<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Acorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/acorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise fast food strike planned in St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Walkout to include workers from McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Follows similar actions in New York and Chicago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the third time in five weeks, non-union fast food workers in a major American city are headed out on strike. Starting at 5 p.m. Central Time today, dozens of employees plan to walk off the job in St. Louis,  following similar strikes in Chicago April 24, and in New York City on Nov. 29 and April 4. Like their counterparts in New York and Chicago, the St. Louis workers are demanding a $15 an hour wage, and the chance to form a union without intimidation.</p><p>“I just feel that if we don’t stand up now, it’s never going to happen,” said Tomecka Wilson, a 32-year-old who works for the seafood chain Captain D’s. “They’re making billions off of us making little to nothing. So they can afford to share a little bit more.”</p><p>Organizers expect 50 to 70 St. Louis workers to strike over the next 24 hours, including workers from McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Hardee’s and Domino’s. The strike got an early start this morning, when a group of workers at a Jimmy John’s went out on strike in protest over alleged humiliation by management: They say their boss required them to wear signs stating that they worked too slowly. “It’s clearly getting national traction,” said Ed Ott, a lecturer in labor studies for the City University of New York, consultant for unions, and board member of New York Communities for Change, the group spearheading fast food organizing in the nation’s largest city. “This is potentially the largest organizing drive in decades.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food workers plan surprise strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Workers in some 70 restaurants expected to walk off job, potentially shutting down several eateries today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 12:11 p.m.</strong>: The Fast Food Forward campaign says hundreds of workers are now out on strike, and that they are on track to have 400 strikers, from about 70 stores, by the end of the day. At least one store was unable to open for lack of employees this morning. Local politicians, including at least three mayoral candidates - City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Comptroller John Liu, and Public Advocate Bill de Blasio - are expected to rally with the fast food workers. Striking workers are currently converging at a Wendy's in Midtown Manhattan, a Wendy's in Brooklyn, and a Burger King in Harlem. At 5:30 PM, strikers and supporters will gather in Harlem's Marcus Garvey Park and march to a McDonald's store for the day's largest event.</p><p>Asked for comment on the strike, spokespeople for McDonald's and the National Restaurant Association referred Salon to their statements from yesterday. In an e-mailed statement, de Blasio said, "Fast Food Forward is fighting for solutions for working people right here and now, and it deserves the support of all New Yorkers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election fraud felony charges dropped for Virginia Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/voter_fraud_charges_dropped_for_virginia_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/voter_fraud_charges_dropped_for_virginia_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did conflicts of interest by Republican A.G. Ken Cuccinelli and prosecutor Marsha Garst play a role in dismissal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>       This piece originally appeared on <strong><a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9948">The Brad Blog</a></strong>.</em></p><p>Given the professed concerns about election fraud among Virginia Republicans, it seems somewhat astonishing that the man at the center of the Commonwealth's most notorious fraud scandal last year seems to be getting off the hook after initially being charged with 13 criminal counts including eight felony charges.</p><p>Colin Small, a Republican Party voter registration supervisor who secretly tossed filled-out voter registration forms into a dumpster last year, had all of his felony charges dropped by the local Republican Commonwealth attorney prosecuting the case yesterday.</p><p>Small was <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9643">arrested and charged with 13 counts</a> -- including destruction and disclosure of voter registrations, as well as obstruction of justice -- in Harrisonburg, Va., in the run-up to the presidential election last year, after he was seen by a local shopkeeper throwing away a bag of registration forms behind his store. Small's felony charges were all dropped on Tuesday, <a href="http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/Felony-Charges-Dropped-for-Man-Accused-of-Throwing-Away-Voter-Registration-Forms-201118571.html">according to local Fox affiliate WHSV</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/voter_fraud_charges_dropped_for_virginia_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/voter_fraud_charges_dropped_for_virginia_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Keefe partner pays $50K to fired ACORN worker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/okeefe_partner_forced_to_pay_50k_to_fired_acorn_worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/okeefe_partner_forced_to_pay_50k_to_fired_acorn_worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannah Giles forks over sum to same secretly taped former ACORN worker that partner paid $100K last week (UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican activist Hannah Giles agreed to pay $50,000 to former San Diego ACORN worker Juan Carlos Vera as a part of a legal settlement struck last summer in response to an invasion of privacy lawsuit filed against her and her former partner James O'Keefe, Vera's attorney Eugene Iredale has confirmed to <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/">the BRAD BLOG</a>.