<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barack_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>13 facts about tax-dodging corporations that will blow your mind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/13_facts_about_tax_dodging_corporations_that_will_blow_your_mind_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/13_facts_about_tax_dodging_corporations_that_will_blow_your_mind_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripley's Believe It or Not]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bank of America was bailed out by the government -- and still paid zero taxes on $4.4 billion in profit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">A judicious writer avoids adjectives like "mind-blowing," especially when covering political or economic issues. But no other word seems to describe the stunning reality of corporate taxation in modern America, which cries out for the italics-heavy, exclamation-point-driven format made famous by "Ripley's Believe It or Not<em>."</em></p><p>Stylistic overkill? Read these 13 facts and you may change your mind.</p><p><strong>1. We're told we can't "afford" full Social Security benefits, even though closing corporate tax-haven loopholes would pay for Obama's "chained CPI" benefit cut <em>more than 10 times over!</em></strong></p><p>Abusive offshore tax havens cost the U.S. $150 billion in lost tax revenue every year (via <a href="http://tjn-usa.org/storage/documents/FACT_Sheet_By_the_Numbers_Final1112nt.pdf">FACT Coalition</a>). That's $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years.</p><p>The "chained CPI" cut, proposed by President Obama and supported by Republicans, is projected to "save" a total of $122 billion to $130 billion over the same time period by denying benefits to seniors and disabled people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/13_facts_about_tax_dodging_corporations_that_will_blow_your_mind_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/13_facts_about_tax_dodging_corporations_that_will_blow_your_mind_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney voted against presidential run in family poll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/romney_voted_against_presidential_run_in_family_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/romney_voted_against_presidential_run_in_family_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading up to the 2012 election, Mitt Romney was more than reluctant to jump into the race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a new book due out in August, The Washington Post's Dan Balz reports that Mitt Romney voted against his own 2012 presidential bid in an internal family poll leading up to the decision.</p><p>From Sam Stein at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/02/dan-balz-book-mitt-romney_n_3530737.html?1372762823">the Huffington Post</a>, who obtained an early copy of the book:</p><blockquote><p>Over the Christmas break of 2010, Mitt Romney and his family took an internal poll on whether he should run for president once more. Twelve family members cast ballots. Ten said no. One of the 10 was Mitt Romney himself.</p> <p>The doubts that the former Massachusetts governor harbored before ultimately launching his second unsuccessful bid for the presidency are one of several attention-grabbing details in "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Collision-2012-Romney-Elections-America/dp/0670025941/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1372714208&amp;sr=1-1" target="_hplink">Collision 2012</a>," the newest book on the 2012 campaign.</p></blockquote><p>In an interview with Balz, Romney said that he changed his mind when he realized how weak the other candidates were in the Republican primary field. "I didn't think that any one of them had a good chance of defeating the president," Romney said, "and in some cases I thought that they lacked the experience and perspective necessary to do what was essential to get the country on track."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/romney_voted_against_presidential_run_in_family_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/romney_voted_against_presidential_run_in_family_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Fox News change with America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I left the network in 2011, I wondered how it would adapt to a new country. The answer is it won't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many Americans know, the Supreme Court made history on Wednesday, by affirming marriage equality and clearing the way for gay couples to marry in California. But if you were watching Fox News at the time, this momentous occasion might have eluded you.</p><p>Sure, the cable network covered the DOMA decision as it broke mid-morning, giving the essential details to viewers. But then it swiftly moved onto what it apparently deemed more urgent stories, like an IRS credit card spending spree on porn and wine, a Keystone Pipeline corruption scandal featuring a billionaire supporter of the president, and President Obama's allegedly lavish trip to Africa.</p><p>As someone who worked at Fox News for two and half years, I can tell you this coverage decision wasn’t surprising -- it fits right into the network's strategy.