<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barack_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:08:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Moore &#8220;needs to get everything it needs right away&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/obama_moore_needs_to_get_everything_it_needs_right_away_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/obama_moore_needs_to_get_everything_it_needs_right_away_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twister]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president pledges his support to the Oklahoma town as it recovers from a devastating tornado]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama pledged urgent government help for Oklahoma Tuesday in the wake of "one of the most destructive" storms in the nation's history.</p><p>"In an instant neighborhoods were destroyed, dozens of people lost their lives, many more were injured," Obama said from the White House State Dining Room. "Among the victims were young children trying to take shelter in the safest place they knew — their school."</p><p>The president added that the town of Moore, Okla., "needs to get everything it needs right away."</p><p>Obama spoke following a meeting with his disaster response team, including Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and top White House officials. On Monday, he spoke with Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin and Republican Rep. Tom Cole, whose home is in the heavily damaged town of Moore, a suburb of Oklahoma City.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/obama_moore_needs_to_get_everything_it_needs_right_away_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/obama_moore_needs_to_get_everything_it_needs_right_away_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Barackalypse Now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/must_see_morning_clip_barackalypse_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/must_see_morning_clip_barackalypse_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Hurricane Scandy" continues to engulf the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, the White House sent out "whoever this guy is" (senior advisor to the president, Dan Pfeiffer) for damage control to address the various scandals plaguing the Obama administration. Jon Stewart was not impressed:</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:426432" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-may-20-2013/barackalypse-now">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/must_see_morning_clip_barackalypse_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/must_see_morning_clip_barackalypse_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still no polling backlash for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/still_no_polling_backlash_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/still_no_polling_backlash_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the Tea Party has gotten a boost from the ongoing IRS and Benghazi controversies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.langerresearch.com/uploads/1149a1PoliticsToday.pdf" target="_blank">ABC News/Washington Post</a> shows that there is still no backlash against President Obama in the polls amid the IRS, Benghazi and Associated Press phone records controversies.</p><p>The poll shows that Obama's approval rating is "stable" at 51 percent, close to a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/" target="_blank">CNN/ORC International</a> poll from earlier this week that showed Obama's approval at 53 percent - up two points from the beginning of April.</p><p>Though it's not all good news. From the poll:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/still_no_polling_backlash_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/still_no_polling_backlash_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aloof, shifty Obama: Nixon times ten thousand!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis McDonough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our evil President managed to both mastermind the IRS flap, and be such a bad boss that no one told him about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/senior-wh-staff-knew-of-irs-investigation-did-not-164378.html">According to Jay Carney</a>, everyone in the White House knew about the big IRS scandal for a few weeks before it went public. Everyone except the president, because this whole month has been a season-long plot arc on HBO's <em>Veep.</em> (Speaking of, where's Joe Biden been lately?) Everyone was afraid to tell their boss about this dumb thing the IRS did, and then he learned about it on the news, and now he is probably <em>super</em> pissed.</p><p>Clearly Obama is a horrible boss and the White House is a toxic work environment, probably, where people are afraid to report bad news to their superiors. <em>Just like Nixon, time ten thousand.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: No one willing to impeach the first black president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush announced on Monday that Obama is not in "any jeopardy" of impeachment -- but only because he is black ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh announced on Monday that President Obama won't be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/impeach_obama_again/" target="_blank">impeached</a> over recent controversies and that "Benghazi is not going to touch" him. And no, it's not because the talking points "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandal</a>" wasn't really, you know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandalous</a>, or that the Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus told impeachment-happy members of Congress to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/" target="_blank">cool it until they have evidence</a> to support their claims or any other reasons that are based in reality.</p><p>It's because Obama is black, and "the American people are not going to tolerate the first black president being removed from office," according to Limbaugh.</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/194156" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/20/limbaugh-obama-wont-be-removed-from-office-beca/194156" target="_blank">Media Matters</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top White House aides knew about IRS probe but didn&#8217;t tell Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_white_house_aides_knew_about_irs_probe_but_didnt_tell_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_white_house_aides_knew_about_irs_probe_but_didnt_tell_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and other senior White House aides knew about the report last month]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House acknowledged on Monday that senior White House aides knew about the Inspector General probe into the IRS's targeting of conservative groups as early as last month, though they did not inform the president about the matter.