<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barack_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>“I just want the U.S. to send my father home”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/%e2%80%9ci_just_want_the_u_s_to_send_my_father_home%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/%e2%80%9ci_just_want_the_u_s_to_send_my_father_home%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The family of a Gitmo detainee twice cleared for transfer remains pessimistic, despite Obama's speech vowing reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muhammad al-Baidhani, an 11-year-old Yemeni boy with a mop of brown curls, only knows his father from photos and a one-hour video conference every two months. Before Muhammad was born, his father was captured and sent to the U.S. military prison at Guantánamo Bay, where he’s been held without charge ever since.</p><p>“Thanks to the U.S., I don’t even know what the word ‘Dad’ means,” Muhammad told me when we met at his family’s house earlier this month in Sanaa, the Yemeni capital. Clutching a portrait of his father, Abdul Khaliq al-Baidhani, in a white prison jumpsuit, he added: “I just want the U.S. to send my father home.”</p><p>If President Obama stands by his statements on Thursday, Muhammad may finally get his wish. During a wide-ranging <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/read-transcript-of-obamas-speech-on-counterterrorism-policy">speech</a> on counterterrorism policy, Obama vowed to lift a freeze on repatriations of Yemenis from Guantánamo that he imposed in January 2010, days after a botched effort to attack a U.S. airliner that authorities linked to Yemen. Obama also renewed the pledge he made on his first day in office in 2009 to close Guantánamo altogether – though without offering a time frame.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/%e2%80%9ci_just_want_the_u_s_to_send_my_father_home%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/%e2%80%9ci_just_want_the_u_s_to_send_my_father_home%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats may be even worse than Republicans at regulating Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/democrats_cant_be_trusted_to_control_wall_street_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/democrats_cant_be_trusted_to_control_wall_street_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new bill making its way through Congress permits the kind of derivatives trading that bankrupted our economy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs Republicans when Wall Street has the Democrats? With the help of congressional Democrats, the Street is rolling back financial reforms enacted after its near meltdown.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/banks-lobbyists-help-in-drafting-financial-bills/?hp">New York Times</a>, a bill that’s already moved through the House Financial Services Committee, allowing more of the very kind of derivatives trading (bets on bets) that got the Street into trouble, was drafted by Citigroup — whose recommended language was copied nearly word for word in 70 lines of the 85-line bill.</p><p>Where were House Democrats? Right behind it. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, Democrat of New York, a major recipient of the Street’s political largesse, co-sponsored it. Most of the Democrats on the Committee, also receiving generous donations from the big banks, voted for it. Rep. Jim Himes, another proponent of the bill and a former banker at Goldman Sachs, now leads the Democrat’s fund-raising effort in the House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/democrats_cant_be_trusted_to_control_wall_street_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/democrats_cant_be_trusted_to_control_wall_street_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Holder versus journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/eric_holder_versus_journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/eric_holder_versus_journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After AG signed off on warrant granting DOJ access to reporter's email, the question now is: Will Obama let him go?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Eric Holder personally signed off on the warrant naming Fox News journalist James Rosen a "possible co-conspirator" in violation of the Espionage Act, Michael Isikoff <a href="http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/23/18451142-holder-okd-search-warrant-for-fox-news-reporters-private-emails-official-says">reported yesterday.</a> Which is sort of awkward, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/05/23/eric_holder_will_lead_investigation_into_journalist_warrant_that_he_approved.html">because Barack Obama also yesterday</a> told the country (the <em>whole</em> country) that he didn't want to criminalize reporting, and that he was going to ask his Justice Department to make sure not to do that anymore.</p><p>Rosen wasn't charged. In truth, the government never really intended to charge him. They just needed a judge to agree that Rosen probably violated the Espionage Act so that they could get their warrant to read his emails, as part of their real investigation into his source, an intelligence analyst named Richard Kim. It worked. That's the scandal: that the government <em>could</em> charge a journalist with, effectively, spying, simply for reporting. Barack Obama yesterday announced that he did not want his Justice Department treating the act of reporting as criminal. He is going to convene a panel, and urge the passage of a shield law. The question is, what will he do about Holder?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/eric_holder_versus_journalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/eric_holder_versus_journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A progressive defense of drones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a liberal I was against drones reflexively. But the moral debate is more complicated than I'd realized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Thursday’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/">speech</a> before the National Defense University, President Obama reflected on the concerns about “morality and accountability” raised by drone strikes. Emphasizing the importance of “clear guidelines” and intelligence gathering to properly “constrain” the use of drones, the president also maintained a firm stance on their necessity: Even though drone strikes sometimes result in civilian casualties, in many circumstances they remain the most effective option for realizing specific military objectives.