<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2006 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2006_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shattering the Rove myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turns out Karl Rove is a terrible political analyst]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some he's a hero, to others a villain, but everyone -- right, left, and center -- seems to agree on one thing about Karl Rove: He’s really really smart. Rove is, most political observers assume, one of the savviest operators in politics today, so when he speaks, people listen. After Citizens United and the 2010 GOP wave, when Rove ruled Washington from his non-perch at American Crossroads, I saw more than one very smart liberal go from mocking Rove as a liar and hack one minute to having the blood drain from the face when he made an ominous political prediction the next. Such is the power of the Rove.</p><p>Or at least it was. Tuesday night may have shattered the Myth of Rove, just as it shattered Rove himself when he <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-7-2012/post-democalypse-2012---america-takes-a-shower---karl-rove-s-math">had a meltdown</a> in front of millions on Fox News viewers after the network called Ohio for Obama. The moment, which has since gone viral, was the perfect encapsulation of Emperor Has No Clothes realization that Rove is now experiencing. Rove was proven wrong. On live TV. By Fox News. And of course, that wasn’t the only thing he got wrong. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/the_biggest_losers_of_pundity/">He blew the whole election</a>, predicting Romney would win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we really have to take Michele Bachmann &#8220;seriously&#8221; now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_serious_staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_serious_staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/02/bachmann_serious_staff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a history of rapid staff turnover and embarrassing past escapades, she's more credible than Cain how?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is talk, now, that we should all be taking Michele Bachmann a bit more "seriously." She is, after all, polling better than Tim Pawlenty, whom we are all definitely supposed to take seriously, no matter how difficult he makes that for us. <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/89232/bachmanns-opportunity">Jon Chait lays out the case for taking Bachmann seriously at the New Republic.</a> It's hard to argue with the basic point -- true conservatives like her and basically hate the rest of the candidates -- but I take some issue with this:</p><blockquote> <p>But while Bachmann may be even crazier than Palin on questions of public policy, she seems to manage to hold things together as a candidate. She can answer questions from the news media. She is putting together a professional campaign rather than relying on amateur advisors. She takes care to point out frequently that she is a former tax lawyer, and she does not engage in Palin's visceral anti-intellectualism, giving herself the aura of a plausible president, at least in the minds of Republican voters. Bachmann may well combine Palin's most powerful traits without her crippling organizational failures.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_serious_staff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_serious_staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann thinks the world is ending and the pope is the antichrist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_end_times_pope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_end_times_pope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/02/bachmann_end_times_pope</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her friends want to bring about the end times in Israel and her church has an issue with the papacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/05/does-michele-bachmann-think-world-ending">Mother Jones writes about</a> Rep. Michele Bachmann's, R-Minn., connections to Olive Tree Ministries, an <a href="http://www.olivetreeviews.org/">evangelical Christian operation</a> founded by a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Markell">former Jew for Jesus</a> and longtime friend of Bachmann's named Jan Markell.</p><p>Olive Tree Ministries, based out of Maple Grove, Minn., produces a weekly radio show and a newsletter, and it is also obsessed with Israel because it believes we are living in the end times. Bachmann's been on Markell's radio show multiple times, attended an Olive Tree Ministries conference, and left a testimonial on its website. As MoJo says:</p><blockquote> <p>When Minneapolis' City Pages first reported [6] on Bachmann's relationship with Markell in 2005, the then-state senator denied any knowledge of Olive Tree Ministries. However, Markell tells Mother Jones that she's known Bachmann off and on for 35 years, and says she spoke about Israel at Bachmann's church in the late 1970s. "My hunch is that they misquoted her," Markell says. "She's been at my conference. Why she would have said [otherwise], I don't know."</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_end_times_pope/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/bachmann_end_times_pope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>266</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Donald Trump on policy" and other ideas that briefly sounded very good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When George W. Bush killed bin Laden: An alternate history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or: An exploration of Dick Cheney's recent daydreams]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush announces the news to the nation on May 24, 2006, immediately following the East Coast airing of the finale of "American Idol." He appears in military fatigues and, for some reason, spurs. Behind him, an oversize Osama bin Laden "Wanted" poster, with the word "LIQUIDATED" stamped on the terrorist mastermind's face. The camera pulls back to reveal that the president's East Room audience is in fact made up entirely of firefighters. The Marine band plays "Stars and Stripes Forever" as the president speaks, forcing Bush to address the room, and the nation, through a bullhorn.