<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Sullivan to leave the Daily Beast, taking The Dish with him</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_to_leave_the_daily_beast_taking_the_dish_with_him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_to_leave_the_daily_beast_taking_the_dish_with_him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blog will adopt a metered-pay system, relying solely on readers for funding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Sullivan, the preeminent blogger whose platform, the Daily Dish, has been hosted by Time, the Atlantic and, currently, the Daily Beast, is making his boldest move ever: taking the site solo, hoping that readers will pay for content directly. The former New Republic editor and <a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_sullivan/">Salon columnist</a> announced today that he, along with the Dish's executive editors, Patrick Appel and Chris Bodenner, has signed an agreement forming Dish Publishing LLC, an independent publishing company that will continue to run the Dish without the use of advertising revenue or venture capital.</p><p>The move is a gamble that he hopes will one day become the norm within the journalism industry. Recalling the old advertising adage, "If you're not paying for the product, you are the product being sold," <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2013/01/a-declaration-of-independence.html">he wrote in the announcement</a>, "we felt more and more that getting readers to pay a small amount for content was the only truly solid future for online journalism."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_to_leave_the_daily_beast_taking_the_dish_with_him/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_to_leave_the_daily_beast_taking_the_dish_with_him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chick-fil-A&#8217;s latest horror</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/chick_fil_as_latest_horror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/chick_fil_as_latest_horror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chick-fil-A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversial fast-food chain publishes a children's book loaded with half-truths about farms and animals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my son enters the so-called Terrible Twos, I've become keenly aware of one thing that makes them so terrible: awareness. After 24 months outside the womb, kids slowly but surely start becoming cognizant of what they have, what they don't have -- and what they want. At this point, too, kids begin more fully processing how the world works -- or at least what the world is telling them about how the world works.</p><p>Advertisers obviously know all of this. They not only know that kids will go full-on terrible in annoying their parents into buying stuff they realize they want, but also that two-year-olds are already starting to develop their own future preferences. Hence, when my son hears the discrete piano tune and Ed Harris' soothing voice on the radio and then cheerily shouts "Home Depot," it is a sign that he is already equating home projects with the local-business-crushing orange Godzilla -- just as that Godzilla's marketing team hopes. Same thing for the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/juggle/2012/12/10/how-to-have-the-happy-meal-talk/">Happy Meal</a>, whose child-focused marketing equates junk food with emotive joy and cheap toys -- a terrible-yet-irresistible combination for a two-year-old.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/chick_fil_as_latest_horror/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/chick_fil_as_latest_horror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Targeted ads coming to TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/predictive_ads_coming_to_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/predictive_ads_coming_to_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gracenote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ready for TV ads customized to your age, sex and income? Too late]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for TV that watches you back.</p><p>As targeted advertising has fueled the growth of internet giants like Google and Facebook, the $70 billion TV commercial market has remained in the dark. Sure there are beer ads during the Super Bowl, but to a far greater degree than on the internet, advertisers just pay for their spots and hope to find a receptive audience. That could change next year with the debut of a new technology from Gracenote, a division of Sony.</p><p>TechCrunch <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/26/gracenote-tv-targeted-ads/">reports</a>, “<a href="http://www.gracenote.com/solutions/">Gracenote</a>‘s new ad replacement system combines viewing habits with personal info to show you more relevant commercials.” While some consumers will undoubtedly appreciate a technology that delivers ads for things they're more likely to buy—reporter Josh Constine writes “I literally left my meeting with company giddy with the possibilities” – some blowback about personal data collection is probably inevitable, like the last gasps of a defeated army.</p><p>Constine describes the technology as follows:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/predictive_ads_coming_to_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/predictive_ads_coming_to_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An online privacy invader gets caught</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impotent? Infertile? Bankrupt? Online advertisers want to know, and they'll break the law to find out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News from the privacy wars: The Federal Trade Commission and Epic Marketing, an online ad network, have settled <a href="http://ftc.gov/os/caselist/1123182/121205epiccmpt.pdf">charges</a> that Epic was secretly and illegally gathering information on the browsing history of Web users, a practice known as "history sniffing" or "history stealing."