<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2016 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2016_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why is &#8220;sensible&#8221; Jeb Bush fundraising for nutty Paul LePage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/why_is_jeb_bush_fundraising_for_paul_lepage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/why_is_jeb_bush_fundraising_for_paul_lepage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul LePage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maine governor seems to embody everything Bush criticizes about his own party ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made about Jeb Bush being perhaps <a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-daily-rundown/52229043#52229043">too moderate for the GOP</a>, thanks to his <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/13/jeb-bushs-gop-canary-in-the-coalmine/">willingness to criticize</a> the party's right flank on immigration and rhetoric. "It's a little troubling sometimes when people are appealing to people's <a href="http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2012/02/23/jeb-bush-2012-gop-field-appealing-peoples-fears">fears and emotion</a> rather than trying to get them to look over the horizon for a broader perspective," Bush said last year after one of his party's presidential primary debates.</p><p>So it's surprising to see that <a href="http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/national/northeast/2013/07/jeb_bush_hosts_fundraiser_for_maine_governor">Bush is hosting a fundraiser</a> for Maine Republican Gov. Paul LePage today in Kennebunkport, the tony seaside town where George H.W. Bush has long kept a summer estate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/why_is_jeb_bush_fundraising_for_paul_lepage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/why_is_jeb_bush_fundraising_for_paul_lepage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are the young Democrats?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Cruz to Paul, GOP is loaded with national figures under 50. Dems seemingly have no one to rival them in 2020]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Hillary Clinton the runaway favorite as the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee (should she run), Republicans are already making clear that they will <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/30/us/politics/republicans-paint-clinton-as-old-news-for-2016-presidential-election.html?hp&amp;_r=0">focus attention on her age</a>, reports Jonathan Martin of the New York Times. Clinton will be nearly 70 if she runs in three years, "a generation removed from most of the possible Republican candidates." As <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/01/the-ageist-attack-on-hillary.html">Mike Tomasky</a> and <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113715/hillary-old-news-tack-worked-obama-it-wont-gop">Alec MacGillis</a> wrote Monday, the attacks could backfire -- and Karl Rove's notion that the GOP will capture a large portion of the youth vote because of Clinton's age is laughable.</p><p>But the attack does reveal a key weakness in today's Democratic Party that could haunt it for the next decade or more -- it has a relatively barren farm system of young up-and-comers. The party could easily survive 2016 with Clinton at the top of the ticket, but what about subsequent cycles?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: GOP needs immigration reform to win the presidency again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It’s certainly right for the Republicans if they ever want to win a presidential race," she said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi urged the House to pass immigration reform, saying that it's "right for our country," but also right for Republicans if they ever hope to win another presidential race.</p><p>"I believe that the members of Congress, many more than are directly affected themselves by the number of Hispanics in their district, will do what is right for our country,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. “And it’s certainly right, for the Republicans, if they ever want to win a presidential race.”</p><p>The immigration reform measure that passed out of the Senate last week is currently under consideration by the House, where it is unpopular among conservative Republicans. Republican leadership has indicated that they may not pass the full Senate version, but could pass legislation piecemeal instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: Hillary Clinton &#8220;would win&#8221; the 2016 presidential race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don't know why she wouldn't run," said the House Minority Leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though she's not yet making any official endorsements for the 2016 presidential race, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was extremely optimistic about a potential run by Hillary Clinton. "If Secretary Clinton were to run — and we think if she ran, she would win — I believe that she would be the best-prepared person to enter the White House in decades, in decades," Pelosi said, "with all due respect to her husband, present company and other presidents."</p><p>Pelosi was speaking on <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/06/27/nancy-pelosi-says-democrats-coalescing-behind-hillary-clinton-2016/2464189/">USA Today's</a> "Capital Download," and said that though she's "not making endorsements right now, because I don't think that's appropriate," among Democrats "[t]here's a great deal of excitement about the prospect that she would run."