<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2008 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2008_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Baseless Condi Rice speculation making a comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoleezza Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10658321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><b>[UPDATED BELOW]</b> Joseph Curl, former White House correspondent for the Washington Times, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/18/curl-one-president-please-with-a-side-of-rice/?page=all#pagebreak">is bringing me back to the good old days of 2006</a> in his latest opinion column for the conservative paper. It's a breathless report that Condoleezza Rice will seek the vice presidency, and it's a classic of the genre.</p><p>Any amateur can speculate that Chris Christie will enter the presidential race, or posit a Mike Bloomberg third-party run, or imagine Hillary Clinton launching a primary challenge against Barack Obama. After all, those three have actually won elections and expressed political ambitions. It takes a real pro to decide to build buzz around someone who not only hasn't ever run for anything, but who's never expressed a desire to run for anything.</p><p>Rice, the national security advisor in George W. Bush's first presidential term and secretary of state in his second, is currently a professor at Stanford with the requisite right-wing think tank fellowship. She has not said or done anything "political" in years. But Curl has been hearing things!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/19/baseless_condi_rice_speculation_making_a_comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breitbart shock: Obama was in same place at same time as New Black Panthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Breitbart's loud, dumb BigGovernment site <a href="http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/10/03/shock-photos-barack-obama-with-new-black-panther-party-on-campaign-trail-in-2007/">has a loud, dumb story</a> about how Barack Obama "appeared and marched with the New Black Panther Party in 2007." The occasion was the 42nd anniversary of the march from Selma, Alabama, and in addition to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Al Sharpton were also there, along with dozens of civil rights era luminaries and <em>thousands of other people</em> because <em>it was a massive annual celebration</em> and not actually an Obama campaign event.</p><p>The New Black Panther Party is a cartoonish fringe group of a couple guys who play "'60s radical" dress-up and say mean things about whitey for Fox cameras in order to scare old white people. They have been <a href="http://www.blackpanther.org/newsalert.htm">explicitly rejected by the old Black Panther Party</a>. For some reason, various conservatives have dedicated themselves to proving that this weird, marginal group of Nation of Islam cast-offs is somehow supported by or deeply connected to the Democratic Party and the Obama administration in particular, because, you know, Eric Holder and Barack Obama, those are two guys who very obviously share the values of extremist anti-white proponents of racial separation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/breitbart_panther_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palins give free publicity to book bashing Palins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here, according <a href="http://gawker.com/5840227/all-the-dirty-new-rumors-about-sarah-palins-sexual-fetish-and-cocaine-use">to the National Enquirer,</a> are the shocking revelations in Joe McGinniss' new book about Sarah Palin, "The Rogue":</p><ul>
<li>She has done drugs.</li>
<li>She had sex with a basketball player before she married Todd.</li>
<li>She is mean and petty.</li>
<li>She is a bad mother.</li>
<li>She had an affair after she married Todd.</li>
</ul><p>There is also, obviously, some stuff about Trig's birth, but I have not yet read the book, so I couldn't tell you how far down the rabbit hole that goes.</p><p>Here's my reaction to those revelations: Sarah Palin is a person! She's done drugs and pissed people off and slept with people, like 90 percent of American humans. If Sarah Palin was smart she'd dismiss the book with a chuckle, say nobody's perfect, laugh off the "gossip," and move on.</p><p>Sarah Palin might not be smart.</p><p>The Palins always prefer grand self-pitying martyrdom to quiet dignity, of course, which is why picking on them can be so profitable: They will <em>always</em> respond, and <em>always</em> help you drum up more publicity for your Palin-attacking venture. Instead of depriving the book of oxygen, they launched a multimedia attack on Joe McGinniss before he'd finished the first draft, and what they accomplished was ... giving him more material and ensuring that even more breathless anticipation awaited the book's release.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; run for Congress?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Joe the Plumber," a man named Sam who is not a plumber, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/joe-plumber-may-run-congress-141951107.html">may run for Congress.</a> Joe, a briefly famous desperate attempt by the John McCain campaign to paint Barack Obama as an enemy of the working man, is mulling a run against Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, who's been in the House since 1983. Joe <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/joe-plumber-may-run-congress-141951107.html">told Yahoo's "The Ticket" his thoughts on the potential campaign:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>"I'm not ruling anything out," Wurzelbacher told The Ticket in an interview Thursday. He added that he thought it was an "interesting idea" and that people have been asking him to run for office since he confronted Obama four years ago. He's spent much of his time since then on the speaker's circuit, he said, encouraging others to run for office.</p>
