To print this page, select "Print" from the File menu of your browser
San Francisco to dot-com developers: No more
Voters pass anti-growth measure Proposition L by a slim margin.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Andrew Leonard
Nov. 08, 2000 | No more dot-com gentrification, San Francisco's voters said Tuesday. With all the precincts reporting, the final vote tally was 120,695 for and 117,216 against a ballot proposal that will effectively halt new office development in such neighborhoods as the Mission District and South of Market.
Proposition K, a much milder anti-growth measure sponsored by San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, was defeated.
Marie Jones, director of economic development for the San Francisco Partnership, said: "Prop. L is not going to solve the problem of housing costs, nonprofit arts displacement or traffic. These are complex problems that require real community planning. Unfortunately, the passage of L will lead to job loss and business displacement."
Victorious supporters of the measure, such as Debra Walker, a Mission District painter and community activist, insist that their measure is not anti-dot-com, it's anti-developer: "What's happened is that real estate interests have artificially accelerated the prices, and people can't afford it, including the dot-com companies. You don't just build yourself out of what is perceived to be a supply and demand crisis, anymore than you print more money when you have a bad economy."
The passage of anti-growth measure Proposition L added a new chapter to San Francisco's long history of progressive politics. But whether Proposition L's passage will have an impact on San Francisco's dot-com economy is, ironically, almost a moot question.
Even as voters were going to the polls, news began to spread of the latest round of dot-com closures. San Francisco's voters may have put an end to new office development just as the new economy locomotive finally ran out of steam.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
|
About the writer Send us a Letter to the Editor Related stories Is the Internet a bad, bad boy? San Francisco's anti-growth Proposition L is an unnecessarily harsh referendum on the merits of the new economy. By Damien Cave 11/06/00
Clamping down on high-tech growth is good for high-tech
|
| Salon.com >> Technology | ||||||
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Business | Comics | Health | Mothers Who Think | News
People | Politics | Sex | Technology and The Free Software Project
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop
Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
Copyright 2005 Salon.com