</p><p>Last week, in a <a href="http://wonkette.com/505026/wonket-sexclusive-totally-blameless-crime-stopper-james-okeefe-to-pay-100000-to-acorn-criminal">scoop by the website Wonkette</a>, it was disclosed that O'Keefe, a <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7860">federal criminal</a>, agreed to pay $100,000 in his own legal settlement with the same former ACORN employee, after heading up the scheme to secretly videotape him in violation of California's Invasion of Privacy Act (<a href="http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/632.html">Cal. Penal Code Â§ 632</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/okeefe_partner_forced_to_pay_50k_to_fired_acorn_worker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/okeefe_partner_forced_to_pay_50k_to_fired_acorn_worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe to pay $100K over ACORN sting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/james_okeefe_to_pay_100k_over_acorn_sting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/james_okeefe_to_pay_100k_over_acorn_sting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative prankster settles with a former ACORN employee for $100,000 and apologizes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative provocateur James O'Keefe has agreed to pay $100,000 and apologize to a former ACORN employee who was fired after being portrayed in one of O'Keefe's undercover video stings.</p><p>The ACORN sting was one of O'Keefe's first and most successful operations, leading to a congressional prohibition on federal funding for ACORN that caused the group to collapse. But Juan Carlos Vera, a former employee whom O'Keefe and accomplice Hannah Giles secretly filmed in a California ACORN office, said the tape violated a state law against recording someone without their permission, so <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/james-okeefe-lawsuit-acorn_n_1782949.html">he sued the two conservative sting artists</a>.</p><p>Giles <a href="http://www.sdcitybeat.com/sandiego/article-10785-hannah-giles-settles-acorn-suit.html">settled this summer</a>, but the suit against O'Keefe is still in federal court.</p><p>Now, according to <a href="http://wonkette.com/505026/wonket-sexclusive-totally-blameless-crime-stopper-james-okeefe-to-pay-100000-to-acorn-criminal">documents obtained by Wonkette</a>, Vera has agreed to drop the case against O'Keefe in exchange for $100,000 and acknowledgment from O'Keefe that the video did not include the fact that Vera had called the police during the sting. <a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/148088292">The settlement</a>, dated Wednesday, adds that O'Keefe “regrets any pain suffered by Mr. Vera or his family.” He has 30 days to pay up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/james_okeefe_to_pay_100k_over_acorn_sting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/james_okeefe_to_pay_100k_over_acorn_sting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP tries to defund nonexistent ACORN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/house_gop_tries_to_defund_non_existent_acorn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/house_gop_tries_to_defund_non_existent_acorn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hal Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Appropriations Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short-term budget bill features a provision to strip funding from the now-defunct group]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though ACORN has been shut down for some time, House Republicans are still trying to defund it.</p><p>A provision in a short-term budget bill introduced by the House Appropriations Committee would cut funding to the group, which advocated for low-income families, but was stripped of all federal funding in 2009 and shut down in 2010.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/acorn-gop-budget-bill_n_2810345.html?1362489640">Huffington Post</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Nevertheless, Section 510 of the latest legislation, introduced by House Appropriations Chair Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), reads: "None of the funds made available in this Act may be distributed to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) or its subsidiaries or successors."</p> <p>Jennifer Hing, a spokeswoman for the committee, said the line was "a typical provision that is included in most appropriations bills."</p></blockquote><p>ACORN, short for the Alliance of Community Organizations for Reform Now, was a repeated target of Republicans, particularly conservative gadfly James O'Keefe. But, as Zach Carter of HuffPo writes, "Independent investigations by the California attorney general, the Massachusetts attorney general and the Brooklyn, N.Y. district attorney would later clear ACORN of criminal wrongdoing, and an investigation by the Government Accountability Office would clear ACORN of charges that it mishandled federal funds."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/house_gop_tries_to_defund_non_existent_acorn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/house_gop_tries_to_defund_non_existent_acorn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP voter form scandal spreads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/gop_voter_form_scandal_spreads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/gop_voter_form_scandal_spreads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suspicious registration forms have now been found in 10 Florida counties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problematic voter forms have now been found in 10 Florida counties,<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/30/us/politics/suspicious-voter-forms-found-in-10-florida-counties.html"> reported</a> the New York Times Sunday. The forms are linked to Strategic Alliance Consulting, a group that was hired by the state Republican Party to sign up new voters, but was fired last week as reports of suspicious forms first surfaced in numerous Florida counties.