</p><p>As a liberal, I’m against drones essentially by reflex. At least, I used to be. Recently, I’ve begun to reconsider that view; and I’m no longer sure where I come down on the morality of drone strikes. Disturbing as I find state-sponsored violence, when drones do the killing instead of soldiers, it seems apparent that we have an easier time recognizing the violence as horrific. War, in its traditional form, distorts our moral reasoning. Drones do not. And as much it grates against my broader political commitments to say so, this is plainly a <em>benefit</em> of drone warfare, other shortcomings notwithstanding.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing Gitmo is not enough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aumf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama admits "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare” -- but fails to offer way out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four years ago, President Obama gave a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-On-National-Security-5-21-09/">seminal counterterrorism speech</a> in front of the Constitution, arguing we “uphold our most cherished values not only because doing so is right, but because it strengthens our country and it keeps us safe.” Today, amid controversies over his administration’s killing of American citizens in drone strikes, efforts to break hunger strikes by Guantánamo Bay detainees who have long been cleared for transfer, and seizures of the call records of national security journalists, Obama tried to reclaim those cherished values in his fight against terror.</p><p>In a speech at the National Defense University, Obama tried to redefine that fight and at least rhetorically end the war. “We must define the nature and scope of this struggle, or else it will define us, mindful of James Madison’s warning that ‘No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/for_obama_a_new_plan_to_fight_terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Code Pink activist berates Obama at national security speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_heckled_at_national_security_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_heckled_at_national_security_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code Pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Will you apologize to the thousands of Muslims that you have killed?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">President Obama's counterterrorism speech was interrupted by a heckler, identified by reporters at the speech as Code Pink's Medea Benjamin, who expressed her outrage about the Administration's use of drones and the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.</p><p style="text-align: left;">“I’m willing to cut the young lady who interrupted me so slack, because it’s worth being passionate about,” Obama said. He added: “I obviously don’t agree with much of what she said."</p><p style="text-align: left;">"Will you tell the Muslim people their lives are as precious as our lives?" she yelled, as she was being escorted out. "Can you take the drones out of the hands of the CIA? Can you stop the signature strikes that are killing people on the basis of suspicious activities? Will you apologize to the thousands of Muslims that you have killed?"</p><p style="text-align: left;">"That will make us safer," she added.</p><p>Here's the video, via <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obamas-counterterrorism-speech-interrupted-by-heckler-video">TPM</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_heckled_at_national_security_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_heckled_at_national_security_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ahead of Obama&#8217;s speech, U.S. acknowledges four American drone killings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/ahead_of_obamas_speech_u_s_acknowledges_four_american_drone_killings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/ahead_of_obamas_speech_u_s_acknowledges_four_american_drone_killings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter from Eric Holder and reports on policy shift do little to allay concerns about endless, boundless drone war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, President Obama will give the first major speech on counterterrorism of his second term. The New York Times<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/us/us-acknowledges-killing-4-americans-in-drone-strikes.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=0&amp;nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=edit_th_20130523"> reported</a> that the speech will mark the opening of "a new phase" of counterterror efforts with greater restrictions applied to the use of lethal drone strikes. There's reason for skepticism.</p><p>On Wednesday afternoon, in a letter to Congress, Attorney General Eric Holder for the first time formally acknowledged that U.S. drones had killed four U.S. citizens -- including Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son. Bearing out long-held concerns in the human rights community over the description of these strikes as "targeted" killings, only one of these U.S. citizens (al-Awlaki senior) was on the government's kill list.</p><p>The New York Times' typically administration-friendly report suggests that Obama's speech will hail the dawn of a new age of high precision, unproblematic drone strikes. The language used in Holder's letter, however, alongside recent disturbing comments from top Pentagon officials, give us reason to doubt that the boundless, limitless War on Terror is coming to any sort of clean end.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/ahead_of_obamas_speech_u_s_acknowledges_four_american_drone_killings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/ahead_of_obamas_speech_u_s_acknowledges_four_american_drone_killings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pic of the day: Barack Obama at prom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/photo_of_the_day_barack_obama_at_prom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/photo_of_the_day_barack_obama_at_prom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pic of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TIME released a picture of the President at 17, dressed for his senior prom in Hawaii]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/05/23/time-exclusive-obamas-1979-prom-photos/?iid=sl-main-lead">TIME Magazine</a> obtained and published this picture of President Obama the night of his senior prom in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 1979, from his classmate Kelli Allman.</p><p>From TIME's press release on the picture:</p><blockquote><p>Pictured left to right in the attached photo: Greg Orme (Allman's date and Obama's friend), Allman, Obama and Obama's date Megan Hughes.