<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barack_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would we give up burgers to stop climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report suggests that adjusting our diet can slow global warming. Now let's see if our politics will let us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the news, humanity spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the history of catastrophic climate change: For the first time, measurements of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surpassed 400 parts per million, aka way above what our current ecosystem can handle.</p><p>Actually, you probably did miss the news because most major media outlets didn't cover it in a serious way, if at all. Instead, they and their audiences evidently view such information as far less news-, buzz- and tweet-worthy than (among other things) the opening of George W. Bush's library and President Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.</p><p>Such an appetite for distraction, no doubt, comes from both those who deny the problem of climate change and those who acknowledge the crisis but nonetheless look away from what feels like an unsolvable mess.</p><p>That sense of hopelessness is understandable. After all, some of the most hyped ways to reduce carbon emissions -- electric cars, mass-scale renewable energy power plants, etc. -- require the kind of technological transformations that can seem impossibly unrealistic at a time when Congress can't even pass a budget.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. reportedly moving toward arming Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk of arming the rebels is gaining traction in the Obama Administration, according to officials]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Discussions within the Obama administration in favor of providing arms to the Syrian rebels are gaining ground amid new indications that President Bashar Assad's regime may have launched additional chemical weapons attacks, U.S. and other diplomatic officials say.</p><p>As the number of suspected attacks grows, U.S. officials said intelligence agencies are seeing signs that Syrian opposition forces may be distancing themselves from the al-Qaida-linked group there — chipping away at one of the key arguments against giving lethal aid to the rebels. Yet, at the same time, the fighters associated with the extremist group are among the most effective against the regime. Assad displayed new confidence, going on the offensive in the hopes of taking advantage of ill will against the extremist group.</p><p>Officials insisted Wednesday that no decisions have been made but said arming the rebels is seen as more likely and preferable than any other military option. One U.S. official described a new "reconsideration" within the administration of the military options. The officials, who all spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss publicly the options under consideration, said most U.S. leaders prefer that the Syrians determine their own fate, so arming the opposition is more palatable than direct U.S. intervention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/us_officials_more_in_favor_of_arming_syria_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama will pitch immigration overhaul in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_will_pitch_immigration_overhaul_in_mexico_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_will_pitch_immigration_overhaul_in_mexico_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before he can sell his plan back home, the president needs support from Mexican authorities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama has his domestic ambition at the top of his travel agenda as he travels to Mexico on Thursday. To sell his immigration overhaul back home, he needs a growing economy in Mexico and a Mexican president willing to help him secure the border.</p><p>Obama was to fly to Mexico City on Thursday to meet with President Enrique Pena Nieto, eager to promote Mexico's economic success and the neighboring country's place as the second largest export market for U.S. goods and services. Mexicans will be hanging on the president's words, but Obama also has in mind an important audience back in the United States.</p><p>Though the role played by Latino voters in last year's U.S. presidential election gets much credit for the current momentum for changing immigration laws and providing a path to citizenship for 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally, another reason for the change in attitudes is that stronger border protections and the recession have been disincentives to cross into the U.S. As a result, illegal immigration has declined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_will_pitch_immigration_overhaul_in_mexico_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_will_pitch_immigration_overhaul_in_mexico_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14 presidential candidates who still owe campaign debt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/14_presidential_candidates_who_havent_paid_for_their_campaigns_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/14_presidential_candidates_who_havent_paid_for_their_campaigns_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[White House hopefuls (and occupants) are awash in red ink]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/center-500px-logo-e1365812656958.jpg" alt="The Center for Public Integrity" align="left" /></a></p><p>Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich dubbed the national debt a "burden for our children for life."</p><p>Ex-Rep. Dennis Kucinich vilified Republicans for adding, by his calculations, $4 trillion to it.</p><p>Rep. Michele Bachmann, meanwhile, predicted debt will precipitate a future of "indentured servitude to foreign lenders."</p><p>What unites these and other presidential candidates is that they themselves are in debt. Campaign debt.</p><p>It's a dubious distinction shared by Democrats and Republicans, eccentric nonagenarians and White House occupants.</p><p>Such debt isn't really hurting anyone but creditors — certainly not the nation nor its creditworthiness.