</p><p>The Times reports:</p><blockquote><p>The Florida Division of Elections has forwarded the reports of possible fraud to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for investigation. Prosecutors in some affected counties are also investigating. It is unclear how many forms have been forwarded, in all: in Palm Beach County, the election supervisor found 106 suspicious forms, but the number in several other counties is far lower...</p> <p>... Election supervisors said they have come across forms with handwriting that did not match previous registration forms, bogus addresses and other identifiers like driver’s license numbers that appeared to be invalid. But in other cases, the forms were just incomplete, which does not constitute fraud.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/gop_voter_form_scandal_spreads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/gop_voter_form_scandal_spreads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s ACORN moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Republican consulting firm allegedly commits voter registration fraud. Where's the right-wing outrage this time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still plenty of conservatives who think ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama and <a href="http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/will-this-devious-group-steal-your-vote/">will do it again this year</a>. ACORN was everywhere four years ago. Even John McCain, late in his campaign and desperate to land a blow on Obama, ran <a href="http://youtu.be/NZ9eelAl5tw">an ad</a> tying his challenger to the community-organizing group before saying in the final debate that ACORN "is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6049529&amp;page=1">maybe destroying the fabric of democracy</a>.” How did ACORN steal the election? A number of the group’s paid canvassers had been caught submitting false voter registration forms in a handful of states, using the names of dead people or false addresses, in order to avoid working.</p><p>Four years later, ACORN is dead, and a Republican firm contracted by the Republican National Committee has adopted its shady tactics. But, so far at least, there’s been hardly a peep from the same conservatives who seized on ACORN about one of their own engaging in almost identical fraudulent tactics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three ways the GOP&#8217;s disenfranchised voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13006709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the party's tactics can be reversed. Many of them can't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party’s war on Democratic voting blocks is like a game of three-dimensional chess in which their strategies are intended to remain dormant until Election Day, and in the following days when votes are officially counted.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> But their game plan is simple. They want to discourage voters by complicating every step for new and existing voters from specific blue cohorts, such as students, poor people and minorities. They’ve adopted new laws or rules that target pathways surrounding polling place voting, while keeping voting by mail—a longtime GOP strategy—free from similar rules. And they are spreading fears that there will be vastly more policing of the process to scare away voters, when in reality that’s not likely to be the case.</p><p>While most of the GOP’s voter suppression strategies are designed to erupt in November, it is now possible to identify at least three major areas where hundreds of thousands of likely Democratic votes have already been thwarted—and where steps to reverse that process, if possible, must be taken soon before fall voter registration deadlines kick in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/three_ways_the_gop_has_disenfranchised_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe violates election law to prove liberals violate election law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/12/james_okeefe_violates_election_law_to_prove_liberals_violate_election_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/12/james_okeefe_violates_election_law_to_prove_liberals_violate_election_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12117821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notorious hidden camera clown commits voter fraud in New Hampshire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James O'Keefe (remember him? weird guy who's always filming himself doing unethical and occasionally illegal things in order to somehow prove that liberals do unethical and illegal things?) has broken the law again, in his never-ending quest to prove that liberals have no respect for the rule of law. The conservative filmmaker and master of disguise <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/11/james-okeefe-voter-fraud-video_n_1200208.html">attempted to commit voter fraud in the New Hampshire primaries.</a></p><p>"Voter fraud" is <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">a right-wing obsession</a> used to justify restrictive ballot access-limiting measures that are actually designed to suppress turnout among people who tend to vote for Democrats. It does not and <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2272405/">cannot exist</a> in anything approaching a large enough scale to affect an election, and even <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam/">isolated incidents</a> of fraud prove difficult for right-wingers to dredge up to prove that their concerns have merit. Dozens of people have spent years tirelessly attempting to prove that organized "voter fraud" is a real thing and all they have ever managed to prove is that sometimes lazy volunteers make fake registration forms, sometimes former felons mistakenly vote despite being disenfranchised, and sometimes people double-vote. There is nothing remotely resembling coordinated voter fraud, carried out with the intention of stealing an election, taking place anywhere in the United States. Those who sincerely believe that there is are deluded, though most of the people who constantly crow about it don't sincerely believe in it; they just want to make it harder for blacks and Latinos and poor