</p><p>"America has won the war on terror," Bush shouts. "Tonight, I am proud to say, Osama bin Laden is in hell." The president explains that the terrorist mastermind was "taken out" by American forces in Afghanistan, along with the entire senior leadership of al-Qaida. Crowds spontaneously gather in celebration outside the White House, with handmade signs ("THESE COLORS DON'T RUN," "LET'S ROLL") in plain view of cable news cameras set up beforehand according to a White House communications office suggestion. A professional-quality sound system blares Lee Greenwood. Then, fireworks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s policy director gave out Abramoff favor money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He greased the wheels for the symbol of GOP corruption, now he works for the leader of the new majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner is so obviously a favor-trading tool of monied interests -- this is the man, it must never be forgotten, who literally handed out tobacco company checks on the floor of the House -- that sometimes it hardly seems noteworthy when he again proves that he is nothing but a puppet of well-heeled lobbyists. But we must guard against cynicism and always take opportunities to remind the nation that Speaker Boehner is a corrupt tangerine.</p><p>So documentarian <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/corruption-watch-john-boehners-abramoff-connection/73396/">Alex Gibney writes today</a> of Boehner's recently hired policy director, Brett Loper. Before joining team Boehner, Loper was, naturally, a medical device lobbyist, whose job was to protect the profits of the medical device industry at the expense of, among other things, the federal deficit. And before that, he worked for the gloriously amoral Tom DeLay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viral video star Ted Williams (and his golden voice) detained in Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/ted_williams_arrested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/ted_williams_arrested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/11/ted_williams_arrested</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The homeless man turned MSNBC voice held by police after an altercation with his daughter in Hollywood]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hollywood Reporter blog <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/live-feed/golden-voiced-ted-williams-detained-70369">confirms</a> that Ted Williams, the man with the golden voice, was briefly detained after a yelling fight with his daughter on Monday night. The event comes just four days after his <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/golden-voiced-homeless-man-lands-69181">debut appearance</a> voicing the MSNBC "Lean Forward" campaign commercials.</p><p>Here's the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7215353n">touching story</a> of Williams' rise from sleeping on the streets to a national media sensation -- all thanks to YouTube.</p><p>     <object height="385" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NND5revP2_c?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NND5revP2_c?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/ted_williams_arrested/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/ted_williams_arrested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hometown paper blasts McConnell over Iraq revelation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/editorial_blasts_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/editorial_blasts_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/11/editorial_blasts_mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky newspaper calls on the Republican leader to explain why he asked President Bush to pull troops from Iraq]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is taking some serious heat from his hometown newspaper for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/iraq_war/?story=/politics/war_room/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq">revelation</a> in George W. Bush's memoir that McConnell asked the president to pull some troops out of Iraq to boost the GOP's chances in the 2006 election.&#160;As <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/iraq_war/?story=/politics/war_room/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq">we reported yesterday</a>, McConnell at the exact same time was publicly accusing Democrats of endangering America because of their calls to withdraw troops from Iraq.</p><p>In an <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20101111/OPINION01/311110017">editorial toda</a>y titled "McConnell's true colors," the Louisville Courier-Journal writes (emphasis ours):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/editorial_blasts_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/editorial_blasts_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Largest New Jersey newspaper offers buyouts to cut losses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expected to lose $10 million this year, Star-Ledger dangles a year's salary, medical benefits for some managers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey's largest newspaper is offering more buyouts to employees as it faces mounting financial pressure.</p><p>In a memo to employees, the publisher of The Star-Ledger of Newark says the newspaper is expected to lose about $10 million this year. The newspaper lost about $9 million last year.</p><p>Publisher Richard Vezza writes that full-time employees will be offered a buyout that will pay them one year's salary plus medical benefits. Employees will have 45 days to make a decision.</p><p>Employees hired before Jan. 1, 2006 will be eligible. In the memo, Vezza says he hasn't set a target number for the buyouts.</p><p>Vezza also wrote in the memo that salaries would be adjusted and some job duties could be combined.</p><p>In 2008, more than 300 employees took buyouts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats deserve credit &#8212; not blame &#8212; on ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/08/05/ethics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters angered by corruption should laud Nancy Pelosi's reforms (and beware a Republican restoration)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarity of thought is rare in both political press coverage and public opinion, but the reaction so far to the House ethics cases brought against Reps. Charles Rangel and Maxine Waters is well beyond average stupid.