</p><p>But it is a reminder that despite candidates' soaring rhetoric about fiscal responsibility, they often fail to follow their own prescription for sound budgetary management amid the relentless rush to remain competitive with political rivals during election seasons that are longer and more expensive than ever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/14_presidential_candidates_who_havent_paid_for_their_campaigns_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/14_presidential_candidates_who_havent_paid_for_their_campaigns_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration to defend age restrictions on emergency contraception</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_administration_to_defend_age_restrictions_on_emergency_contraception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_administration_to_defend_age_restrictions_on_emergency_contraception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversial appeal reaffirms the administration's previous position on the morning-after pill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Justice Department filed a notice on Wednesday to appeal a court order to remove restrictions on the morning-after pill and provide over-the-counter access to emergency contraception for women and girls of all ages.</p><p>The Obama administration's decision to appeal comes despite a recommendation from the Food and Drug Administration to lift age restrictions and other scientific research saying the drug is safe and effective for all ages.</p><p>As the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/02/health/us-will-appeal-order-on-morning-after-pill.html?hp" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The appeal reaffirms an election-year decision by Mr. Obama’s administration to block the drug’s maker from selling it without a prescription or consideration of age, and puts the White House back into the politically charged issue of access to emergency contraception...</p> <p>By appealing the judge’s ruling, Mr. Obama’s Justice Department is essentially renewing the objections that [secretary of health and human services Kathleen Sebelius] — backed by the president — had more than a year ago. In recent weeks, conservative groups had urged the Justice Department to appeal the judge’s ruling so that the contraception would not be available to very young girls.</p> <p>On Wednesday, a Justice Department official said the appeal would concentrate on the two areas where the department believes the judge overstepped his legal authority. The official also said the White House had not been involved in the decision of whether to appeal Judge Korman’s ruling.</p></blockquote><p>Reproductive rights advocates have criticized the administration's position on emergency contraception as overtly political and having little to do with science or women's health.</p><p>“Age barriers to emergency contraception are not supported by science, and they should be eliminated,” Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement on Wednesday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_administration_to_defend_age_restrictions_on_emergency_contraception/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/obama_administration_to_defend_age_restrictions_on_emergency_contraception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Medicaid improves mental health for uninsured</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/medicaid_improved_mental_health_for_uninsured_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/medicaid_improved_mental_health_for_uninsured_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/medicaid_improved_mental_health_for_uninsured/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But new research suggests it's less effective in treating physical conditions like high blood pressure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — If you're uninsured, getting on Medicaid clearly improves your mental health, but it doesn't seem to make much difference in physical conditions such as high blood pressure.</p><p>The counterintuitive findings by researchers at Harvard and MIT, from an experiment involving low-income, able-bodied Oregonians, appear in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. The study offers a twist for states weighing a major Medicaid expansion under President Barack Obama's health care law, to serve a similar population of adults around the country.</p><p>"The study did not generate any evidence that Medicaid coverage translated to measurable improvements in physical health outcomes over a two-year window," said lead researcher Katherine Baicker of the Harvard School of Public Health. "It did generate robust improvements in mental health and enormous reductions in financial strain and hardship."</p><p>That leaves policymakers with "a much more nuanced and complex picture" of the potential benefits of expanding Medicaid, said Baicker, an economist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/medicaid_improved_mental_health_for_uninsured_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/medicaid_improved_mental_health_for_uninsured_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s half-dose of Plan B</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emergency contraception being made available for those 15 and up may sound like a victory. But here's why it's not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounded like a major victory for reproductive health: Per an announcement by the FDA late Tuesday, emergency contraception will finally be available on the shelves for anyone 15 and up. Until now, women under 17 have needed a prescription for the time-sensitive and safe medication, and anyone seeking to buy Plan B had to find an open pharmacy counter. This is unquestionably a move in the right direction.</p><p>But there's a catch. Less than a month ago, the Obama administration was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/">court-ordered</a> to lift the age requirement entirely, by a federal judge calling them out for politicizing the process. There's no scientific or public health basis for any age limit -- the idea is that the morning-after pill be sold just as condoms are -- and requiring documentary proof of age presents a hurdle particularly for younger women and the undocumented. Also for no clear reason, Plan B will only be sold in places that have a pharmacy, as opposed to any convenience store, despite the fact that pharmacy employees will no longer be involved except with girls under 15.