</p><p>I was employed by Fox for two and half years, beginning in 2008 and ending in 2011<em>. </em>Unlike other former Fox producers who’ve caused a stir, I’m not here to dish juicy tidbits about secret meetings or specific anchors. I have no gripes to share about the No. 1 rated cable news channel. But my time there -- beginning on the cusp of the Obama age in 2008 as a guest booker for <a href="http://foxnews.com/">Foxnews.com</a>’s “Strategy Room,” and ending in 2011 working on “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano -- did give me valuable insight into the network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koch brothers helped derail climate change with lawmaker pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/koch_brothers_helped_derail_climate_change_with_lawmaker_pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/koch_brothers_helped_derail_climate_change_with_lawmaker_pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through Americans for Prosperity, the Kochs pushed a pledge to vote against any legislation not offset by tax cut]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new two-year study by the <a href="http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/investigations/the_koch_club/story/Koch_millions_spread_influence_through_nonprofits/" target="_blank">Investigative Reporting Workshop</a> at American University demonstrates how the Koch brothers have helped to derail climate change legislation. The conservative group Americans for Prosperity, which the Kochs bankroll, pushed lawmakers to sign a <a href="http://www.noclimatetax.com/">pledge</a> not to vote for “legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue.”</p><p>From the study:</p><blockquote><p>[I]n 2011 and 2012, Koch Industries Public Sector LLC, the lobbying arm of Koch Industries, advocated for the Energy Tax Prevention Act, which would have rolled back the Supreme Court’s ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could regulate greenhouse gases. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., and co-signed by 92 Republicans (and three Democrats), 61 of whom signed an anti-climate tax “pledge.” An economist with the American Council for Capital Formation — a nonprofit group that receives Koch money — testified about that same bill before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Margo Thorning told members of the House in February 2011 that regulation of greenhouse gas emissions “makes little economic or environmental sense,” according to her testimony.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/koch_brothers_helped_derail_climate_change_with_lawmaker_pledge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/koch_brothers_helped_derail_climate_change_with_lawmaker_pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Clapper is still lying to America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/this_man_is_still_lying_to_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/this_man_is_still_lying_to_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Intelligence Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A smoking gun shows Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is a big liar -- and it's not the first time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"James Clapper Is Still Lying": That would be a more honest headline for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/misinformation-on-classified-nsa-programs-includes-statements-by-senior-us-officials/2013/06/30/7b5103a2-e028-11e2-b2d4-ea6d8f477a01_story.html">yesterday's big Washington Post article</a> about the director of national intelligence's letter to the U.S. Senate.</p><p>Clapper, you may recall, unequivocally said "no, sir" in response to Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asking him: "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Clapper's response was shown to be a lie by Snowden's disclosures, as well as by reports from the <a href="http://www.euronews.com/2013/07/01/greenwald-nsa-can-obtain-one-billion-cell-phone-calls-a-day-store-them-and-lis/">Guardian</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-surveillance-architecture-includes-collection-of-revealing-internet-phone-metadata/2013/06/15/e9bf004a-d511-11e2-b05f-3ea3f0e7bb5a_story.html">the Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/secret-prism-success-even-bigger-data-seizure">the Associated Press</a> and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-14/u-s-agencies-said-to-swap-data-with-thousands-of-firms.html">Bloomberg News</a> (among others). This is particularly significant, considering lying before Congress prevents the legislative branch from performing oversight and is therefore a felony.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/this_man_is_still_lying_to_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/this_man_is_still_lying_to_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Bush heading to the same African city</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tanzania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both will be in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania at the same time, though it's unclear whether they will meet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania (AP) — President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush are planning to be in the same city a world away from home, but the question is whether they will get together.</p><p>The Democratic president was to fly Monday into Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, the last stop on a weeklong tour of Africa that wraps up Tuesday. His Republican predecessor coincidentally also plans to be there for a conference on African women organized by the George W. Bush Institute.</p><p>Their wives plan to team up at the conference Tuesday for a joint discussion on promoting women's education, health and economic empowerment. President Bush plans to be in attendance, before delivering his own speech there the following day, after the Obamas will have left.</p><p>Initially aides said the men had no plans to meet, but Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes indicated Sunday that could change. "There may be something," Rhodes said.</p><p>Having both presidents in town "sends a very positive message that both political parties in the United States share a commitment to this continent," Rhodes said.