<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Arizona</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bodies of Arizona firefighters recovered</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bodies_of_arizona_firefighters_recovered_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bodies_of_arizona_firefighters_recovered_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flags in Prescott, Ariz., are flying at half-mast to commemorate the 19 lives lost in the wildfire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YARNELL, Ariz. (AP) — As the windblown blaze suddenly swept toward them, an elite crew of firefighting "hotshots" desperately rushed to break out their emergency shelters and take cover on the ground under the foil-lined fabric.</p><p>By the time the flames had passed, 19 men lay dead in the nation's biggest loss of firefighters in a wildfire in 80 years.</p><p>The tragedy Sunday evening all but wiped out the 20-member Granite Mountain Hotshots, a unit based in the small town of Prescott, Prescott Fire Chief Dan Fraijo said as the last of the bodies were retrieved from the mountain. Only one member survived, and that was because he was moving the unit's truck at the time, authorities said.</p><p>The deaths plunged the town into mourning, and Arizona's governor called it "as dark a day I can remember" and ordered flags flown at half-staff.</p><p>"We are heartbroken about what happened," President Barack Obama said while on a visit to Africa. He predicted the tragedy will force government leaders to answer broader questions about how they handle increasingly destructive and deadly wildfires.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bodies_of_arizona_firefighters_recovered_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bodies_of_arizona_firefighters_recovered_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jan Brewer expands Medicaid in Arizona: Will other states follow?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/jan_brewer_expands_medicaid_in_arizona_will_other_states_follow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/jan_brewer_expands_medicaid_in_arizona_will_other_states_follow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up with steve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Up with Steve" panelists discuss the possibility of other Republicans embracing the expansion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a bold move this week, Gov. Jan Brewer (R-Ariz.) called a special session to expand Medicaid measures in her state. Brewer, known to be a staunch critic of Obama, surprised many in her party and set a precedent that other conservative states might follow.</p><p>On "Up with Steve," Business Insider's Josh Barro, Center of Social Inclusion's Maya Wiley, Politico's Maggie Haberman and Slate's Matt Yglesias discussed the possibility of Medicaid expansion in other states, which Yglesias feels is likely:</p><blockquote><p>"In a lot of ways, the surprising thing about this is the fact that is has become surprising to see Republicans embrace this. When the Democrats were writing the Obamacare bill, they knew some states were more conservative than others. They knew that Republicans wouldn't be enthusiastic about this. They made the terms of Medicaid expansion extremely generous. It's all federal money and the people who live in Arizona, Michigan or wherever are paying taxes to the federal government one way or the other. Not expanding Medicaid doesn't save anyone money. It just costs your local healthcare providers and local citizens a bundle. When the bill was first passed I think no one thought this was so controversial and now Jan Brewer is doing what is simply the common sense solution and saying if the federal government is here, take my money. You take it. What is weird is so many Republicans don't see it that way."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/jan_brewer_expands_medicaid_in_arizona_will_other_states_follow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/jan_brewer_expands_medicaid_in_arizona_will_other_states_follow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minuteman leader charged with child molestation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/minuteman_leader_charged_with_child_molestation_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/minuteman_leader_charged_with_child_molestation_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Simcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minuteman Civil Defense Corps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Simcox is the former leader of one of the largest militia groups patrolling the Arizona border]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" /></a> Chris Simcox, the former leader of one of the largest militia groups patrolling the Arizona border during the peak of the nativist <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/anti-immigrant#.UcMSNT7F174">Minuteman movement</a>, has been charged with molesting three young girls.</p><p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2005/winter/the-little-prince#.UcMW34YgyBE">Simcox</a>, 52, was arrested yesterday after detectives found probable cause that he had molested the girls, all under the age of 10, police spokesman Sgt. Tommy Thompson <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/19/chris-simcox-minuteman-arrested_n_3469474.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">told Reuters.</a> The charges stem from incidents over the last few months. Simcox has denied all charges, according to a press release from the Phoenix Police Department.</p><p>He faces two counts each of child molestation and sexual conduct with a minor, and one count of attempted child molestation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/minuteman_leader_charged_with_child_molestation_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/minuteman_leader_charged_with_child_molestation_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if we demanded Ted Cruz&#8217;s papers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/what_if_we_demanded_ted_cruzs_papers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/what_if_we_demanded_ted_cruzs_papers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naturalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada-born senator wants to require documentary evidence of citizenship for voting. Maybe he should think again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Ted Cruz (R. Tex) is very unhappy about this week’s Supreme Court ruling, which held that Arizona cannot demand “documentary evidence” of United States citizenship as a condition of registering to vote in federal elections. The ruling has opened a “hole” in the law, he says, that will allow “non-citizens to register and thereby encourages voter fraud.” He has therefore vowed to “file a commonsense (sic) amendment to the immigration bill that permits states to require I.D. before registering voters."