people to vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/12/james_okeefe_violates_election_law_to_prove_liberals_violate_election_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/12/james_okeefe_violates_election_law_to_prove_liberals_violate_election_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>338</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional &#8220;voter fraud&#8221; troll now preemptively predicting fake voter fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/hans_fraud_weprin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/hans_fraud_weprin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/12/hans_fraud_weprin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former Bush lawyer with a history of hyping up phony fraud threats sounds the alarm on tomorrow's NY-9 election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans A. von Spakovsky wants you to know that if Democrat David Weprin pulls it out and wins the special election tomorrow for the congressional seat vacated by Anthony Weiner, Weprin will have won this longtime Democratic district through voter fraud. So, you know, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276915/watch-out-voter-fraud-new-york-ninth-hans-von-spakovsky">just be prepared!</a></p><p>Polls show Republican Bob Turner slightly leading, so obviously any result other than a Turner victory means ACORN paid homeless people to vote 100 times under false names. "Will [close polls] tempt some locals to resort to the kind of voter fraud that Kings County and Brooklyn are infamous for?" asks former Fulton County, Georgia Republican Party head Hans A. von Spakovsky, who is apparently unaware that "Kings County and Brooklyn" is redundant.</p><p>Spakovsky suspects imminent voter fraud because some people listed on the registration rolls have moved or died:</p><blockquote> <p>A source within the Turner camp tells me the campaign sent a letter and campaign literature to all the voters on the permanent list maintained by the Board of Elections who are automatically mailed absentee ballots. They have received hundreds of pieces of returned mail marked &#8220;address unknown&#8221; or &#8220;return to sender&#8221; and at least five marked &#8220;deceased.&#8221;</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/hans_fraud_weprin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/hans_fraud_weprin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing hack says helping poor people vote is criminal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/voting_vadum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/voting_vadum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/02/voting_vadum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew Vadum attacks those who help "nonproductive segments of the population" participate in democracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days after Rolling Stone <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">posted Ari Berman's very good piece</a> on how the GOP campaign against ACORN and "voter fraud" is actually just part of a coordinated effort to stop minorities and poor people from voting at all, right-wing "investigative journalist" Matthew Vadum has now <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/09/registering_the_poor_to_vote_is_un-american.html">explicitly endorsed disenfranchising poor people</a> for the sole reason that they're poor and will vote for people who will do things to alleviate their poverty. It is positively Swiftian, if Jonathan Swift had been an actual cannibal.</p><p>The piece is published at the hilariously named "American Thinker" site, because Vadum is too dimwitted even for the Examiner or a Breitbart site or the Washington Times or Human Events or any of the other homes of the conservative movement's lesser talents.</p><p>Here is your pull quote:</p><blockquote> <p>Welfare recipients are particularly open to demagoguery and bribery.</p> <p><strong>Registering them to vote is like handing out burglary tools to criminals.</strong> It is profoundly antisocial and un-American to empower the nonproductive segments of the population to destroy the country -- which is precisely why Barack Obama zealously supports registering welfare recipients to vote.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/voting_vadum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/voting_vadum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Battle for Brooklyn&#8221;: In breaking news, Goliath beats David</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Takes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Battle for Brooklyn" follows a bitter, racially tinged urban development fight -- but it's also a love story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the movies, when David fights Goliath, we generally know who's going to win. In real life, of course, it tends to be the other way around, as the compact and fascinating documentary <a href="http://battleforbrooklyn.com">"Battle for Brooklyn"</a> demonstrates. Compressing a seven-year civic struggle over a massive redevelopment project in the center of Brooklyn, N.Y., into 93 minutes, Michael Galinsky and Suki Hawley's film spins a compelling tale about the value of individual and collective resistance, even as it makes clear where power in our society really resides. Along the way, "Battle for Brooklyn" tells the story of a love affair and a new family, and reminds us that even billionaires are not omnipotent.</p><p>No doubt "Battle for Brooklyn" will be of most interest to New Yorkers, and particularly to people who live or work in the city's most populous borough. But the film's basic situation -- local residents and community activists vs. the development schemes of major politicians and big business -- is an archetypal element of urban life, one that can be found in almost any city, large or small, from Maine to California. What distinguished kazillionaire developer Bruce Ratner's plan to remake the center of "America's fourth-largest city" (to borrow the boosterish phrase of Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz) was primarily its size and audacity, along with the fact that the ensuing battle turned very ugly and inevitably attracted the attention of the national media, much of which is headquartered a few miles away across the East River.