<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > 2016 Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/2016_elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Go away, 2016 presidential obsession!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media fixate on the presidential race while sequester cuts fester and real questions about Libya go unanswered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter that Sen. Rand Paul can’t even spell Hillary Clinton’s name right <a href="https://twitter.com/SenRandPaul/status/332857889498742784">on Twitter</a>, as he insists the Benghazi killings mean she "should never hold high office again.” No matter that the former secretary of state isn’t officially seeking high office again. Despite it all, everyone is<em> positive</em> that Paul is running for president against Clinton, and so his trip to Iowa this week is big news.</p><p>So was Chris Christie's lap band surgery; it’s <em>obvious</em> what that means. Joe Biden tells Rolling Stone he spends four to five hours a day with President Obama -- we all know <em>why</em>. The attempted rehabilitation of George W. Bush was all about the presidential ambitions of his brother Jeb. Sen. Marco Rubio’s immigration reform proposals are covered almost exclusively in terms of what they mean for his 2016 chances, not for U.S. immigration policy. And the White House schemes of freshman Sen. Ted Cruz, instead of being a laughable footnote in stories about his radicalism, are instead headline news everywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary in the (White) House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We elected a black man. Are we ready to elect a woman?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" /></a><br /> I DREAM of Iowa.</p><p>Hillary Clinton has just made her first public appearances since resigning as Secretary of State, and I am enthusiastic about her presumed candidacy; it’s making me dream of Iowa. I long to go there to work on electing the first woman president.</p><p>I watched Barack Obama there last November at the final stop of his final campaign, just before midnight on the chilly evening before election day in Des Moines, the crowd of 20,000 strong doing call and response along with our president. “Fired up!” “Ready to go!”</p><p>This is not post-racial America, despite what some would try and have us believe. This is still racist that-nigger-messed-up-the-country America and I am crying from true joy to think that 20,000 mostly white folks are out there in Iowa — in Iowa! — for our president. For Barack Obama. For a black man. A black man! (I don’t believe that Iowans are any more likely to be racist than the rest of us, but the heartland of America is not the first place that jumps to mind when I think of racial progress.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton &#8220;should never hold high office again&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul argued that "too many questions remain unanswered" about Benghazi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an op-ed for <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/10/the-moment-of-responsibility-for-hillary-clinton/?page=all#pagebreak">The Washington Times</a>, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., set the stage for a potential 2016 match-up against Hillary Clinton by attacking her handling of the Benghazi attacks, writing that "The new evidence we have today — and that continues to mount — suggests that at the very least, Mrs. Clinton should never hold high office again."</p><p>Paul referenced his contention at a Senate hearing earlier this year that he would have "relieved her of her position" if he was in office and learned that she did not read cables asking the State Department for more security at the U.S. consulate in Libya:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove super PAC attacks Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new video from American Crossroads targets Clinton for her handling of the Benghazi attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new video from the Karl Rove-linked super PAC American Crossroads attacks Hillary Clinton for the State Department's handling of the attacks in Benghazi, asking why Clinton "blamed protesters" and videos, instead of terrorists. "Was she part of a coverup?" the video asks.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DqFtEtpy9G8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is revolution coming to the U.S.?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They tend to come in waves, triggered by wars and anti-system protests. It can happen here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the third revolutionary wave hit the U.S. next? The revolutions in today’s world are getting ever closer to America.</p><p>Revolutions tend to occur in waves, triggered by the aftermath of wars, like the world wars, or by revolutions in leading countries, like the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848. In the last generation, there have been four regional waves of revolution. With the end of the Cold War, communist regimes were swept from power from Eastern Europe to Central Asia, surviving only in a few countries including China, North Korea and Cuba. Unable to justify themselves with the pretense of fighting communism, military dictatorships were swept away in Latin America. Then the Arab Spring triggered a wave of populist if not necessarily democratic revolutions against autocracies in North Africa and the Middle East.</p><p>Are we seeing a new wave of revolutionary politics in the heartland of the industrial West? Although governments are not being violently overthrown in Europe, political systems are being destabilized by the rise of anti-system movements opposed to the major establishment parties. In Greece, the leftist Syriza party and the far-right Golden Dawn have sapped power from the political center. The most recent Italian election was dominated by anti-system candidates, including Silvio Berlusconi and the comedian Beppe Grillo.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a big fracking setback got overlooked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A potential 2016 contender softens his pro-fracking stance, citing unsettled science. So why is it being ignored?