</p><p>This raises a fascinating question. How would Cruz himself go about providing “documentary evidence” of his <em>own</em> citizenship?</p><p>As it happens, he was born in Canada, where his parents were working at the time. Thus, his birth certificate cannot provide any such proof. And because he claims citizenship by birth, he would never have had any reason to obtain a certificate of naturalization. According to Cruz’s official website, however, his mother was born and raised in Delaware, which is quite sufficient under the law to confer citizenship on Ted – if we take his word for it. On the other hand, what if we demanded the fabled documentary evidence?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/what_if_we_demanded_ted_cruzs_papers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/what_if_we_demanded_ted_cruzs_papers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes sweeping anti-abortion bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation would restrict almost all abortions to the first 20 weeks after conception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-led House on Tuesday passed a far-reaching anti-abortion bill that conservatives saw as a milestone in their 40-year campaign against legalized abortion and Democrats characterized as yet another example of a GOP war on women.</p><p>The legislation, sparked by the murder conviction of a Philadelphia late-term abortion provider, would restrict almost all abortions to the first 20 weeks after conception, defying laws in most states that allow abortions up to when the fetus becomes viable, usually considered to be around 24 weeks.</p><p>It mirrors 20-week abortion ban laws passed by some states, and lays further groundwork for the ongoing legal battle that abortion foes hope will eventually result in forcing the Supreme Court to reconsider the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, that made abortion legal.</p><p>It passed 228-196, with six Democrats voting for it and six Republicans voting against it.</p><p>In the short term, the bill will go nowhere. The Democratic-controlled Senate will ignore it and the White House says the president would veto it if it ever reached his desk. The White House said the measure was "an assault on a woman's right to choose" and "a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/house_passes_extensive_anti_abortion_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz measure would overturn SCOTUS on voter registration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/ted_cruz_measure_would_overturn_scotus_on_voter_registration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/ted_cruz_measure_would_overturn_scotus_on_voter_registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruled against an Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship prior to voter registration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, tweeted that he will be introducing an amendment - attached to the Senate's immigration bill - that would overturn the Supreme Court's Monday decision to strike down an Arizona law that requires voters to prove their citizenship before they can register to vote.</p><p>[embedtweet id="346694498652418048"]</p><p>"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the federal 'motor voter' law preempts Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration," he explained on his <a href="https://www.facebook.com/SenatorTedCruz/posts/386143721497934">Facebook</a> page. "This hole in federal statutory law allows non-citizens to register and thereby encourages voter fraud. I will file a commonsense amendment to the immigration bill that permits states to require I.D. before registering voters."</p><p>The Supreme Court found 7-2 that the law, which the state passed in 2004, is pre-empted by a federal law that provides voters with a form for registration and requires states to “accept and use” the form.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/us/justices-reject-arizona-voting-law-requiring-proof-of-citizenship.html?_r=0">New York Times</a> explains:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/ted_cruz_measure_would_overturn_scotus_on_voter_registration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/ted_cruz_measure_would_overturn_scotus_on_voter_registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS throws out Arizona&#8217;s citizenship proof law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/scotus_throws_out_arizonas_citizenship_proof_law_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/scotus_throws_out_arizonas_citizenship_proof_law_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Circuit Court of Appels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Antonin Scalia penned the court's majority opinion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states cannot on their own require would-be voters to prove they are U.S. citizens before using a federal registration system designed to make signing up easier.</p><p>The justices voted 7-2 to throw out Arizona's voter-approved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal "Motor Voter" voter registration law.</p><p>Federal law "precludes Arizona from requiring a federal form applicant to submit information beyond that required by the form itself," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the court's majority.</p><p>The court was considering the legality of Arizona's requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal "motor voter" registration law. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which doesn't require such documentation, trumps Arizona's Proposition 200 passed in 2004.</p><p>Arizona appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/scotus_throws_out_arizonas_citizenship_proof_law_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/scotus_throws_out_arizonas_citizenship_proof_law_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona drops felony charges against undocumented immigrant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/in_arizona_felony_charges_for_undocumented_immigrants_dropped_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/in_arizona_felony_charges_for_undocumented_immigrants_dropped_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New America Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[felony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luz Ruiz Rascón had been arrested with four others in one of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's highly publicized worksite raids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newamericamedia.