<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ever-changing ideologies of Jane Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Roe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norma McCorvey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new profile of Norma McCorvey reveals the complicated woman behind the historic abortion ruling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four decades ago, she was known as Jane Roe. She was already a mother, and when she became pregnant again she fought, all the way to the Supreme Court, for the right to terminate. And though that eventual decision came too late for her to act upon it, it changed reproductive freedom in this country -- and has been hotly fought over ever since. But Norma McCorvey has long made it clear she isn't the patron saint of abortion. And <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/01/commoditization-norma-mccorvey-jane-roe-wade">in a new profile in Vanity Fair</a> to mark the 40th anniversary of Roe v<em>.</em> Wade, she emerges as the most contradictory of figures, a woman who has built a career around disavowing her role in a history-making case.</p><p>McCorvey wasn't interviewed for Joshua Prager's profile. "I almost forgot i have a one thousand dollar fee," she texted him when he requested to speak to her. And when he declined to pay, she replied, "Then we wont speak." Why should she, when being Jane Roe has been her job? It's a job that has exasperated pro-choice activists and been exploited by the far right. Just last summer, "legitimate rape" expert Todd Akin erroneously cited her example as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/todd_akin_blame_law_order/">"false claims like those made in Roe v<em>.</em> Wade."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_ever_changing_ideologies_of_jane_roe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan, Virginia pass backdoor abortion restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transvaginal ultrasound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governors in Michigan, Virginia sneak in a New Year surprise when no one was looking: Abortion restrictions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Friday before the long  holiday weekend, the Republican governors of Michigan and Virginia snuck in a little New Year's surprise for the women of their states, quietly signing abortion legislation that helped make 2012 the second most restrictive year for reproductive rights.</p><p>In Michigan, Rick Snyder <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/29/us-usa-abortion-michigan-idUSBRE8BS00N20121229">signed</a> a bill passed by the lame-duck Senate -- the same one whose anti-union legislating dominated headlines in recent weeks -- requiring clinics that perform more than 120 abortions a year to become surgical outpatient facilities, a level of licensing intended to be onerous and put clinics out of business. He also approved a bill that purports to screen for women being coerced into abortions.</p><p>Snyder did veto another bill limiting insurance coverage in private employee plans, which would have required purchase of a separate abortion rider. He objected to that on the grounds that rape victims would have to pay out of pocket if they didn't buy the rider, and because, "As a practical matter, I believe this type of policy is an overreach of government into the private market." Overreach of government into other realms, of course, is another matter entirely. (According to Michigan resident Emily Magner, one legislator <a href="http://www.musingsofalady.com/2012/12/13/michigan-republicans-gone-rogue/">interrupted</a> her to cry, "THIS ISN’T ABOUT WOMEN! THIS IS ABOUT PROTECTING FETUSES!”)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Catholic Church&#8217;s new gay insult</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catholic leaders in the U.S. and U.K. may keep on speaking out against gay marriage. But they can't fight progress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been a busy past few weeks for the Catholic Church and its muckety-mucks. There was the pope's holiday message insisting that gay marriage is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_popes_hateful_christmas_message/">a threat to world peace and an "attack" on the family. </a>Then, Ireland's Cardinal Sean Brady used the death of a pregnant woman in a Galway hospital – and subsequent galvanizing outcry — as an excuse to urge his nation's Catholics to insist on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/">preservation of rights for the "innocent."</a> And finally, in one last little outburst of vituperation before the year ran out, Italian priest Piero Corsi posted a rant on a bulletin board of his church, blaming women for <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/27/us-italy-priest-idUSBRE8BQ0E020121227 ">"provoking the worst instincts, which then turn into violence and sexual abuse,"</a> adding, "The core of the problem is in the fact that women are more and more provocative, they yield to arrogance, they believe they can do everything themselves and they end up exacerbating tensions." But lest you think the men in black now intend to ease off on the crazy talk for the winter, it looks instead like they're just getting warmed up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_catholic_church_continues_their_anti_gay_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 was a banner year for antiabortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the war on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard mourdok]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States passed 43 provisions restricting abortion last year, and zero to improve women's access to reproductive care]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2012/statetrends42012.html" target="_blank">policy review</a> released by the Guttmacher Institute, 2012 saw the second-highest number of abortion restrictions ever enacted. The ranking comes as little surprise in a year when politicians like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock became household names, and one of the House's staunchest antiabortion members got second billing on the Republican presidential ticket.