</p><p>And not just any kind of history. Epic was specifically looking for people who had visited websites searching for information on "fertility issues, impotence, menopause, incontinence, disability insurance, credit repair, debt relief, and personal bankruptcy." Epic divided these people up into "interest groups" and targeted advertisements to them. So if, for example, you Googled "impotence" and visited a few Web pages with relevant information, the next time you checked out CNN.com you might suddenly be assaulted by a slew of Viagra and Cialis advertisements.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How consumer brainwashed are you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perfect marketing campaign: A free game app that tests our recognition of corporate branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For his 15th birthday, I gave my son an iPod Touch, a piece of technology that would have seemed like the purest magic to me when I was his age. He likes it, a lot, and I like to watch him use it a lot, because paying attention to how teenagers interact with modern consumer technology is an endlessly fruitful way to learn about where the intersecting forces of capital and entertainment will push society next. But even with long experience at this voyeuristic style of technology journalism, I was a little taken aback when I saw what he was doing with his new favorite toy last Sunday.</p><p>He was playing <a href="http://aticod.com/portfolio/logosQuiz/">Logos Quiz,</a> a game that is based primarily on the ability to identify corporate logos.</p><p>I was appalled and amazed. We've all become quite used to product placement in our entertainment, to living in a world in which TV shows like, say, "Hawaii 5-0" don't even try to hide their primary function as vehicles for Victoria's Secret and Microsoft Surface marketing campaigns. But to make the ability to recognize a brand into the product itself -- that's pure genius. A 15-year-old's attention span in 2012 is perhaps the most fickle thing to ever exist on this planet -- to see my son trying to guess whether a certain squiggle signified BMW or Mercedes Benz was astonishing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 disturbing trends in junk food advertising for children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bribing kids with toys and convincing them to eat a “fourth meal" are just a couple of the industry's tricks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Ever wonder why one-third of all children in the United States are overweight, if not dangerously obese? According to a slew of recent reports, the cornucopia of junk food advertising to children plays a substantial role in creating this public health crisis. From bribing children with toys and sweepstakes to convincing them to eat a “fourth meal,” the industry is glutted with examples of perverse, profit-chasing schemes to capitalize on children’s appetites at the expense of their long-term health. Here are 7 most perverse trends in junk food advertising to children.</p><p><strong>1. Bombarded!</strong></p><p>Junk food marketing to children and adolescents has become billion-dollar industry. According to 2006 data, the most recent numbers available, kids experience at least $1.6 billion worth of food advertising a year--the vast majority of the ads geared toward pushing high-calorie and low-nutrition snacks down kids’ throat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: Sporting goods ad moved from daytime TV in Norway for being &#8220;stupid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/weird_news_sporting_goods_ad_moved_from_daytime_tv_in_norway_for_being_stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/weird_news_sporting_goods_ad_moved_from_daytime_tv_in_norway_for_being_stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird news of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the commercial aired on prime-time television, viewers took to Facebook to complain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Facebook commenters called its commercial "stupid and provocative," XXL, a Norwegian sporting goods company, has rescheduled the zombie commercial to air only after 9 p.m. on Norway's television networks.</p><p>Translated into English from the company's <a href="https://www.facebook.com/xxlnorge?fref=ts">Facebook page</a>, using Bing Translator:</p><blockquote><p>Our advertising agency did extensive research before we landed to make a commercial with references from the zombie genre. To remove the "scary truth" they have deliberately used the daylight throughout the film, entertaining rock recording history rather than creepy music, and we have a hint of a little boy on the scooters that overcomes stupid zombies etc. We also have seasoned with what we believe is a large dollop of humor.</p></blockquote><p>Watch the "stupid" commercial, below:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9709095/Norway-bans-zombie-advert-from-daytime-TV-for-being-stupid.html">Telegraph</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/weird_news_sporting_goods_ad_moved_from_daytime_tv_in_norway_for_being_stupid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/weird_news_sporting_goods_ad_moved_from_daytime_tv_in_norway_for_being_stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives flip out over Lena Dunham Obama ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/conservatives_flip_out_over_lena_dunham_obama_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/conservatives_flip_out_over_lena_dunham_obama_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13053228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Girls" creator makes a flirty Obama ad and drives the right so batty they compare her to the Russian strongman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lock up your virgins! There's a dark-skinned, middle-aged man coming for them! And in other breaking news, archconservatives have absolutely no sense of humor.