</p> <p>TIME is also releasing a note Obama wrote in Allman's yearbook at the end of his senior year that reads, in part, "You are extremely sweet and foxy, I don't know why Greg would want to spend any time with me at all! You really deserve better than clowns like us; you even laugh at my jokes!"</p></blockquote><p>Read the full story <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/05/23/time-exclusive-obamas-1979-prom-photos/?iid=sl-main-lead">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/photo_of_the_day_barack_obama_at_prom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/photo_of_the_day_barack_obama_at_prom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s drone speech will probably be maddening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/today_obama_defends_his_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/today_obama_defends_his_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar al-Awlaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His proposed reforms appear positive, but will he continue to ignore the real arguments against his policy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Barack Obama will give a speech about drones. And about other stuff, like <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/obama-drones-speech_n_3322759.html">closing Guantánamo</a>, but primarily about drones. It will ... probably not remotely satisfy either his left-wing (and libertarian) critics who see his drone policy as an inherently immoral enterprise or his right-wing critics who think the president is not sufficiently committed to defeating Islamic terrorism. But it will probably do less to satisfy his right-wing critics, because <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/us/us-acknowledges-killing-4-americans-in-drone-strikes.html?_r=0">Obama has apparently wrested control of our unmanned missile-launching flying machines from the CIA.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/today_obama_defends_his_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/today_obama_defends_his_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner: &#8220;Inconceivable&#8221; Obama didn&#8217;t know about IRS targeting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/boehner_inconceivable_obama_didnt_know_about_irs_targeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/boehner_inconceivable_obama_didnt_know_about_irs_targeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Speaker doesn't really buy that the President's top aides didn't tell him about the investigation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said that it is "inconceivable" to him that President Obama's top advisers didn't inform him about the investigation into IRS targeting of conservative groups once they learned of it.</p><p>“It’s pretty inconceivable to me that the president wouldn’t know,” Boehner said on Fox News on Wednesday. “I’m just putting myself in his shoes. I deal with my senior staff every day. And if the White House had known about this, which now it appears they’ve known about it for about a year, it’s hard to imagine it wouldn’t have come up in some conversation.”</p><p>“They could have attempted to insulate the president from this news,” he <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/23/boehner-inconceivable-that-obama-didnt-know-about-irs-targeting/">continued</a>. “But with as many people that were involved in the audit, the number of people involved in the investigation, somebody — and the number of people in the White House that knew — it really is inconceivable that he wouldn’t have known about it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/boehner_inconceivable_obama_didnt_know_about_irs_targeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/boehner_inconceivable_obama_didnt_know_about_irs_targeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to announce new effort to close Guantanamo Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_announce_new_effort_to_close_guantanamo_bay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_announce_new_effort_to_close_guantanamo_bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detainees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the Pentagon still wants $450 million for upgrading the prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a big counterterrorism speech on Thursday, President Obama will announce a renewed effort to close Guantanamo Bay prison, and will restart transfers of detainees to other countries, reportedly now including Yemen.</p><p>From the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323336104578499433996940490.html">Wall Street Journal</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The U.S. has been in talks with the Afghan government about transferring Afghan detainees from Guantanamo. Human-rights advocates believe these detainees could be among the first transferred.</p> <p>A U.S. official said the transfers to Yemen would begin slowly, starting with two or three detainees, to ensure Yemen can keep track of the detainees and prevent them from joining militant groups. The official said that transfers to Yemen could still be months away.</p></blockquote><p>As the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/pentagon-wants-450-million-for-maintaining-upgrading-guantanamo-prison/2013/05/22/edd4c896-c2af-11e2-9642-a56177f1cdf7_story.html">Washington Post</a> reports, though, the Pentagon is still asking Congress for over $450 million to maintain and upgrade the facilities at Guantanamo Bay, a move that's at odds with the President's announcement:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_announce_new_effort_to_close_guantanamo_bay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_announce_new_effort_to_close_guantanamo_bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to address drones, Guantánamo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_address_drones_guantanamo_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_address_drones_guantanamo_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president will deliver a speech at the National Defense University Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama on Thursday is expected to address some of the thornier aspects of national security policy, including drone strikes, the prison at Guantanamo Bay and the dire threats Americans continue to face — even from fellow citizens.</p><p>On the eve of the president's speech at the National Defense University, the Obama administration revealed for the first time that a fourth American citizen had been killed in secretive drone strikes abroad. The killings of three other Americans in counterterror operations since 2009 were known before a letter from Attorney General Eric Holder to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy acknowledged the four deaths.