<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > ballot measures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/ballot_measures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Slideshow: Gay couples get married in Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex marriages in Washington state officially became legal this week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, Washington state began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, after voters legalized it on Election Day. More than 800 couples <a href="http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019849568_marriage07m.html?prmid=4939">lined up</a> to get married yesterday, beginning at midnight the night before. Here are pictures from throughout the state, inspired by a tweet from <a href="https://twitter.com/pourmecoffee/status/277064185286905856">@PourMeCoffee</a>.</p><p>[slide_show id=13118132]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/slideshow_gay_couples_get_married_in_washington_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rahm Emanuel pushes for Illinois gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/rahm_emanuel_pushes_for_illinois_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/rahm_emanuel_pushes_for_illinois_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chicago mayor says “the time is right” ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel says that “the time is right” for Illinois to pass a bill legalizing same-sex marriage, and called for it to be a priority in the state.</p><p>The election “continued America’s great history of expanding opportunity and equality,” Emanuel wrote in a <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/opinions/letters/16279794-474/time-for-marriage-equality-in-illinois.html">letter</a> to the Chicago Sun-Times. “Today, we must take the next step on that journey by affording the opportunity to marry to all Americans — and we can continue that march by quickly enacting marriage equality here in Illinois.”</p><p>The <a href="http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/11/14/chicago-mayor-rahm-emanuel-says-now-time-marriage-equality">Advocate</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>In Illinois, a marriage equality bill was introduced in February by the state’s three openly gay legislators (there will be a fourth in the next term). Gov. Pat Quinn, also a Democrat, has made it clear he supports such a measure. The Democrats have a majority of seats in both the state Senate and House, and in the next term, beginning in January, will have supermajorities.</p> <p>All these factors would appear to bode well for the bill, and there has been speculation that a vote on it could come before the end of this year. Emanuel, however, declined to predict when the legislature might take it up or if it would pass. He said he simply wants to ensure marriage equality won’t get lost in the shuffle amid the state’s financial and other challenges, and he thinks it will unless someone makes it a priority.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/rahm_emanuel_pushes_for_illinois_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/rahm_emanuel_pushes_for_illinois_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for pot policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public opinion on marijuana is moving fast, and pols will eventually follow. But "eventually" could be a while]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election results this week from Washington, Colorado, Massachusetts and Arkansas demonstrate that public opinion about cannabis has moved much faster than the positions of elected officials. That Massachusetts voters would pass a fairly loosely regulated medical marijuana system isn’t very surprising. But that voters in Arkansas came within a whisker of passing one shows that it isn’t just a hippie-dippie issue anymore. And for Colorado and Washington to take the plunge into full legalization – not just of use or for medical purposes, but full-scale commercial growing and sales – marks an epoch.</p><p>There are two “What next?” questions: What happens at the ballot box two or four years from now? And what happens in Colorado and Washington over the next year or two? Neither question has a clear answer, but the political developments may be easier to forecast than the operational ones.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/whats_next_for_pot_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballot measures: A rundown of results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States weighed in on issues including the death penalty, GMO labeling, human trafficking and racist language ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voters around the country weighed in Tuesday on a cornucopia of ballot measures, offering a partial insight into the state of opinion around the nation on issues ranging from genetically modified foods to the death penalty.</p><p><strong>Racist language to remain in Alabama Constitution -- but perhaps with good reason:</strong></p><p>Alabama voted against a measure to remove references to segregation in its state Constitution, which includes the line, “separate schools shall be provided for white and colored children.” Amendment 4 would have removed the racist language, but, its opponents argued, it carried with it a series of other, largely tax-based contentions. As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/31/us/alabama-simmers-before-vote-on-its-constitutions-racist-language.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times reported </a>in advance of the vote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
