<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > American History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/american_history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The theme song of the radical right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/the_theme_song_of_the_radical_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/the_theme_song_of_the_radical_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battle Hymn of the Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Goldwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How "Battle Hymn of the Republic" -- Reagan's favorite song -- became the background music of the modern GOP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As conservatives gained power and confidence in the decades after Barry Goldwater’s defeat, each of the three political tributaries whose convergence fueled the movement—anticommunism, antitaxation, and the Religious Right—could claim the “Battle Hymn” as a call to arms. The song resonated with the Manichaean proclivities of cold warriors, who regarded America’s confrontation with the Soviet Union as an ultimate battle, waged in the shadows of nuclear brinksmanship. Even as it addressed contemporary anxieties, the song also conjured up an idyllic American past, one in which traditional values thrived, untroubled by an intrusive federal bureaucracy. Finally, the hymn spoke to the growing electoral clout of evangelical Christians, who had shed the political alienation encouraged by fundamentalism and begun to stride unabashedly into the political arena; it became, for instance, a staple at anti-abortion rallies and was frequently played at protests against the government’s banning of prayer in public schools.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/the_theme_song_of_the_radical_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/the_theme_song_of_the_radical_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarians: Still a cult</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/libertarians_still_a_cult/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/libertarians_still_a_cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvin Coolidge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaRouche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laissez-faire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protectionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13323475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply note libertarianism's fatal flaw and you'll get an enraged, hysterical response. They still don't get it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/the_question_libertarians_just_cant_answer/">previous Salon essay</a>, in which I asked why there are not any libertarian countries, if libertarianism is a sound political philosophy, has infuriated members of the tiny but noisy libertarian sect, as criticisms of cults by outsiders usually do. The weak logic and bad scholarship that suffuse libertarian responses to my article tend to reinforce me in my view that, if they were not paid so well to churn out anti-government propaganda by plutocrats like the Koch brothers and various self-interested corporations, libertarians would play no greater role in public debate than do the followers of Lyndon LaRouche or L. Ron Hubbard.</p><p>An unscientific survey of the blogosphere turns up a number of libertarians claiming in response to my essay that, because libertarianism is anti-statist, to ask for an example of a real-world libertarian state shows a failure to understand libertarianism. But if the libertarian ideal is a stateless society, then libertarianism is merely a different name for utopian anarchism and deserves to be similarly ignored.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/libertarians_still_a_cult/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/libertarians_still_a_cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>596</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remains of Amelia Earhart&#8217;s plane may have been located</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/remains_of_amelia_earharts_plane_may_be_found/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/remains_of_amelia_earharts_plane_may_be_found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amelia earhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonar photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A historical aircraft recovery group might solve the 76-year-old mystery of the pilot's disappearance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 2, 1937, during an attempt to complete a circumnavigational flight of the globe, Amelia Earhart's Lockheed Model 10 Electra vanished en route to Howland Island in the Pacific Ocean. Now, a team of researchers believes it has solved the 76-year-old mystery of her disappearance. Newser reports that a series of blurry <a href="http://www.newser.com/story/168725/sonar-image-may-show-earharts-plane.html">sonar images </a>taken off an uninhabited Pacific island may reveal the location of Earhart's aircraft.</p><p>The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery took the sonar images last summer during an expedition to Nikumaroro, a former British colony in the Pacific Ocean. Although the images are grainy, TIGHAR says they <a href="http://www.dw.de/is-amelia-earharts-disappearance-solved/a-16842693">indicate</a> an "anomaly" 600 feet below the ocean's surface.</p><p>"It looks unlike anything else in the sonar data," a TIGHAR <a href="http://tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Archives/Research/Bulletins/66_NikuVIIUpdate/66_NikuVIIUpdate.html">bulletin</a> on the organization's website reads. "It’s the right size, it’s the right shape, and it’s in the right place."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/remains_of_amelia_earharts_plane_may_be_found/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/remains_of_amelia_earharts_plane_may_be_found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He predicted today’s GOP… in 1895</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folksy evangelical Sam P. Jones warned of “scandalmongers” who “feed on human character and soiled reputation”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam P. Jones was an influential southern evangelical at the end of the 19th century, and one of his pieces in June 1895, published in the Biloxi Herald, was titled “Scandalmongers.” In his folksy style, Jones categorized three types: “the cowardly scandalmonger, who by innuendo drives his thrust and probes with his bill”; “the talkers of a community. Their tongues are ten feet thick and a thousand miles long”; and finally, those who “sit in the sanctum of newspaper offices, and wield a pen dipped in gall.” Altogether, these various scandalmongers were “vultures which feed on human character and soiled reputation…. Taste for tainted meat can be cultivated until it is more desired than fresh meat.”</p><p>Seizing on the Benghazi tragedy, IRS probe, and whatever else they can get their claws into, today’s Republicans on Capitol Hill and the outraged echo chamber at Fox News are vultures of the breed Sam P. Jones saw in the political world of his day. The fresh meat they have no taste for is what we might call productive reform legislation, which their diversionary tactics prevent from being put front and center. The vultures feed instead on rotten issues like abortion (how many babies did Planned Parenthood kill today?) or dismantling Obamacare before it can do good, put government in a positive light, and lead to further reform of a system that is stacked in favor of private insurance companies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Duel With the Devil&#8221;: Murder in Old New York</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/duel_with_the_devil_murder_in_old_new_york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/duel_with_the_devil_murder_in_old_new_york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Burr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13309045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before their fatal duel, Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr teamed up in court to save a man from the gallows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crime and punishment: Dostoyevsky was far from the only writer to recognize how much a society reveals about itself in the way it handles both. For novelists, a detective can serve as a roving eye, licensed to peer into the secrets of every social stratum, while a trial, with its pitched adversaries and high stakes, becomes a dramatic way to decide not only what happened but who, if anyone, is to blame.</p><p>That's how Paul Collins uses the famous real-life murder mystery at the center of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/V/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Duel With the Devil."</a> This sensational crime took place in Manhattan in December, 1799, on the very brink of a new century (or not quite, if you're the sort of pedant who insists that the millennium didn't really turn until New Year's 1801 -- and yes, those people were around back then, too!). The body of a young Quaker woman, Elma Sands, was found at the bottom of a well in Lispenard Meadows, a swath of marshy, undeveloped land that separated New York City proper from Greenwich Village, approximately where the neighborhood of Soho stands today. The guy almost everyone liked for the killer was Levi Weeks, a carpenter who lived in the same boarding house as Sands, an establishment run by Sands' cousin, Catharine Ring, and her husband, Elias.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/duel_with_the_devil_murder_in_old_new_york/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/duel_with_the_devil_murder_in_old_new_york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Unwinding&#8221;: What&#8217;s gone wrong with America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george packer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Unwinding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A deeply-reported exploration of the past 35 years of American life gauges the human cost of "freedom"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of George Packer's new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374102414/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America"</a> as the un-Internet take on the transformation this country has undergone in the past 35 years. It's wide ranging, deeply reported, historically grounded and ideologically restrained. To write "The Unwinding", Packer clearly had to spend a lot of time out of his own habitat and in the company of other people, listening more than talking, and largely keeping his opinions to himself. Imagine that! It's called journalism.</p><p>Packer's inspiration, as he explains in the book's afternotes, was the "U.S.A." trilogy by John Dos Passos, three novels that use a third-person choral method to portray American life in the early 20th century. "The Unwinding," while nonfiction, is narrative rather than polemical or analytic. Each chapter is a story, or an installment in a story, about a person or place. Some of the subjects are famous (Newt Gingrich, Oprah Winfrey, Colin Powell, Alice Waters) because such people, Packer writes, now "occupy the personal place of household gods, and they offer themselves as answers to the riddle of how to live a good or better life." But the key figures, the ones whose trajectories arc through the entire book like ribs or rafters, are unknowns: an African-American factory worker turned organizer in Ohio, a disillusioned lawyer who drifts from public service to finance and back again, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist with extreme libertarian beliefs and a scion of North Carolina tobacco farmers trying to make it as an entrepreneur. In the book's most bravura chapters, the city of Tampa, Fla. serves as yet another character.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/the_unwinding_whats_gone_wrong_with_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 21 fiercest things Richard Nixon ever did</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Powerful, moving images of Richard Nixon that will restore every true late-'60s/early-'70s kid's faith in humanity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I guess <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo">Reagan was an <em>OK</em> president</a> if you like played-out memes and whatever, but every Tru Post-War Kid knows the master of presidential IDGAF was Richard "Everything's Coming up" Milhous Nixon.</strong></p><p><strong>21. The time he hung out with Elvis in the Oval Office</strong></p><p><a href="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/5364-04.jpg"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/5364-04.jpg" alt="" title="Nixon elvis" class="size-full wp-image-13298914" height="430" width="650" /></a></p><p>"Hey Elvis they should call them tranquLOLizers right?"</p><p><strong>20. The time Richard Nixon was the original The Dude.</strong></p><p><a href="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/marac_gmu5.jpg"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/marac_gmu5.jpg" alt="" title="Nixon elvis" class="size-full wp-image-13298914" /></a></p><p><strong>19. More like SWAG IT TO ME</strong></p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KFEhmF-cSi8" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p><p><strong>18. The time he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4UEv_jjPL0">told off</a> his dog's haters</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What interpreting Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s dreams can teach us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/what_abraham_lincolns_dreams_can_teach_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/what_abraham_lincolns_dreams_can_teach_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Twain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigmund Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sleep]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By analyzing the dreams of early Americans, we can finally answer the elusive question: Were they like us?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">In 1889, Joseph Pulitzer’s New York Evening World held a contest to determine America’s “Champion Dreamer.” The winner was a Maryland junior college instructor named Buckey who dreamed he’d shot a man who wore a thick black mustache. As Buckey walked to work the next morning, the vividly seen face of his victim was suddenly before his eyes a second time. The two men jumped back, equally startled. “For God’s sake, don’t shoot me!” cried the stranger. Buckey and he recognized each other, because they had dreamed the same dream.</p><p style="text-align: left;">In the midst of the Civil War, newspapers North and South featured stories about soldiers whose dreams predicted war’s end. On April 25, 1863, Boston’s Saturday Evening Gazette demonstrated the credence it had given to a local artilleryman’s dream by printing a retraction, regretting that the man’s six-week-old vision of April 23 as “the date of Peace” had not been met. The wife of a Union general, meanwhile, could not banish from her fragmented sleep narratives gruesome premonitions about her sons: “One night I dream that Paul is drowned, another that Benny is dead.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/what_abraham_lincolns_dreams_can_teach_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/what_abraham_lincolns_dreams_can_teach_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to debunk George W. Bush&#8217;s attempts at revisionism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your definitive guide to the Bush cronies' talking points, and why all of them are insane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every dog goes to heaven and every former president should get a shot at repairing his legacy, especially when it's as tattered as George W. Bush's. With the opening of his presidential library and museum this week, observers from former Bush officials to mainstream outlets were taking a fresh, rosy look at the Bush legacy. Some offered dopey and facially ridiculous cheerleading, while others offered more compelling suggestions to return to the Bush era with an open mind. After all, other presidents left office in a cloud only to be redeemed by history years later.</p><p>So, is this week making you feel a bit nostalgic for the Bush era? Don't. It's been almost half a decade since the 43rd president left office, and he's looking as bad as ever. Of course, that won't stop a small circle of admirers (many of whom used to be on his payroll) from trying, so here's your guide to taking on the five biggest specious pro-Bush talking points put forward this week:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>248</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colonial Williamsburg: Where the Tea Party gets schooled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/colonial_williamsburg_where_the_tea_party_gets_schooled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/colonial_williamsburg_where_the_tea_party_gets_schooled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revolutionary War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williamsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial Williamsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's lots of NRA and Tea Party garb in colonial Williamsburg. But the history has a confrontational new approach]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just got back from a family vacation at <a href="http://www.history.org/">Colonial Williamsburg,</a> the Virginia granddaddy of all American “living history” museums. (They hate the term “theme park,” and those people in 18th-century costume are “actor-interpreters,” not characters.) The first thing to say is that we all had a great time: My kids studied up on Revolutionary War spycraft, watched several terrific programs of 18th-century theater, and delivered orations from the Declaration of Independence late at night in our hotel room. We learned how bricks and barrels were made in that pre-industrial age, and my nine-year-old daughter signed up in the Virginia militia to fight the British. (Historical accuracy be damned: One of her drill sergeants was female too.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/colonial_williamsburg_where_the_tea_party_gets_schooled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/colonial_williamsburg_where_the_tea_party_gets_schooled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The New Mind of the South&#8221;: Not your daddy&#8217;s Dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_new_mind_of_the_south_not_your_daddys_dixie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_new_mind_of_the_south_not_your_daddys_dixie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The South]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A daughter of the South says the region is changing more than even those who live there realize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracy Thompson, a former newspaper reporter born and raised in Georgia, first got the idea for her book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1439158037/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The New Mind of the South,"</a> when a cousin passed on a startling bit of family history. Their shared ancestor, Thomas Thompson, was a Union man. Thompson clan legend held that Thomas had briefly pretended to support the Union, but only because he hoped to be reimbursed for property confiscated by General Sherman. Thomas was in truth a staunch anti-Confederate according to documents held in the National Archive. Furthermore, he wasn't alone; Thompson found two dozen similar cases from the same small county when she visited the archives herself. "I'd always wondered why, unlike every other Southern family I knew, ours had no Civil War stories, " she remarks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_new_mind_of_the_south_not_your_daddys_dixie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_new_mind_of_the_south_not_your_daddys_dixie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When prostitution wasn&#8217;t a crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/when_prostitution_wasnt_a_crime_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/when_prostitution_wasnt_a_crime_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the first women in American colonies were sex workers, and their profession became a crime only recently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You've heard this before: “What two consenting adults do behind closed doors is their own business.” In the United States, it's even almost true – arguments guarding sexual rights and privacy won out in the landmark Supreme Court ruling <em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>, in which state sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional. But that does not apply to people who wish to exchange sex for money. Sex workers' rights are largely unprotected, and remain a political battleground; meanwhile, people who buy and sell sexual services are arrested, shamed, compelled into “rehabilitation” programs, and branded with criminal records.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>But there was a time in American history when it wasn't quite so. Laws against selling sex are fairly new – just about 100 years old – and came onto the books long after the sex trade took root in American cities. Does that mean there was a time when selling sex was more tolerated? Or did the law simply take some time to catch up to the new American people's prejudices?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/when_prostitution_wasnt_a_crime_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/when_prostitution_wasnt_a_crime_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are liberals being hypocrites about Obama&#8217;s wars?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe liberals don't criticize Obama's foreign policy because American liberalism has always been pro-intervention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Atlantic's resident thoughtful apostate conservative Conor Friedersdorf <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/progressives-are-internalizing-hawkish-war-on-terror-claims/273102/">published a piece this morning</a> arguing that progressives who furiously fought against Bush's "war on terror" have internalized many of its central tenets, now that it's being waged by Barack Obama. Friedersdorf says liberals made various critiques of Bush's foreign misadventures -- that they caused "blowback," that they were an abuse of executive power, and that they implied a forever war without any possibility of an ending -- that they are now largely not making against Obama, even though all those arguments still apply.</p><p>The reason for this, according to Friedersdorf, is that everyone hated Bush and knew he was incompetent, but people like Obama because he's clearly smart and conscientious, which causes people to defend actions they would have criticized under his predecessor:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/are_liberals_really_being_hypocrites_about_obamas_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would Lincoln use drones?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/would_lincoln_use_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/would_lincoln_use_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13197827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lincoln probably would have loved drones, but may have held off using them to kill for strategic reasons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the nation deep in the throes of Hollywood-induced Lincoln-philia, Washington Examiner editor Mark Tapscott asked Friday what the revered president might do about one of the thorniest political questions of 2013: “<a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/mark-tapscott-would-lincoln-have-droned-robert-e.-lee/article/2520893">Would Lincoln have droned Robert E. Lee?</a>” His answer -- an imagined conversation between Lincoln and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton that has the 16th president remarking “OMG” and “sheesh” -- is dumb, but the question and answer are more interesting that Tapscott gives them credit.</p><p>Lincoln is rightly held up as the paragon of the American presidency, so it makes sense that people would ask how he would handle a tough moral question like the use of unmanned killer drones, which has compelling arguments both for and against. WWLD? We consulted experts and the historical record to find out. The answer may surprise you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/would_lincoln_use_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/would_lincoln_use_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion prof: Opposing gun control is a sin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/symbolic_narratives_of_the_gun_control_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/symbolic_narratives_of_the_gun_control_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reform movements have been most successful when they combined facts with powerful symbolic images]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>"We don’t benefit from ignorance.” </em><br /> —President Obama, January 16, 2013, at a press conference on his plan for new gun control legislation</p><p>When you look at a gun, do you see danger or safety? It all depends on the angle you’re looking from, risk perception experts<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-ropeik/the-gun-control-fight-its_b_2322759.html" target="_blank">say</a>. The gun control debate is ultimately a clash of <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=286205" target="_blank">competing worldviews</a>, and it’s very fraught. Each side draws on symbolic narratives—I would call them myths—with deep roots in the American past.</p><p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/symbolic_narratives_of_the_gun_control_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/symbolic_narratives_of_the_gun_control_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for strangers, heathens, wastrels!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans counted on tried-and-true class warfare like never before. This time, "outsiders" were the majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get to the persistence of class warfare in our politics, let’s talk about Skinch Painter. In 1900, when the San Francisco Examiner tracked him down, he was 78, “hale, hearty, and contented.” He hadn’t inherited a penny, but neither had he worked a day in his life. “He has never borrowed a dollar, nor stolen one,” the column read. “He has never been a tramp nor a beggar. He has never done a day’s work in exchange for money ... Yet he has lived.”</p><p>One day, when he was in his teens, he said to himself, “Look here, Skinch Painter, this old world owes you a living, and all you’ve got to do is collect it.” Wandering the Ozarks of Missouri, he inhabited a cave and relied on nature for his food and clothing. He hunted, fished and gathered nuts and berries, wearing only animal skins and going barefoot.</p><p>“Labor is a useless sin,” said Skinch. “The time a man spends working is just so much time lost from living.”</p><p>We can just about see Fox News sending a camera crew out to interview Skinch, and one of its handsomely paid straight men wrapping up the piece with an offhand, “See, you don’t need government handouts. If you don’t want to work, you can do what this guy does. At least he’s not a taker. The rest of us in this country, we’ll continue to work for a living.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oliver Stone: America is an “outlaw nation”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Untold History of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cinematic renegade talks about Obama, FDR, his new Showtime series and the myth of American exceptionalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across a four-decade career in the movie business that has encompassed three Academy Awards, 18 narrative films and several documentaries as a director, and innumerable side projects as a writer and producer, Oliver Stone has been obsessed with one topic: America. Indeed, during what you might call Stone’s classic Hollywood period, from “Salvador” in 1986 to “Nixon” in 1995 – and I don’t exclude such apparent detours as “The Doors” and “Natural Born Killers” – his central subject has been all the ways the United States has driven itself crazy, on both the foreign and domestic fronts, in the years since his own Eisenhower-era childhood.</p><p>Given that background, it’s almost surprising that it’s taken Stone this long to tackle a straightforward nonfiction project like his Showtime miniseries “The Untold History of the United States,” which tries to counter the jingoistic mythmaking and obligatory “American exceptionalism” of most public discourse about 20th-century history. That phrase refers to a creed that still holds sway (or so polls suggest) among a large proportion of the U.S. population, although it hasn’t been taken seriously by historians for many years: The idea that America has a special and even sacred role to play in world history, and cannot be compared to other nations driven by the grubby realities of politics and economics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Paula Broadwell wronged her readers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/how_paula_broadwell_wronged_her_readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/how_paula_broadwell_wronged_her_readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biographers agree that Broadwell wronged her readers -- and not just by sleeping with her subject]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Paula Broadwell violated the bond of trust between a biographer and her readers when she had an affair with her subject may seem beyond doubt. Certainly it seems less questionable than the notion that, by the same turn, her lover, Gen. David Petraeus, violated the trust of the U.S. government. Nevertheless, it is Petraeus who stepped down as the director of the CIA last week, while Broadwell's book about him, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1594203180/?tag=saloncom08-20">"All In: The Education of General David Petraeus,"</a> jumped up a few thousand notches on Amazon's best-seller list and has had its paperback publication date bumped forward by Penguin Books.</p><p>If we have learned anything from the past decade of book-world scandals — whether over plagiarism, fabrication, Internet sock puppetry or simple inaccuracy — it's that what seems like an obvious ethical violation to some observers will strike others as no big deal. Biography, a genre that can scale the heights or wallow in the gutter, is a particularly delicate enterprise. There's no official — or even quasi-official — biographer's code of ethics, and members of the profession are contemplating changing that. While informed readers are unlikely to confuse the likes of Broadwell with the the authors of definitive, years-in-the-making, doorstop "lives," the biographical profession is at least slightly besmirched by the scandal. "When Jayson Blair did his nonsense, it reflected badly on all journalists," said acclaimed biographer David Nasaw, "and this will reflect on all biographers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/how_paula_broadwell_wronged_her_readers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/how_paula_broadwell_wronged_her_readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Civil War to James Bond in one quick step</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/from_the_civil_war_to_james_bond_in_one_quick_step/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/from_the_civil_war_to_james_bond_in_one_quick_step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Fleming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[007]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13067962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A historian discovers the truth of Faulkner’s comment: The past isn't dead -- it's not even past]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I set out in the early 1990s to write a short biographical piece on Col. William C. Oates, the Confederate commander of the 15th Alabama Infantry, who failed to dislodge Col. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain and his 20th Maine Regiment from the slopes of Little Round Top at Gettysburg on July 2, 1863, I had no idea where the project would take me.  For one thing, that brief sketch led eventually — some 15 years later — to my writing <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0195331311/?tag=saloncom08-20">a biography of Oates</a>, cradle to grave.  For another thing, it showed me how close our connections are to the past and how relevant is William Faulkner’s comment that the past is not dead; in fact, it’s not even past.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/from_the_civil_war_to_james_bond_in_one_quick_step/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/from_the_civil_war_to_james_bond_in_one_quick_step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Spielberg&#8217;s magnificent &#8220;Lincoln&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pick_of_the_week_spielbergs_magnificent_lincoln/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pick_of_the_week_spielbergs_magnificent_lincoln/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abraham Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field and an amazing cast bring history alive in Spielberg's moral masterpiece]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Spielberg’s <a href="http://www.thelincolnmovie.com/">“Lincoln”</a> has a lot to live up to, even when you get past the fact that its subject is the greatest of all American presidents and one of history’s most mythologized characters. Its cast members have won at least five Oscars, with two apiece belonging to the odd but compelling couple at the center of the story, Daniel Day-Lewis as Abraham Lincoln and Sally Field as Mary Todd Lincoln, his tormented and demanding co-strategist and life partner. The two best-known previous films about our 16th president were made by D.W. Griffith and John Ford, who represent exactly the kind of classic American cinema against which Spielberg measures himself. (In fairness, neither Griffith's early talkie "Abraham Lincoln," starring Walter Huston, nor Ford's "Young Mr. Lincoln," with Henry Fonda in the title role, is much watched these days.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pick_of_the_week_spielbergs_magnificent_lincoln/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/pick_of_the_week_spielbergs_magnificent_lincoln/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>