</p><p>In a completely typical clip from the creator of "Girls," <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/can_lena_dunham_be_a_bossypants/">Lena Dunham</a> winkingly talks to young women about "your first time" and how important it is to do with "a guy who really cares." Cares about health insurance. Birth control. Ending war. "You don't want a guy who says, 'Oh hey, I'm at the library studying' when really he's out not signing the Lilly Ledbetter Act," she explains, "or who thinks that gay people should never have beautiful, complicated weddings of the kind we see on Bravo and TLC all the time." As Dunham says, it's "super uncool" not to vote, and that's why she supports voting for Barack Obama.</p><p>It's a cute, sincere spot, addressed to young women and spoken in the vernacular of a young woman. Nobody even gets an abortion or smokes crack. Cue right-wing freakout. Take for example the Right Scoop, which not only denounced the Dunham ad as "disgusting," but gasped that Vladimir Putin once launched a similar appeal to college-aged ladyfolk. <a href="http://www.therightscoop.com/disqusting-new-obama-ad-asks-who-would-you-rather-do-it-with-obama-or-romney/">"Ugh,"</a> writes the expectedly anonymous blogger who posted the clip.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/conservatives_flip_out_over_lena_dunham_obama_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/conservatives_flip_out_over_lena_dunham_obama_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expedia&#8217;s perfect same-sex marriage ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/expedias_perfect_same_sex_marriage_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/expedias_perfect_same_sex_marriage_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A wedding spot shows just how far travel can take you ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a travel ad with a twist. In Expedia's lovely, leisurely "Find Yours" spot, a dad prepares to take a jaunt to California to attend his daughter's wedding. And as we follow his journey from his home to the reception, we watch a man who admits he's got some father-of-the-bride issues to work through — especially because he's grappling with the fact that his daughter is marrying another woman.</p><p>Expedia's been running its "Find Yours" campaign — featuring real travelers on their adventures — since July. A blogger goes to Mexico on a voyage that moves her into <a href="http://youtu.be/5npClDquTCA ">a life of public service</a>, while a father bonds with his toddler <a href="http://youtu.be/V_Iijlg1vmk">on an amusement park ride</a>. Travel, Expedia dares to say as it shows a fan cheering for his team, can help you find "your religion." It can, it says as it shows a somber man at the Vietnam memorial, help you find "your gratitude." This is not lightweight, beachy stuff. It's a bold rebranding of the traditional sales pitch of travel, one that promises it not as escape from life but a meaningful journey straight into its most essential purpose: connection. And in one of the most illuminating examples of that, in a three-minute ad that's garnered over 2 million views since it debuted earlier in October, Artie Goldstein finds his <a href="http://youtu.be/ThzdsnXeE28">"understanding</a>."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/expedias_perfect_same_sex_marriage_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/expedias_perfect_same_sex_marriage_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-tolerance subway ads to hang near anti-Islam posters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/pro_tolerance_subway_ads_to_hang_near_anti_islam_posters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/pro_tolerance_subway_ads_to_hang_near_anti_islam_posters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Subway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Christian group and a Jewish group will unveil their own responses to "savages" ads]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/extra_nypd_reportedly_protect_anti_islam_ads/"> Islamophobic ads, </a>which went up around New York subway stations last week, two religious groups (one Jewish, one Christian) are taking out ads to urge tolerance.</p><p>The original anti-Islam ad read, "In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad." The posters from the Jewish group Rabbis for Human Rights will directly counter this message with the slogan, "In the choice between love and hate, choose love. Help stop bigotry against our Muslim neighbors."</p><p>The New York Times<a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/04/pro-muslim-subway-ads-to-hang-near-anti-jihad-ads/?smid=tw-share"> reported Thursday:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/pro_tolerance_subway_ads_to_hang_near_anti_islam_posters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/pro_tolerance_subway_ads_to_hang_near_anti_islam_posters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Score one for the breast-feeders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/it_gets_better_for_moms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/it_gets_better_for_moms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luvs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luvs diapers' controversial new ad campaign is a triumph for mothers who breast-feed in public]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pretty blonde at the restaurant knows exactly how to deal with the waiter whose eyes are fixed on the area below her neckline. "Yeah, hey," she tells him, her fingers directing his gaze toward hers. "Up here." Best diaper ad ever.