</p><p>As USA Today points out, at the end of the 2008 primary campaign, Pelosi had a slightly different take:</p><blockquote><p>In 2008, Pelosi was House speaker and stayed officially neutral in the primary battle between Clinton and Barack Obama. She drew ire from Clinton's campaign with a comment that it would be "harmful" for unelected "superdelegates" to determine the nomination. At that key moment, support from superdelegates was seen as the only way Clinton might prevail.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump is heading to Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/donald_trump_is_heading_to_iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/donald_trump_is_heading_to_iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his first ever trip, Trump will speak to religious conservative activists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump will make his first-ever trip to Iowa this August to speak to religious conservative activists, according to the <a href="http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20130623/NEWS09/306230061/1056/news05">Des Moines Register</a>.</p><p>From the Register:</p><blockquote><p>Trump accepted an invitation to the Family Leader’s second-annual leadership summit, an event the organizer says he hopes will help Iowa conservatives coalesce early on in the next presidential nominating cycle.</p> <p>Speakers will be asked to talk about threats facing the country and families.</p></blockquote><p>Though the Register says that Trump's trip "is bound to incite 2016 speculation," it also reports that Iowa Republicans aren't taking a potential Trump run seriously -- especially since he stirred up speculation about a run in both 2000 and 2011, before ultimately deciding against it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/donald_trump_is_heading_to_iowa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/donald_trump_is_heading_to_iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives to Hillary: OK, but please no Lanny Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left seems largely happy with Hillary now, because she can beat Republicans. Just please no wars or Mark Penn!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/netroots-nation-2013-hillary-clinton-93192.html" target="_blank">story this weekend</a> on Politico about the feelings progressives have toward Hillary Clinton, titled "Progressives at Netroots Nation 2013: Hillary Clinton must win us over." Within it, the "more than two dozen" attendees interviewed offer some hesitations about going with another Clinton in 2016 and her still-hawkish foreign policy. But as the author of the piece admits, "the backing of progressives appears to be Clinton’s to lose."</p><p>Another NBC News <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/22/19092548-liberal-activists-warm-to-hillary-clinton-for-president" target="_blank">story on precisely the same topic</a> comes away with a similar conclusion: "progressives are ready to give her another shot."</p><p>Progressives are basically fine with Hillary Clinton taking the 2016 nomination. There! Settled.</p><p>And why shouldn't they be? As Markos Moulitsas puts it, “The fact that she makes 2016 uninteresting makes that attractive." Yeah, that's about all you need, too. She would win. And you know who's a good nominee to go with, in general, in politics? The one who would <em>win the election</em>. Progressives overall might prefer, say, an Elizabeth Warren or Martin O'Malley for the nominee, but they likely won't run if Hillary Clinton runs, so whatever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio’s awful day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He won’t back his own bill, an aide insults American workers, and his angling looks wishy-washy, not savvy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was big news that Sen. Marco Rubio wouldn’t say he backed his own immigration reform bill on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday. He told Jon Karl it was “an excellent starting point,” oddly passive language for someone who’s a co-sponsor. Obviously Rubio is keeping his promise to the right to push for even tougher border control in the final bill, but his wishy-washy response didn’t seem leader-like.</p><p>Luckily or not, Rubio’s wimpy reply was overshadowed by reaction to a deeply reported New Yorker piece by Ryan Lizza that placed the Florida Republican at the center of the "Gang of Eight" negotiations. It featured a choice quote dissing American workers from an anonymous Rubio aide, explaining why his boss backed the Chamber of Commerce over the AFL-CIO when it came to a guest worker agreement (they eventually compromised): “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Cuomo pretends to want public financing really badly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/andrew_cuomo_pretends_to_want_public_financing_really_badly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/andrew_cuomo_pretends_to_want_public_financing_really_badly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He launches a "push" for the reform and wins himself plaudits -- but many doubt he's trying to pass the bill at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is very good at getting what he wants. When he decided he wanted to be the first governor to get a gun reform package passed after Newtown, he put on a <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/blakezeff/andrew-cuomos-gun-genius">master's class in political chess</a> -- exerting his will on previously defiant Republicans and disorganized Democrats, forcing the bill through in the <a