</p><p>During the year, 19 states enacted 43 provisions to restrict access to abortion services, whether mandating invasive ultrasounds, blocking health insurance coverage, shuttering women's health clinics or limiting access to the morning-after pill and contraception. The record for most restrictions was set in 2011 with 92.</p><p>The worst offenders? Arizona ranked No. 1, enacting seven antiabortion restrictions, and Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin followed close behind with at least three restrictions each.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Catholic Church&#8217;s angry Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savita Halappanavar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the pope denounces gay marriage, in a bizarre holiday message, the Church goes on the attack for "life"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the holidays this year, the Catholic Church chose to give the world the gift of bizarre, alienating and utterly missing the point rhetoric. Oh, you shouldn't have! We already got one of those <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/keep_your_guns_out_of_my_school/">from the NRA! </a></p><p>First, Pope Benedict XVI used his annual holiday message to the Vatican to denounce gay and lesbian progress as a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_popes_hateful_christmas_message/">"manipulation of nature" and an "attack"</a> on the family. Now, Cardinal Sean Brady, the Primate of all Ireland, has used the galvanizing death of a pregnant woman in a Galway hospital as an excuse to <a href="http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/republic-of-ireland/cardinal-sean-brady-calls-for-campaign-against-abortion-16254392.html">double down on anti-abortion rhetoric</a>. Guys, maybe next year you could ask Santa for a sense of timing and a pair of ears that aren't tone-deaf.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_catholic_churchs_angry_christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economist makes the gun debate look absurd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British publication says only drastic change in the law would make a difference]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein has an <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273989-feinstein-doesnt-have-concealed-carry-permit-anymore">F rating</a> from the NRA. It makes you wonder what the NRA would rate a politician who proposed an assault weapons bill that doesn’t <a href="http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=28d0c499-28ec-42a7-902d-ebf318d46d02">protect gun owners</a> by “exempting more than 900 specific hunting and sporting weapons.” For a rough comparison, try to imagine if staunchly pro-life Senators favored federally financed abortions on demand during the first trimester of pregnancy.</p><p>Feinstein has not released all of her proposed bill’s specifics but in her short, remarkable press release it appears closely modeled on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/is_this_an_assault_weapon/">federal assault weapons ban</a> that was in effect from 1994 until 2004. Feinstein finds “A Justice Department study found the Assault Weapons Ban was responsible for a 6.7 percent decline in total gun murders. However, since the 2004 expiration of the bill, assault weapons have been used in at least 459 incidents, resulting in 385 deaths and 455 injuries.” In other words, after a national trauma that supposedly changed the debate, an anti-gun Senator can only argue for a bill that might reduce gun murders by 6.7 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/the_economist_makes_the_gun_debate_look_absurd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas&#8217; abortion drug bill: More side effects and higher costs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers are pushing outdated FDA rules on abortion drugs, worrying health care advocates and medical experts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A GOP lawmaker is looking to make Texas the latest state to restrict the use of abortion medications in a way that some experts warn could increase the drugs’ side effects while making them more expensive.</p><p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a></p><p>Anti-abortion activists and legislators can’t enact an outright ban on abortion-inducing drugs like mifepristone (formerly known as RU-486). Instead, they have sought to force doctors to strictly adhere to U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines that appear to be significantly out of step with the current scientific understanding of how the medications should be used.</p><p>Lawmakers have passed abortion drug restrictions in Arizona and Ohio, overcoming legal challenges. The Oklahoma Supreme Court recently <a href="http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/12/oklahoma-high-court-strikes-down-state-abortion-laws.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ruled</a> that similar legislation in that state was unconstitutional. A North Dakota bill is currently tied up in litigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How feminism caused Sandy Hook, according to the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those on the right who would blame the tragedy on anything but guns see women as the problem -- not the heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogged wish of many on the right to make the tragic Sandy Hook shooting about anything but guns means that it has to be about other things -- ideally, things they already do not like. Things like feminism, abortion or anything else that contributes to the oppression of white men, of which, you’ll note, murderous rampager Adam Lanza was one. And when it came to the last point, solipsism was not limited to the right. Here, a guide to the lowlights.