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an oft-rumored 2016 presidential candidate, a regular subject of obsequious profiles in the <a href="http://www.5280.com/magazine/2012/08/happy-shrewdness-john-w-hickenlooper?page=0,2">local</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/magazine/09Hickenlooper-t.html?pagewanted=all">national</a> press (including in <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/13/130513fa_fact_lizza">this week's New Yorker</a>), and the chief executive of one of the biggest fossil fuel states in America, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's declarations about environmental issues carry weight. And so his stunning admission late last week is, indeed, big news in how it so definitively proves that political money buys hostility toward environmental science.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/how_a_fracking_setback_got_overlooked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie&#8217;s weighty secret</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten days after telling a former White House doctor to “shut up” about his weight, the governor had lap-band surgery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there was something remarkable about <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/why_chris_christie_wont_be_president/">New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s furious outburst</a> at former White House doctor Connie Mariano last February, after she suggested to CNN that his evident obesity was “a time bomb,” and that she hoped he would slim down for the sake of his health.</p><p>“I’m a Republican. I like Chris Christie. I want him to run. I just want him to lose weight,” Mariano said. “I’m a physician more than I’m a Democrat or Republican. And I’m worried about this man dying in office.” The White House doctor under George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, Mariano revealed that she helped Clinton lose 30 pounds, and suggested Christie could be helped, too.</p><p>“If he can overcome this disease, he deserves the White House,” the doctor later told the Newark Star-Ledger. “He’s a tough SOB. And all of us really like him because he’s refreshingly honest. He’s no BS-er. … I want him to lose weight so he can win the office.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/chris_christies_weighty_secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul will never be president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/rand_paul_will_never_be_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/rand_paul_will_never_be_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George McGovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be a viable White House contender, you have to be within your party’s mainstream on public policy. He's not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul, president of the United States of America? Unlikely at best.</p><p>Paul the Younger hasn’t disguised the plain fact that he’s running for the 2016 Republican nomination for president; he’s already begun making appearances in early primary and caucus states, and this week he started <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/article/347241/rand-machine-ramps">putting in motion the machinery for a presidential campaign</a>.  It’s always possible he won’t be running in 2016 – but for now, he’s certainly running for 2016.</p><p>And yet … Rand Paul faces very long odds. Perhaps not quite as long as his father did in his numerous presidential runs, but long enough.</p><p>There are basically two questions to ask about whether someone would be a viable candidate for a major party nomination. First, a candidate must have conventional qualifications. Paul certainly clears that hurdle, although not all that impressively. By 2016, he’ll be finishing up a full Senate term. That’s a little more than Barack Obama had (presumably Obama’s state legislative service meant little on this score). It’s more than Mitt Romney, a one-term governor, had. It’s the same number of years as George W. Bush, although Bush had the added qualification of having been reelected. So there’s no real barrier there.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/rand_paul_will_never_be_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/rand_paul_will_never_be_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite in a potential Dem primary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows Clinton has a huge lead over other potential Democratic opponents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891">Quinnipiac University</a> finds that Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite to win in a potential 2016 Democratic primary field. If she doesn't run, Biden is the frontrunner by a significant margin.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Ms. Clinton would get 65 percent of Democratic votes compared to 13 percent for Vice President Joe Biden, 4 percent for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and 1 percent or less for Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. If Clinton is not in the race, Biden would get 45 percent, with 15 percent for Gov. Cuomo, 6 percent for, Gov. Patrick, 3 percent O'Malley and 2 percent for Warner.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz will never be president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Costa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breathless staffers say he’s got 2016 plans, but the Tea Party bully will never win a national election. Bank on it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2012 election cycle I occasionally ran stories declaring that various Republicans being touted as White House material “will never be president.” <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/sarah_palin_president/">Sarah Palin </a>after her narcissistic Gabby Giffords meltdown; <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/newt_gingrich_will_never_be_president/">Newt Gingrich</a> early in his race-baiting campaign; <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt_romney_will_never_be_president/">Mitt Romney</a> after his British Olympics screw-up.