href="http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/15/new-yorks-gun-bill/?smid=tw-share">dead of night</a>, and effectively writing <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/177227/cuomo-nothing-like-that-will-ever-happen-wo-a-message/">his own rules</a> to get the bill passed. When he decided he wanted to be known as the governor who helped get marriage equality passed in New York? He <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/blakezeff/andrew-cuomos-gun-genius">impressed upon Republican lawmakers</a> to cast votes they -- rightly, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/salons_gay_marriage_courage_meter/">it turns out</a> -- thought would <a href="http://www.queerty.com/pro-equality-republican-roy-mcdonald-loses-ny-state-senate-primary-20120925/">end their careers</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/andrew_cuomo_pretends_to_want_public_financing_really_badly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/andrew_cuomo_pretends_to_want_public_financing_really_badly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary must own 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter's a nice start. But if she wants to get serious about 2016, she needs to get involved in the 2014 midterms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If successfully running a presidential campaign was as easy as launching a kickass Twitter account, Hillary Clinton would be unbeatable in 2016. Her widely hailed Twitter debut was perfect, embracing her public and private roles – wife, mom, senator, Secretary of State – sending up the sexist mockery she’s endured -- “hair icon,” “pantsuit aficionado” – and leaving the next entry in her bio a teasing “TBD.”</p><p>Her cheeky Twitter debut told me two almost contradictory things: Hillary Clinton is having an enormously good time with this phase in her life, and she’s planning on running for president.</p><p>Obviously a winning campaign will be way harder than launching her Twitter presence, but let’s give her credit for a bold first step. Still, I was thrilled by Clinton’s sure-footed Twitter move – and then I was kind of horrified by how thrilled I was, particularly as I saw a comparable giddiness among liberals and the media (and no, they’re not the same thing.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton&#8217;s poll numbers slip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clintons_poll_numbers_slip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clintons_poll_numbers_slip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new Gallup poll shows Clinton's favorability rating down since April]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from Gallup shows Hillary Clinton's favorability ratings slipping slightly since April, largely because of the controversy over the attacks in Benghazi and Clinton's testimony before Congress about them. The poll shows Clinton's at 58 percent favorability in June, down from 64 percent in April. Her unfavorable rating is up to 39 percent in June, from 31 percent in April.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162986/hillary-clinton-favorability-slips-slightly.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>This poll shows only slight changes in the public's overall assessment of Clinton, with her unfavorable rating now marginally higher than at any time since 2008. However, there is no telling what the future might hold, as members of the House Oversight Committee have publicly speculated that Clinton may have to testify before the Republican-led committee again.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clintons_poll_numbers_slip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clintons_poll_numbers_slip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann: I might run for president in 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/bachmann_leaves_door_open_on_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/bachmann_leaves_door_open_on_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retiring Tea Partyer says she isn't going anywhere and is "not taking anything off the table"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her first televised interview since announcing that she's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/michele_bachmann_drops_out/">not going to run for reelection</a> next year, Rep. Michele Bachmann told Fox News host Sean Hannity that we haven't seen the last of her yet.</p><p>“Sometimes you can be more effective on the outside than on the inside,” she said, echoing sentiments made by other Tea Party firebrands after being pushed out of office, like Allen West. “I’m not going away, I’m not leaving Washington, I’m not leaving the national scene.”</p><p>She suggested that her future plans may even include a bid for higher office, and Hannity asked her specifically about another White House run:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/bachmann_leaves_door_open_on_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/bachmann_leaves_door_open_on_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz&#8217;s personality problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas senator is annoying, and doesn’t play well with others. Will that doom his White House ambitions?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Cruz has sharp elbows. He’s already managed to annoy several senators, including Republicans, and sparked what appears to be a full-on feud with Sen. John McCain. He also wants to be president of the United States.