</p><p>Obama's speech is expected to reaffirm his national security priorities — from homegrown terrorists to killer drones to the enemy combatants held at the military-run detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — but make no new sweeping policy announcements. The White House has offered few clues on how the president will address questions that have dogged his administration for years and, critics say, given foreign allies mixed signals about U.S. intentions in some of the world's most volatile areas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_address_drones_guantanamo_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/obama_to_address_drones_guantanamo_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lois Lerner, IRS disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/lois_lerner_irs_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/lois_lerner_irs_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lois Lerner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elijah cummings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The executive who took the Fifth has bungled this mess from start to finish. Why is she still employed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One puzzling response to the IRS mess, common among pundits, is demanding firings, of anyone, anywhere, now, yesterday – Obama should just make heads roll! “Why weren’t more people fired?” Sen. Max Baucus asked at a Senate hearing Tuesday. But shouldn’t we all want to figure out exactly who is responsible for targeting conservatives before trying to placate the gods of outrage by offering up indiscriminate scapegoats?</p><p>Acting IRS director Stephen Miller walked the plank, even though there’s no evidence he had anything to do with the wrongful targeting of conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, and the commissioner of the agency's tax exempt and government entities division, Joseph Grant, is retiring early. I’m not defending either man; bad things happened on their watch and that’s what happens to people at the top. Yet the woman at the center of the scandal, Lois Lerner, the IRS director of exempt organizations, still has a job --  and that makes no sense.</p><p>I don’t like scapegoating, but Lerner seemed like a reasonable candidate to lose her job even before she delivered a tin-eared self-defense in front of Darrell Issa’s House Oversight Committee – and then pleaded the Fifth Amendment, exercising her constitutional right to avoid self-incrimination,</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/lois_lerner_irs_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/lois_lerner_irs_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts: Fox News spying scandal a game-changer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/experts_fox_news_spying_scandal_a_game_changer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/experts_fox_news_spying_scandal_a_game_changer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates see potential "sea change" now that government crackdown on leaks includes framing journalism as a crime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addressing reporters Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, "If you are asking me whether the president believes that journalists should be prosecuted for doing their jobs, the answer is no.” The comment came in light of revelations that in 2010 an FBI agent had described Fox News correspondent James Rosen as a possible “co-conspirator” in a crime for the journalistic act of obtaining leaked information from a State Department source.</p><p>Even if we are to take Carney at his word, his remark comes as little assurance. The president may believe that journalists should never be prosecuted for doing their job. What's at stake, then, is what this administration considers the job of a journalist. In the context of the ongoing war on leaks and an administration invested in the tight control of information, the presidential view on protected journalistic activity<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/obama_leaves_room_for_whistle_blower_persecution/"> seems a far cry from a robust Fourth Estate.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/experts_fox_news_spying_scandal_a_game_changer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/experts_fox_news_spying_scandal_a_game_changer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden cracks Obama teleprompter joke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/biden_cracks_obama_teleprompter_joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/biden_cracks_obama_teleprompter_joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teleprompter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Barack's learning to speak without a teleprompter," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Joe Biden was speaking at a Jewish American Heritage Month reception in Washington on Tuesday and decided to join in on the running jokes about President Obama's affinity for his teleprompter.</p><p>According to a <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/biden-jokes-that-barack-is-learning-to-speak">pool report</a>, after asking that the teleprompter in the room be taken down, Biden joked: “You can’t tell Barack that the teleprompter’s down. The standing joke in the office is Barack’s learning to speak without a teleprompter; I’m learning to speak with one.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/biden_cracks_obama_teleprompter_joke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/biden_cracks_obama_teleprompter_joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On freedom of speech, Obama-Nixon comparisons are apt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing Benghazi and the IRS flap to Watergate is wrong, but on First Amendment issues this president disappoints]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than reflecting a partisan assailant's lack of creativity, Nixon metaphors and -gate suffixes are so overused in politics that they now most often mean almost nothing. Yes, to call someone "Nixonian" or to invoke Watergate in naming a scandal is typically less a serious substantive critique of an opponent than a reflection of the critic's laziness and stupidity.</p><p>"Most often" and "typically," though, are the operative words these days. While I'm obviously hesitant to invoke the 37th president terms for the aforementioned reasons -- and while I agree with my Salon colleague <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Alex Pareene</a> and my pal <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/">Steve Almond</a> that the IRS and Benghazi brouhahas most certainly do not warrant Nixon references -- I do believe Nixon's legacy is nonetheless applicable to the revelations about the Obama administration's posture toward press freedom.