<p>"I like the idea of it -- just regular Americans running. If a regular guy runs, right away the media's going to attack him," Wurzelbacher said. "What kind of education does he have? What does he know about this? My answer to that is, regular Americans aren't experts, but dammit, look where the experts have gotten us. Maybe we need some regular guys in there. That's what I've been doing the past two and a half years, just encouraging regular Americans to run. Tell the liberal media to go to hell and I don't care what you guys say about me, I'm going to try to fix this country."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/joe_the_congressman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sheriff Joe: Birther?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sheriff Joe Arpaio might be a birther, now. A quasi-birther, at least. <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=335261">WorldNetDaily "broke" the "news"</a> that Arizona's most civil rights-disregarding lawman "has agreed to examine evidence challenging the validity of Barack Obama's purported long-form birth certificate in a determination of the president's eligibility for the 2012 election ballot." Which certainly sounds like a very good use of the resources of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, right? There is even a picture of Arpaio with Jerome Corsi, author of "Where's the Birth Certificate," a book whose title question was answered twice before publication:</p><blockquote>
<p>Arpaio told the tea-party leaders that he expects political pressure, but he pointed out that as the chief law enforcement officer of Maricopa County, he's taken an oath to respond to citizens who approach him about enforcing the law.</p>
<p>Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Lt. Justin Griffin confirmed to WND that Arpaio is "waiting to receive all the documentation and all the investigative material from Dr. Jerry Corsi, and then he will look into the matter and compare it to the Arizona revised statutes."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/sheriff_joe_birther/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mistakes of the 2008 Democratic primary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every time I try to get out of this discussion about whether liberals made the wrong choice in the 2008 Democratic primary, someone pulls me back in. The Nation's Ari Melber, a writer I like a lot, asked me my thoughts via Twitter Monday night. Even more intriguing, a Salon reader who criticized me regularly but always respectfully for my Obama skepticism in 2008 posted on Facebook that I had been right back then. OK, I live for being told I was right -- but I have no way to know whether Hillary Clinton would have been a tougher Democratic president than Barack Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/index.html">I've already written</a> about why I think liberals pondering "buyers' remorse" over Obama is useless and divisive. My discussion with Melber and my Facebook friend made me realize something else. One of my primary complaints about Obama supporters in 2008 was the way so many blamed the Clintons for the GOP crusade against them, as though Republicans would have played fair if only the unethical Clintons hadn't given them Whitewater, Travelgate and most notably, sex scandals. That was unfair to the Clintons, and it was also naive. It hugely underestimated the ferocity of modern-day GOP attack politics. Now I find myself wondering if progressives are over-focused on Obama's perceived shortcomings when it comes to dealing with Republicans, because we likewise don't want to deal with the amoral political savagery of the enemy he faces.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/mistakes_of_2008_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should liberals have buyers&#8217; remorse over Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I dodged one of my least favorite questions on "Real Time With Bill Maher" Friday night: Would Hillary Clinton have been a better choice for liberals than Barack Obama in 2008? Neil deGrasse Tyson got me off the hook by quickly answering "yes"; you can watch the segment below.</p><p>I ducked the question because I honestly have no idea -- and I have no desire to refight the bruising battles of the 2008 Democratic primary. I'm firmly on record questioning the notion that Obama was the clear progressive, compared to Clinton. There was absolutely no evidence that was true. One advantage to Clinton, I thought, was that she knew the extent to which the right wing would go to sabotage a Democratic president. On the other hand, I had sympathy with people who dreaded a sequel to the ugly Clinton Wars, and thought a different Democrat might have a better chance to avert a rerun of '90s-style partisan warfare. I didn't agree, but I thought that was a fair and reasonable hope.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/buyers_remorse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>211</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann&#8217;s stepsister: An out Obama fan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/13/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not all of Michele Bachmann's family shares her far-right views. As the media has been aware for sometime, the Minnesota Republican has an openly gay stepsister, Helen LaFave.