</p><p><strong>Blame Obamacare and abortion. </strong>We heard, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/huckabee_blames_gays_for_the_newtown_massacre/">early out of the gate,</a> from Mike Huckabee, who didn’t wait for the funerals to start blaming the liberal banishment of God from schools and government, including “tax-funded abortion pills,” by which the Personhood proponent meant birth control. “We dismiss the notion of natural law and the notion that there are moral absolutes and seemed amazed when some kids make it their own morality to kill innocent children. We diminish and even hold in contempt <a href="http://mikehuckabee.com/mike-huckabee-news?ID=70415326-e438-41e4-9972-467097d2029f&amp;buffer_share=45810&amp;utm_source=buffer">the natural family of a father and mother </a>creating and then responsibly raising the next generation and then express dismay that kids feel no real connection to their families or even the concept of a family.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Dobson blames gays, abortion for shootings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/james_dobson_blames_gays_abortion_for_shootings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/james_dobson_blames_gays_abortion_for_shootings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Dobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus on the Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Focus on the Family founder James Dobson says God "allowed judgment to fall upon us" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Dobson, the founder of the social conservative Focus on the Family, joined <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/huckabee_blames_gays_for_the_newtown_massacre/">Mike Huckabee</a> and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/fischer-god-didnt-stop-ct-school-shooting-because-hes-gentleman-who-doesnt-go-where-he-not-w">Bryan Fischer</a> in blaming the shootings in Newtown, Conn., on Americans who have "turned our back on God," and embraced abortion and gay marriage.</p><p>Via <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/dobson-connecticut-shooting-was-god-allowing-judgment-fall-upon-us-turning-our-back-him">Right Wing Watch</a>, Dobson said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/james_dobson_blames_gays_abortion_for_shootings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/james_dobson_blames_gays_abortion_for_shootings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans&#8217; new Todd Akin moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanne Shaheen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are considering killing a measure that would give raped female soldiers free access to abortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there’s one thing this election taught us, it’s that fighting against abortion in the case of rape should be avoided at all costs. And yet, Republicans may come back for another serving of Todd Akin’s humble pie.</p><p>Right now, if you’re a woman in the military, which has startlingly high rates of sexual assault, and you get raped, you face the added insult of having to pay for an abortion out of your own pocket. That’s because the military's health insurance plan is the only one in the federal government that does not cover abortion in the case of rape or incest. It'll only cover the procedure if the woman's life is in danger</p><p>Democrats in the Senate have tried to change this, but House Republicans have so far resisted, thus producing two different bills -- one with the change and one without. Yesterday, the House named its representatives to a bicameral committee that will hammer out the differences between the two bills, including this provision. While killing the amendment could reignite the explosive abortion and rape debate of the summer, Republicans generally oppose the expansion of reproductive rights, even for raped female soldiers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion deaths wildly underestimated</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savita Halapannavar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternal Mortality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was worldwide news when a woman died in Ireland after being denied an abortion. She was hardly the only tragedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, many have heard the name of Savita Halappanavar, whose death in a Galway hospital this fall was a chilling reminder of how abortion bans can be deadly.</p><p>That case had the benefit of a vocal and angry person to speak on the dead woman's behalf -- her husband, Praveen. He has said she requested a termination that may have saved her life -- but was told, "This is a Catholic country." (An official inquiry by the hospital has yet to be released, and Praveen Halapannavar is <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/1129/breaking33.html">appealing</a> to the European Court of Human Rights.) But for every Savita, there are thousands of women whose names we don't know, women who aren't even counted.</p><p>The most commonly cited statistic suggests that complications from unsafe abortions led to approximately 13 percent of maternal deaths worldwide. That's a World Health Organization figure first arrived at in 2000, which hasn't been re-evaluated. Every year, when WHO says how many women have died from unsafe abortions, they're simply taking the same percentage of the global maternal mortality figure -- 56,000 in 2003, or 47,000 in 2008. But one epidemiologist, Caitlin Gerdts, wondered if that number wasn't a potentially vast understatement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Legislature passes harsh abortion restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/michigan_legislature_passes_harsh_abortion_restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/michigan_legislature_passes_harsh_abortion_restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two bills that would limit abortions move forward in the state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh off passing a right-to-work law and considering a ban on Shariah, the Michigan state Legislature also passed two harsh new measures to restrict abortions in the state.