<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2004 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2004_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shattering the Rove myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turns out Karl Rove is a terrible political analyst]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some he's a hero, to others a villain, but everyone -- right, left, and center -- seems to agree on one thing about Karl Rove: He’s really really smart. Rove is, most political observers assume, one of the savviest operators in politics today, so when he speaks, people listen. After Citizens United and the 2010 GOP wave, when Rove ruled Washington from his non-perch at American Crossroads, I saw more than one very smart liberal go from mocking Rove as a liar and hack one minute to having the blood drain from the face when he made an ominous political prediction the next. Such is the power of the Rove.</p><p>Or at least it was. Tuesday night may have shattered the Myth of Rove, just as it shattered Rove himself when he <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-7-2012/post-democalypse-2012---america-takes-a-shower---karl-rove-s-math">had a meltdown</a> in front of millions on Fox News viewers after the network called Ohio for Obama. The moment, which has since gone viral, was the perfect encapsulation of Emperor Has No Clothes realization that Rove is now experiencing. Rove was proven wrong. On live TV. By Fox News. And of course, that wasn’t the only thing he got wrong. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/the_biggest_losers_of_pundity/">He blew the whole election</a>, predicting Romney would win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh no, the Democrats are &#8220;Kerry-izing&#8221; Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13008017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Politico, "Kerry-izing" means saying Mitt has no clue on foreign policy, not "lying about his record"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought an attempted "Kerry-ization" of a candidate -- referring to the treatment of Sen. John Kerry by the Republicans and the press in 2004 -- would involve a coordinated campaign of lies and misinformation, but <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=535C2E5C-F14D-486F-A9E4-B78428305F14">according to Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei it just means "saying he doesn't have a foreign policy."</a></p><p>Allen and VandeHei, Politico's mascot and co-founder, have yet another one of their bizarre, needlessly lengthy (especially needless because they just repeat the same points over and over again ...) news articles that are also lengthy throat-clearing "state of the race" pieces that rehash the very obvious observations of D.C. reporters covering this race. (<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76898.html">Some of these articles</a> also double as opinion pieces about how mean and unfair the press and the Democrats are being to Mitt Romney.)</p><p>So, sure, it is at this point a truism that this election resembles 2004 in that the incumbent president has an advantage on "national security" issues and the challenger is perceived as rich and out of touch. So obviously the Democrats are now doing exactly what they accused the Other Side of doing, before:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Patrick McHenry, the rudest, most shameless College Republican in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course he was unfair to Elizabeth Warren: He was trained by the most cutthroat political organization around]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_McHenry#Connections_with_Countrywide_Mortgage_Scandal">Countrywide</a>) called Elizabeth Warren a liar at the conclusion of a House Oversight subcommittee hearing that had already consisted mainly of Republican members of Congress getting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/elizabeth-warren-liar-gop-facts-cfpb_n_866505.html">very basic information about Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau completely wrong.</a> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RET2Z5AVJ8A" width="425"></iframe></p><p>McHenry has been one of the most completely shameless of House Republicans since his arrival in Congress, in 2005, when he immediately and publicly endorsed Tom DeLay's brilliant plan to exempt himself from ethics rules as his connections to Jack Abramoff began to end his career. But he was born to be cheerfully corrupt: He's a product of the College Republicans, an organization that trains little Lee Atwaters, Karl Roves and Grover Norquists in the arts of scorched-earth campaigning and wholly irresponsible "governing" on behalf of the monied interests that bought you your job. The ethos is win by any means necessary, legal or quasi-legal (or worse, as long as you never get caught), and McHenry was very good at that, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0510.wallace-wells.html">Benjamin Wallace-Wells' memorable profile of the then-freshman in the Washington Monthly.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Osama&#8217;s death looked like at ground zero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/02/bin_laden_death_tv_coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/02/bin_laden_death_tv_coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/02/bin_laden_death_tv_coverage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I rode the subway in to experience the madness for myself -- the crowds, the tweeting and the conspiracy theories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> <p>       <em>"Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.&#8221;</em>     </p> <p>-- President Barack Obama, May 1, 2011</p> </blockquote><p>     <strong>1.</strong>   </p><p>This is how history breaks in 2011. I was watching AMC's "The Killing" last night when my daughter walked into the living room around 11 p.m. and said, "Osama bin Laden is dead."</p><p>"What? Are you <em>sure</em>? Where did you hear this?"