</p><p>White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in a press conference Monday that officials, including Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, learned April 16th about the review of whether or not the IRS targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status for heightened scrutiny. The White House also said on Monday that the chief lawyer for the White House learned of the investigation on April 22, though a member of her staff learned of it the same time as McDonough.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_white_house_aides_knew_about_irs_probe_but_didnt_tell_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_white_house_aides_knew_about_irs_probe_but_didnt_tell_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beltway scandal machine breaks, knows nothing about America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_scandal_machine_breaks_knows_nothing_about_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_scandal_machine_breaks_knows_nothing_about_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While DC fixates on whether Obama is worse than Nixon, polls show the public likes the president more and more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great Charles Pierce may deride it as “Tiger Beat on the Potomac,” but sometimes I’m damn grateful we have Politico. Good reporters like Maggie Haberman and Ken Vogel aside, even Politico’s trademark triviality sometimes provides an important political service.</p><p>Case in point: Its hilarious <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/dc-turns-on-obama-91386.html#ixzz2TrQc1hRi">“D.C. turns on Obama”</a> piece last week, which marked the crest of Scandalmania and also helped explain polls that show Americans trust President Obama’s version of events when it comes to the Benghazi and IRS controversies. I expected polls to show people believe the president on these issues, but I’ll admit I was surprised to see his approval rating actually ticked up a bit despite the constant drumbeat of scandal. But it did -- and that should force the media to look in the mirror, though it probably won’t.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_scandal_machine_breaks_knows_nothing_about_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_scandal_machine_breaks_knows_nothing_about_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama: Incidental black man?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/barack_obama_incidental_black_man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/barack_obama_incidental_black_man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commencement Speeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disparity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president gets personal at Morehouse College, as hard questions loom for black men and his presidency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the distracting controversies piling on his political plate, who could blame President Obama for getting reflective at his recent commencement speech to Morehouse College graduates? Who could blame the first black president, typically a cool arbiter of analysis and restraint, for getting personal in his remarks to his receptive, brotherly crowd?</p><p>How does a black president deliver 2013 Morehouse graduates realistic advice and a pep talk at the same time? How can he optimistically send them forth — with straight talk, or a straight face?</p><p>The average white family has about $632,000 in wealth, versus $98,000 for black families. The overall unemployment rate for whites is 6.7 percent, versus 13 percent for blacks, generally. The unemployment rate for black young adults ages 16 to 24 -- those outside the commencement halls -- is 25 percent, on par with Spanish- or Greek-level joblessness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/barack_obama_incidental_black_man/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/barack_obama_incidental_black_man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House lawyer reportedly knew of IRS findings in April</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeks before an audit went public, the chief attorney knew about conservative targeting by the agency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House chief attorney Kathryn Ruemmler was reportedly informed about the IRS's targeting of conservative groups in April, weeks before an Inspector General audit on the matter went public.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/20/white-house-knew-of-irs-targeting-in-late-april-official-says/">Washington Post</a>, which cites "a senior White House official":</p><blockquote><p>The Treasury inspector general for tax administration told the White House counsel’s office that it “was completing a report finding that line IRS employees had improperly scrutinized certain 501(c)(4) organizations by using words like ‘tea party’ and ‘patriot,;” the senior White House official said. White House staff were also told the report had not been finalized, and that the publication date had not been set, but would likely come soon.</p></blockquote><p>And <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/us/politics/white-house-told-of-irs-scrutiny-of-groups-in-april.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">The New York Times</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s hope for progressivism yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/theres_hope_for_progressivism_yet_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/theres_hope_for_progressivism_yet_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunisia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten years after America invaded Iraq, we're finally emerging from the dark shadow cast by the neocon movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten years ago, my part of the world was full of valiant opposition to the new wars being launched far away and at home -- and of despair. And like despairing people everywhere, whether in a personal depression or a political tailspin, these activists believed the future would look more or less like the present.  If there was nothing else they were confident about, at least they were confident about that. Ten years ago, as a contrarian and a person who prefers not to see others suffer, I tried to undermine despair with the case for hope.</p><p>A decade later, the present is still contaminated by the crimes of that era, but so much has changed. Not necessarily for the better -- a decade ago, most spoke of climate change as a distant problem, and then it caught up with us in 10,000 ways. But not entirely for the worse either -- the vigorous climate movement we needed arose in that decade and is growing now. If there is one thing we can draw from where we are now and where we were then, it’s that the unimaginable is ordinary, and the way forward is almost never a straight path you can glance down, but a labyrinth of surprises, gifts, and afflictions you prepare for by accepting your blind spots as well as your intuitions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/theres_hope_for_progressivism_yet_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/theres_hope_for_progressivism_yet_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three scandals, Beltway style</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, AP phone logs. In DC's game of scandal, you lose to the IRS and Benghazi!