</p><p>During his African visit, Obama has credited Bush with helping save millions of lives by creating the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, manufacturing jobs won&#8217;t revive the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/no_manufacturing_jobs_wont_revive_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/no_manufacturing_jobs_wont_revive_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop claiming a factory boom will save the country and lift people up. Here's what these jobs really look like]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the American imagination, the phrases “the decline of the middle class” and “the loss of factory jobs” are almost inextricably linked. But the promise of a U.S. manufacturing revival has gained strength and currency in policy circles, with many arguing it’s a way to turn the economy around. President Obama has trumpeted the growth of factory jobs in speech after speech. “Think about the America within our reach,” he told his audience at last year’s State of the Union address. “An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs!”</p><p>But, for all the optimism and nostalgia for an America that once was, it’s worth asking whether factory jobs are more likely to help workers rise to the middle class today -- or leave them stranded among the working poor.</p><p>Elena Suarez was on her lunch break, taking a walk on the side of the road in the industrial park where she works, and eating a sandwich as she walked, when I stopped her to ask about her job. She’s a machine operator at Resonetics, a manufacturing company in Nashua, New Hampshire that specializes in precision laser micromachining for the medical device industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/no_manufacturing_jobs_wont_revive_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/no_manufacturing_jobs_wont_revive_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamas visit Nelson Mandela&#8217;s family in South Africa</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/obamas_visit_mandela_family_in_south_africa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/obamas_visit_mandela_family_in_south_africa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Mandela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president urged leaders to follow the example set by the ailing former South African president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JOHANNESBURG (AP) -- President Barack Obama encouraged leaders in Africa and around the world Saturday to follow former South African President Nelson Mandela's example of country before self, as the U.S. president prepared to pay personal respects to relatives who have been gathered around the critically ill anti-apartheid icon.</p><p>"We as leaders occupy these spaces temporarily and we don't get so deluded that we think the fate of our country doesn't depend on how long we stay in office," Obama said.</p><p>Obama spoke at a news conference with South African President Jacob Zuma in the midst of a weeklong tour of the continent that also included stops in Senegal and Tanzania. But many other African nations are embroiled in religious, sectarian and other conflicts.</p><p>Obama decided to avoid stopping in his father's home nation of Kenya because of international disputes there. The International Criminal Court is prosecuting Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta for crimes against humanity, including murder, deportation, rape, persecution and inhumane acts allegedly committed by his supporters in the violent aftermath of Kenya's 2007 elections.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/obamas_visit_mandela_family_in_south_africa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/obamas_visit_mandela_family_in_south_africa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What big secret did a 4-star general reveal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_big_secret_did_a_4_star_general_reveal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_big_secret_did_a_4_star_general_reveal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James "Hoss" Cartwright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuxnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With James Cartwright being targeted for leaks, the claim that he caused danger to the U.S. raises real questions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a number of news outlets reported last night, retired Marine General James Cartwright is the latest government insider <a href="http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/27/19174350-ex-pentagon-general-target-of-leak-investigation-sources-say?lite">to be targeted</a> by the Obama Administration’s aggressive pursuit of leakers. Cartwright, a four-star general who until 2011 served as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reportedly received notice from the Department of Justice he is a target in the investigation into the source for David Sanger’s <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/world/middleeast/obama-ordered-wave-of-cyberattacks-against-iran.html?_r=4&amp;pagewanted=2&amp;pagewanted=all">2012 reports</a> on the Stuxnet virus the U.S. and Israel used to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program.</p><p>Most reports on the news have focused on Cartwright’s seniority, though Cartwright is not the only high-ranking retired general under such investigation. (As recently as April, an investigation into retired CIA Director and four star General David Petraeus’ handling of classified information <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/05/fbi-petraeus-broadwell-investigation/2058031/">remained active</a>.) Few, however, have considered how odd this particular leak investigation is. This investigation presumably is not about Stuxnet itself, nor about U.S. and Israeli involvement in it. So what is the secret Cartwright allegedly revealed?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_big_secret_did_a_4_star_general_reveal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/what_big_secret_did_a_4_star_general_reveal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s leaking more: Snowden or the government condemning him?