</p><p>It's the most attention-getting spot in Luvs' recent witty campaign on the triumph of the maternal experience, and a mainstream victory for nursing moms. Tied to a piece of Nielsen data that revealed that second-time mothers are more likely to buy the brand, the Luvs series features a quartet of evolutionary "first and second" baby experiences, including a horrified <a href="http://youtu.be/D8wwfsCBZVg">adventure in temperature-taking</a> and a fumble through <a href="http://youtu.be/tJJdizpZVls ">a public restroom diaper change</a>. But it's the lady who transforms from the shy new mother hiding her baby under a blanket and gazing apologetically around the room into the confident veteran who can look at her infant and crack, "She's already ordered," while her toddler issues a "Got a problem with that?" stare who's the standout. Sure, that second-timers statistic may be <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/ad-day-luvs-144053">a little skewed</a>, but the other message — that breast-feeding should be no big thing — is rock solid. This week AdWeek praised the spot for its <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/ad-day-luvs-144053">"humor, skill, and grace,"</a> while Jezebel declared it <a href="http://jezebel.com/5947749/public-breastfeeding-is-awesome-says-luvs">"pretty cool."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/it_gets_better_for_moms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/it_gets_better_for_moms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creationists take on Dr. Pepper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/creationists_take_on_dr_pepper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/creationists_take_on_dr_pepper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13011978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pro-evolution Dr. Pepper ad rubs super-serious Facebook fans the wrong way. It's soda, people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you're keeping track of the religious values of the crap you ingest, here's an update: <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/our_chick_fil_a_economy/ ">Chick-fil-A is still conservative</a>, but Dr. Pepper hates God. Well, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/24/kirk_cameron/">the God of Kirk Cameron anyway. </a></p><p>On Thursday, Dr. Pepper posted a new ad on Facebook explaining the <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DrPepper">"evolution of flavor"</a> with a riff on the famous evolution of man illustration that shows how homo got sapien. The ad traces the path from a knuckle dragger through the "Pepper discovery" to the final silhouette of a happy, naked Dr. Pepper drinker. Possibly Prince Harry.</p><p>It's not the cleverest or most original concept the soda brand could have come up with – that evolution trope has been used to sell everything <a href="http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/johnnie-walker-whisky-evolution-6342905/">from alcohol</a> to<a href="http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/veet-hair-removal-cream-evolution-9690255/ "> hair removal cream</a> to <a href="http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/veet-hair-removal-cream-evolution-9690255/">sound systems</a> to <a href="http://www.coloribus.com/adsarchive/prints/bose-sound-system-evolution-2639305/">Whoppers</a>. Yet it was shocking enough to the folks who still haven't read the memo from Darwin to cause an uproar on Facebook.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/creationists_take_on_dr_pepper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/creationists_take_on_dr_pepper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kim Kardashian and Old Navy settle lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/kim_kardashian_and_old_navy_settle_lawsuit_over_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/kim_kardashian_and_old_navy_settle_lawsuit_over_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/kim_kardashian_and_old_navy_settle_lawsuit_over_ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The celebrity sued the retail chain for using a look-a-like model in their advertising campaign last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOS ANGELES (AP) — Kim Kardashian has settled a lawsuit against Old Navy claiming the clothing retailer violated her publicity rights by using a lookalike in an ad.</p><p>Kardashian sued over the spot in July 2011, claiming the company's use of a model who looked like her might confuse consumers about her actual endorsements, which include a clothing store and shoe line.</p><p>No details about the settlement were filed with the court.</p><p>"The lawsuit was resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties," said the reality TV starlet's attorney Gary Hecker, who declined to elaborate.</p><p>A spokesperson for Old Navy parent company The Gap Inc. was not immediately available.</p><p>The lawsuit was over the commercial titled "Super C-U-T-E." The ad began airing in February 2011 and was still being used in some of the company's promotions months later, Kardashian's lawsuit stated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/kim_kardashian_and_old_navy_settle_lawsuit_over_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/kim_kardashian_and_old_navy_settle_lawsuit_over_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate candidate cribs old ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/senate_candidate_cribs_old_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/senate_candidate_cribs_old_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Republican Senate candidate's new ad looks an awful lot like a 2-year-old John Hancock mutual fund ad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have to fill 24 hours a day of airspace with nothing but your Senate campaign, as does former Hawaii Republican Gov. Linda Lingle, who became the first candidate in history to create an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/us/politics/linda-lingle-turns-hawaii-tv-channel-into-24-hour-campaign-ad.html">entire cable network dedicated to her campaign</a>, you need to produce a lot of content. So perhaps it should be forgiven if her new ad bears a striking resemblance to a John Hancock mutual fund ad from 2010.