</p><p>Those particular revelations, of course, aren't happening in a vacuum. Instead, they relate to an administration whose known obsessions suggest this is part of a larger, dare I say Nixonian, pathology -- one defined by a hostility toward the most basic democratic ideals.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI identifies 5 Benghazi suspects</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/fbi_identifies_5_benghazi_suspects_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/fbi_identifies_5_benghazi_suspects_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moammar Gadhafi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials still don't have enough evidence to make any arrests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. has identified five men who might be responsible for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, last year, and has enough evidence to justify seizing them by military force as suspected terrorists, officials say. But there isn't enough proof to try them in a U.S. civilian court as the Obama administration prefers.</p><p>The men remain at large while the FBI gathers evidence. But the investigation has been slowed by the reduced U.S. intelligence presence in the region since the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks, and by the limited ability to assist by Libya's post-revolutionary law enforcement and intelligence agencies, which are still in their infancy since the overthrow of dictator Col. Moammar Gadhafi.</p><p>The decision not to seize the men militarily underscores the White House aim to move away from hunting terrorists as enemy combatants and holding them at the military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The preference is toward a process in which most are apprehended and tried by the countries where they are living or arrested by the U.S. with the host country's cooperation and tried in the U.S. criminal justice system. Using military force to detain the men might also harm fledgling relations with Libya and other post-Arab-Spring governments with whom the U.S. is trying to build partnerships to hunt al-Qaida as the organization expands throughout the region.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/fbi_identifies_5_benghazi_suspects_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/fbi_identifies_5_benghazi_suspects_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver: Why the scandals aren&#8217;t hurting Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/nate_silver_why_the_scandals_arent_hurting_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/nate_silver_why_the_scandals_arent_hurting_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's approval losses could be "offset by improved voter attitudes about the economy," Silver argued]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times columnist Nate Silver took a look at President Obama's approval ratings, which have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/still_no_polling_backlash_for_obama/">held</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/">steady</a> despite the controversies over Benghazi, the IRS and the Associated Press, and <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/is-the-economy-saving-obamas-approval-ratings/?smid=tw-fivethirtyeight&amp;seid=auto">hypothesized</a> that improvements in the economy might have eased the negative impact of these issues on Obama's poll numbers.</p><p>Citing a Tuesday poll from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-rating-steady-amid-controversies-likely-buoyed-by-rising-economic-hopes/2013/05/20/5509c03e-c17f-11e2-bfdb-3886a561c1ff_story.html?hpid=z2">the Washington Post</a> showing that President Obama's approval on the economy is at 48 percent, up from 44 percent in April, Silver writes: "The economic mood may have been lifted by two highly visible indicators — record-breaking stock prices and rebounding housing prices — along with a series of improved jobs reports."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/nate_silver_why_the_scandals_arent_hurting_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/nate_silver_why_the_scandals_arent_hurting_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to oust Michele Bachmann from Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading her in the polls, Democratic challenger Jim Graves tells Salon his plan to upset the Tea Party icon in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrat Jim Graves was feeling good as he sat down for an interview with Salon in Washington Monday, the same day his campaign released a poll showing him <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/">two points ahead</a> of Rep. Michele Bachmann, whom he narrowly lost to in 2012.</p><p>This time around, he'll start with higher-name ID -- "I think we started off last time around at 18 percent and now we're pushing 75 to 80 percent" -- and more support from national Democrats, who were initially skeptical about his chances and didn't get heavily involved <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/national_dems_boost_bachmann_challenger/">until mid-October</a>. "I don't think they jumped in at all," Graves quipped of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, before quickly excusing them in a typical Minnesota-nice fashion: "There was lower-hanging fruit, I don't blame them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aloof, shifty Obama: Nixon times ten thousand!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis McDonough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our evil president managed to both mastermind the IRS flap and be such a bad boss that no one told him about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/senior-wh-staff-knew-of-irs-investigation-did-not-164378.html">According to Jay Carney</a>, everyone in the White House knew about the big IRS scandal for a few weeks before it went public. Everyone except the president because this whole month has been a season-long plot arc on HBO's "Veep." (Speaking of, where's Joe Biden been lately?) Everyone was afraid to tell their boss about this dumb thing the IRS did, and then he learned about it on the news, and now he is probably <em>super</em> pissed.</p><p>Clearly Obama is a horrible boss, and the White House is a toxic work environment, probably, where people are afraid to report bad news to their superiors. <em>Just like Nixon, times ten thousand.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
