<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2010 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2010_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sharron Angle: &#8220;It&#8217;s a possibility&#8221; that I would run for Senate again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/sharron_angle_its_a_possibility_that_i_would_run_for_senate_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/sharron_angle_its_a_possibility_that_i_would_run_for_senate_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angle, a Tea Party favorite, lost her challenge to Harry Reid in 2010]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharron Angle, the Tea Party favorite who lost a challenge to Harry Reid in 2010, said that she'd be open to running for office again. "It's a possibility," Angle said, the <a href="http://elkodaily.com/news/angle-local-conservatives-should-run-for-office/article_05cf0dc0-aaf1-11e2-a71a-0019bb2963f4.html">Elko Daily Free Press</a> reports.</p><p>Speaking to the a committee meeting of the Elko County Republican Party, while promoting her book “Right Angle: One Woman’s Journey to Reclaim the Constitution," Angle added: "If you believe in representative government, then you have to be willing to be one of those representatives. And I’m willing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/sharron_angle_its_a_possibility_that_i_would_run_for_senate_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/sharron_angle_its_a_possibility_that_i_would_run_for_senate_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failed Tea Party candidate mulls another run in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/failed_tea_party_candidate_mulls_another_run_in_alaska/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/failed_tea_party_candidate_mulls_another_run_in_alaska/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Murkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Miller, who a lost a bid for Senate in 2010, is considering a challenge to Mark Begich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Miller, a Tea Party candidate in Alaska who lost a bid for Senate in 2010, is forming an exploratory committee and considering a run against Democratic Sen. Mark Begich in 2014.</p><p>“For several months now, my wife and I have engaged in serious reflection about our family, Alaska, and the state of our nation,” Miller wrote in an email to supporters, <a href="http://atr.rollcall.com/alaska-joe-miller-launching-senate-exploratory-committee/">Roll Call</a> reports. “After consultation with our political advisers, trusted friends, and many of our 2010 volunteers, we have decided to test the waters for a 2014 US Senate run.”</p><p>He continued on his <a href="http://joemiller.us/2013/04/why-i-am-considering-a-2014-us-senate-run/">website</a>, referencing his 2010 run: "Though I was labeled an 'extremist' by the likes of Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich for telling the truth, both of our sitting senators now routinely engage in such “extremist” rhetoric with respect to federal overreach, government spending, and entitlement reform. Yet they are still unwilling to tackle the tough issues."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/failed_tea_party_candidate_mulls_another_run_in_alaska/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/failed_tea_party_candidate_mulls_another_run_in_alaska/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Dem covers up her past and runs again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/wall_street_dem_covers_up_her_past_and_runs_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/wall_street_dem_covers_up_her_past_and_runs_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reshma Saujani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parochial Politics Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember Reshma Saujani, the hedge fund congressional candidate? She's back, but don't mention the hedge funds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity the poor Wall Street Democrat. Well, you don't need to pity them <em>that</em> much, because they're rich, but the Wall Street Democrats are in a bit of a tough place right now, what with leftish ideas once again resurgent in the Democratic Party and everyone in America still hating everyone involved in high finance, with very good reason.</p><p>So what are you to do if, say, you spent years working as a hedge fund attorney, and all your friends and colleagues are in the finance industry, but you really, really want to get elected to something in a liberal city as a Democrat? If you're Reshma Saujani, you just pretend you never had anything to do with Wall Street and hope no one digs too deep.</p><p>Saujani is running for New York City public advocate. New York's public advocate, one of only three city-wide elected offices, is sort of like the city's "ombudsman." <a href="http://pubadvocate.nyc.gov/role-public-advocate">The advocate's job</a> is essentially to annoy the mayor as much as possible, and then run for that office. The advocate is expected, to put it broadly, to look out for "the little guy," against the city's bureaucracy and police department and so on. The job, thus far, has always gone to liberal, populist figures; Democrats have held the post since it was created in 1994, even as the city repeatedly elected Republican mayors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/wall_street_dem_covers_up_her_past_and_runs_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/wall_street_dem_covers_up_her_past_and_runs_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP memo brags party kept the House by gerrymandering</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_memo_brags_party_kept_the_house_by_gerrymandering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_memo_brags_party_kept_the_house_by_gerrymandering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerrymandering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By targeting legislature races in 2010, Republicans say they were able to keep control of the House ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://rslc.com/_blog/News/post/REDMAP_2012_Summary_Report">report</a> from Republican State Leadership Committee boasts that the party was able to keep control of the House of Representatives by gerrymandering prior to the 2012 elections.