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/logo-1-e1367862979339.jpg" alt="New America media" align="left" /></a> PHOENIX – Luz Ruiz Rascón noticed the signs as she stepped into her home. Missing lampshades, grease in the kitchen, papers everywhere. Tiny details that any other time would have caused her to admonish her children.</p><p>“They missed me. They needed me to be here,” she said.</p><p>Rascón was returning home after nine months and 12 days in jail. She was arrested last year in a worksite raid and charged with several counts of identity theft for allegedly working with false documents.</p><p>A felony conviction would have made her ineligible for legalization should Congress pass federal immigration reform in the future. Identity theft is also considered a crime of “moral turpitude,” a deportable offense.</p><p>But after fighting the charges in court, Rascón was victorious in getting the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office to drop the felony charges.</p><p>Her case is among a handful of cases being fought by a team of attorneys who are challenging the legality of a controversial practice in Arizona: charging undocumented immigrants as felons for identity theft.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/in_arizona_felony_charges_for_undocumented_immigrants_dropped_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/in_arizona_felony_charges_for_undocumented_immigrants_dropped_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trent Franks fundraises off of rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Republican also told supporters that he's "been through a spin dryer" since the remark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., is asking supporters to help defend him against the "taxpayer-funded abortion lobby" that is attacking him for his remark that pregnancy rates from rape are "very low."</p><p>"NARAL, Planned Parenthood and the taxpayer-funded abortion lobby is attacking me for one reason -- I'm 100 percent unapologetically pro-life and I won't back down," Franks wrote to supporters in an email, the <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130613franks-firestorm-spurs-fundraising.html?nclick_check=1">Arizona Republic</a> reports. "Will you contribute $25, $50, $100, or even $500 right now to help me fight back?"</p><p>“Now they will spend whatever it takes to destroy me, remove me from Congress, and stop me from protecting any more unborn children," he continued.</p><p>Franks was referring to comments he made during a House Judiciary Committee debate on his bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks. Democrats were pushing an amendment to create an exception for rape or incest, which ultimately failed. “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” Franks said, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/12/gop-congressman-rate-of-pregnancies-from-rape-is-very-low/">Washington Post</a> reported.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/trent_franks_fundraises_off_of_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House responds to &#8220;alarming&#8221; Trent Franks rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Franks had said that the rate of pregnancy resulting from rape is "very low"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded to comments by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., that the rate of pregnancy resulting from rape is "very low," saying that Franks' remark shows an "alarming disregard for women."</p><p>Franks made the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/">comments</a> in a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, during the debate on his bill to ban abortion after 20 weeks at the national level. Franks was voicing his objections to an amendment that would create an exception for rape or incest. “Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” he said.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/13/white-house-trent-franks_n_3436713.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">Huffington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/white_house_responds_to_alarming_trent_franks_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Senate candidate calls House Republican &#8220;moron&#8221; for rape comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez, who is running for Senate in Massachusetts, slammed Arizona Rep. Trent Franks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel Gomez, the Republican candidate in the special election for senator of Massachusetts, said that Republican Rep. Trent Franks is a "moron" for commenting that most rapes don't result in pregnancy.</p><p>“I think that he’s a moron and he proves that stupid has no specific political affiliation,” Gomez told <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/massachusetts-gop-candidate-slams-moron-lawmakers-rape-comment/">ABC News</a>.</p><p>“I have no idea what goes into the mind of a moron like that,” he continued. “These kinds of comments only come from a moron and they shouldn’t be tolerated one bit.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/gop_senate_candidate_slams_moron_house_republican_for_rape_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Rate of pregnancy from rape is &#8220;very low&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona was arguing against a rape and incest exception to an abortion ban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a House Judiciary Committee debate on his measure to ban abortions after 20 weeks, Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., got a little <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/todd_akin/">Todd Akin</a>-esque, arguing that the chances of a pregnancy resulting from rape are "very low," and therefore a Democratic amendment that would create a rape and incest exception to the ban is irrelevant.</p><p>“Before, when my friends on the left side of the aisle here tried to make rape and incest the subject — because, you know, the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low,” Franks said, according to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/12/gop-congressman-rate-of-pregnancies-from-rape-is-very-low/">Washington Post</a>. He continued: “But when you make that exception, there’s usually a requirement to report the rape within 48 hours. And in this case that’s impossible because this is in the sixth month of gestation. And that’s what completely negates and vitiates the purpose for such an amendment.