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama hates journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/why_obama_hates_journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/why_obama_hates_journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house press corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's rare press conferences do nothing to convince him that reporters are essential for democracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama did a press conference yesterday! He hardly ever does press conferences, because he hates the press and thinks taking random open questions from them is a waste of everyone's time, and that makes the Washington press corps very unhappy. They think he is dodging their tough questions. You would think that they would be quite pleased when he decides to have a press conference, but some of them were still kind of cranky!</p><p>Like Politico's Glenn Thrush, who was mad that the press conference was announced only 90 minutes before it happened. Thrush said <a href="https://twitter.com/GlennThrush/status/329222653665751040">the whole game is rigged.</a></p><p>[embedtweet id="329220152124129281"]</p><p>Then he got in <a href="https://twitter.com/pfeiffer44/status/329223333642129408">a funny argument with Dan Pfeiffer.</a></p><p>So the president, in his first term, did fewer press conferences than Bush did in his first term, and Bush was famous for not doing press conferences so that he didn't have to explain or defend himself. Obama, though, is capable of defending himself without a script, even if he frequently falls back on increasingly grating clichés. He simply skips them because they really are a waste of everyone's time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/why_obama_hates_journalists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/why_obama_hates_journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gang of Eight&#8221; freezes out gay immigrants in reform bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now Democrats must decide if they will offer an amendment to include gay immigrants in the reform package]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been said about the 844-page bipartisan immigration reform package introduced in April. Some Republicans have called it "amnesty," while many immigrant rights groups view it as unnecessarily punitive. But no one on either side of the debate has called it "gay friendly" -- because it isn't.</p><p>The measure excludes a provision to allow American citizens to sponsor their same-sex partners for legal permanent residency. To do so, Republicans among the "Gang of Eight" allege, would be legislative suicide.</p><p>“There’s a reason this language wasn’t included in the Gang of Eight’s bill: It’s a deal-breaker for most Republicans,” Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/us/politics/push-to-include-gay-couples-in-immigration-bill.html?hp" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Times. “Finding consensus on immigration legislation is tough enough without opening the bill up to social issues.”</p><p>Flake's "social issues" refer, more directly, to the very existence of gay immigrants and their families, a reality that many Republicans and Democrats seem eager to overlook in the name of political expedience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans embrace conspiracy theory that DHS is buying up ammo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Inhofe and Jim Jordan believe the Obama Administration is trying to curb access to bullets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conspiracy theory is getting renewed life among Republicans who claim that the Obama administration, specifically the Department of Homeland Security, is buying up ammunition in order to thwart gun owners by taking over the market. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., and Rep. Frank Lucas, both Republicans from Oklahoma, introduced a bill last week to crack down on the alleged practice.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/news/296471-gop-aims-to-slow-federal-bullet-buys">The Hill</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe and Rep. Frank Lucas have introduced a bill that would prohibit every government agency — except the military — from buying more ammunition each month, than the monthly average it purchased from 2001 to 2009.</p> <p>The lawmakers say the Obama administration is buying up exceedingly high levels of ammunition in an attempt to limit the number of bullets the American public have access to on the open marketplace.</p></blockquote><p>Inhofe argued that Obama has been "adamant about curbing law-abiding Americans’ access and opportunities to exercise their Second Amendment rights," and that "One way the Obama Administration is able to do this is by limiting what’s available in the market with federal agencies purchasing unnecessary stockpiles of ammunition."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama hints at military action in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/obama_hints_at_potential_military_action_in_syria_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/obama_hints_at_potential_military_action_in_syria_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/obama_hints_at_potential_military_action_in_syria/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the president reiterated he'd prefer to have international backing before escalating U.S. involvement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama signaled Tuesday he would consider U.S. military action against Syria if "hard, effective evidence" is found to bolster intelligence that chemical weapons have been used in the 2-year-old civil war. But Obama made clear he would prefer to have the backing of the international community before escalating American involvement.