</p><p>I batted 1.000 for that cycle, but it was easy. In 2016, Republicans won’t be facing a Democratic incumbent, so somebody has a shot. I recently wrote that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/why_chris_christie_wont_be_president/">New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie</a> will never be president, due to his out-of-control anger issues, but candidly, I think that’s my riskiest one yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>265</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo disputes report about not challenging Hillary in 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The only discussions I’m having are about how to help the state," he said ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo disputed a New York Post <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/">report</a> that he decided he will not to run for president in 2016 if Hillary enters the race. “There is no truth to the assertion that I’m talking presidential politics and strategy and what Hillary Clinton should do or shouldn’t do or what I’m doing presidentially,” Cuomo told WCNY on Monday, the New York Observer's <a href="http://politicker.com/2013/04/cuomo-shoots-down-latest-report-on-his-presidential-ambitions/">Politicker</a> blog reports.</p><p>“The only discussions I’m having are about how to help the state, how to get the state running, how to make the government a better government,” he conitnued. “And to the extend I’m focusing on politics, it’s my race next year.”</p><p>“I understand the press appeal of presidential politics,” Cuomo added. “But no, I’m doing what I’m doing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/cuomo_disputes_report_about_not_challenging_hillary_in_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Cuomo won&#8217;t run if Hillary does</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Governor reportedly decided he has no chance in 2016 if Clinton runs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has reportedly decided not to run for president in 2016 if Hillary Clinton enters the race, according to the New York Post.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/if_hillary_is_running_for_prez_out_dkbcdkHXOK19hRsJYXL6fK">Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“The governor has told people in recent weeks that there’s not a chance for him to run if Hillary gets in the race because she’ll easily wrap up the Democratic nomination,’’ said a Cuomo administration insider with direct knowledge of the situation.</p> <p>“He knows that and he accepts that, and so he won’t even be thinking at all in those terms — unless Hillary decides not to run, which seems unlikely,’’ the source continued.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/report_cuomo_wont_run_if_hillary_does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush is right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Known for her candor, the former first lady says Jeb shouldn’t run -- because “we’ve had enough Bushes.” Correct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We heard it repeatedly during the 2012 campaign and its sad aftermath for the GOP: The party’s silver lining was its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-leadership/post/the-republican-partys-deep-bench-of-rising-stars/2012/09/04/37bae364-f696-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_blog.html">“deep bench”</a> of <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/top-10-republican-presidential-contenders-for-2016-20121106">2016 contenders</a>. Paul Ryan and Chris Christie, Marco Rubio and Rand Paul, Bobby Jindal and Scott Walker -- they were younger than Mitt Romney; they brought racial and ethnic diversity; Christie would bring a little ideological diversity, too, coming from the almost extinct wing of Northeastern Republicans. 2016 promised to be a bracing, exciting battle for the new soul of the party.</p><p>So I’ve found it a sad commentary on GOP rebuilding that there’s been so much talk this week about the likelihood and desirability of a Jeb Bush candidacy. And apparently one influential Republican, his mother, Barbara, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/jeb-bush-2016-barbara-bush-90623.html#ixzz2RUyDQi1A">agrees with me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush on Jeb: &#8220;We&#8217;ve had enough Bushes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former First Lady said she doesn't want her son to run for President]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former First Lady Barbara Bush says that though she thinks Jeb Bush is a strong candidate for the presidency in 2016, she doesn't want him to run. "We've had enough Bushes," she said on "The Today Show."</p><p>"He's by far the best qualified man, but no," she <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/296067-barbara-bush-weve-had-enough-bushes">continued</a>. "I really don't. I think it's a great country, there are a lot of great families, and it's not just four families or whatever. There are other people out there that are very qualified, and we've had enough Bushes."</p><p>Bush added that she doesn't think Jeb, the former governor of Florida, will run: "He's the most qualified, but I don't think he'll run."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal kills controversial tax plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since announcing the plan, Jindal's approval ratings in Louisiana have dropped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal scrapped a plan to replace income and corporate taxes with a new sales tax, following public outcry and a precipitous drop in his approval ratings.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/jindal_gives_up_on_tax_swap_pl.html#incart_big-photo">New Orleans Times-Picayune</a> reports that Jindal announced that he will pull his plan in a speech opening this year's legislative session, telling state lawmakers that he will not "pout" or "take his ball and go home." From the Times-Picayune:</p><blockquote><p>The speech is a major concession that Jindal's proposal, a complicated plan contained in a total of 11 bills, is unpopular both within and outside the Legislature. The proposal has come under increasingly heavy fire in recent weeks as business groups and advocates for the poor have assailed its effects and think tanks have questioned whether the math in the proposal adds up.</p> <p>Jindal acknowledges the strong opposition to the proposal in his prepared remarks.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One thing we don&#8217;t know about Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/hillary_2016_and_the_mark_penn_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/hillary_2016_and_the_mark_penn_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did she learn any lessons from 2008?