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/whos_leaking_more_snowden_or_the_government_condemning_him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/whos_leaking_more_snowden_or_the_government_condemning_him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James "Hoss" Cartwright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow, we've been given a lot of private information about Edward Snowden since the investigation into him began]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the month since the Guardian first started reporting on the surveillance documents provided by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden, the government has taken to the media to condemn his leaks and insist he is flagrantly violating the law. To prove this, the government has been incessantly leaking information itself.</p><p>Huffington Post’s Michael Calderone extensively <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/27/edward-snowden-media_n_3510581.html?1372363532">detailed</a> this week's NSA media counteroffensive against Snowden, as officials have tried to explain — anonymously and without real proof — that Snowden's leaks have hurt national security. On Wednesday, intelligence officials <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/27/edward-snowden-media_n_3510581.html?1372363532">described to ABC News, Washington Post, Reuters and AP</a> how terrorists are allegedly “changing their tactics” now that they've been tipped off that the U.S. is monitoring the Internet.</p><p>Essentially, the government leaked a bunch of classified information in an attempt to prove leaking classified information is dangerous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/whos_leaking_more_snowden_or_the_government_condemning_him/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/whos_leaking_more_snowden_or_the_government_condemning_him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark-skinned and plus-sized: The real Rachel Jeantel story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/did_anyone_really_hear_rachel_jeantel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/did_anyone_really_hear_rachel_jeantel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plus-size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Jeantel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Painting Rachel Jeantel as "combative" is a classic way to discredit the validity of black women's traumas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trayvon Martin’s trial might be intriguing, fascinating cultural theater to some. To me, it is more akin to a cultural trauma: a continual reminder of how unsafe all those young black men that I love actually are as they move through the world -- and how tenuous and torturous it would be to seek justice on their behalf. Troubled, though, by the negative characterizations of Trayvon Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel, after her first day of testimony, I tuned in yesterday in a show of sofa-based, sister-girl solidarity.</p><p>Immediately, I heard newscasters referring to her prior testimony, which I had watched on video, as combative and aggressive. And I felt my pressure start to rise.</p><p>These kinds of terms – combat, aggression, anger – stalk black women, especially black women who are dark-skinned and plus-sized like Rachel, at every turn seeking to discredit the validity of our experiences and render invisible our traumas. By painting Rachel Jeantel as the aggressor, as the one prone to telling lies and spreading untruths, it became easy for the white male defense attorney to treat this 19-year-old, working-class black girl, a witness to the murder of her friend, as hostile, as a threat, as the one who needed to be regulated and contained and put in her place.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/did_anyone_really_hear_rachel_jeantel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/did_anyone_really_hear_rachel_jeantel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1231</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;White House Down&#8221;: Destroying America in order to save it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Emmerich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channing Tatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Channing Tatum saves Jamie Foxx's peacemaking black president from a right-wing coup in "White House Down"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As gristly, undigested globs of American fear, American hope and semi-justified American paranoia go, <a href="http://www.whitehousedown.com/">“White House Down”</a> is both highly entertaining and perfectly timed (in a way that can only be accidental). This ripping and ridiculous yarn from disaster-movie king Roland Emmerich (he of “Independence Day,” <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/13/2012_2/‎" target="_blank">“2012,”</a> etc.) is about a right-wing coup d’état staged against an African-American president who has vowed to take down the “military-industrial complex.” No, seriously! And he kind of says it like it’s a new idea! All in all, the movie is something like an MSNBC remake of “Die Hard” mixed with “Les Misérables” (minus the singing) mixed with a wishful-thinking version of Barack Obama in which he personally takes out Serbians and white supremacists with an RPG. Oh, and just a little bit of “Home Alone in the White House.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s war on journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps most troubling? The president is being aided by a cadre of Benedict Arnolds within the media itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of all the harrowing story lines in journalist Jeremy Scahill's new film "Dirty Wars," the one about Abdulelah Haider Shaye best spotlights the U.S. government's new assault against press freedom.