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media ready to embrace Andrew Breitbart again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/breitbart_msm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/breitbart_msm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/07/breitbart_msm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reminder to the mainstream press that trusting Mr. BigGovernment.com will get you burned again, soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is happening again! The press is aiding in the reputation-rehabilitation of an unstable, manic, self-aggrandizing right-wing provocateur with a history of botched attack jobs and a fungible personal interpretation of "truth," because they love a comeback story. Sure, the last time everyone began treating Andrew Breitbart as something other than a sideshow performer, they all got burned, but hey, this Weiner thing held up! That means he has been vindicated, about everything, and it is time to defund ACORN again.</p><p>The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/07/nyregion/andrew-breitbart-a-blogger-looks-for-legitimacy.html?_r=1&amp;hp">has one of those stories</a> that doesn't actually say anything about how Breitbart is desperately seeking legitimacy and validation from the MSM that he has also supposedly dedicated his career to overthrowing. Breitbart <a href="http://mrctv.org/videos/andrew-breitbart-talks-matt-lauer-about-rep-weiner">had a sit-down with Matt Lauer</a> this morning to explain that he feels sorry for Weiner but still might release the really dirty picture. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/breitbart-boosts-cred-with-weiner-confession/2011/06/07/AGDMp9KH_video.html">"Breitbart boosts cred with Weiner confession,"</a> CBS reports. I realize the objective press doesn't see it this way, but one shouldn't win and lose "credibility points" like chips at a blackjack table. One is credible if one is credible, and the fact that an unreliable source is sometimes correct doesn't make that source suddenly trustworthy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/breitbart_msm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/breitbart_msm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issa demands Holder probe ACORN, other issues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/02/us_republicans_attorney_general/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/02/us_republicans_attorney_general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/02/us_republicans_attorney_general</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP's House investigator wants the attorney general to study ACORN, New Black Panther Party, and Wikileaks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican's top House investigator has a suggestion for Attorney General Eric Holder: Step it up or step down.</p><p>California Rep. Darrell Issa (EYE'-suh) says Holder is hurting the Obama administration because the Justice Department isn't doing more to investigate several issues.</p><p>Issa -- who's set to lead the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee -- says the department hasn't done enough concerning the activities of the now-defunct community group ACORN,  as well as a 2008 incident of alleged voter intimidation in Philadelphia involving the New Black Panther Party and those behind the WikiLeaks releases.</p><p>Issa tells "Fox News Sunday" that Holder should either stop hurting the administration or leave it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/02/us_republicans_attorney_general/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/02/us_republicans_attorney_general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing voter fraud obsession leads to tens of criminal charges</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives call for widespread intimidation of minority voters to solve a non-existent problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worrying about "voter fraud" is a convenient way for Republicans and conservatives to practice voter intimidation and old-fashioned suppression of minority voters without drawing as much negative attention as, say, an outright poll tax would. In truth, there is hardly any "voter fraud," and even if it was as rampant as they pretend, it wouldn't actually <em>work.</em>, as <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2272405/">Christopher Beam explains today.</a> (For it to swing an election, it would require the participation of a ridiculous number of people willing to commit a felony, including, in the fevered conservative imagination, illegal immigrants willing to risk deportation in order to support Harry Reid.)</p><p>The Bush administration dedicated itself to fighting this imaginary menace of voter fraud, either because conservatives have deluded themselves into believing it a legitimate problem or just to, again, throw minorities off voter rolls. But in five years <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all">they managed 86 convictions</a>, some of which were accidents and all of which were incredibly small-scale.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/voter_fraud_scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s planned sexual harassment &#8220;prank&#8221; goes awry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/james_okeefe_cnn_sex_boat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/james_okeefe_cnn_sex_boat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/29/james_okeefe_cnn_sex_boat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative activist planned to secretly film himself "seducing" a CNN reporter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After his success destroying ACORN, a lobbying and community organizing group for poor people, James O'Keefe was hailed as a right-wing hero, a crusading muckraker for a new generation of conservative journalists. Except he is actually a dumb clown, as he proved when he was arrested for sneaking into Sen. Mary Landrieu's office while pretending to be with "the phone company." His latest backfiring stunt is even stupider, and makes even less sense: He attempted to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/09/29/okeefe.cnn.prank/">lure a female CNN reporter onto a sex boat</a>, of some kind... to embarrass <em>her?