<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Al Jazeera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/al_jazeera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian women segregated on public transportation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of a 23-year-old's brutal rape and murder, a look at some of the country's antiquated safety measures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> Safety while traveling in cities has been an especially stubborn obstacle for women in India, as an increasing number of them join the workforce and are out later at night.</p><p>But the brutal gang rape of a 23-year-old woman on a bus in Delhi on Dec. 16 has now thrown the issue of women's safety in India into sharp relief.</p><p>The victim, who passed away Saturday from injuries sustained during the assault, had boarded a privately operated bus with a man<a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/india/121230/delhi-gang-rape-victim-planning-her-wedding" target="_blank">said to be her fiance</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-20753075" target="_blank">The BBC had reported</a> the vehicle was a "white line" bus, one of several services run by private operators to supplement the city's public bus network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_women_segregated_on_public_transportation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner drops Current after Al Jazeera deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Jazeera's struggle to reach U.S. homes meets another setback after major deal to buy Gore's network goes through]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Jazeera this week purchased Al Gore's cable network Current TV in what the New York Times' <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/?hp">Brian Stelter called </a>"a coming of age moment" for the Qatar-funded network in the United States. By buying Current, Al Jazeera seemed set to establish itself in the U.S. after struggling for years to gain purchase in unreceptive markets outside of New York and Washington.</p><p>However, hours after the estimated $500 million deal was made, Time Warner Cable announced that it would no longer carry the Current channel, and thus Al Jazeera's new channel Al Jazeera America would not be distributed by the cable provider. Although the Current deal will still bring Al Jazeera into around 40 million American homes, the Time Warner move constituted a considerable blow for the globally respected network -- Time Warner Cable reaches 12 million homes.</p><p>As HuffPo's Michael Calderone<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html"> reported:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>