just start shooting. The buttons are obvious and in convenient places and I made it nearly all the way through the testing without having to consult the manual. But on the set, I ran into an annoying and non-adjustable sleep feature: The camera goes to sleep without any warning and you have to turn it on again (and again and again). The Canon, on the other hand, gives you ample warning with a series of gentle beeps.

Overall, the Sony renders color better than the other cameras -- but not $1,500 better. Sony also has single-CCD cameras and a line of Digital 8 cameras, which are considerably cheaper but also have less sophisticated features than the TRV900.

The Panasonic's PV-DV910 caught my eye right away. With a detachable light on top, it reminded me of a submarine. It has lots of bells and whistles. However, some of these extras, like a 300x digital zoom, turned out to be more gimmicky than useful. If you try, for example, to zoom in on a distant building, you get a blown-up view of a few windows, say -- but not a magnification of the whole thing. The reds and greens had an unnatural glare in our test shoot. The camera also doesn't like shadows very much; my film was marred by light glaring off a leather booth -- something which didn't happen with the Canon and Sony.

Worse yet, the Panasonic's digital image stabilization compromises the image quality. Image stabilization smoothes out the bumps as you shoot video at a crowded party or wedding, but the Panasonic's digital image stabilization overcompensates for small physical movements -- if you jerk one way it jerks the other way. Optical image stabilization is better than digital since it is actually integrated into the camera lens -- it moves with your body.

My mild dislike of the Panasonic turned into outright disdain, though, when I found out that the timecode resets itself every time you turn the camera off and back on -- making it difficult to keep track of how much tape you have left.

Because of Sony's reputation, I had been biased in favor of the TRV900, but the Canon Elura was my surprise favorite. It's amazing that Canon managed to fit so many incredible features into such a tiny package. At five inches high and four inches wide, it slips into a purse or backpack easily and still matches the Sony feature for feature with optical zoom and optical image stabilization. It's small enough that I could hold it steady enough to shoot with one hand, and I have small hands. When I took the cameras out on the street, the Elura was completely unnoticed by passersby; and in heavy crowd situations I had absolute control over it.

Both the Canon and the Sony take still photos with progressive scan -- which means that the cameras read all the pixels of the image with a single pass, for cleaner edges and sharper photos. The Canon also did an excellent job with shadows, reproducing the way our set actually looked, including a dark backdrop. The Elura has a 12x optical zoom and a 48x digital zoom, and optical image stabilization for a steady shot. (When you hear optical, think optimal: an optical zoom magnifies the image, while a digital zoom simply blows it up for a jagged, pixelated image.)

For a single-CCD camera, the Canon Elura performs extraordinarily well. So well, in fact, that I wouldn't be able to justify spending an additional $1,000 for Sony's 3-CCD model. The Elura's colors are bright and the edges are sharp. The red on Harry's tie did bleed a little into the gray suit, but the same happened with the Sony and the Panasonic.

Before doing this review, I had my heart set on buying the Sony TRV900. Now I'm definitely going for the more-bang-for-your-buck Canon Elura. By the end of the shoot, the Elura was starting to feel like an extension of my hand. Spend some time finding the camera that fits you like a glove, and start shooting -- and editing. It's a lot of fun.
salon.com | Dec. 31, 1999

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

  Get a printer-friendly version

  E-mail a friend about this article

  Backflip this article to find it again

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon