<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Argo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/argo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Naomi Watts, &#8220;Argo,&#8221; &#8220;Wonderstone&#8221; among bizarre Teen Choice Awards nominees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/naomi_watts_argo_wonderstone_among_bizarre_teen_choice_awards_nominees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/naomi_watts_argo_wonderstone_among_bizarre_teen_choice_awards_nominees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Impossible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Incredible Burt Wonderstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, teens loved "The Impossible" and "The Words"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knew teens were such big Oscar-bait fans?</p><p>Among the nominees, <a href="http://www.justjared.com/2013/05/22/teen-choice-awards-2013-nominations-revealed/">announced today via press release</a>, for the Teen Choice Awards are Naomi Watts and her tsunami drama "The Impossible"; Ben Affleck and his Iranian hostage caper "Argo"; Bradley Cooper in the plagiarism melodrama "The Words" (remember "The Words"?); and Carey Mulligan for "The Great Gatsby." Outside the prestige categories, things got even weirder, with Jessica Biel nominated for two little-seen films: the science fiction remake "Total Recall" and the romantic comedy "Playing for Keeps." The box-office disappointment "The Incredible Burt Wonderstone" got three nominations.</p><p><em>Plus ça change</em>, though: the final "Twilight" film led the field with the most nominations, and Justin Bieber was nominated for "Choice Male Hottie." Good luck, Justin -- and say hi to beloved teen icon Naomi Watts on the red carpet!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/naomi_watts_argo_wonderstone_among_bizarre_teen_choice_awards_nominees/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/naomi_watts_argo_wonderstone_among_bizarre_teen_choice_awards_nominees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Clooney teaming up with &#8220;Argo&#8221; journalist for another film</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/george_clooney_teaming_up_with_argo_journalist_for_another_film/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/george_clooney_teaming_up_with_argo_journalist_for_another_film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joshuah bearman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grant heslov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several of Joshuah Bearman's magazine articles are being adapted for the big screen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Clooney and Grant Heslov, the team behind 2012's best picture, "Argo" are in talks to develop another film, "Coronado High," based on a not-yet-published article by Joshuah Bearman, the journalist whose 2007 "Wired" story inspired the Oscar-winning film set in Iran.</p><p><a href="http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column-post/george-clooney-grant-heslov-circling-argo-reporters-coronado-tale-sony-exclusive-87886">The Wrap </a>reports:</p><blockquote><p>Bearman's article has not been published yet so details remain thin, but those familiar with the story say it involves a group of teenagers who are used to smuggle drugs in Coronado, which is an affluent resort city near San Diego, California.</p> <p>Clooney and Heslov will produce with David Klawans, who executive produced "Argo." He's also producing an adaptation of Bearman's 2010 Wired magazine article "Art of the Steal."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/george_clooney_teaming_up_with_argo_journalist_for_another_film/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/george_clooney_teaming_up_with_argo_journalist_for_another_film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salman Rushdie, screenwriter: Getting around protesters &#8220;was like the end of &#8216;Argo&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/salman_rushdie_screenwriter_getting_around_iranian_protestors_was_like_the_end_of_argo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/salman_rushdie_screenwriter_getting_around_iranian_protestors_was_like_the_end_of_argo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salman Rushdie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midnight's children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Iran tried to shut down Rushdie's new adaptation of "Midnight's Children," Sri Lanka's president intervened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salman Rushdie is a man at liberty.</p><p>The fatwa placed on him by Iran long since having been lifted, the novelist is trying new things, from last year's memoir "Joseph Anton" to the upcoming film adaptation of "Midnight's Children," his Booker Prize-winning novel. Rushdie wrote the script for "Midnight's Children" along with director Deepa Mehta, and also narrates the film, which is to be released May 3. But that doesn't mean he isn't still causing controversy.</p><p>The fallout from "The Satanic Verses," which brought the ire of Iran, led to a shooting delay that could have jeopardized the entire film.</p><p>"Midnight's Children" isn't even about Iran -- it takes on the story of India's history, from the moment of independence to the Partition between India and Pakistan -- an element that Rushdie claims is the book's greatest legacy, educating Indian Hindus and Pakistani Muslims about one another.</p><p>The novel is a massive tome -- and it was clearly difficult to winnow down into a film that runs 146 minutes. Rushdie, for decades a literary gadfly, says he was inspired by friends like Kazuo Ishiguro and Gunter Grass. Below, he discusses his influences, whether he'd write about Kashmir, and how the Sri Lankan president saved his film.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/salman_rushdie_screenwriter_getting_around_iranian_protestors_was_like_the_end_of_argo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/salman_rushdie_screenwriter_getting_around_iranian_protestors_was_like_the_end_of_argo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The politics of &#8220;ZD30,&#8221; &#8220;House of Cards&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/the_politics_of_zd30_house_of_cards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/the_politics_of_zd30_house_of_cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramin bahrani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kornacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew O'Hehir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at any price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A real-time salon -- with Kornacki, O'Hehir, filmmaker Ramin Bahrani and 100 or so friends -- talked film/politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Steve Kornacki:</strong> I was just thinking, this is for me -- being with Ramin and Andrew -- is good practice for “Up,” because I’m surrounded by two people who are much, much smarter than me.  So I’m going to basically ask the questions here and try to steer the conversation and let you hear from these guys. I guess a good place to start would be that we had three really high-profile films last year that were politically themed: “Zero Dark Thirty,” “Lincoln,” and “Argo.” I’m going to start with you, Ramin: Do you see any kind of a trend there, or any kind of statement about the time we’re in? Is there more of an appetite for political films?</p><p><strong>Ramin Bahrani:</strong> Well, probably Andrew would know historically, but I think depending on what’s happening in the world, there’s always a possibility for a political film to exist. I mean, “Zero Dark Thirty” was probably the one that was the most directly connected to what was happening, “Lincoln” in more of a shadow way, “Argo,” I think, in maybe a way that makes the least sense in terms of what’s happening, actually. I think there’s always an appetite, and now that we clearly have a major conflict in Washington, I think that Occupy Wall Street is making people think very differently about society and our role in it. I think wealth and equality and this whole idea [of a] 99 percent is a huge topic – it’s on people’s minds, especially young people. So anyway, that informs cinema.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/the_politics_of_zd30_house_of_cards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/the_politics_of_zd30_house_of_cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iranian media reports that authorities plan to sue Hollywood over &#8220;Argo&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/iranian_media_reports_that_authorities_plan_to_sue_hollywood_over_argo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/iranian_media_reports_that_authorities_plan_to_sue_hollywood_over_argo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claiming that the film gives an "unrealistic portrayal" of the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Associated Press is reporting that several Iranian media outlets, including the Shargh daily, are saying that French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre (famous for reprsenting Venezuelan terrorist Carlos the Jackal) is currently advising Iranian authorities on how to file a lawsuit against Hollywood over Ben Affleck's Oscar-winning film, "Argo."</p><p>The talks come after officials dismissed the film about the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis, calling it anti-Iran propaganda in February, and again taking issue with Michelle Obama's presentation of the best picture award to "Argo" at the Oscars ceremony. The lawsuit would allege that "Argo" gives an "unrealistic portrayal" of the country, but it's not clear yet specifically whom the lawsuit would target.</p><p>As of January, the Iranian government has been working on its own retelling of the crisis, called "The General Staff."  According to the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/iran-planning-sue-hollywood-argo-427481">Hollywood Reporter</a>, the project is being liberally funded by the Art Bureau of the Iranian government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/iranian_media_reports_that_authorities_plan_to_sue_hollywood_over_argo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/iranian_media_reports_that_authorities_plan_to_sue_hollywood_over_argo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the CIA infiltrated Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/is_hollywood_secretly_in_bed_with_the_cia_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/is_hollywood_secretly_in_bed_with_the_cia_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book exposes the incestuous relationship between the two and the extent to which they both feed us propaganda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT A TIME WHEN THE CIA is still hiding the details of its extrajuridical drone strike assassination program from congressional watchdogs and the media, one would think it an awkward moment for Hollywood to confer Academy Awards on films that celebrate its secret agents.<br /> <a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" /></a></p><p>But apparently not. While a robust debate has emerged about <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em>’s depiction of torture, the film largely celebrates the tireless spycraft of a CIA analyst who was complicit. Meanwhile, <em>Argo</em> is an unqualified nod towards the CIA’s collaboration with Hollywood in liberating hostages held in Iran in 1979.</p><p><em>Argo</em> and <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em> are only the latest film productions the CIA has influenced in the 15 years since the Agency opened its official liaison office to Hollywood. Tricia Jenkins examines the history of this version of “Hollywood confidential” in <em>The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television</em>. Short and dry, her book raises serious ethical and legal questions about the relationship between the CIA and Hollywood, and the extent to which we consume propaganda from one through the other.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/is_hollywood_secretly_in_bed_with_the_cia_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/is_hollywood_secretly_in_bed_with_the_cia_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben&#8217;s right: Marriage is work. That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Garner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oscar winner's raw, awkward thank-you to his wife gave us a glimpse into the reality of married life  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ben Affleck picked up the Oscar Sunday night for "Argo," the actor/producer/director/<a href="http://youtu.be/lGeqX-OBo0Q">Jimmy Kimmel love slave</a> turned those boring last minutes of the broadcast into a memorably strange statement about marriage. As he looked out at his beautiful wife, Jennifer Garner, he told her – and the world – "I want to thank my wife, who I don't normally associate with Iran. I want to thank you for working on our marriage for 10 Christmases. It’s good. <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/love-sex/ben-affleck-thanks-jennifer-garner-for-working-on-their-marriage-153803671.html">It is work, but it’s the best kind of work, and there’s no one I'd rather work with."</a> And if nothing else had happened the entire broadcast, it would have been worth it for the pinched, "Honey, <em>whaaaaaa</em>?" smile on Garner's face as he said that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/bens_right_marriage_is_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar posters that should have been</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonrise Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wreck-It Ralph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the movie posters that Mondo Gallery commissioned for this year's crop of Oscar movies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Oscars have come and gone, it is time for Hollywood to look back and wonder, "What could we have done differently?" Our advice: look in the direction of Austin, Texas' <a href="http://blog.mondotees.com/">Mondo Gallery</a>. Through a partnership with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts &amp; Sciences, Mondo commissioned a series of limited edition silk-screened posters that, we think, put the actual campaigns to shame.</p><p>Who knows – perhaps with the right poster, "Wreck-It Ralph" might have snagged best picture!</p><p>Be sure to view these in full-screen mode.</p><p>[slide_show id="13211482"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar posters that should have been</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonrise Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wreck-It Ralph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the movie posters that Mondo Gallery commissioned for this year's crop of Oscar movies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Check out the movie posters that Mondo Gallery commissioned for this year's crop of Oscar movies]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/the_oscar_posters_that_should_have_been_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seth MacFarlane to Rush Limbaugh: Now I understand why conservatives hate the media</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush says he sent MacFarlane a mash note, and compares Michelle Obama's Oscar appearance to something out of Orwell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth MacFarlane has another admirer: Rush Limbaugh.</p><p>On Monday's radio broadcast, Limbaugh <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">said</a> he sent the widely derided Oscars host an "attaboy note." MacFarlane's response, according to Rush? "You know what? I kind of understand how you conservatives feel about the media now."</p><p>Limbaugh was fired up about the Oscars, and saw evidence of a liberal conspiracy to create a totalitarian world, and also a political tug-of-war between Steven Spielberg and Harvey Weinstein.</p><p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">Speaking</a> of Michelle Obama's appearance via video link to hand out the best picture Oscar with Jack Nicholson, Limbaugh said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle is the next Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/michelle_is_the_next_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/michelle_is_the_next_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kirk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She dazzled on Fallon and the Oscars, and a poll has her leading for Senate. Another first lady with major options]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the months after Bill Clinton's second election, few would have guessed that first lady Hillary Clinton would be just a few years away from a successful run for Senate, a stint as secretary of state, and the subject of front-running buzz to be the next president of the United States.</p><p>Of course, it turns out she was. And the current first lady, Michelle Obama, is more popular than Clinton was then. So, what does the future hold for her?</p><p>After a winning weekend on Jimmy Fallon's show and the Academy Awards, it's clear she will be in demand.</p><p>There’s a tradition at the Oscars of an elder statesman of Hollywood (and they are mostly states<em>men</em>) presenting the award for best picture at the end of the perennially overtime award show. Last year it was Tom Cruise, the year before that it was Steven Spielberg (his third appearance in 10 years), and before that people like Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, Harrison Ford and Clint Eastwood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/michelle_is_the_next_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/michelle_is_the_next_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did &#8220;Lincoln&#8221; lose? Blame Bill Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/why_did_lincoln_lose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/why_did_lincoln_lose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Lincoln" had the most nominations, and the most Oscar-y patina, but lost. Some point fingers at another president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone looking at the Oscar race last October or so would have thought that "Lincoln" would take the whole thing -- it was a perfect merger of inspiring historical subject matter, prestigious director, Oscar-bedecked star, and it came into the ceremony with the most nominations. And yet aside from star Daniel Day-Lewis and the film's production design team, the film didn't win a thing; 10 nominations, including ones for best picture, best director for Steven Spielberg, and best adapted screenplay for Tony Kushner came up empty.</p><p>One possible reason? The New York Times has a theory they won't attribute to anyone, but which they pushed in stories both Friday and today: "Lincoln" and its producers <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/25/movies/awardsseason/best-picture-for-argo-in-varied-oscar-field.html?hp">"seemed to overreach by getting Bill Clinton to introduce a clip at the Golden Globes last month."</a> The film seemed to bid for recognition as more than a movie, as something serious and grave, in its marketing materials as well, with <a href="http://www.awardsdaily.com/FYC/gallery/2012-13/photo.php?id=3067">For Your Consideration ads</a> describing noble sacrifice and exhorting "His Story is Our Story." At a time when Congress is held in low esteem (to say the least), a reminder that the film's depiction of a fractious Congress united by a charismatic leader is somehow meant to be contemporary hardly inspires.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/why_did_lincoln_lose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/why_did_lincoln_lose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars: They were dreary, desperate and insincere. But it had its moments!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85th annual oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis makes history, Ben Affleck's a class act. But who was the pretend Matthew Broderick guy hosting?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know that Daniel Day-Lewis’ deadpan gag about switching roles with Meryl Streep – “I was all set to play Maggie Thatcher, and she was Steven’s first choice for ‘Lincoln’” – was actually the funniest joke in the world, but it pretty much brought down the house just before midnight on Sunday. It was one of the few occasions during the Oscars when someone who seemed to have an adult sensibility and an education was speaking on that stage, and I for one felt almost pathetically grateful. Most of the rest of the overextended, hit-and-miss spectacle formerly known as the Academy Awards went back and forth between dreary and desperate to please, which is a pretty good description of host Seth MacFarlane as well.</p><p>Of course it’s standard operating procedure for someone in my position (or yours, for that matter!) to mock the Oscars for all kinds of reasons: The terrible musical numbers, the doomed attempts to seem hip and relevant, the amazing empty stretches in the middle of the evening occupied only by technical awards no one outside the film industry understands and commercials for “financial products.” In a year when the most famous awards ceremony in the history of show business changes its name in a last-minute branding panic, that’s all way too easy. It wasn't clear that the Oscars had any further to fall after the legendary James Franco-Anne Hathaway debacle of two years ago and the emergency Billy Crystal early-'90s flashback of last year -- and indeed I suspect this year <em>wasn't</em> worse -- just cruder, stranger and more detached from the Oscars' alleged and theoretical purpose.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar&#8217;s very weird night</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_very_weird_night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_very_weird_night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasts of the Southern Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life of Pi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbra Streisand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our picks for the highlights — and many, many low-lights — from one of the oddest Oscars in years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Academy Award nominee Abraham Lincoln once said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." The Oscars are our annual endurance test of both. It's the Olympics of show-business power — a cage match whose outcome determines future development deals and stratospheric salaries. For the viewer at home, however, somewhere around the third hour/fifth ill-advised musical number, it tends to deteriorate into a trial of audience stamina and fortitude.</p><p>The show's organizers have in recent years flailed about before our eyes to make the evening's proceedings a less grim broadcast – bringing James Franco and Anne Hathaway in hopes of making it a dewy, youthful affair, then turning around and trotting out Billy Crystal with the promise of the balm of the reassuringly familiar. This year, the spaghetti it threw at the wall of television viewers was Seth MacFarlane, and the pitch was basically, "Let's try making the show saucy and fun -- like the 2012 Golden Globes, but without a British person." And now we know how well <em>that</em> idea works.</p><p>Herewith, then, are our most memorable moments of a show that will go down in history as the time the awards gave over its power to Stewie Griffin, and the adversity that followed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_very_weird_night/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_very_weird_night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Ben Affleck&#8217;s evening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/liveblog_the_2013_oscar_award_ceremony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/liveblog_the_2013_oscar_award_ceremony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life of Pi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Argo" wins best picture. Ang Lee, Jennifer Lawrence and Daniel Day-Lewis bring home the big individual awards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[liveblog id=66]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/liveblog_the_2013_oscar_award_ceremony/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/liveblog_the_2013_oscar_award_ceremony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Lawrence, &#8220;Silver Linings Playbook&#8221; win big at Independent Spirit Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/jennifer_lawrence_silver_linings_playbook_win_big_at_independent_spirit_awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/jennifer_lawrence_silver_linings_playbook_win_big_at_independent_spirit_awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Spirit Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is momentum moving away from "Argo" as Oscar night arrives?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't ink "Argo" into your Oscars pool yet.</p><p>The last, late momentum could be with "Silver Linings Playbook."</p><p>Director David O. Russell's film cleaned up at the Independent Spirit Awards on Saturday, the last ceremony before tonight's Academy Awards.</p><p>It won Independent Spirit Awards for best film, director, screenplay and actress for Jennifer Lawrence.</p><p>"The last time I held one of these was 19 years ago for best screenplay and best first feature [for 'Spanking the Monkey'] and my son was 1 year old," Russell said, accepting his award for best director. "Matthew's here today and he gave me this movie."</p><p>Russell's son has bipolar disorder. In the film -- up for eight Oscars -- Bradley Cooper's character wrestles with the illness.</p><p>John Hawkes won best actor for "The Sessions." His co-star Helen Hunt took best supporting actress. Best supporting actor went to Matthew McConaughey for "Magic Mike."</p><p>"Amour" was named best foreign film.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/jennifer_lawrence_silver_linings_playbook_win_big_at_independent_spirit_awards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/jennifer_lawrence_silver_linings_playbook_win_big_at_independent_spirit_awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar loves a white savior</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a movie features white people rescuing people of color from their plight, odds are high an Oscar will follow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.easyodds.com/sports-betting/tv-and-awards-betting/awards/oscars/outright/best-picture.html">oddsmakers</a>, Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln" does not have the best chance of winning the 2013 Academy Award for best picture. That top spot right now goes to Ben Affleck's "Argo" — but it shouldn't. If history is any gauge, "Lincoln" has to be the front-runner thanks to its status as this year's only Oscar-nominated White Savior film.</p><p>If you've been to the movies in the last half-century, you know the White Savior genre well. It's the catalog of films that features white people single-handedly rescuing people of color from their plight. These story lines insinuate that people of color have no ability to rescue themselves. This both makes white audiences feel good about themselves by portraying them as benevolent messiahs (rather than hegemonic conquerors), and also depicts people of color as helpless weaklings -- all while wrapping such tripe in the cinematic argot of liberation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>164</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Lincoln&#8221; just a big yawn?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/lincoln_too_boring_for_the_oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/lincoln_too_boring_for_the_oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spielberg's history lesson, with its great cast and undoubted significance, may be too uncool for the Oscars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ben Affleck’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/argo">“Argo”</a> is indeed named best picture in Sunday night’s Oscar ceremony, as most people in and around the movie business now expect, then one of the lingering questions for Academy-watchers will be: What the Sam Hill happened to <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/lincoln">“Lincoln”</a>? <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/steven_spielberg">Steven Spielberg’s</a> historical opus seemed like a film perfectly constructed to win awards – which may, in a sense, have been the problem. A gorgeously detailed and beautifully photographed recreation of a pivotal moment in American history, it features a star-studded cast anchored by a great performance from one of the leading screen actors of our day. <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tony_kushner">Tony Kushner’s</a> glittering screenplay is alive with ideas, Lincolnian anecdotes, philosophical collisions and parables about politics and power.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/lincoln_too_boring_for_the_oscars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/lincoln_too_boring_for_the_oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who should win the Oscars (but probably won&#8217;t)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/who_should_win_the_oscars_but_probably_wont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/who_should_win_the_oscars_but_probably_wont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonrise Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert De Niro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Kushner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Haneke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Academy voters: There is still time to repent! In this year's dramatic Oscar race, is one more plot twist coming?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been an unusually dramatic <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/oscars_2013">Oscar race</a> this year, with a remarkably strong roster of films – most of which are actually popular with the general public! – and several unexpected switchbacks. Here we are, five days away from the big night, and nearly everyone expects the big winner to be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/why_argo_doesnt_deserve_the_oscar/">“Argo,”</a> a movie that was given up for dead after Ben Affleck wasn’t nominated for best director. So let’s stipulate that while three of the top six categories appear to have been decided beyond any reasonable doubt, there’s probably one big surprise out there somewhere that no one sees coming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/who_should_win_the_oscars_but_probably_wont/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/who_should_win_the_oscars_but_probably_wont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Argo&#8217;s&#8221; winning political strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/how_argo_did_it_the_state_of_the_oscar_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/how_argo_did_it_the_state_of_the_oscar_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Mendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Ben Affleck failed to get a best director nomination, all seemed lost. But things changed quickly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest headline of Oscar nomination morning wasn't the 12 nominations garnered by "Lincoln." It was the one nomination that <em>didn't</em> happen: Ben Affleck's anticipated best director nomination for "Argo" didn't materialize, likely at the expense of two unexpected nominees (Benh Zeitlin for "Beasts of the Southern Wild" and Michael Haneke for "Amour"). This would seem to have doomed "Argo's" chances in the nine-film best picture race, where it was nominated; the last time a film won best picture without a nomination for its director was in 1989, when "Driving Miss Daisy" triumphed after surprising nominees Woody Allen and Kenneth Branagh crashed the best director party. Since then, a film without a best director nod has rarely even been taken seriously as a contender to win it all.</p><p>But everything is poised to change for "Argo." The precursor awards for Affleck and his film have been rolling in and building momentum for his Oscar campaign: The actor-turned-director picked up trophies for directing from the Critics' Choice Awards, the Golden Globes, the Directors Guild of America, and the UK's BAFTA Awards. As voting ends today, "Argo" is perceived to be in the lead: the aggregate Oscar prognosticators at Movie City News's authoritative Gurus O' Gold <a href="http://moviecitynews.com/2013/02/gurus-o-gold-9-days-from-the-big-show/">have overwhelmingly declared</a> "Argo" the film to beat for best picture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/how_argo_did_it_the_state_of_the_oscar_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/how_argo_did_it_the_state_of_the_oscar_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