&#160; While shying from the spotlight, LaFave has publicly opposed Bachmann's anti-gay stance since the congresswoman proposed a gay-marriage ban in the Minnesota Senate (as the Daily Beast <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/06/14/michele-bachmanns-unrivaled-extremism-gay-rights-to-religion.html">reported earlier this year</a>).</p><p>LaFave's political differences from Bachmann's go beyond the spheres of LGBT rights, however, as a short clip discovered on Vimeo suggests. Captured outside the U.S. Capitol in 2009 when Obama was sworn in, the video shows a friendly LaFave (who appears with her long-term partner Nia Wronski) telling the videographer of her excitement about the "reawakening of the country" and the "start of something new." Wronski expresses a desire to see more barriers broken down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/bachmann_gay_step_sister_obama_inauguration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudy Giuliani not returning his gay friends&#8217; calls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rudy Giuliani, a petty little crypto-fascist who used to be the mayor of New York, thought, for a while, that he could be the Republican nominee for president, because of 9/11. Back in the good old days, the one single, solitary admirable thing about the man was that despite being a hateful race-baiting Republican politician, he was cool with gay people.</p><p>After Giuliani left his (second) wife in 2001 by announcing his infidelity at a press conference, he moved in with his good friends Howard Koeppel and Mark Hsiao, a gay couple who've been together since 1991. They were so close, these three, that Koeppel asked if Giuliani would perform their wedding ceremony. Giuliani said he would, once gay marriage became legal in New York.</p><p>Then Giuliani ran for president. And he decided <a href="http://gawker.com/5219683/americas-mayor-suddenly-against-the-gay-marriage">that marriage is between a man and a woman</a> (followed by two more women). His sudden change of heart propelled him to a distant third-place finish in the Florida Republican primary, followed by his exit from the race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/rudy_gay_friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin baffles and frustrates fans by quitting bus tour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/22/palin_quits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin quit her cross-country bus tour (or PAC-funded family vacation) about one region into the country. Everyone is so used to her quitting things that no one really noticed. Life went on. Jon Huntsman ran for president. Rick Perry preemptively denied gay rumors.</p><p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/06/22/palin_bus_tour_takes_extended_pit_stop__110313.html">But Scott Conroy at RealClearPolitics wondered what happened</a> to the tour that was supposed to be heading through the Midwest and Southwest at some point in this rapidly ending month. It seems like Sarah Palin just went home to Alaska, to eat salmon or something.</p><blockquote>
<p>As Palin enjoys her sojourn to the 49th state, she has not reconnected with key early-state figures like Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, and she may have jeopardized whatever political momentum she gained from her recent reemergence in the 2012 discussion. Her political action committee's website still greets visitors with a stale banner, announcing the nationwide bus tour beginning "[t]his Sunday, May 29th."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/palin_quits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>235</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama should come out for gay marriage already</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/21/obama_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With New York state's same-sex marriage vote likely to come any day (or hour) now, President Obama is strongly hinting that he'll soon have a brand-new position on the issue to share with the country. "He&#8217;s very clear about the fact that his position is evolving," <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/obamas-position-on-gay-marriage-still-evolving/2011/03/03/AGJOvIdH_blog.html">White House press secretary Jay Carney said yesterday.</a> That's a call-back to an unsatisfactory old line the president once used when he wanted to assure the LGBT community that he's <em>secretly</em> on their side.</p><p>Liberals have a tendency (much more pronounced in 2007 and 2008 but still evident) to imagine that Barack Obama is just as liberal as them. Because he's obviously smart, because he dabbled with genuine leftism in his youth, and because he opposed Iraq, liberals think he's actually Paul Krugman, forced by electoral circumstance (or cowardice) to talk and govern like George H.W. Bush. Coincidentally, this is also Newt Gingrich and Stanley Kurtz's thesis. It's silly when they say he's hiding his socialism behind a veneer of centrism and it's silly when liberals say he's doing the same.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/21/obama_marriage_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>229</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House spokesman and Kos blogger have uncomfortable chat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer went to Netroots Nation, the annual liberal activist conference, and as punishment for the administration's crimes against liberalism, he was interviewed by a Kos blogger named "Angry Mouse." Liberals, ladies and gentlemen: They demand to be taken seriously!