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20121212/NEWS15/121212069/michigan-abortion-bill-senate-approves">Detroit Free-Press</a>:</p><blockquote><p>One bill passed the Senate, 27-10, and calls for more stringent licensing of abortion clinics; the other, passed out of the House insurance committee into the full House, would allow health care providers to refuse service based on moral objections, religious reasons or matters of conscience.</p> <p>Both must be voted on by the full House.</p> <p>Two bills already on Snyder’s desk would limit abortion coverage on policies sold on a statewide health insurance exchange unless consumers purchase it as an add-on. The exchange is a Web-based marketplace where consumers will be able to buy insurance as health care reform takes full effect in 2014.</p></blockquote><p>“Those three issues were our top issues: conscience, insurance and regulation and reform,” Ed Rivet, a spokesman for Michigan Right to Life, told the Free-Press. “That we’re doing them all simultaneously is pretty remarkable."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/michigan_legislature_passes_harsh_abortion_restrictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/michigan_legislature_passes_harsh_abortion_restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;American Horror Story&#8217;s&#8221; coat hanger abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/american_horror_storys_coat_hanger_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/american_horror_storys_coat_hanger_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Horror Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On last night's episode, a pregnant lesbian patient took matters into her own hands]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Television is skittish about abortions. Occasionally, a character will have one — “Grey’s Anatomy’s” Christina Yang <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2011/09/someone_actually_had_an_aborti.html">did last season</a>, to no serious outcry. But miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies and women deciding to keep the baby, even to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7nh0xsrcHs">bring said baby into a zombie-infested post-apocalypse</a>, are far more common. And so too now is a woman giving herself a failed coat-hanger abortion.</p><p>On last night’s “American Horror Story,” in an episode titled “The Coat Hanger,” Sarah Paulson’s character, Lana Winters, a lesbian journalist wrongfully trapped in an insane asylum who had been raped by Dr. Threadson (Zachary Quinto), a serial killer who likes to skin people alive, found out she was pregnant. She tried to give herself an abortion with a coat hanger after the Catholic asylum staff forbade her from having a medically supervised one. Her attempt was bloody and unsuccessful —  but the devil might have had something to do with that. When the show jumped in time to the future, it was revealed that Lana and Dr. Threadson’s child grew up to be just like his daddy, a skin-flaying murderer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/american_horror_storys_coat_hanger_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/american_horror_storys_coat_hanger_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry: My goal is to make all abortion &#8220;a thing of the past&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/rick_perry_my_goal_is_to_make_all_abortion_a_thing_of_the_past/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/rick_perry_my_goal_is_to_make_all_abortion_a_thing_of_the_past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don’t think there is any issue that better fits the definition of 'compelling state interest,'" Perry said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Rick Perry, R-Texas, is pushing state lawmakers to put into place further restrictions on abortion, telling them that "To be clear, my goal, and the goal of many of those joining me here today, is to make abortion, at any stage, a thing of the past."</p><p>In a press conference Tuesday, organized by Texas Right to Life, Perry said that he wants to eliminate all abortion: "While Roe v. Wade prevents us from taking that step, it does allow states to do some things to protect life if they can show there is a compelling state interest. I don’t think there is any issue that better fits the definition of 'compelling state interest' than preventing the suffering of our state’s unborn."</p><p>Laura Bassett of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/11/rick-perry-abortion_n_2279734.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular">HuffPo</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/rick_perry_my_goal_is_to_make_all_abortion_a_thing_of_the_past/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/rick_perry_my_goal_is_to_make_all_abortion_a_thing_of_the_past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal judge rules &#8220;Choose Life&#8221; license plates unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_judge_rules_choose_life_license_plates_unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_judge_rules_choose_life_license_plates_unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Choose Life"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is "viewpoint discrimination" for North Carolina to only offer an antiabortion plate, the judge wrote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judged has banned North Carolina from issuing "Choose Life" license plates, ruling that it is unconstitutional for the state not to offer a pro-choice alternative.</p><p>U.S. District Judge James C. Fox wrote in his ruling that "The State's offering a Choose Life license plate in the absence of a pro-choice alternative constitutes viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment."</p><p><a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-12-10/news/sns-rt-us-usa-abortion-ncarolinabre8b9108-20121210_1_plates-abortion-rights-abortion-debate">Reuters</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The ACLU filed a lawsuit in September 2011 after state legislators approved the "Choose Life" plate but refused to authorize voluntary license plates with abortion rights slogans such as "Respect Choice."</p> <p>The anti-abortion plate was one of approximately 70 new specialty plates approved by the Republican-led legislature and signed into law by Democratic Governor Bev Perdue in June 2011.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_judge_rules_choose_life_license_plates_unconstitutional/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/federal_judge_rules_choose_life_license_plates_unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: On abortion and right-to-work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should women seeking abortions get all the choice, one Twitter user wonders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="278209369588523008"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Republicans just bad at politics?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans want to believe their problem is messaging, not ideas. That's dangerous strategy -- and wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the hand-wringing and soul searching going on in the conservative movement boils down to one fundamental question: Are we bad at selling our policies, or are the policies themselves the problem? This distinction is critical and leads to radically different prescriptions. If the issue is merely in the marketing, then the damage the party sustained a month ago is mostly cosmetic and can be quickly repaired with better messaging and candidates. The alternative, however, calls for rethinking foundational principles -- and is much more painful.</p><p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_republican_crisis_Qa5DtRK4LC6EtswfoLo8mN">John Podhoretz</a> and <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/07/framing-the-debate/">Matt Lewis</a> made the cases for the "just politics" camp in the context of the "fiscal cliff" debate. Democrats, they argue, have deftly outmaneuvered Republicans into spending all their time defending unpopular things that are peripheral to core conservative values. Podhoretz writes in the New York Post that even though Republicans have the superior policy on the Bush tax cuts and the need to cut entitlements, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_republican_crisis_Qa5DtRK4LC6EtswfoLo8mN">they have the inferior “messaging”</a> and have ended up the “the eat-your-vegetables-and-shut-up party” -- noble and responsible, but doomed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/are_republicans_just_bad_at_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly agrees: Roots of the War on Christmas are gay rights and abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just "grouchy misanthropic heathen atheists" who hate Christmas, a Fox News guest says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill O'Reilly agreed with "Imus in the Morning" producer Bernard McGuirk last night that the "roots" of the War on Christmas are not just atheists, but also "abortion and the gay rights agenda, because Christianity is against those things."</p><blockquote><p>MCGUIRK: The war on Christmas is very, very real, and if you ask me, in addition to some grouchy misanthropic heathen atheists it has to do — at the root of it — it has to do with two things — abortion and the gay rights agenda, because Christianity is against those things. It’s subtle but that’s why it’s so pronounced in recent years, in my opinion.</p> <p>O’REILLY: Hundred percent agree. I absolutely agree 100 percent that it's the diminishment of Christianity is the target and Christmas is the vehicle because the secularists know the opposition to their agenda -- legalized drugs is in there as well -- comes primarily from the Judeo-Christian traditionalist people.</p></blockquote><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3lxmQATcWb8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/12/07/1301451/bill-oreilly-blames-fabricated-war-on-christmas-on-fabricated-gay-rights-agenda/">ThinkProgress</a>/<a href="http://www.towleroad.com/2012/12/mcguirk.html">Towleroad</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More babies won&#8217;t save the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/more_babies_wont_save_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/more_babies_wont_save_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of pressuring women to have more children, we should really be investing in the ones we already have ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Ross Douthat, whose enthusiasm for 19th-century views on sexuality can always be counted on, struck again this weekend <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/opinion/sunday/douthat-the-birthrate-and-americas-future.html?_r=0">with another column addressing his favorite concern</a>, the sadly empty uteruses of America. He was roundly criticized by feminists, including the <em>Prospect</em>'s E.J. Graff. He outlined a belief that foolishly letting women decide how many babies they have will lead to American decline. The argument, always claimed to be made more in sorrow than in anger, is that women will simply have to give up on the advantages of limiting child-bearing so that we have enough young people around to take care of us when we’re old.</p><p>Douthat calls for an end to our modern, feminist ways, which he calls "decadent." But I would like to offer a better, more humane solution to the problem of a declining future workforce: Instead of simply flooding the market with babies to buoy the economy, why not invest—with public funds, as a community—in the ones we have to get the same results?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/more_babies_wont_save_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/more_babies_wont_save_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>