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Pfeiffer, a Senior Adviser to the president for strategy and communications, <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/05/dan-pfeiffer-explains-irs-scandal/65379/">did all the Sunday shows last week</a>, in an effort to address the troika of scandals that Washington is currently fixated on. It was probably the best thing the White House could've done, on a morning when those shows were inevitably going to be full of gleeful piling on. It was also just adding fuel to the fire. The political press is in scandal coverage mode and as long as Congress plays along nothing can shut the machine off until each scandal runs its course.</p><p>Let's recap the scandals, in case you have been too busy having message board debates about Star Trek or deciphering new Kanye lyrics to pay attention:</p><p>1. Benghazi. Republicans insist the White House did something evil and incomprehensible involving talking points following the September 11, 2012 attack on the American consulate in the Lybian city. Recently, the White House released an email chain showing the process of drafting and revising the talking points.<br /> 2. The IRS. The IRS reportedly targeted conservative nonprofits for extra scrutiny of their tax-exempt status.<br /> 3. The Associated Press. The Justice Department sought access to, and received, a massive trove of phone data of AP journalists, as part of its investigation into a leak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands treated for sexual abuse-related injuries in military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2012 alone, as many as 4,000 veterans sought disability benefits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 85,000 veterans were treated last year for injuries or illness stemming from sexual abuse in the military, and 4,000 sought disability benefits, underscoring the staggering long-term impact of a crisis that has roiled the Pentagon and been condemned by President Barack Obama as "''shameful and disgraceful."</p><p>A Department of Veterans Affairs accounting released in response to inquiries from The Associated Press shows a heavy financial and emotional cost involving vets from Iraq, Afghanistan and even back to Vietnam, and lasting long after a victim leaves the service.</p><p>Sexual assault or repeated sexual harassment can trigger a variety of health problems, primarily post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. While women are more likely to be victims, men made up nearly 40 percent of the patients the VA treated last year for conditions connected to what it calls "military sexual trauma."</p><p>It took years for Ruth Moore of Milbridge, Maine, to begin getting treatment from a VA counseling center in 2003 — 16 years after she was raped twice while she was stationed in Europe with the Navy. She continues to get counseling at least monthly for PTSD linked to the attacks and is also considered fully disabled.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/thousands_treated_for_sexual_abuse_related_injuries_in_military_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy Noonan hears a dog whistle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandalgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How desperate is GOP? It now fantasizes that Obama’s campaign was a coded order to the IRS to target the Tea Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the best evidence the GOP knows the IRS scandal doesn’t reach into the White House: Now they’re saying they don’t need to find evidence that President Obama directed or even knew about the investigation of Tea Party groups’ non-profit status; his actively campaigning for reelection represented a “dog whistle” to tell the agency to target his political enemies.</p><p>The dog whistle quote came via NBC's “Meet the Press” Sunday from Peggy Noonan, who can no longer be taken seriously as a writer or pundit. When host David Gregory pressed her on the lack of evidence for her claims that the IRS scandal was worse than Watergate, Noonan insisted that the president “was giving a dog whistle to people who could launch this thing." The former Reagan-Bush speechwriter vividly summed up, in her thousand points of crazy style, where the IRS “scandal” went over the last few days: Obama didn’t need to order the tax agency to harass Tea Party groups (and his critics don’t need proof that he did so): his criticizing the group during the 2012 campaign, as well as blasting the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, represented an implicit order to do so.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Obama to make big speech about drones, Guantanamo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President will reportedly address White House counterterrorism policy on Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, President Obama will reportedly make a big speech to address White House counterterrorism policy, including the closing of Guantanamo Bay and the Administration's use of drone strikes.</p><p>According to an administration official, Politico reports, Obama will discuss the policy at the National Defense University in Washington. From <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/obama-to-speak-on-guantanamo-counterterror-drones-164301.html">Politico</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Obama plans elaborate on "the state of the threats we face, particularly as Al Qaeda core has weakened but new dangers have emerged," the official said. He will also "discuss the policy and legal framework under which we take action against terrorist threats, including the use of drones" and "will review our detention policy and efforts to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay."</p> <p>The president will also "frame the future of our efforts against Al Qaeda, its affiliates and adherents."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman&#8217;s right: Austerity kills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_krugmans_right_austerity_kills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_krugmans_right_austerity_kills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austerity kills -- radical cuts destroy economies and lives, and the honest numbers and economics keep proving it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I will never forgive them,” wrote 13-year-old Kieran McArdle to the Daily Record, a national newspaper based in Glasgow. “I won’t be able to come to terms with my dad’s death until I get justice for him.”