<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > ADP jobs report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/adp_jobs_report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The big surprise in the ADP jobs report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP jobs report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wingers expected a low number because of a change in how it counts jobs. They didn't get what they wanted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tale of two surprises: One little, one big.</p><p>The payroll processing company ADP reported that private sector employers <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/adp-jobs-report-2012-11">added 158,000 jobs in October.</a> That's the little surprise: The consensus estimate of economists was that ADP would report around 125,000 new jobs. That's not a great number, but it is in line with what we've been seeing in recent months: confirmation of a slow recovery in the labor market.</p><p>But here's the tricky part. On Wednesday, ADP announced that it was <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/10/updates-to-adp-employment-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29">rejiggering its methodology</a> for counting jobs. This was long overdue -- ADP's goal, every month, is to come up with a number that ends up close to what the government reports  on the first Friday of every new month. But in the past, ADP's numbers have been a terrible guide to what the BLS reports -- often coming in much higher, or far lower.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