</p><p>"It's online."</p><p>The texts and calls and tweets and Facebook posts and cable news ticker feeds piled up from there, morphing into that familiar buzzing audiovisual din. Our other atmosphere.</p><p>At first there was no actual news, just rumor and speculation. Finally the Sunday night shows were interrupted by reports that Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida mastermind and America's most wanted criminal, might finally be dead, nine-and-a-half years after the worst-ever terrorist attack on American soil.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/02/bin_laden_death_tv_coverage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/02/bin_laden_death_tv_coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Bush campaign manager Ken Mehlman finally comes out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/25/ken_mehlman_is_gay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/25/ken_mehlman_is_gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/25/ken_mehlman_is_gay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man who engineered Bush's reelection and then steered the RNC is now a gay activist for equality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former head of the Republican National Committee and Bush '04 campaign manager Ken Mehlman has finally come out as a gay man. Mehlman broke the "news" <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/08/bush-campaign-chief-and-former-rnc-chair-ken-mehlman-im-gay/62065">to The Atlantic's Mark Ambinder.</a></p><p>Everyone in politics basically suspected/"knew" this for years, but Mehlman says he only came to grips with it personally this year.</p><p>"Mehlman's leadership positions in the GOP came at a time when the party was stepping up its anti-gay activities," Ambinder writes, and boy howdy. But Mehlman has decided to become an open advocate for gay marriage, and the moderation of the GOP on gay issues. He participated in a fundraiser for the American Foundation for Equal Rights -- a group supporting the legal challenge to Proposition 8 in California -- last September, and he "has become a de facto strategist for the group," attracting major Republican donors.</p><p>"It's taken me 43 years to get comfortable with this part of my life," Mehlman tells Ambinder. Plus he recently moved:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/25/ken_mehlman_is_gay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/25/ken_mehlman_is_gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama, single mom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/obama_marriage_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/obama_marriage_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/29/obama_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYT mag shows how the first marriage stays strong: Hard work, yes, but huge sacrifice, from one spouse especially]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hard to imagine another political couple, much less one residing in the White House, agreeing to sit down with a reporter from the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/magazine/01Obama-t.html?_r=1&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">New York Times Magazine</a> to discuss the intimate particulars of their marriage as the Obamas did for a cover story in this Sunday's magazine. Or perhaps the reverse is true: It's hard to imagine that most reporters would find the particulars of a <em>good</em> political marriage a newsworthy topic. The Clintons' marriage, portrayed as mercenary at best, was fodder for torrid speculation and political character assassination; the Bushes made everyone wonder how an elegant book-reading woman with seemingly moderate views put up with her smirking frat boy of a husband (a puzzle that inspired, among other things, Curtis Sittenfeld's splendidly nuanced fictional take on their marriage, "<a href="http://www.salon.com/books/int/2008/09/08/sittenfeld_q_a/index1.html">An American Wife</a>.") But the Obamas are the fairy tale; our Bama-lot, a suave, sexy, undeniably modern couple who inspire speculation not for their sins, but their virtues. Instead of mockery, they make us ask: Dude, how can we get some of that?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/obama_marriage_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/29/obama_marriage_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Barack Obama needs to do to close the deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/obama_closing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/obama_closing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/10/28/obama_closing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three Democratic operatives offer advice for how the candidate should spend the final week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's crunch time. There's only a week to go in this seemingly interminable 2008 presidential election. The consensus from the national polls is that Democrat Barack Obama enjoys a lead in the mid-to-high single digits and he looks to be strong in key battleground states as well. Obama's lead at this late stage contrasts starkly with the position in which Al Gore and John Kerry found themselves, respectively, during the closing week of the 2000 and 2004 elections. Though many superstitious Democrats around the country refuse to let the thought even enter their minds, much less pass from their lips, the truth is that the 2008 presidential election is, at this point, Barack Obama's to lose. That said, today we ask a very simple question: What should Obama and his campaign do now to close out his presidential bid?