</p><p>Kieran’s father, 57-year-old Brian, had worked as a security guard in Lanarkshire, near Glasgow. The day after Christmas 2011, Brian had a stroke, which left him paralyzed on his left side, blind in one eye, and unable to speak. He could no longer continue working to support his family, so he signed up for disability income from the British government.</p><p>That government, in the hands of Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron since the 2010 elections, would prove no friend to the McArdles. Cameron claimed that hundreds of thousands of Britons were cheating the government’s disability system. The Department for Work and Pensions begged to differ. It estimated that less than 1 percent of disability benefit funds went to people who were not genuinely disabled.</p><p>Still, Cameron proceeded to cut billions of pounds from welfare benefits including support for the disabled. To try to meet Cameron’s targets, the Department for Work and Pensions hired Atos, a private French “systems integration” firm. Atos billed the government £400 million to carry out medical evaluations of people receiving disability benefits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_krugmans_right_austerity_kills/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_krugmans_right_austerity_kills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>213</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Obama approval at 53 percent amid IRS, Benghazi controversies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same poll showed Obama's approval at 51 percent in early April]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new CNN/ORC poll finds that despite the controversies surrounding the IRS and the attacks in Benghazi, President Obama still enjoys a 53 percent approval rating, up from 51 percent at the beginning of April.</p><p>45 percent now say they disapprove of the President.</p><p>From <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/19/have-new-controversies-hurt-obama-has-gop-overreacted/">CNN</a>:</p><blockquote><p>"That two-point difference is well within the poll's sampling error, so it is a mistake to characterize it as a gain for the president," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Nonetheless, an approval rating that has not dropped and remains over 50% will probably be taken as good news by Democrats after the events of the last week."</p> <p>The CNN poll is in-line with Gallup, which also indicated a very slight rise in Obama's approval rating over the same time period. And Gallup's daily tracking poll also indicated a slight upward movement of Obama's approval rating over the past week. But as with the CNN poll, it was within that survey's sampling error.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan: &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; if there was a Benghazi cover-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We just need to investigate this for the sake of good government," he added]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on this week's episode of Fox News Sunday that he does not know whether there was a "cover-up" related to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, but the investigation needs to run its course.</p><p>"Those of us who have had the briefings, seen the videos, know there was no protest involved," Ryan said. "To suggest afterwards that this was the result of a spontaneous protest, we now know is not the case. So the burden of proof here is on the administration's side. Why did they continue to push this kind of a story when they knew nearly immediately afterwards that that was not the case?"</p><p>Host Chris Wallace asked Ryan if he thinks the White House "purposely misled" the American people to help win the election. "I don't know the answer to that question," Ryan replied. "Rather make a conclusion before an investigation has been completed, we just need to investigate this for the sake of good government."</p><p>As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/19/paul-ryan-benghazi_n_3302582.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">The Huffington Post</a> points out, this is a slightly different approach from the one Ryan has been taking:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Amy Poehler returns to SNL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Meyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Weekend Update, she and Seth Meyers had just one reaction to the IRS scandal: "Really!?!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Poehler returned to "Saturday Night Live" this weekend to help Seth Meyers cover the IRS scandal on Weekend Update, for "Really!?! With Seth and Amy."</p><p>"IRS: No one needs to avoid scandals more than you. You're less popular with Americans than exercise," Meyers said.</p><p>"I mean really, the government only keeps you around to make the DMV look good," Poehler added.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=n37073" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_week_in_10_pics_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_week_in_10_pics_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umbrellagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris hadfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.J. Simpson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the House Judiciary Committee hearings to #umbrellagate, a look at the week's most enduring images]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the House Judiciary Committee hearings to #umbrellagate, a look at the week's most enduring images]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_week_in_10_pics_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: Don&#8217;t call for impeachment without evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reince Priebus chided members of the Republican party who have called for Obama's impeachment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus warned members of the Republican party to be cautious when calling for President Obama's impeachment over the Benghazi and IRS scandals, "until you have evidence."</p><p>“We have to be persistent but patient,” Priebus told <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/behind-the-curtain-why-the-gop-thinks-it-could-blow-it-91528.html?hp=t1">Politico</a>. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent. But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.”</p><p>Republicans like Sen. Jim Inhofe, Okla., and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah, have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/">argued</a> that the President could be impeached over the State Department's handling of the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya — not to mention the slew of Republicans who have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">invoked</a> Watergate when discussing the IRS scandal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