</p><p>In a White House news conference, Obama appealed for patience, saying he needs more conclusive evidence about how and when chemical weapons detected by U.S. intelligence agencies were used and who deployed them. If those questions can be answered, Obama said he would consider potential actions the Pentagon and intelligence community have readied for him in the event Syria has crossed his chemical weapons "red line."</p><p>"There are options that are available to me that are on the shelf right now that we have not deployed," he told reporters packed into the White House briefing room. Those options include setting up a protective "no-fly zone" over Syria, creating a humanitarian corridor at the Turkish border or providing weapons directly to the rebels.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/obama_hints_at_potential_military_action_in_syria_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/obama_hints_at_potential_military_action_in_syria_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Many Americans aren&#8217;t sure if Obamacare is the law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/many_americans_arent_sure_if_obamacare_is_the_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/many_americans_arent_sure_if_obamacare_is_the_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows that 42 percent have their doubts about whether the Affordable Care Act is in effect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A survey by the <a href="http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/8439.cfm">Kaiser Family Foundation</a> finds that a big chunk of Americans are not sure whether the Affordable Care Act is the law of the land -- and an even bigger chunk of uninsured, low-income families don't know how it will impact them.</p><p>According to the survey, which asked about the "current status of the health care law," 12 percent believe Congress repealed the ACA, 7 percent believe it was overturned by the Supreme Court, and 23 percent are unsure.</p><p>When it comes to low-income families making less than $40,000 a year, 56 percent said they did not have enough information about how the law will impact their families, while 58 percent of those who are uninsured said the same thing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/many_americans_arent_sure_if_obamacare_is_the_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/many_americans_arent_sure_if_obamacare_is_the_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials are now the Crash Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty-somethings coming of age today will be forever shaped by the country's economic recession]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> The economy is personal. It colors our decisions about everything: when to have kids, what city to move to, who to vote for, who to sleep with. And nobody knows this better than the biggest generation in history: the Millennials. These 80 million Americans have come of age during the worst economic recession since the Depression, an experience that will have profound repercussions on our lives—and our political consciousness.</p><p>I call us the Crash Generation. For many of us in our twenties, 2008 was a period awash in exhilarating highs and terrifying lows. The words “depression,” “economic crisis,” “mass layoffs,” and “foreclosures,” along with “hope,” “change,” and “Obama,” all clogged the headlines and made their way into whiskey-fueled party conversations. Washington and the media had never been so frank about the cataclysmic proportions of a financial crash. And a candidate had never kicked young voters into such high gear like Barack Obama, who seemed to reflect the seismic demographic shift our generation was heralding. The mythic American dream-bubbles were bursting for young people at the exact moment we had begun to wield our political influence. That second half of 2008 was our JFK assassination. Our Vietnam. Our Great Depression.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Americans still don&#8217;t want to intervene in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/poll_americans_still_dont_want_to_intervene_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/poll_americans_still_dont_want_to_intervene_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[62 percent say it's not American's responsibility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new CBS News/New York Times poll shows that the majority of Americans don't think the United States has a responsibility to intervene in Syria, by a margin of 62-24 percent. Last month, only 20 percent of those surveyed thought the U.S. should intervene, while 62 percent still thought it should not.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57581989/poll-americans-against-u.s-intervention-in-syria-n-korea/">CBS News</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Still, those following the news about Syria very closely are far more likely to think the U.S. has a responsibility to get involved there. Nearly half (47 percent) of that group thinks the U.S. has a responsibility to get involved there -- though about as many do not (48 percent).</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/poll_americans_still_dont_want_to_intervene_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/poll_americans_still_dont_want_to_intervene_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell responds to Obama&#8217;s drink joke with Clint Eastwood joke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McConnell's campaign tweeted a picture of the senator drinking with an empty chair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell responded to a crack President Obama made about him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a reference to Clint Eastwood's empty chair bit at the Republican National Convention.</p><p>Obama had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">joked</a> that people complain that he doesn't reach across the aisle enough. "'Why don't you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?' they ask," Obama said. "Really? Why don't <em>you</em> get a drink with Mitch McConnell?"</p><p>McConnell responded during an appearance before the Southeast Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/29/mcconnell-jokes-about-his-soft-side-in-response-to-obama/">Washington Post</a> reports, saying: “I’m shocked. He’s obviously not seeing my soft side.”