</p><p>The RSLC's report was called "How a Strategy of Targeting State Legislative Races in 2010 Led to a Republican U.S. House Majority in 2013," and outlines how the group used $30 million to target Democratic-held state legislature races in 2010, in blue states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin. In the midterms that year, Republicans <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/01/17/1459991/rslc-gerrymandering-house/">went from</a> controlling 14 state legislatures across the country to controlling 25.</p><p>By pumping money into the relatively small-time races, the RSLC pushed in Republican legislators who in turn influenced the redistricting process in their states, which gave Republicans an edge in a number of congressional races in the 2012 elections.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_memo_brags_party_kept_the_house_by_gerrymandering/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/gop_memo_brags_party_kept_the_house_by_gerrymandering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Nikki Haley&#8217;s book full of lies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikki Haley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12874091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supposed Romney running mate front-runner under fire for memoir distortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. As Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/romney-taps-aide-beth-myers-to-run-search-for-vp-running-mate/2012/04/16/gIQA9o8PLT_blog.html">begins to seriously consider running mates</a>, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley <a href="http://www.thestate.com/2012/04/15/2235292/south-carolina-governors-memoir.html#storylink=cpy">again finds herself under fire</a>. This time, the State newspaper has taken her to task for twisting the truth in her memoir, "Can't Is Not an Option." (That is for real the title of her memoir.)</p><p>Every politician's memoir, especially if written while the author is still in office, is a series of self-serving half-truths. There's really not much benefit to total and complete honesty, and most politicians are convinced enough of their own righteousness that they probably don't even think of their omissions and distortions as dishonest. So, everyone Haley trashes in her book says she is lying. That is not that surprising!</p><p>Among the points of contention:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting, not OWS, will change America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/18/voting_not_ows_will_save_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/18/voting_not_ows_will_save_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10123053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A low progressive turnout in 2010 got us into this mess. We can't let that happen again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a close and objective look at the angry demonstrators now gathered on Wall Street, and at similar protest encampments burgeoning from San Francisco to Madrid. What you see is not simply a vast expression of rage at the crisis enveloping the world of democracy.</p><p>The demonstrations also frame a fundamental contradiction – a profound source of strength that has been transformed into a disabling weakness.</p><p>They deserve enormous credit for drawing a global spotlight to the perpetrators of that crisis: a sinister cabal of financial scamsters and right-wing politicians, backed by the dubiously “grass-roots” electorate of the Tea Party. What almost no one, on the right or left alike, wants to talk about is that the cabal was empowered by the very people who are now denouncing it.</p><p>Progressives, out of a mixture of political correctness and embarrassment, carefully avoid the subject. The Republicans are delighted at the silence, because it masks what should be fatal weaknesses in their own position.</p><p>It may not be pleasant to hear, but a massive Democratic voter cop-out in last year’s elections is what put the reactionary right in the driver’s seat, creating the disastrous logjam in Congress, and bringing to a dead halt the hyperactive first two years of the Obama administration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/18/voting_not_ows_will_save_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/18/voting_not_ows_will_save_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>167</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove begins general election campaign without pesky candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/rove_crossroads_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/rove_crossroads_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP's most famous strategist doesn't need to wait for an actual nominee to begin the anonymously funded attack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the publisher who hates dealing with flaky authors to the football coach who dreams of his brilliant plays being run without unreliable players, high-powered professionals everywhere wish they could stop the fallible human element from interfering with their genius. Karl Rove, campaign strategist extraordinaire, is no different. How much easier it is to manage a campaign without a stupid candidate ruining everything by having an long-buried arrest record or saying something obscene into an open microphone! Thanks to Citizens United, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/republican-groups-stalk-obama-with-ad-campaigns/">Rove's dream has come true:</a> The candidate-less presidential campaign has begun.</p><p>Rove has no great love for Rick Perry or Mitt Romney, but his raison d'etre is getting Republicans elected and viciously smearing Democrats, so he's charging ahead without waiting for the party to settle on one of those jokers. American Crossroads, Rove's shadow-RNC is <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/republican-groups-stalk-obama-with-ad-campaigns/">launching ad campaigns</a> targeted at President Obama's campaign stops, accusing him of wanting to raise everyone's taxes. ("The message is somewhat misleading," ABC News says, but because "Karl Rove lies" is a "dog bites man" story, they don't devote much ink to it.