</p><p>Of course in a confrontation between a Kos blogger named "Angry Mouse" ("who often reacted to the communications director's answers to questions with an audible sigh or a skeptical, elongated 'OK,' <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/167067-top-white-house-official-to-frustrated-liberals-we-need-you-in-2012">according to The Hill</a>) and a professional liar for the executive branch, I must reluctantly side with the blogger. <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2011/06/17/netroots-nation-pfeifferdammerung.aspx">Especially after this, as recounted by Dave Weigel</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>Pfeiffer was only booed (lightly) once. That was when he was asked why Obama had filled out a survey in 1996 stating his approval of gay marriage, but had moved right on the issue as president.</p>
<p>"First of all," said Pfeiffer, "someone else filled out that questionnaire."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/dan_pfeiffer_nn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>156</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we done with Rush Limbaugh yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are we sick of Rush Limbaugh yet? We might be! <a href="http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20110522/SUB/110529982">Crains reported yesterday</a> that the April Arbitron report showed the conservative movement's most powerful mouthpiece -- and Sean Hannity, his much-dumber distant rival -- slumping in the ratings after the midterms:</p><blockquote>
<p>Top-rated Mr. Limbaugh has taken the biggest fall. He had a 3.0 share of listeners for his WABC-AM midday slot -- a 33% slide from October and from last April. Mr. Hannity&#8217;s afternoon show was down 28% from its fall peak, as was fellow conservative Mark Levin's evening program.</p>
</blockquote><p>Rush isn't the only right-wing radio shouter with a declining audience. Glenn Beck <a href="http://www.nbcnewyork.com/entertainment/television/NATLGlenn-Beck-Dropped-from-New-York-Radio-Station-112932239.html">was dropped by stations in New York</a>, by <a href="http://www.alternet.org/media/150406/glenn_beck_dropped_by_radio_station_because_his_bizarre_religious_rants_hurt_ratings/">a chain of stations in Connecticut</a>, and by a station in <a href="http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/02/glenn_beck_dropped_by_wtdy.php">Madison, Wis.;</a> Hannity and Beck were <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/01/19/beck-hannity-philly/">both dropped in Philadelphia.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/limbaugh_ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When George W. Bush killed bin Laden: An alternate history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Bush announces the news to the nation on May 24, 2006, immediately following the East Coast airing of the finale of "American Idol." He appears in military fatigues and, for some reason, spurs. Behind him, an oversize Osama bin Laden "Wanted" poster, with the word "LIQUIDATED" stamped on the terrorist mastermind's face. The camera pulls back to reveal that the president's East Room audience is in fact made up entirely of firefighters. The Marine band plays "Stars and Stripes Forever" as the president speaks, forcing Bush to address the room, and the nation, through a bullhorn.</p><p>"America has won the war on terror," Bush shouts. "Tonight, I am proud to say, Osama bin Laden is in hell." The president explains that the terrorist mastermind was "taken out" by American forces in Afghanistan, along with the entire senior leadership of al-Qaida. Crowds spontaneously gather in celebration outside the White House, with handmade signs ("THESE COLORS DON'T RUN," "LET'S ROLL") in plain view of cable news cameras set up beforehand according to a White House communications office suggestion. A professional-quality sound system blares Lee Greenwood. Then, fireworks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/osama_bush_alternate_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt and friends blame Obama for inventing, popularizing birtherism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The popular way for "respectable" conservatives to dismiss birtherism without insulting the birthers (who, remember, make up something like 400 percent of the Republican Party, according to various scientific polls) is to call it a "distraction," or darkly insinuate that Democrats might be behind the whole thing. This is traditionally known as "blaming the victim," and it is what right-wingers basically always do when they're not "playing the victim," which they tend to also do a great deal of, these days. (Sarah Palin has mastered doing both simultaneously.)</p><p>After the president, in a moment of profound humiliation for the nation as a whole, released a scanned copy of his original, "long-form" birth certificate in order to quiet a preposterous television clown whose ridiculous political ambitions are currently being indulged by a political press that knows exactly how ridiculous the entire game is, Newt Gingrich immediately had the perfect Republican response: "All I would say is, why did it take so long?" Gingrich told Talking Points Memo. <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/gingrich-on-birth-certificate-release-why-did-it-take-so-long.php?ref=fpi">"The whole thing is strange."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/">http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/newt_blames_victim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>204</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huckabee trashes Glenn Beck for calling him a progressive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Glenn Beck called former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate (and potential 2012 candidate) Mike Huckabee a "Progressive," which, in Beck's world, means "Nazi."</p><p>