</p><p><a href="http://youtu.be/bbzV8Y_37i4">The new ad</a> portrays an older man sitting silently in a coffee shop screen-left with a laptop, chatting with his wife over instant messenger. The text of their conversation appears on the right side of the screen. The man says he’s worried about Social Security and Medicare. He and his wife agree that Lingle is the best candidate to deal with the programs, as Democratic challenger Mazie Hirono “gets nothing done.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/senate_candidate_cribs_old_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/senate_candidate_cribs_old_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota&#8217;s gender-bending win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/toyotas_gender_bending_win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/toyotas_gender_bending_win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12990608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A car commercial with a twist plays with gender expectations -- and wins]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not the first time a beautiful, bikini-clad model has been used to sell a car. But this one's a little different.</p><p>In a new Japanese Toyota ad, the long-haired 19-year-old Ukrainian Stav Strashko struts toward a car as the camera lovingly follows the model's perfect, red bikini-bottomed butt. A jacket is seductively shed. And then Strashko turns around to reveal – she's a man, baby! Yup, that bare chest is flat, but the bulge in the bikini bottom is not.</p><p>It's a novel twist on the old hot chick advertising trope, and while it may have exactly zero to do with why you should buy a car, it has everything to do with the changing way gender is portrayed in advertising. Strashko is the surprise within the ad but, thankfully, he isn't the punch line of it. This isn't some transphobic BS trying to sell the notion of <a href="http://youtu.be/CmKTnKFzKlU">what makes a "real" woman </a>(apparently it's menstrual blood) or some hardy-har-har challenge to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/16/paddy-power-transgendered-ladies-ad">distinguish the "stallions from the mares"</a> or a joke about how gender identity is something <a href="http://youtu.be/P4sAs-cfWZ0 ">one whimsically takes on and then regrets</a>. In a making-of clip, Strashko says proudly, <a href="http://youtu.be/1EX9_eVJ4ig">"I can't put it in words how excited I am about this commercial and everything I experienced here."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/toyotas_gender_bending_win/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/toyotas_gender_bending_win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misleading advertising on the rise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/22/misleading_advertising_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/22/misleading_advertising_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POM Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sketchers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12989494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four ways the Federal Trade Commission can fight back and protect consumers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, President Obama created the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, a new agency to protect American consumers with the explicit purpose of preventing some of the risky practices that led to the crisis of 2008. It took one of the greatest financial disasters in history to initiate regulatory change. But there were a number of small failures leading up to the disaster that indicated things were going poorly. Had the CFPB existed at any one of these smaller junctures, much of the disaster could have been averted.<br /> <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a></p><p>Today, the United States is at a similar juncture: consumers need additional protection, misleading advertising is on the rise, and the current agency responsible for regulation—the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—is not doing enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/22/misleading_advertising_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/22/misleading_advertising_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: Toilet paper ads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/weird_news_toilet_paper_ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/weird_news_toilet_paper_ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12988049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's come to this]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="yui_3_5_1_21_1345501023779_262">RYE BROOK, N.Y. (AP) — Two brothers from a New York City suburb have an advertising concept that's on a roll — a roll of toilet paper.</p><p id="yui_3_5_1_21_1345501023779_256">Bryan and Jordan Silverman are creators of toilet tissue printed with ads, and sometimes with coupon codes that can be read by cellphones. The Journal-News says in a story Sunday that the brothers expect their product to appear this fall in the Port Chester-Rye Brook Public Library.</p><p id="yui_3_5_1_21_1345501023779_376">Twenty-two-year-old Jordan Silverman came up with the idea for Star Toilet Paper in 2010. His 18-year-old brother tells the newspaper that he was initially skeptical but came to see it as advertising to "a really captive audience."