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/rove_crossroads_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/rove_crossroads_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln joins conservative lobby in fight against EPA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the party and the White House failed to save her Senate seat, the ostensible Democrat aids polluters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, then-Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Walmart) was facing a tough primary fight from a more liberal Democrat. With labor and progressive groups aligned against her, the White House and the Democratic Party jumped in to defend Lincoln. Bill Clinton himself campaigned for Lincoln, and the effort paid off: She lost to a Republican in the general election. And then she joined a right-wing interest group. And now she's fighting the EPA's plan to regulate greenhouse gases.</p><p>The National Federation of Independent Business is generally treated in the press as the official practically apolitical voice of American small business (and the press treats the word of "small business" with almost as much reverence as that of military generals) but it is, in fact, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/22/AR2007012201182.html">a conservative lobbying organization</a> that has spent decades fighting for anti-labor, anti-environmental and anti-consumer policies, all in the name of protecting our cherished "independent businesses."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, the book-promoting election loser calls the president "a strapping young man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now Christine O&#8217;Donnell regrets her witch comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not because she is witch, but because it was a bad political move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more entertaining Senate races of 2010 involved conservative activist Christine O'Donnell, who won a startling Republican primary victory in Delaware over the party establishment's candidate, then-Rep. Michael Castle.</p><p>During the ensuing general election campaign, a video from 1999 emerged in which O'Donnell told Bill Maher that she "dabbled" in witchcraft in her youth. The Tea Party candidate, fearing that this might alientate her Christian support base, quickly released a video in which she stated, "I'm not a witch." The comment invited a wealth of media mockery (and an SNL spoof -- see below).</p><p>In her new memoir, "Troublemaker: Let&#8217;s Do What It Takes to Make America Great Again," O'Donnell expresses regret over the video. According to the AP, she writes, "It was a wrong-headed move, made for all the wrong reasons, but it was mine." O'Donnell also blames an insistent media consultant for pushing the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/odonnell_now_regrets_witch_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim-bashing doesn&#8217;t win elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/muslim_bashing_doesn_t_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/muslim_bashing_doesn_t_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/18/muslim_bashing_doesn_t_work</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the 2010 midterms suggests that this strategy won't pan out for the GOP in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2010 midterm election campaign, virtually every hard-charging candidate on the far right took a moment to trash a Muslim, a mosque, or Islamic pieties. In the wake of those elections, with <a href="http://www.omaha.com/article/20110101/AP09/301019703">85 new Republican House members</a> and a surging Tea Party movement, the political virtues of anti-Muslim rhetoric as a means of rousing voters and alarming the general electorate have gone largely unchallenged. It has become an article of faith that a successful 2010 candidate on the right should treat Islam with revulsion, drawing a line between America the Beautiful and the destructive impurities of Islamic cultists and radicals.</p><p>"Americans are learning what Europeans have known for years: Islam-bashing wins votes," <a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/a-banner-year-for-islam-bashing-25607/">wrote</a> journalist Michael Scott Moore in the wake of the 2010 election. His assumption was shared by many then and is still widely accepted today.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/muslim_bashing_doesn_t_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/muslim_bashing_doesn_t_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How business lobbies bought all the laboratories of democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/buying_state_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/buying_state_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/14/buying_state_laws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALEC's dream of a world where industry writes every state law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure is funny that, at basically the same time, state legislatures across the country began passing a slew of similar measures attacking collective bargaining, undocumented immigration and abortion, right? Just a weird coincidence, I'm sure, this sudden nationwide war on public employee unions and immigrants and women.</p><p>Hah, I am just kidding. We all know it's because of lobbyists and the American Legislative Exchange Council. ALEC is sort of a Match.com for state lawmakers and the nation's worst industry lobbies. The Center for Media and Democracy's ALEC Exposed project <a href="http://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed">has a handy list of the hundreds of bills</a> ALEC pushes in every state in the union, on subjects ranging from school vouchers to gutting environmental regulations to opposition to the National Popular Vote Compact. (Yeah, that one I don't even get.)