</p><p>Shaye is the Yemeni journalist who in 2009 exposed his government's coverup of a U.S. missile strike that, according to McClatchy's newswire, ended up killing "dozens of civilians, including 14 women and 21 children." McClatchy notes that for the supposed crime of committing journalism, Shaye was sentenced to five years in prison following a trial that "was widely condemned as a sham" by watchdog groups and experts who noted that the prosecution did not "offer any substantive evidence to support (its) charges."</p><p>What, you might ask, does this have to do with the American government's attitude toward press freedom? That's where Scahill's movie comes in. As the film shows, when international pressure moved the Yemeni government to finally consider pardoning Shaye, President Obama personally intervened, using a phone call with Yemen's leader to halt the journalist's release.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, African leaders clash on gay rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/obama_african_leaders_clash_on_gay_rights_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/obama_african_leaders_clash_on_gay_rights_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senegal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senegalese President Macky Sall insisted he is "still not ready to decriminalize homosexuality"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — Laying bare a clash of cultures, President Barack Obama on Thursday urged African leaders to extend equal rights to gays and lesbians but was bluntly rebuked by Senegal's president, who said his country "still isn't ready" to decriminalize homosexuality.</p><p>Obama opened his weeklong trip to Africa one day after the U.S. Supreme Court expanded federal benefits for married gay couples. In his first in-person comments on the ruling, Obama said the court's decision marked a "proud day for America." He pressed for similar recognition for gays in Africa, wading into a sensitive area in a region where dozens of countries outlaw homosexuality and a few punish violations with death.</p><p>"When it comes to how the state treats people, how the law treats people, I believe that everybody has to be treated equally," Obama said during a news conference with Senegalese President Macky Sall at the grand presidential palace in Dakar.</p><p>But Sall gave no ground. Senegal is "very tolerant," he assured Obama, but is "still not ready to decriminalize homosexuality." Sall said countries make decisions on complex issues in their own time, noting that Senegal has outlawed capital punishment while other countries have not — a pointed jab at the U.S., where the death penalty is legal in many states.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/obama_african_leaders_clash_on_gay_rights_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/obama_african_leaders_clash_on_gay_rights_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &#8220;Veep&#8221; got right about our government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the west wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ides of March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Louis-Dreyfus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It obliterates mainstream myths by showing the government isn't full of geniuses -- and the public isn't all morons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After two full seasons of "Veep," it should be clear that Armando Ianucci's HBO satire is the most accurately scripted show ever made about American politics -- full stop. There is no need to qualify or massage that statement; it's just flat-out true, even though I'm guessing many people who work in politics despise it.</p><p>The reason that's my guess is because unlike other movies and TV shows about politics, "Veep" -- whose season finale just aired -- portrays politicians, staffers, lobbyists and reporters not as the heroic idealists and brilliant Machiavellis that politicos desperately want to see looking back at them from the mirror. Instead, "Veep" shows Washington for what it is: not merely Hollywood for trolls, but a place where painfully average and often untalented drones follow their star-fucking ambitions only to be caught in a soul-sapping system that devours whatever last remaining shreds of humanity they still possessed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issa saved by the news cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/issas_irs_scandal_quietly_crumbles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/issas_irs_scandal_quietly_crumbles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast and Furious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another lying miss for the Oversight Committee chair, though this one couldn't have fallen apart at a better time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been so much news this week, from the Supreme Court to the racist television cooking lady to the return of "Crossfire," that some of the political media's old favorite stories have almost entirely disappeared from cable news and the blogosphere. Victims of the news cycle include <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/">the trio of "scandals"</a> that gripped official Washington for weeks beginning last month. In particular, the controversy over IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups has largely disappeared from the headlines. Considering how much of a political gift that particular controversy was to Republicans, you'd expect them to be upset about this fact. But recent revelations have actually given them cause to celebrate the nation's short attention span.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/issas_irs_scandal_quietly_crumbles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/issas_irs_scandal_quietly_crumbles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on climate change: &#8220;We need to act&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/obama_on_climate_change_we_need_to_act_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/obama_on_climate_change_we_need_to_act_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president vowed Tuesday "to put an end to the limitless dumping of carbon pollution"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama declared the debate over climate change and its causes obsolete Tuesday as he announced a wide-ranging plan to tackle pollution and prepare communities for global warming.