</p><p>Do those things go together? The political scientist John Sides <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/2013/05/22/why-ted-cruz-needs-to-trust-republicans/">thinks it’s going to be a problem</a>:</p><blockquote><p>[T]o be the Republican nominee, he’ll need the support of his Republican colleagues. The 2012 election once again showed—and despite some skepticism—that it is very hard to win the nomination unless you’re preferred by a substantial chunk, if not the vast majority of, your party’s leaders (as was Romney). Which is to say, it pays to be nice to your colleagues. It’s no guarantee, of course: junior Senator Hillary Clinton kept her head down and played nice, and lost the nomination. John McCain often irritated his fellow Republicans, but still mustered enough support within the party to win the nomination.</p></blockquote><p>But political scientist Dave Hopkins <a href="https://twitter.com/DaveAHopkins/status/337382079866220544">isn’t so sure</a>: “Don't think this is the problem for Cruz that John does. McCain bugged Sen colleagues/leaders too; still won '08 nom.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hickenlooper strikes major blow to death penalty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/hickenlooper_strikes_major_blow_to_death_penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/hickenlooper_strikes_major_blow_to_death_penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Colorado, a moderate Governor temporarily halts an execution, raising huge questions about capital punishment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper is known for a lot of things - his cheery nature, his <a href="http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2013/03/15/hickenlooper-marijuana-not-guns-is-the-concern/92703/">self-promoted</a> "quirkiness," his beer-brewing background, his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/governor_or_big_oil_spokesman/">loyalty to his oil and gas donors</a> - but he is not known for being a particularly courageous conviction politician. After all, much of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/how_to_turn_your_state_liberal/">high-profile change that has happened in Colorado</a> has come not from his strong leadership, but from the Democratic-controlled legislature forcing his hand.</p><p>But in a stunning <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23299865/nathan-dunlap-temporary-reprieve-from-governor">announcement</a> today, Hickenlooper displayed a burst of genuine courage rarely seen anywhere in politics, much less in Colorado's ultra-cautious Democratic Party culture. Facing the decision of whether to execute convicted murderer Nathan Dunlap for his role in 1993's infamous Chuck E. Cheese killings, Hickenlooper used a temporary reprieve order for Dunlap to raise huge questions surrounding the death penalty itself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/hickenlooper_strikes_major_blow_to_death_penalty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/hickenlooper_strikes_major_blow_to_death_penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go away, 2016 presidential obsession!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media fixate on the presidential race while sequester cuts fester and real questions about Libya go unanswered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter that Sen. Rand Paul can’t even spell Hillary Clinton’s name right <a href="https://twitter.com/SenRandPaul/status/332857889498742784">on Twitter</a>, as he insists the Benghazi killings mean she "should never hold high office again.” No matter that the former secretary of state isn’t officially seeking high office again. Despite it all, everyone is<em> positive</em> that Paul is running for president against Clinton, and so his trip to Iowa this week is big news.</p><p>So was Chris Christie's lap band surgery; it’s <em>obvious</em> what that means. Joe Biden tells Rolling Stone he spends four to five hours a day with President Obama -- we all know <em>why</em>. The attempted rehabilitation of George W. Bush was all about the presidential ambitions of his brother Jeb. Sen. Marco Rubio’s immigration reform proposals are covered almost exclusively in terms of what they mean for his 2016 chances, not for U.S. immigration policy. And the White House schemes of freshman Sen. Ted Cruz, instead of being a laughable footnote in stories about his radicalism, are instead headline news everywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary in the (White) House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We elected a black man. Are we ready to elect a woman?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" /></a><br /> I DREAM of Iowa.</p><p>Hillary Clinton has just made her first public appearances since resigning as Secretary of State, and I am enthusiastic about her presumed candidacy; it’s making me dream of Iowa. I long to go there to work on electing the first woman president.</p><p>I watched Barack Obama there last November at the final stop of his final campaign, just before midnight on the chilly evening before election day in Des Moines, the crowd of 20,000 strong doing call and response along with our president. “Fired up!” “Ready to go!”</p><p>This is not post-racial America, despite what some would try and have us believe. This is still racist that-nigger-messed-up-the-country America and I am crying from true joy to think that 20,000 mostly white folks are out there in Iowa — in Iowa! — for our president. For Barack Obama. For a black man. A black man! (I don’t believe that Iowans are any more likely to be racist than the rest of us, but the heartland of America is not the first place that jumps to mind when I think of racial progress.