</p><p>His campaign Twitter account also <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mcconnell-responds-to-obamas-whcd-joke-about-having">tweeted</a> a picture of McConnell drinking with an empty chair, also looping in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/clint_eastwood_steals_the_rnc/">Clint Eastwood</a>:</p><p>[embedtweet id="328939838835392513"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census reveals historic black voter turnout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data shows more African Americans voted in 2012 than any other ethnic group, and at a greater rate than whites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.</p><p>Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.</p><p>Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.</p><p>William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi man charged in ricin case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mississippi_man_charged_in_ricin_case_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mississippi_man_charged_in_ricin_case_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tupelo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former martial arts instructor allegedly sent poisoned letters to President Obama and other public officials]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRANDON, Miss. (AP) — An ex-martial arts instructor made ricin and put the poison in letters to President Barack Obama and others, the FBI charged Saturday, days after dropping similar charges against an Elvis impersonator who insisted he had been framed.</p><p>The arrest of 41-year-old James Everett Dutschke early Saturday capped a week in which investigators initially zeroed in on a rival of Dutschke's, then decided they had the wrong man. The hunt for a suspect revealed tie after small-town tie between the two men and the 80-year-old county judge who, along with Obama and U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, was among the targets of the letters.</p><p>Dutschke's house, business and vehicles in Tupelo were searched earlier in the week often by crews in hazardous materials suits and he had been under surveillance.</p><p>Dutschke (pronounced DUHS'-kee) was charged with "knowingly developing, producing, stockpiling, transferring, acquiring, retaining and possessing a biological agent, toxin and delivery system, for use as a weapon, to wit: ricin." U.S. attorney Felicia Adams and Daniel McMullen, the FBI agent in charge in Mississippi, made the announcement in a news release Saturday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mississippi_man_charged_in_ricin_case_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mississippi_man_charged_in_ricin_case_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin slams Correspondents&#8217; Dinner as &#8220;pathetic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/sarah_palin_slams_correspondents_dinner_as_pathetic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/sarah_palin_slams_correspondents_dinner_as_pathetic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Yuk it up media and pols," she wrote on her Facebook page, also calling the attendees "DC assclowns"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is no fan of the White House Correspondents' Dinner: The former Alaska governor took to Facebook and Twitter to mock the "DC assclowns" who attended the festivities."Yuk it up media and pols," she wrote on her <a href="https://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin/posts/10151584428988588">Facebook</a> page. "While America is buried in taxes and a fight for our rights, the permanent political class in DC dresses up and has a prom to make fun of themselves. No need for that, we get the real joke."</p><p>Palin also tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="328346466567479296"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/sarah_palin_slams_correspondents_dinner_as_pathetic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/sarah_palin_slams_correspondents_dinner_as_pathetic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Obama and Conan&#8217;s speeches at the Correspondents&#8217; Dinner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President cracked birther jokes, and Conan took on the NRA's Wayne LaPierre]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner, President Obama joked about his birthplace ("I'm also hard at work on plans for the Obama library. Some have suggested that we put it in my birthplace but I'd rather keep it in the United States") and Conan O'Brien knocked the NRA's Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre for not having the top title in the group (“Which begs the question, how freaking crazy do you have to be to be the actual president of the NRA?”)</p><p>Here's Obama's speech:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ON2XWvyePH8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>And Conan's:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VIgSgLFwEMs" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Correspondents&#8217; Dinner spoofs &#8220;House of Cards&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/white_house_correspondents_dinner_spoofs_house_of_cards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/white_house_correspondents_dinner_spoofs_house_of_cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of cards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Spacey works on the seating chart in the video that opened the dinner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House Correspondents' Dinner opened with a spoof of "House of Cards," in which Kevin Spacey goes to great lengths to complete the seating chart for the dinner. "It must be so hard to write jokes about a town that already is one," he says, addressing Conan O'Brien.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/m1JMQAoAxtI" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/white_house_correspondents_dinner_spoofs_house_of_cards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/white_house_correspondents_dinner_spoofs_house_of_cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>