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton made her first public speech since leaving the State Department last night, <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/too-early-2016-not-hillary-clintons-fans#.UVt9ia8y9QM.twitter">addressing the Vital Global Leadership Awards at the Kennedy Center.</a> She did not say she is running for president in 2016. But this week, at least, she seems very much like she is. A super PAC staffed in part with former Clinton campaign aides <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/02/hillary-clinton-president-super-pac-website/2046861/">is up and running and sending out press releases.</a> Clinton made a show of support for gay marriage in a Human Rights Campaign video, and will make <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/02/hillary-clinton-set-for-reemergence-on-public-stage/">a whole host of speeches at venues across the country</a> over the next few months. (She's on the lucrative private speaking circuit as well.)</p><p>There is a series of clichéd caveats you have to get through when you write about this stuff: 2016 is a long ways away. Making predictions is an invitation to mockery in a few years' time. At this point in 2006, the 2008 election was supposedly going to pit Mark Warner against George Allen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/hillary_2016_and_the_mark_penn_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/hillary_2016_and_the_mark_penn_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Hillary group presses supporters for pledges</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/hillary_clintons_unofficial_2016_campaign_kicks_off_today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/hillary_clintons_unofficial_2016_campaign_kicks_off_today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Group supporting Clinton for president asks for cash and hits cable news. "We can't let another day go by"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.readyforhillary.com/">Friends of Hillary PAC</a>, the official unofficial political action committee pushing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to run for president in 2016, went live today, blasting out an email to supporters asking that they take a "pledge to help put Hillary in the White House."</p><p>Clinton has publicly divulged no plans to run and has no formal political operation -- so the PAC is <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/04/hillary_clinton_running_for_president_her_diehard_fans_and_loyalists_have.html">hoping to fill the void</a>, calling itself the "nation's premier organization urging" Clinton to run. Chairwoman Allida Black wrote to supporters today:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/hillary_clintons_unofficial_2016_campaign_kicks_off_today/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/hillary_clintons_unofficial_2016_campaign_kicks_off_today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Walker hires torture apologist to ghostwrite campaign book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/scott_walker_hires_torture_apologist_to_ghostwrite_campaign_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/scott_walker_hires_torture_apologist_to_ghostwrite_campaign_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen will collaborate with the Wisconsin governor on a book in preparation for 2016]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is going to try to be president now. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/343881/walker-writing-book-former-bush-adviser-robert-costa">Robert Costa reports that Walker is "collaborating on a book with Marc Thiessen, a former chief speechwriter for President George W. Bush."</a> It's not like a sci-fi robot murder mystery that takes place in the distant future on Ganymede, either: It is an <em>I would like to be president</em> sort of book, "with stories about his family, his values, and his rise to power." It will probably be boring.</p><p>But just because it will be a boring book doesn't mean that its existence isn't interesting.</p><p>Thiessen is a very poor Washington Post opinion columnist who wrote a book in which he strung together a series of distortions in support of the thesis <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2010/03/29/100329crbo_books_mayer?currentPage=all">that torture is great.</a> Before the book and the column gig, he was a speechwriter for George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. (Before <em>that</em>, Thiessen spent six years as a spokesperson and "policy adviser" to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/26/weekinreview/ideas-trends-the-quotations-of-chairman-helms-race-god-aids-and-more.html">unreconstructed white supremacist</a> Sen. Jesse Helms, which is another thing that should effectively <a href="http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/07/conservatives-a.html">bar him from participating in civilized society.</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/scott_walker_hires_torture_apologist_to_ghostwrite_campaign_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/scott_walker_hires_torture_apologist_to_ghostwrite_campaign_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove: GOP&#8217;s 2016 candidate &#8220;could&#8221; back gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/karl_rove_gops_2016_candidate_could_back_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/karl_rove_gops_2016_candidate_could_back_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I could" imagine the Republican candidate supporting same-sex marriage, Rove said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a discussion on ABC News' "This Week" of the Supreme Court's upcoming decision on Proposition 8 and DOMA, Karl Rove said that he could envision the 2016 Republican presidential candidate backing gay marriage.</p><p>“Can you imagine the next presidential campaign a Republican candidate saying flat out ‘I am for gay marriage,’” host George Stephanopoulos asked Rove.</p><p>"I could," he replied.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=4LP3GL3J8TCLN5VC&amp;content_type=content_item&amp;layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;widget_type_cid=svp&amp;read_more=1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="420" height="421"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/karl_rove_gops_2016_candidate_could_back_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/karl_rove_gops_2016_candidate_could_back_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