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton &#8220;should never hold high office again&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul argued that "too many questions remain unanswered" about Benghazi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an op-ed for <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/10/the-moment-of-responsibility-for-hillary-clinton/?page=all#pagebreak">The Washington Times</a>, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., set the stage for a potential 2016 match-up against Hillary Clinton by attacking her handling of the Benghazi attacks, writing that "The new evidence we have today — and that continues to mount — suggests that at the very least, Mrs. Clinton should never hold high office again."</p><p>Paul referenced his contention at a Senate hearing earlier this year that he would have "relieved her of her position" if he was in office and learned that she did not read cables asking the State Department for more security at the U.S. consulate in Libya:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove super PAC attacks Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new video from American Crossroads targets Clinton for her handling of the Benghazi attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new video from the Karl Rove-linked super PAC American Crossroads attacks Hillary Clinton for the State Department's handling of the attacks in Benghazi, asking why Clinton "blamed protesters" and videos, instead of terrorists. "Was she part of a coverup?" the video asks.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DqFtEtpy9G8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is revolution coming to the U.S.?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They tend to come in waves, triggered by wars and anti-system protests. It can happen here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the third revolutionary wave hit the U.S. next? The revolutions in today’s world are getting ever closer to America.</p><p>Revolutions tend to occur in waves, triggered by the aftermath of wars, like the world wars, or by revolutions in leading countries, like the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848. In the last generation, there have been four regional waves of revolution. With the end of the Cold War, communist regimes were swept from power from Eastern Europe to Central Asia, surviving only in a few countries including China, North Korea and Cuba. Unable to justify themselves with the pretense of fighting communism, military dictatorships were swept away in Latin America. Then the Arab Spring triggered a wave of populist if not necessarily democratic revolutions against autocracies in North Africa and the Middle East.</p><p>Are we seeing a new wave of revolutionary politics in the heartland of the industrial West? Although governments are not being violently overthrown in Europe, political systems are being destabilized by the rise of anti-system movements opposed to the major establishment parties. In Greece, the leftist Syriza party and the far-right Golden Dawn have sapped power from the political center. The most recent Italian election was dominated by anti-system candidates, including Silvio Berlusconi and the comedian Beppe Grillo.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a big fracking setback got overlooked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A potential 2016 contender softens his pro-fracking stance, citing unsettled science. So why is it being ignored?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an oft-rumored 2016 presidential candidate, a regular subject of obsequious profiles in the <a href="http://www.5280.com/magazine/2012/08/happy-shrewdness-john-w-hickenlooper?page=0,2">local</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/magazine/09Hickenlooper-t.html?pagewanted=all">national</a> press (including in <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/13/130513fa_fact_lizza">this week's New Yorker</a>), and the chief executive of one of the biggest fossil fuel states in America, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's declarations about environmental issues carry weight. And so his stunning admission late last week is, indeed, big news in how it so definitively proves that political money buys hostility toward environmental science.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie&#8217;s weighty secret</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten days after telling a former White House doctor to “shut up” about his weight, the governor had lap-band surgery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there was something remarkable about <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/why_chris_christie_wont_be_president/">New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s furious outburst</a> at former White House doctor Connie Mariano last February, after she suggested to CNN that his evident obesity was “a time bomb,” and that she hoped he would slim down for the sake of his health.</p><p>“I’m a Republican. I like Chris Christie. I want him to run. I just want him to lose weight,” Mariano said. “I’m a physician more than I’m a Democrat or Republican. And I’m worried about this man dying in office.” The White House doctor under George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, Mariano revealed that she helped Clinton lose 30 pounds, and suggested Christie could be helped, too.</p><p>“If he can overcome this disease, he deserves the White House,” the doctor later told the Newark Star-Ledger. “He’s a tough SOB. And all of us really like him because he’s refreshingly honest. He’s no BS-er. … I want him to lose weight so he can win the office.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>