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/house_goper_rate_of_pregnancy_from_rape_is_very_low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party hates Jan Brewer now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["She is George Bush in a skirt!" a top Arizona Republican angrily declares. How it all went downhill so suddenly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Arizona this week, black is white, up is down, left is right and Gov. Jan Brewer is getting <a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=116437529869&amp;story_fbid=10151590798079870">praised by gay Democrats</a> and slammed by Tea Party conservatives.</p><p>The governor made a name for herself on Fox News and at national gatherings of conservatives like CPAC as a kind of uber-Tea Partyer, who <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Scorpions-Breakfast-Interests-Politicos-Americas/dp/0062106392">eats scorpions for breakfast</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/chilly-reception-obama-lands-in-phoenix-has-words-with-gop-governor/">wags her finger in the president's face</a> at lunchtime, signs <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jan-brewer-jesus-got-me-here">strict anti-immigration bills into law</a> in the afternoon, and gives the Tea Party flag the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/19/159771/jan-brewer-tea-party-flag/">same legal protections</a> as the Star-Spangled Banner by bedtime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling out GOP&#8217;s &#8220;racist, sexist&#8221; bluff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/gops_new_political_prop_babies_of_color/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/gops_new_political_prop_babies_of_color/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives to women of color: We will save you -- by taking away your rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We are a multicultural society now and cultures are bringing their traditions to America that really defy the values of America, including cultures that value males over females,” said Sen. Nancy Barto.</p><p>How ironic is this cocktail of pseudo-feminism and American exceptionalism? Deeply, given that Barto, an Arizona state senator, was explaining two years ago why the state needed a ban on race and sex-selective abortions (the race and sex being that of the fetus) -- a law the ACLU, the Maricopa County NAACP, and the National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum challenged in court this week in an unprecedented fashion. In other words, a law explicitly targeting and trying to limit the choices of women of color was being sold as their redemption.</p><p>In the two years since the law was passed, no one has ever been charged under it. That’s because the point was always to try to seize back the feminist mantle for the antiabortion side, and to tar abortion with both racism and sexism. (They even named it after Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass.) While sex-selective abortions are a real phenomenon in Asian countries with heavy son preference, the U.S. in general and Arizona in particular don’t have a problem with them. The complaint notes, “ The state's own statistics show no difference in birth ratio of boys and girls to Asian women as compared to other women.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/gops_new_political_prop_babies_of_color/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/gops_new_political_prop_babies_of_color/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. woman charged with drug smuggling released in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/u_s_woman_charged_with_drug_smuggling_released_in_mexico_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/u_s_woman_charged_with_drug_smuggling_released_in_mexico_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yanira Maldonado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yanira Maldonado was arrested after police found 12 pounds of pot under her seat on a commercial bus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOGALES, Mexico (AP) — An Arizona woman facing drug smuggling charges in Mexico was freed late Thursday night, after court officials reviewed her case.</p><p>Yanira Maldonado was greeted by well-wishers as she left the lockup on the outskirts of Nogales and hugged her husband, Gary, as officials closed the jail doors behind her.</p><p>"She lived through a nightmare," said her attorney, Jose Francisco Benitez Paz.</p><p>Maldonado was arrested by the Mexican military last week after they found nearly 12 pounds (5.4 kilograms) of pot under her seat on the commercial bus traveling from Mexico to Arizona.</p><p>The case created a nightmare scenario that has prompted outrage in the U.S. among politicians and pitted the conservative Mormon family against a judicial system that has long struggled with corruption.</p><p>Her release came hours after court officials reviewed security footage that showed her and her husband boarding a bus in Mexico with only blankets, bottles of water and her purse in hand.</p><p>The judge determined that she was no longer a suspect and all allegations against her were dropped, according to Benitez Paz.</p><p>She spoke briefly to reporters clustered outside the jail, saying she thanks God, her husband and her lawyer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/u_s_woman_charged_with_drug_smuggling_released_in_mexico_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/u_s_woman_charged_with_drug_smuggling_released_in_mexico_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mistrial in penalty phase of Arias case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/mistrial_in_penalty_phase_of_arias_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/mistrial_in_penalty_phase_of_arias_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jodi Arias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mistrial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 13 hours of deliberations over three days, the jury failed to agree to a sentence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHOENIX (AP) -- As jurors in Jodi Arias' murder trial filed one by one from the courtroom after a dramatic five months of gut-wrenching testimony and gruesome photographs, three women on the panel cried and one looked to the victim's family, mouthing the word, "Sorry."</p><p>The silent gesture offered a glimpse into what was likely a tense few days inside the deliberations room as the jury finally determined it could not agree on whether to sentence Arias to life in prison or execution for murdering her boyfriend.