</p><p>In a major speech at Georgetown University, Obama warned Americans of the deep and disastrous effects of climate change, urging them to take action before it's too late.</p><p>"As a president, as a father and as an American, I'm here to say we need to act," Obama said.</p><p>Obama announced he was directing his administration to launch the first-ever federal regulations on heat-trapping gases emitted by new and existing power plants — "to put an end to the limitless dumping of carbon pollution."</p><p>Other aspects of the plan will boost renewable energy production on federal lands, increase efficiency standards and prepare communities to deal with higher temperatures.</p><p>Even before Obama unveiled his plan Tuesday, Republican critics in Congress were lambasting it as a job-killer that would threaten the economic recovery. Obama dismissed those critics, noting the same arguments have been used in the past when the U.S. has taken other steps to protect the environment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/obama_on_climate_change_we_need_to_act_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/obama_on_climate_change_we_need_to_act_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actually, even the Flat Earth Society believes in climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, such a group exists. It thinks the world is flat -- but also getting warmer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his big speech on climate change today, President Obama mocked Republicans who deny the existence of man-made global warming by derisively referring to them as members of "the Flat Earth Society."</p><p>"We don't have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society," Obama <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/307655-obama-we-dont-have-time-for-a-meeting-of-the-flat-earth-society">said</a>. "Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it's not going to protect you from the coming storm."</p><p>As it turns out, there is a real <a href="http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/">Flat Earth Society</a> and its president thinks that anthropogenic climate change is real. In an email to Salon, president <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2010/feb/23/flat-earth-society">Daniel Shenton</a> said that while he "can't speak for the Society as a whole regarding climate change," he personally thinks the evidence suggests fossil fuel usage is contributing to global warming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Obama just kill Keystone XL?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse-gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[350.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not necessarily, but his new policy makes it less likely the administration will approve the pipeline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ahead of the president's big speech on climate change, the Huffington Post's Sam Stein <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/obama-keystone_n_3497292.html?1372180768">breaks the news</a> that President Obama will ask Secretary of State John Kerry to reject the Keystone XL pipeline if State finds the pipeline increases carbon emissions. It's huge news that took environmentalists completely by surprise. They didn't expect the president to address Keystone in his speech -- he's avoided discussing the pipeline at all since issuing an executive order to have State study the environmental impact some time ago.</p><p>So is this the end of Keystone? Stein says the "policy somewhat splits the difference -- not killing the project outright, but ensuring that it meets a basic environmental standard."</p><p>Environmentalists are thrilled, but reserving a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/">healthy skepticism</a> because there's still a big "if" here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS guts Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/scotus_guts_voting_rights_act_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/scotus_guts_voting_rights_act_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Court rules states with a history of discrimination no longer need federal approval to change voting regulations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A deeply divided Supreme Court threw out the most powerful part of the landmark Voting Rights Act on Tuesday, a decision deplored by the White House but cheered by mostly Southern states now free from nearly 50 years of intense federal oversight of their elections.</p><p>Split along ideological and partisan lines, the justices voted 5-4 to strip the government of its most potent tool to stop voting bias — the requirement in the Voting Rights Act that all or parts of 15 states with a history of discrimination in voting, mainly in the South, get Washington's approval before changing the way they hold elections.</p><p>Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a majority of conservative, Republican-appointed justices, said the law's provision that determines which states are covered is unconstitutional because it relies on 40-year-old data and does not account for racial progress and other changes in U.S. society.</p><p>The decision effectively puts an end to the advance approval requirement that has been used to open up polling places to minority voters in the nearly half century since it was first enacted in 1965, unless Congress can come up with a new formula that Roberts said meets "current conditions" in the United States. That seems unlikely to happen any time soon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/scotus_guts_voting_rights_act_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/scotus_guts_voting_rights_act_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>