    <object height="240" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201104190007" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allownetworking" value="all" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg3?id=201104190007" height="240" src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/pl55.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320"></embed></object>
  </p><p>Huckabee's crime? He supports Michelle Obama's anti-obesity initiative, because modern-day culture-warrior right-wingers do actually think encouraging healthy behavior for children is an infringement on liberty. And because of that suppot, Huckabee is clearly a left-wing Nazi Progressive -- "like John McCain" -- who conspired with McCain to ... sabotage the Romney campaign, in 2008. (???)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/">http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/huckabee_beck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Drudge hypes Jerome Corsi&#8217;s new birther book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/20/corsi_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Good news, literate people: Jerome Corsi's latest book has gone to press. And Matt Drudge <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash7.htm">has exclusive details!</a> And by "details" I mean "incredibly, comically vague assertions."</p><p>Corsi is best known, still, for his famous "Swift Boat" book, which was full of easily debunked lies about John Kerry, but which was not easily debunked until all the lies had been properly reported and disseminated. Since that book he's gone "full fruitcake," repeating every single right-wing conspiracy theory that comes down the pike, from the NAFTA superhighway to the truly weird <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Corsi#Black_Gold_Stranglehold">"abiotic oil" theory,</a> which says petroleum doesn't come from biological material.</p><p>Corsi already wrote <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Obama_Nation">his silly Obama book,</a> in time for the 2008 elections, but he forgot to make that book about how Obama was secretly born in Kenya, because that particular conspiracy theory had just been invented at the time. So now he's giving it another go, with "Where's the Birth Certificate."</p><p>Drudge's "FLASH" is very, very funny, so I'm just going to reprint it:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/">http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/corsi_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Barack Obama actually not in this photo of Barack Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jack Cashill, the right-wing journalist currently winning the national game of "'prove' the most outlandish thing you possibly can about Barack Obama" with both his theory that Bill Ayers ghost-wrote "Dreams From My Father" and his claim that the president's father was <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102240030">actually</a> Jimi Hendrix, <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=283881">dropped a bombshell today</a>: Barack Obama is not actually in a photo of Barack Obama and his grandparents.</p><p>As Cashill explains:</p><blockquote>
<p>In his definitive 2010 biography of Barack Obama, "The Bridge," New Yorker editor David Remnick features a photograph of a dapper young Barack Obama sitting between his grandparents on a Central Park bench.</p>
<p>The bench is real. The grandparents are real. The wall behind them is real. Barack Obama is not. He has been conspicuously photoshopped in. Who did this and why remains as much a mystery as Obama's extended stay in New York.</p>
</blockquote><p>The video evidence: </p><p>So, yes, this is actually just a picture of Barack Obama's grandparents hanging out in New York, where they did not live and where Obama was attending college, without their grandson, who was I guess secretly in Pakistan, at the time. I think that's what has been definitively proven here. Obama was being a Marxist Muslim in Pakistan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/">http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/07/birther_photoshop_fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s policy director gave out Abramoff favor money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner is so obviously a favor-trading tool of monied interests -- this is the man, it must never be forgotten, who literally handed out tobacco company checks on the floor of the House -- that sometimes it hardly seems noteworthy when he again proves that he is nothing but a puppet of well-heeled lobbyists. But we must guard against cynicism and always take opportunities to remind the nation that Speaker Boehner is a corrupt tangerine.</p><p>So documentarian <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/corruption-watch-john-boehners-abramoff-connection/73396/">Alex Gibney writes today</a> of Boehner's recently hired policy director, Brett Loper. Before joining team Boehner, Loper was, naturally, a medical device lobbyist, whose job was to protect the profits of the medical device industry at the expense of, among other things, the federal deficit. And before that, he worked for the gloriously amoral Tom DeLay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/">http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/boehner_scanlon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