</p><p>After about 13 hours of deliberations over three days, the panel gave up.</p><p>Judge Sherry Stephens gave a heavy sigh as she announced a mistrial in the penalty phase of the case Thursday. A conference with the judge and attorneys was set for June 20 to determine how both sides want to proceed. In the interim, Stephens set a July 18 retrial date, sending prosecutors back to the drawing board to rehash the shocking case and details of sex and lies to another 12 people.</p><p>"This was not your typical trial," Stephens told jurors. "You were asked to perform some very difficult duties."</p><p>The jurors declined to comment and left the courthouse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/mistrial_in_penalty_phase_of_arias_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/mistrial_in_penalty_phase_of_arias_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz: &#8220;I don&#8217;t trust the Republicans&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/ted_cruz_i_dont_trust_the_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/ted_cruz_i_dont_trust_the_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cruz was responding to John McCain's criticism of conservatives who have been blocking budget negotiations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican in-fighting continues: Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Wednesday that he doesn't trust either Democrats or Republicans when it comes to budget negotiations. "The senior senator from Arizona urged this body to trust the Republicans. Let me be clear, I don't trust the Republicans," Cruz said, according to <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/ted-cruz-i-dont-trust-republicans">TPM</a>. "And I don't trust the Democrats."</p><p>Cruz was responding to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/gop-moderates-feud-with-conservatives-over-stall-tactics-on-budget/2013/05/21/b60b3500-c262-11e2-914f-a7aba60512a7_story.html">harshly criticized</a> conservative  Republicans who are holding up the Senate's ability to pass a budget. "What are we on my side of the aisle doing? We don't want a budget unless we put requirements on the conferees that are absolutely out of line and unprecedented?" McCain said on the Senate floor on Tuesday.</p><p>Ezra Klein of the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/22/wonkbook-a-thaw-in-the-senate/">Washington Post</a> explains:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/ted_cruz_i_dont_trust_the_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/ted_cruz_i_dont_trust_the_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court strikes down Arizona abortion ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The panel called the abortion law unconstitutional "under a long line of invariant Supreme Court precedents"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appellate panel has struck down an Arizona law banning abortion at 20 weeks, calling it unconstitutional “under a long line of invariant Supreme Court precedents” guaranteeing a woman's right to an abortion.</p><p>The ban would also have severely restricted emergency abortion care for women with high-risk pregnancies, forcing doctors to wait until a woman's condition posed an immediate threat of death or catastrophic damage before offering her appropriate medical care.</p><p>In its opinion, the panel rejected what they deemed an undue legislative intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/us/arizonas-ban-on-abortions-struck-down-in-federal-court.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jodi Arias: I deserve a second chance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/jodia_arias_i_deserve_a_second_chance_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/jodia_arias_i_deserve_a_second_chance_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jodi Arias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The convicted murderer speaks out in a surprise jailhouse interview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHOENIX (AP) — In a surprise jailhouse interview just hours after a jury began deliberating her fate, Jodi Arias spoke out Tuesday about her murder trial, her many fights with her legal team and her belief that she "deserves a second chance at freedom someday."</p><p>Arias spoke to The Associated Press as part of a series of interviews with media outlets. She repeated many of her claims from previous interviews, testimony on the witness stand and her statements to the jury earlier Tuesday as she pleaded for mercy.</p><p>But she provided some new information about her case and how she believed her lawyers let her down by not calling more witnesses who could have bolstered her claims that she was a victim of domestic violence at the hands of Travis Alexander.</p><p>Arias was convicted last week of first-degree murder in the June 2008 stabbing and shooting death of her one-time lover in what prosecutors described as a cold, calculated killing carried out in a jealous rage. Arias has maintained all along it was self-defense.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/jodia_arias_i_deserve_a_second_chance_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/jodia_arias_i_deserve_a_second_chance_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is climate change fueling an epidemic?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valley Fever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outbreaks of valley fever have been attributed in part to climbing temperatures in California and Arizona]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a><br /> If you haven’t heard of valley fever, you’re not alone. Although cases in states like California are rising, public awareness is low and misdiagnoses from doctors are sadly high. The AP <a href="http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2013-05-05/fever-hits-thousands-parched-west-farm-region#.UYrOTis4XBC">reported</a> an 850 percent spike in cases across the country from 1998 to 2011, with California and Arizona being the worst states.</p><p>“The fever has hit California’s agricultural heartland particularly hard in recent years, with incidence dramatically increasing in 2010 and 2011,” <a href="http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2013-05-05/fever-hits-thousands-parched-west-farm-region#.UYrOTis4XBC">wrote</a> the AP’s Gosia Wozniacka. “The disease — which is prevalent in arid regions of the United States, Mexico, Central and South America — can be contracted by simply breathing in fungus-laced spores from dust disturbed by wind as well as human or animal activity.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>