</p><p id="yui_3_5_1_21_1345501023779_266">The brothers from Rye Brook have entered their concept in a contest run by Entrepreneur magazine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/weird_news_toilet_paper_ads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/weird_news_toilet_paper_ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike&#8217;s not abusing fat kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/nikes_not_abusing_fat_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/nikes_not_abusing_fat_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Summer Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12975620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial ad starring an overweight 12-year-old wants to sell sneakers -- but also has an important message]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's become one of the most distinctive ads of the London Olympics. A lone figure in the distance, running down an empty road toward the camera. As he advances, the voice of Tom Hardy tells us that "Greatness – it's just something we made up. Somehow we've come to believe that greatness is a gift reserved for a chosen few. For prodigies. For superstars. And the rest of us can only stand by watching. You can forget that. Greatness is not some rare DNA strand. It's not some precious thing. Greatness is no more unique to us than breathing. We're all capable of it. All of us." By the time Hardy has reeled off his spiel, the figure of greatness is right in front of us. It's a 5-foot-3, 200-pound, 12-year-old kid.</p><p>Nike found Nathan Sorrell when they came to his small Ohio town and put out a call for <a href="http://www.recordherald.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&amp;SubSectionID=1&amp;ArticleID=144055">"a boy with a specific profile."</a> (I'm guessing: husky.) Sorrell is not really a runner. In fact, on the ad's second take, the kid -- who'd eaten his lunch a short time before -- threw up in a ditch. In an interview with his local paper, he said that he and his mother are now trying to lose weight together, and that if they succeed, Nike will return to do another spot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/nikes_not_abusing_fat_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/nikes_not_abusing_fat_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who deserves to die?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/who_deserves_to_die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/who_deserves_to_die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12947745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bold ad campaign aims to destigmatize lung cancer -- by telling animal lovers and crazy aunts they should die]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking: People don't like being told they deserve to die. Yet this week, the Wisconsin ad agency Laughlin Constable launched a national campaign targeting an assortment of groups they say do.</p><p>The images are bold and chilling: Photos of a variety of archetypes, each captioned with similar messages. "Hipsters deserve to die. The tattooed deserve to die. Cat lovers deserve to die. Crazy old aunts deserve to die." The reaction has been immediate and strong. A Utah resident told a local news station, <a href="http://www.abc4.com/content/news/state/story/Controversial-ad-campaign-says-you-deserve-to-die/wtD747okcUynBc-CP57aNA.cspx">"I think it's stupid, as a matter of fact I think it ought to be taken down."</a> In Chicago, a resident called it <a href="http://www.kval.com/news/offbeat/Posters--160075645.html?tab=video&amp;c=y">"very offensive to people who are animal lovers."</a> Across the country, the ads have been torn down.</p><p>But the message behind that attention-grabbing – and incendiary -- campaign is a powerful one. Dig a little deeper, and you'll see it's from the <a href="http://www.lungcanceralliance.org/get-information/am-i-at-risk/what-are-the-risks-for-lung-cancer.html">Lung Cancer Alliance</a>, which explains, "Every year 160,000 lives are lost to a deadly disease. They didn't ask for it, but many people seem to think they deserved it. ... Lung cancer doesn't discriminate, and neither should you."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/who_deserves_to_die/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/who_deserves_to_die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s road sign legends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/americas_road_sign_legends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/americas_road_sign_legends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burma-Shave's rhyming ads turned highway billboards into poetry, and changed advertising -- and America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a>In a simpler time, when automobiles went slower and the pre-Eisenhower highway system in the United States was less developed, there was a popular advertising campaign that ran from 1927 until 1963. It consisted of rhymed messages sequentially staked on the right side of the road, all ending with the advertiser's name, "Burma-Shave."</p><p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/BurmaShave.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-320401" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/BurmaShave.jpg" alt="" width="437" height="351" /></a></p><p>[caption id="attachment_320381" align="aligncenter" width="511" caption="Examples of vintage Burma-Shave road signs, including a blue South Dakota version. (Ray Crockett photo)"]<a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/raycrockett.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-320381" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/raycrockett.jpg" alt="" width="511" height="373" /></a>[/caption]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/americas_road_sign_legends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/americas_road_sign_legends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>