</em> <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" height="374" id="ep" width="416"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&amp;videoId=us/2010/09/28/boudreau.okeefe.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="374" src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&amp;videoId=us/2010/09/28/boudreau.okeefe.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/james_okeefe_cnn_sex_boat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/james_okeefe_cnn_sex_boat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now reopen Breitbart&#8217;s ACORN fraud &#8212; and get the story right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/acorn_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/acorn_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/07/21/acorn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sherrod's case parallels deceptions used in that other big smear -- and offers a chance to restore lost standards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former USDA official Shirley Sherrod, a dedicated public servant innocent of the prejudice and misconduct falsely imputed to her, deserves justice. As soon as the White House and Tom Vilsack restore her job, with an appropriate apology, they will begin to remove a stain of cowardice from their administration. But while that may be all the government can do, it isn&#8217;t sufficient to close this case.</p><p>Real justice, as I suspect Sherrod would agree, also requires due process for Andrew Breitbart, the Internet impresario who framed her on his Big Government website. In these circumstances, that means a fair, thorough and tough examination of the media fraud that launched his operation last year: the ACORN tapes, whose misuse by Breitbart closely parallels his behavior in the Sherrod affair.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/acorn_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/acorn_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shame of right-wing &#8220;journalism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/the_tragedy_of_right_wing_journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/the_tragedy_of_right_wing_journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/07/20/the_tragedy_of_right_wing_journalism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart and Tucker Carlson distort facts to smear liberals, and it works. What liberals should learn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It pains me to pay attention to the work of the Daily Caller, Tucker Carlson's vanity project, as Carlson vies to compete with Andrew Breitbart on the right-wing "investigative journalism" frontier. What Carlson's "journalism" has in common with Breitbart's (besides being ethics-free) is blowing up stories that purport to "expose" the left with what are supposed to be the left's own words &#8212; except that later, it will turn out that "the left's own words" will have been hyped, manipulated and selectively edited, and that the story was baloney.</p><p>Today <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/07/20/shirley_sherrod_breitbart/index.html">a big Breitbart "scoop" blew up in his angry face</a>, when it was shown that the Big Journalism proprietor selectively edited a clip of an African-American USDA official seeming to admit she treated a white farmer poorly out of her own racial bias. It turns out that Shirley Sherrod was actually telling the story to show how the issue of race often obscures the issue of class, and the fact that poor black farmers and poor white farmers had a lot in common (eventually, she helped and became close to the white farmer and his family) &#8212; but Breitbart left all of that out of the video (just as he selectively and unfairly edited his cartoonish ACORN tapes).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/the_tragedy_of_right_wing_journalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/21/the_tragedy_of_right_wing_journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>282</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN hoax victim files lawsuit against O&#8217;Keefe and Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/14/acorn_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/14/acorn_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/07/14/acorn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falsely portrayed as promoting teenage prostitution in the ACORN videotapes, Juan Carlos Vera is seeking damages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many victims of Andrew Breitbart&#8217;s ACORN video hoax is finally striking back in court, against pseudo-pimp James O&#8217;Keefe and pseudo-ho Hannah Giles if not Breitbart himself. Former San Diego ACORN office employee Juan Carlos Vera, who was falsely portrayed in a heavily edited videotape as conspiring with O&#8217;Keefe and Giles to traffic underage girls across the Mexican border, <a href="http://lastblogonearth.com/2010/07/09/acorn-worker-sues-okeefe-and-collaborators/">is suing&#160;both of the right-wing filmmakers</a>, seeking $75,000 in damages under California&#8217;s privacy statutes.</p><p>Filed &#160;last week in the U.S. District Court in San Diego, Vera&#8217;s <a href="http://sdcitybeat.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/okeefe111.pdf">brief complaint</a> claims that O&#8217;Keefe, Giles and up to 20 unnamed parties violated his "reasonable expectation of privacy" by conspiring to secretly videotape him and then posting the tapes on the Internet without his consent, causing him to lose his job and other damages. Indeed, as the complaint notes, the "pimp and prostitute" explicitly asked Vera whether their conversation would be confidential.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/14/acorn_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/14/acorn_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