</p><p><a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2002/09/ghostwriting-law">Here's how the ALEC process works</a>: GOP state legislators go to fancy conferences where they sit down with lobbyists and right-wing activists and draft right-wing legislation together. They return home and introduce it without mentioning the source. The lobbies then throw some cash at the legislators working to advance their agenda. Then, these days, the bill passes, and everyone else gets around to getting outraged about it, long after their outrage would do much good. Repeat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/buying_state_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/buying_state_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If gay marriage fails in New York, Mayor Bloomberg&#8217;s money is partly to blame</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionaire mayor supports equality with words, but he helped the GOP retake the state Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has forcefully urged the New York state Legislature to pass gay marriage. He's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304520804576347762363512474.html">spoken on it in public</a> and lobbied for it in private. He clearly sees the equality fight as an important part of his legacy, and he's urged Albany politicians to do the same:</p><blockquote> <p>In his speech, Mr. Bloomberg said state lawmakers have a clear choice: "Do you want to be remembered as a leader on civil rights? Or an obstructionist?"</p> <p>"On matters of freedom and equality, history has not remembered obstructionists kindly," the mayor said. "Not on abolition. Not on abortion. Not on women's suffrage. Not on workers' rights. Not on civil rights. And it will be no different on marriage rights."</p> </blockquote><p>Here's the situation in Albany right now: Marriage equality has passed the Democratic-led state Assembly, as it has multiple times in the past. It's stalled in the Senate, which, as always, is deadlocked. Tempers <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/24/frustration-rising-in-albany-with-no-vote-on-marriage/">are flaring.</a> Equality advocates now accuse Republicans of deliberately delaying in order to kill the issue without a vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Rand Paul as dumb as he sounds?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/rand_paul_playing_dumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/rand_paul_playing_dumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/24/rand_paul_playing_dumb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or is the senator from the Tea Parties putting on an act?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, via <a href="http://www.oliverwillis.com/2011/06/22/video-bernie-sanders-vs-rand-paul/">Oliver Willis</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_06/explaining_penny_wise_pound_fo030458.php">Steve Benen</a>, is a clip of Sens. Al Franken, Bernie Sanders and Rand Paul discussing a bill that would help prevent senior hunger: <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="286" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wYgVglm2xFY" width="450"></iframe></p><p>As Sanders and Franken explain: If we make sure old folks have money for and access to adequate nutrition, fewer of them will need to be hospitalized or placed in nursing homes. Because Medicare would pay a lot more money for hospitalization or nursing home care than it would cost to make sure these old folks don't go hungry to begin with, this program is cost-effective <em>in addition to being humane.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/rand_paul_playing_dumb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/rand_paul_playing_dumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>311</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One party to rule them all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/connecticut_wisconsin_one_party_rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/connecticut_wisconsin_one_party_rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/09/connecticut_wisconsin_one_party_rule</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecticut Democrats and Wisconsin Republicans provide sharply different definitions of the words "radical agenda"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, The New York Times offered readers a fascinating look at the consequences of one party rule in two different states. In Connecticut, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/nyregion/democratic-rule-remakes-connecticuts-legislative-face.html">Democratic control of the governorship and state legislature</a> have pushed through an agenda of higher taxes and extended social welfare safety net benefits that must make President Obama green with envy.</p><blockquote> <p>Lawmakers over the last several weeks have enacted the largest tax increase in Connecticut history and approved the nation's first law to mandate paid sick leave for some workers. They voted to extend protections for transgender people, to charge in-state college tuition rates to illegal immigrants, to extend an early-release program for prisoners and to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana.</p> </blockquote><p>Meanwhile, in Wisconsin, Republicans, fearful that recalls will soon allow Democrats to take majority control of the state Senate, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/us/politics/08wisconsin.html?_r=2&amp;ref=us">are racing to push through their own priorities.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/connecticut_wisconsin_one_party_rule/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/connecticut_wisconsin_one_party_rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: Deport the Tea Partiers!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/rand_paul_jail_tea_parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/rand_paul_jail_tea_parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/01/rand_paul_jail_tea_parties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky senator calls for those who attend "radical political speeches" to be jailed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Tea Party" Senator Randall "Rand" Paul (R-Ky.) says he supports free speech, but does he actually want his own supporters jailed for sedition? Definitely yes, according to a shocking audio recording!</p><p>Paul is mostly good on civil liberties -- he was one of the few senators to oppose the extension of the Patriot Act -- but he is also kind of dumb, and he often makes dumb arguments, especially when speaking extemporaneously. And that is how, on Sean Hannity's radio show last Friday, Rand Paul <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/05/31/232182/rand-paul-criminalize-speech/">announced his support for the deportation of Tea Partiers:</a></p><p>     <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eVXWS8g4TAM" width="425"></iframe>   </p><p>The transcript (emphasis <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/05/31/232182/rand-paul-criminalize-speech/">ThinkProgress's</a>):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/rand_paul_jail_tea_parties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/rand_paul_jail_tea_parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Patrick McHenry, the rudest, most shameless College Republican in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course he was unfair to Elizabeth Warren: He was trained by the most cutthroat political organization around]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_McHenry#Connections_with_Countrywide_Mortgage_Scandal">Countrywide</a>) called Elizabeth Warren a liar at the conclusion of a House Oversight subcommittee hearing that had already consisted mainly of Republican members of Congress getting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/24/elizabeth-warren-liar-gop-facts-cfpb_n_866505.html">very basic information about Warren's Consumer Financial Protection Bureau completely wrong.</a> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RET2Z5AVJ8A" width="425"></iframe></p><p>McHenry has been one of the most completely shameless of House Republicans since his arrival in Congress, in 2005, when he immediately and publicly endorsed Tom DeLay's brilliant plan to exempt himself from ethics rules as his connections to Jack Abramoff began to end his career. But he was born to be cheerfully corrupt: He's a product of the College Republicans, an organization that trains little Lee Atwaters, Karl Roves and Grover Norquists in the arts of scorched-earth campaigning and wholly irresponsible "governing" on behalf of the monied interests that bought you your job. The ethos is win by any means necessary, legal or quasi-legal (or worse, as long as you never get caught), and McHenry was very good at that, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0510.wallace-wells.html">Benjamin Wallace-Wells' memorable profile of the then-freshman in the Washington Monthly.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/25/patrick_mchenry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Private messages from top Palin aide leak</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/mansour_twitter_messages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/mansour_twitter_messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/24/mansour_twitter_messages</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shocking Twitter DMs reveal that Rebecca Mansour worships her boss and dislikes Mitt Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tucker Carlson's Internet Tendency has published <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/24/what-a-top-aide-to-sarah-palin-really-thinks-about-mitt-romney-bristol-palin-erick-erickson-and-more/">a series of private Twitter messages</a> sent by Rebecca Mansour, Sarah Palin's closest advisor, to an unknown "online-only acquaintance." The direct messages forwarded to the Daily Caller were sent in the summer of 2010, and they contain a number of unflattering descriptions of various figures in the Republican party and the conservative press.&#160;The Caller <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/24/rebecca-mansours-direct-messages-the-full-text/">does provide the (partially redacted) original messages,</a> in case you don't want to rely solely on their interpretation of the material.</p><p>The DMs are not that outrageous or shocking, because we already all know that Palin and her inner-circle are paranoid and petty. It's news that they hate Mitt Romney? The fact that Palin's operation is an unprofessional cult of personality is public knowledge. But they're still entertaining for anyone fascinated by Palin and her camp.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/mansour_twitter_messages/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/mansour_twitter_messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Donald Trump on policy" and other ideas that briefly sounded very good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul, America&#8217;s dumbest senator, will not be enslaved by your &#8220;right&#8221; to basic healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/rand_paul_dumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/rand_paul_dumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/12/rand_paul_dumb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government will drag doctors out of their homes and make them heal people at gunpoint, according to an adult]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul is stupid. Or, at least, he is not very bright. I say that not because I disagree with him politically, but because he regularly says stupid things. Stupid things that he <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/03/11/rand_paul_anti_choice_pro_toilet">thinks are very clever</a>. (Also, he seems pretty ignorant of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/07/29/rand_paul_harlan_county">the history of the state he was elected to represent</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/09/14/rand_paul_filibuster_budget">the powers of a senator</a>, but ignorance is different from dumbness.)</p><p>So considering his history of smugly saying stupid things, no one should be surprised <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/88175/rand-paul-really-crazy">that Sen. Paul said this:</a></p><p>     <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u_HVyoT2PgM?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u_HVyoT2PgM?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/rand_paul_dumb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/rand_paul_dumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