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/obama_closing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/28/obama_closing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The stolen election of 2004: Chapter 53</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/stealing_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/stealing_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2008/08/01/stealing_america</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Stealing America" airs out the same old questions (and conspiracy theories) about the murky Bush-Kerry election. But it avoids the really scary stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <div class="art c"><img class='wp-image-10007605' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/08/story.jpg' /></p><p> I don't mind that Dorothy Fadiman's film <a href="http://www.stealingamericathemovie.org/">"Stealing America: Vote by Vote"</a> raises once again the massively vexed question of whether the 2004 presidential election was fixed. That spectral possibility lingers in many people's minds, retains at least a general outline of plausibility and, thanks to the electronic voting systems in use in so much of the country, can never be conclusively proven or disproven. I do mind, though, that "Stealing America" is a clumsy if well-intentioned work of recycled propaganda, a mixture of hard evidence, random anecdote and far-flung inference that may convince some viewers that a clear verdict can be rendered on that impossibly murky event. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/stealing_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/stealing_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the youth vote win it for Obama this fall?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/youth_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/youth_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/05/29/youth_vote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The likely Democratic nominee has a unique appeal to voters under 30. A look at how a strong youth turnout -- or lack thereof -- could affect this November's results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just who are you, Generation Y? The salvation of Barack Obama and America? Or just more fool's gold in the Democratic search for El Dorado? For as surely as the sun rises in the east, and Tim Russert's Election Night board will focus on one overhyped swing state (Virginia? Colorado?), so have three electability talking points emerged from Obamamania. You, Generation Y, otherwise known as "the youth vote," are one of them. </p><p>The creed goes like this: The senator from Illinois (who is just about to put the finishing touches on a victory over the senator originally from Illinois) will inspire record numbers of African-Americans, independents and voters under 30 to go to the polls this November, sweeping away all before him like <a href="http://www.salon.com/march97/kamiya970321.html">Peter O'Toole riding into Aqaba.</a> </p><p>The African-American part seems pretty solid. The number of black voters will grow, and Obama will outperform previous Democratic candidates among them, perhaps enough to help him by 2 percentage points or more in states such as Virginia and North Carolina and a crucial 1 point -- give or take -- in other battleground states like Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Missouri. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/youth_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/youth_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP on the verge of imploding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/24/blumenthal_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/24/blumenthal_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/excerpt/2008/04/24/blumenthal_death</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at how radicalism has forced the Republican Party to retreat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 3, 2007, ten Republican candidates aspiring to succeed <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/george_w_bush/">George W. Bush</a> as president debated at the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/ronald_reagan/">Ronald W. Reagan</a> Library, where they mentioned Reagan 21 times and Bush not once. By raising the icon of Reagan, they hoped to dispel the shadow of Bush. Reagan himself had often invoked magic -- "the magic of the marketplace" was among his trademark phrases and he had been the TV host at the grand opening of Disneyland, "the Magic Kingdom," in 1955. Evoking his name was an act of sympathetic magic in the vain hope that its mere mention would transfer his success to his pretenders and transport them back to the heyday of Republican rule. </p><p> Bush's second term has witnessed the great unraveling of the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/republican/">Republican</a> coalition. After nearly two generations of political dominance, the Republican coalition has rapidly disintegrated under the stress of Bush's failures and the Republicans' scandals and disgrace. The Democrats have the greatest possible opening in more than a generation -- potentially. They should pay strict attention to how Bush has swiftly undone Republican strengths as an object lesson. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/24/blumenthal_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/24/blumenthal_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pickens weasels out on Swift Boat challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/pickens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/pickens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/11/19/pickens</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Kerry accepts his challenge, the Texas oilman changes the terms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens recently offered $1 million to anyone who could disprove any of the allegations the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth made about <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_kerry/">John Kerry's</a> military service. As we <a href="/politics/war_room/2007/11/16/kerry/index.html">reported</a> Friday, Kerry has accepted the offer himself, inviting Pickens to meet him at a mutually agreeable location in Massachusetts or Texas -- and to bring a check made out to the Paralyzed Veterans of America. </p><p>Pickens has now <a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/advertising/20071116/LAF07116112007-1.html">responded</a> to Kerry's invitation, but not in the "bring it on" way you might expect of a man who's sure of his own righteousness. Pickens doesn't deny that he made the initial challenge, but now that Kerry has accepted, he apparently feels the need to add some conditions. </p><p>"In order to disprove the accuracy of the Swift Boat ads, I will ultimately need you to provide the following," he tells Kerry. "(1) The journal you maintained during your service in Vietnam, and (2) Your military record, specifically your service records for the years 1971-1978, and copies of all movies and tapes made during your service." </p><p>Oh, and one more thing. If Kerry "cannot prove anything in the Swift Boat ads to be untrue," he'll need to make a $1 million contribution himself to the Medal of Honor Foundation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/pickens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/19/pickens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerry takes on the Swift Boat Veterans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/16/kerry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/16/kerry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/11/16/kerry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it's three years too late, but there's $1 million on the line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We interrupt this presidential campaign to bring you a blast from the not-so-distant past. </p><p>At a recent <a href="http://www.spectator.org/dinnerLanding.asp">gala dinner</a> for the American Spectator, Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens, a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/11/politics/campaign/11swift.html?_r=1&amp;n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/S/Swift%20Boat%20Veterans%20for%20Truth&amp;oref=slogin">major contributor</a> to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, apparently offered $1 million to anyone who could disprove any of the Swifties' claims about <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_kerry/">John Kerry's</a> service in Vietnam. </p><p>In a letter sent to Pickens today, Kerry has accepted the challenge himself. "I welcome the opportunity to prove that you are a man of your word and that the so-called 'Swift Boat Veterans for Truth' lied," Kerry says in his letter. "While I am prepared to show they lied on allegation after allegation, you have generously offered to pay one million dollars for just one thing that can be proven false. I am prepared to prove the lie beyond any reasonable doubt." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/16/kerry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/16/kerry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Christian right could defeat Rudy &#8212; and make Hillary president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/19/giuliani_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/19/giuliani_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/19/giuliani</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon crunches the numbers -- what happens to the 2008 electoral map if a third-party social conservative enters the race, as threatened, against Giuliani and Clinton?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/rudy_giuliani/">Rudy Giuliani</a>'s chief attractions to Republican primary voters is supposed to be electability. "We're going to need the strongest possible Republican who can win in every state," the former New York City mayor <a href="http://www.nysun.com/article/59958">said</a> during an August campaign stop, "and I'm the only one who can do that." Giuliani, the narrative goes, can change the electoral map of the country, taking stronghold states away from the Democrats and providing the last, best defense against the looming specter of President Hillary Clinton. </p><p>But the largest single voting bloc in the GOP is not ready for the coronation of a pro-choice candidate like Giuliani. A group of key Christian conservative leaders <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/09/30/giuliani/">voted</a> at a Sept. 29 meeting in Salt Lake City to consider supporting a socially conservative third-party candidate if Giuliani is the Republican nominee; the same group will <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/18/giuliani/">meet</a> in Washington on Saturday for further discussion of the third-party option. Conservative anger is real, at least for now. As longtime conservative activist Richard Viguerie, who was at the first meeting, told Salon, "If Giuliani is the nominee, it will be the end of the Republican Party. There's no way that conservatives are going to continue to play the role of mistress, and here's a man who's wrong on every single social issue." Viguerie predicts disaster for a Giuliani candidacy. "In a two-way race, I think he'd be hard-pressed to get 40 percent of the vote. In a three-way race, he won't come close." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/19/giuliani_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/19/giuliani_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ll go no more a-Rove-ing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/karl_rove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/karl_rove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2007/08/13/karl_rove</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country takes leave of the political serial killer who tried to forge a one-party state. But don't expect the Mayberry Machiavelli to pay for his civic sins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the departure of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/karl_rove/">Karl Rove</a> the Bush administration now enters its last throes. As a legacy for his patron, Rove has designed the public relations offensive for the fall presidential campaign to attempt to corner congressional Democrats through a combination of Gen. David Petraeus' forthcoming report on the "surge" in Iraq and presidential budget vetoes; but once those tactics are played the political string runs out. President Bush will be left with the unalloyed counsel of Vice President Dick Cheney, whose endgame transcends Rove's machinations. "I don't worry about the polls," Cheney said on CNN's "Larry King Live" on July 31. One more hypothetical restraint on Cheney has been removed. </p><p>Rove's resignation marks a tacit recognition of the failure of his theory of political realignment, though hardly of its consequences. Trailing him out of the West Wing is the cloud of a subpoena from the Senate Judiciary Committee that seeks his testimony about his primary role in purging <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/us_attorneys/">U.S. attorneys</a> for partisan purposes. But even when Rove leaves government service at the end of August, Bush will extend the protective cover of executive privilege. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/karl_rove/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/13/karl_rove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Bloomberg could buy the White House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/12/bloomberg_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/12/bloomberg_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/12/bloomberg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He just quit the GOP and became an independent. But does America crave a sane version of Ross Perot with actual governing experience?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Bloomberg, the mega-billions mayor of America's richest city, proclaimed his above-the-fray neutrality in the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/2008_election/">presidential race</a> at a recent press conference. </p><p>"I'm going to stay out of both the primaries and the general election because I've got to work with everybody as mayor of the city of New York," declared Bloomberg, a Democrat turned nominal Republican and now <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/06/19/2007-06-19_partys_over_for_bloomy.html">independent</a> who has been elected to two terms as Rudy Giuliani's successor. "And if I pick sides, the public may not feel that I'm representing them." </p><p>These seemingly laudable sentiments deserve a Bronx cheer because they collide with reality. As host of the <a href="http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2004/08/31/rnc_day_one/index.html">2004 GOP Convention,</a> Bloomberg praised George W. Bush from the stage at Madison Square Garden for "leading the global war on terrorism." And Bloomberg's top political advisors make scant secret that they are currently plotting ways for him to enter the 2008 White House field as a problem-solving independent, socially liberal and fiscally responsible. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/12/bloomberg_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/12/bloomberg_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A conversation with John Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/edwards_transcript/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/edwards_transcript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/06/edwards_transcript</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic hopeful talks about his wife's cancer, the problem with Bush and Cheney, and why he cares about poverty this time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> John Edwards sat down with Salon Tuesday night after the former North Carolina senator spoke to about 800 Iowans at a town meeting at Prairie High School here. </p><p><b> Tonight was a sort of normal event, where your wife Elizabeth's cancer was very much in the background. Did you sense that as well?</b> </p><p> I did. I think that's largely been true since the first week. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/22/edwards/index.html">first week</a> it was <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/03/27/edwards/index.html">very intense.</a> We were in New Hampshire yesterday and did similar events, and it was very much the same. Now Elizabeth gets a lot of attention and you could see the crowd gathered around... </p><p><b> I'm not saying that anyone didn't know. </b> </p><p> They know. But I think people are still capable of feeling good feelings towards Elizabeth and at the same time focusing on the things that matter for the country. You notice I said that you could ask Elizabeth a question if you wanted to, and nobody had any questions. </p><p><b> Did you learn anything about yourself over the last two weeks, since the public announcement that Elizabeth's cancer had returned? </b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/edwards_transcript/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/edwards_transcript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthew Dowd&#8217;s not-so-miraculous conversion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/05/matthew_dowd_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/05/matthew_dowd_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2007/04/05/matthew_dowd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the former Bush pollster a true believer turned disillusioned critic, or was he an opportunist from the get-go?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he tells it, Matthew Dowd's conversion from true believer in George W. Bush to disenchanted critic is a chapter in a "Pilgrim's Progress" through the wilderness of this world. His long quest for agape, <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/washington/01adviser.html">as related to a New York Times reporter,</a> begins about a decade ago with Dowd in the Slough of Despond, "frustrated about Washington, the inability for people to get stuff done and bridge divides," when suddenly a great-hearted figure appears who lights a candle in the darkness. "It's almost like you fall in love," Dowd professed. But his dream turns to dross and his faith into doubt. Bush is not the deliverer but the deceiver. "I had finally come to the conclusion that maybe all these things along do add up. That it's not the same, it's not the person I thought." But Dowd is unsure whether Bush is a changed man or a captive. "He's become more, in my view, secluded and bubbled in." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/05/matthew_dowd_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/05/matthew_dowd_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run, Elizabeth, run</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/edwards_69/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/edwards_69/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Couric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2007/03/27/edwards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many presidents have lived with the ill health of loved ones. Can we stop asking John Edwards when he's dropping out of the presidential race?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What made the comeback so withering was that it was delivered in such a matter-of-fact tone. </p><p>During a "60 Minutes" interview Sunday night, Katie Couric kept hectoring <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_edwards/">John and Elizabeth Edwards</a> about their <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/22/edwards/index.html">stubbornness</a> in the face of cancer. Again and again, without getting the response she wanted, Couric asked them why they hadn't yielded to the return of Elizabeth's illness and broadly hinted that they should have called off John's <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/2008_election/">campaign for the presidency.</a> Finally, almost in exasperation, Couric turned to Elizabeth and said bluntly, "Here you're staring at possible death..." Elizabeth interrupted Couric with this cut-to-the-chase response: "Aren't we all, though?" </p><p>Left unsaid was that Couric's husband had died from colon cancer in 1998 -- and the perky anchor kept appearing on the "Today" show till the last week of his life. Left unsaid was that legendary newsman Ed Bradley, who died of leukemia last year, was contributing to "60 Minutes" until the very end. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/edwards_69/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/27/edwards_69/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoveOn moves in with Pelosi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/23/move_on</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The netroots group's support proved crucial to passage of the Democrats' Iraq spending plan. But antiwar activists say MoveOn has been co-opted by its access to power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, looks at the Iraq spending bill that Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders managed to pass in the House today, what he sees is a way to end the war. The bill, which won passage on a nearly strict party-line vote, commits $124 billion to fund operations in Iraq, but it calls for removal of American combat troops by the summer of 2008. The plan is not perfect, Pariser concedes. It does not require complete withdrawal. Still, this week, MoveOn signed on to Pelosi's supplemental funding bill, citing a poll of its members showing overwhelming support of the idea. </p><p>MoveOn's longtime allies in the antiwar movement, however, look at the bill -- and MoveOn's support for it -- and see something very different. Groups who call for immediate withdrawal argue that MoveOn's position is a betrayal of their cause, and that Pelosi's bill merely continues the war while allowing Democrats to say they've done something to oppose it. Cindy Sheehan, the "peace mom" who favors immediate withdrawal, describes MoveOn as supporting "the slow-bleed strategy of the Democratic leadership." Gail Murphy, of the group CodePink, says, "MoveOn has taken a compromised position -- in fact I think they were involved behind the scenes in creating a compromised position." Other peace activists call MoveOn's e-mail poll of its membership a sham. If MoveOn's millions of members knew the full details of the bill, they would surely oppose it. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The road goes on for John and Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/22/edwards_68/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/22/edwards_68/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/22/edwards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confronted with a second bout of cancer, Elizabeth Edwards remains determined to campaign with her husband -- all the way to the White House.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were words that no one ever wants to say about the person he loves: "When the cancer goes from the breast and shows in the bone, which it's doing now, it's no longer curable. It is completely treatable." </p><p>At a remarkable and emotionally raw Thursday afternoon press conference, there was <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_edwards/">John Edwards</a> -- husband, father and presidential candidate -- putting the best interpretation on the recurrence of his wife Elizabeth's cancer. "Many people in similar circumstances," he said, "have lived many years undergoing treatment." </p><p>In a media environment where counterfeit emotion often seems more convincing than genuine sentiment, this turning-point moment in Elizabeth Edwards' life and perhaps the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/2008_election/">2008 campaign</a> was the ultimate in reality TV -- and it had the added virtue of being true. During the opening moments of the press conference, it was difficult to watch Elizabeth Edwards as she seemingly fought to maintain her composure. But then her husband began talking about how "we've been married for 30 years" and a brave smile flickered across her face, soon followed by an actual grin. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/22/edwards_68/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/22/edwards_68/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