</p><p>According to <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/frontrow/2010/07/26/house-democrats-fret-over-rangel-case/">conventional media wisdom</a> -- always heavily influenced by&#160;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68Lzaw_lgPk&amp;feature=channel">Republican noisemakers</a> -- the Democrats <a href="http://newsok.com/swamp-gas/article/3482062">should expect to suffer</a> because two powerful committee chairs from their party are undergoing ethics investigations. But why should Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats take the blame when they brought reform that led to those investigations, regardless of the political consequences?</p><p>Yet, having thrown out the bums who tolerated corruption for so long under Republican leadership, the public is supposedly itching to throw out their replacements, who have reformed the House rules, created a new Office of Congressional Ethics, and handled every case impartially, as promised when the Democrats took over in January 2007. Voters have plenty of reasons to feel frustrated and angry this year, but ethics reform is not among them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/05/ethics_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Census campaign takes to smart phones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/us_census_hispanics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/us_census_hispanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/03/10/us_census_hispanics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Be Counted, Represent" to offer free music and concert tickets to try to boost Hispanic participation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groups pushing for robust Hispanic participation in the 2010 census have announced a campaign to reach that hard-to-count demographic through its smart-phone-toting youngsters.</p><p>The "Be Counted, Represent" campaign was announced Wednesday at a press conference in Los Angeles.</p><p>It offers music downloads and a chance at concert tickets to cell phone users who share their e-mail addresses and phone numbers with organizers and forward information about the census to their friends.</p><p>Organizers hope the pro-census messages will zip throughout the social networks of youngsters who can persuade their parents to fill out and return their census forms.</p><p>The messages will stress that undercounted areas risk losing funding for transit, infrastructure and other needs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/us_census_hispanics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/10/us_census_hispanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama has to stay above 50 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/10/27/undecideds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A GOP operative argues that in a race between a white and black candidate, "undecideds" vote white. Meaning, "undecideds" will break for McCain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As his campaign manager has described it, John McCain is now looking at a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/us/politics/17campaign.html?_r=2&amp;ref=politics&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">"narrow-victory scenario."</a> "The fact that we're in the race at all," added Steve Schmidt, "is a miracle. Because the environment is so bad and the head wind is so strong."</p><p>But talk of miracles and head winds aside, I think John McCain really does have a decent shot at winning, and that's not just because I'm a longtime Republican political operative. Despite what the polls seem to be saying, a closer look at the numbers shows that a Democratic victory is not a foregone conclusion. Why? Because if history is any guide, Barack Obama, as an African-American candidate for political office, needs to be polling consistently above 50 percent to win. And in crucial battleground states, he isn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/10/27/undecideds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>267</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dixie is gone with the wind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/19/south_schaller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/19/south_schaller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Webb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2008/08/19/south_schaller</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No economic-populism-inspired revivals are going to turn the region blue. Virginia's Jim Webb is a lonely exception.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can economic populism return the white South to the Democratic Party? </p><p>Bob Moser thinks so. In his newly published and smartly written book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Dixie-Awakening-Democratic-Majority/dp/0805087710/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1219091129&sr=8-1">"Blue Dixie: Awakening the South's Democratic Majority</a>," Moser argues that the conventional wisdom that took hold in the mid-1990s -- namely, that Bill Clinton-led, Democratic Leadership Council-inspired centrism had saved the Democratic Party nationally, and at least partially in the South as well -- was in fact the force that drove wary working-class white Southerners into the arms of the Republicans for good. </p><p>Moser, a North Carolina native who now lives in Brooklyn, N.Y., relays the story of a conversation he had at the 2000 Democratic National Convention with a female Democrat from his home state who laughed when he told her he was looking to talk to liberals in the Tar Heel State delegation. "The state had historically been the South's most progressive," writes Moser, saddened and dismayed by the woman's laughter. "But after eight years of Bill Clinton and his pro-corporate, anti-New Deal, Republican-Lite DLC having assumed near-complete control of the national party, were there any liberals still active enough to be delegates?" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/19/south_schaller/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/19/south_schaller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More ways to call Hillary Clinton the C-Word</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/hillary_clinton_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/hillary_clinton_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/01/25/hillary_clinton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very special T-shirt just for country music fans. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class='wp-image-10027758' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/01/story26.jpg' /> </p><p>Paging Clinton haters! </p><p>Thursday, Broadsheet <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/01/24/roger_stone/index.html">discussed</a> a Republican political operative who is using an acronym to sling the C-word at Hillary Clinton. <a href="http://citizensunitednottimid.org/">Citizens United Not Timid, aka CUNT,</a> is a political action committee dedicated to "educating the public about what Hillary Clinton really is," by selling T-shirts with a red, white and blue female crotch logo. Classy. </p><p>Yet, there are other creative ways to tar Clinton with the C-word via T-shirt. Today, we offer this photo of a special rebus puzzle T-shirt for country music fans who hate Hillary. Let's keep the misogynist Hillary hate-wear coming! Send pics or links to broadsheet@salon.com. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/hillary_clinton_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/25/hillary_clinton_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP&#8217;s crowded closet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/31/gay_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/31/gay_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Ashburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2007/08/31/gay_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The party's culture of concealment has led to embarrassment  and personal destruction. Isn't it about time for the right to cure its homophobia?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Is everybody gay?" </p><p>That was the cry of the lovelorn schoolteacher in the classic 1997 film "In and Out," after her diffident fianc&eacute; reveals his true orientation (and dumps her for Tom Selleck). Ten years later, more than a few discombobulated Republicans must be muttering the same question, despite the fervent denial of <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2007/08/28/craig/index.html">Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig</a> that he is, indeed, gay. As one embarrassing episode follows another, with almost predictable regularity, perhaps it is time for Republicans and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/conservatives/">conservatives</a> to ask themselves an obvious question: What makes the Republican Party -- and the conservative movement more generally -- so attractive to closeted homosexual men? </p><p>Somewhere in the textbooks of psychosexual pathology there may be a straightforward answer, so to speak. Does the party draw closeted men because they can hide behind Republican homophobia? Or does the party promote <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/homophobia/">homophobia</a> as a political ruse while closeted men run the show? Whatever the answer, the result is routine humiliation and personal destruction. Even worse, the party's culture of concealment encourages right-wing gay-bashing, such as Tucker Carlson's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290003">grotesque boast</a> that he and another adolescent thug beat up a gay man who "bothered" him in a bathroom years ago. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/31/gay_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/31/gay_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The legend of Rahm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/rahm_emanuel_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/rahm_emanuel_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/05/08/rahm_emanuel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Rahm Emanuel the reason the Democrats took back the House in the 2006 election? A Chicago reporter makes the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Election Night 2002 was a gloomy watch for Democrats. Their party, led by a pair of innocuous Midwestern Main Streeters, Richard Gephardt and Thomas Daschle, lost control of the Senate and lost seats in the House, sinking to its lowest ebb since the Roaring '20s. Smug right-wing pundits predicted the Democrats were on their way to joining the Whigs in the ashcan of American political parties.</p><p>It was a different story in Illinois. The Democrats won everything. They took the governorship for the first time in 30 years. They captured the state Senate. This despite running a ticket made up of ward bosses' children and in-laws. I remember sitting on my couch in Chicago and thinking, "If the Democrats want to turn it around, they need to take some lessons from the machine around here. Chicago Democrats have no scruples. They treat political offices as feudal inheritances. They shake down contributors like a corrupt pope selling indulgences. They're sleazy, they're arrogant but they WIN."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/rahm_emanuel_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/08/rahm_emanuel_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was Charlie Crist thinking?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/crist_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/crist_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Senate Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2007/04/06/crist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did a Republican governor just add tens of thousands of Democrats to the voter rolls in Florida?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his campaign for the Florida governorship last fall, Charlie Crist frequently expressed <a target="new" href="http://www.tbo.com/news/metro/MGB8SKEI9TE.html">deep moral opposition</a> to the state's practice of permanently prohibiting convicted felons from exercising their right to vote. But Crist is a Republican, and his promise to fix Florida's <a href="/politics/feature/2002/11/01/lists/index.html">notorious felon-voting ban</a> sometimes sounded like nothing more than campaign puffery. Felon disenfranchisement has long given Republicans a considerable boost at the polls in Florida; if the state's ex-cons had been allowed to <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/florida_recount/">vote in 2000,</a> George W. Bush would now be the commissioner of baseball. Was Charlie Crist really going to kill this political golden goose? </p><p>On Thursday, he did just that. Crist, who became governor after handily defeating Democrat Jim Davis in November, ushered in a proposal that will quickly restore the voting rights of most of Florida's felons as soon as they are released from prison. The plan looks sure to alter the political landscape in the nation's most populous -- and electoral-vote-rich -- swing state. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/crist_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/06/crist_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#8217;s long history of politicizing justice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/30/civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/30/civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/30/civil_rights</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not only the U.S. attorneys who are threatened by partisan politics. Since Day One, the Bush administration has been quietly dismantling the DOJ's Civil Rights Division.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/us_attorneys/">U.S. attorneys</a> scandal shows that the Bush administration was mistaken in its belief that it could politicize the nation's top federal law enforcement agency, the Department of Justice, with impunity. The <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/alberto_gonzales/">attorney general</a>'s chief of staff and the director of the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys have both had to leave their jobs, and Congress has begun grilling DOJ leadership. But having decimated another entire sector of the DOJ in plain sight for six years with little consequence, is it any wonder the Bush White House figured nobody would miss a few prosecutors? </p><p>Since George Bush took office, his administration has been not so quietly dismantling the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, which is responsible for enforcing the nation's civil rights laws, and doing it for the same reason the eight federal prosecutors were fired: to use the enforcement power of the federal government for Republican gain. Instead of attending to the Civil Rights Division's historic mission, addressing the legacy of slavery by enforcing anti-discrimination laws, the Bush administration has employed the division to advance the political agenda of a key GOP constituency, the Christian right and also, quite literally, to get Republicans elected. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/30/civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/30/civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoveOn moves in with Pelosi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/23/move_on</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The netroots group's support proved crucial to passage of the Democrats' Iraq spending plan. But antiwar activists say MoveOn has been co-opted by its access to power.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Eli Pariser, the executive director of MoveOn.org, looks at the Iraq spending bill that Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders managed to pass in the House today, what he sees is a way to end the war. The bill, which won passage on a nearly strict party-line vote, commits $124 billion to fund operations in Iraq, but it calls for removal of American combat troops by the summer of 2008. The plan is not perfect, Pariser concedes. It does not require complete withdrawal. Still, this week, MoveOn signed on to Pelosi's supplemental funding bill, citing a poll of its members showing overwhelming support of the idea. </p><p>MoveOn's longtime allies in the antiwar movement, however, look at the bill -- and MoveOn's support for it -- and see something very different. Groups who call for immediate withdrawal argue that MoveOn's position is a betrayal of their cause, and that Pelosi's bill merely continues the war while allowing Democrats to say they've done something to oppose it. Cindy Sheehan, the "peace mom" who favors immediate withdrawal, describes MoveOn as supporting "the slow-bleed strategy of the Democratic leadership." Gail Murphy, of the group CodePink, says, "MoveOn has taken a compromised position -- in fact I think they were involved behind the scenes in creating a compromised position." Other peace activists call MoveOn's e-mail poll of its membership a sham. If MoveOn's millions of members knew the full details of the bill, they would surely oppose it. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/23/move_on_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How U.S. attorneys were used to spread voter-fraud fears</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/21/us_attorneys_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/21/us_attorneys_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/21/us_attorneys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long before it fired eight U.S. attorneys for political reasons, the Bush administration had politicized their jobs by making them push a favorite GOP talking point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under intense criticism for <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/28/attorneys/index.html">firing</a> eight United States attorneys, the Bush administration has spent the past few weeks casting about for an explanation for the dismissals that involves performance rather than politics. On March 13, White House spokesman <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/dan_bartlett/">Dan Bartlett</a> tried to come up with one. "Over the course of several years, we have received complaints about U.S. attorneys," he insisted, "particularly when it comes to election fraud cases." On Tuesday, President Bush pressed home this claim with a similar statement during his defense of embattled Attorney General <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/alberto_gonzales/">Alberto Gonzales.</a> "We did hear complaints and concerns about U.S. attorneys," said Bush. "Some complained about the lack of vigorous prosecution of election fraud cases." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/21/us_attorneys_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/21/us_attorneys_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
