<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barbara_boxer_d_calif/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not morning in California</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/not_morning_in_california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/not_morning_in_california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/07/not_morning_in_california</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's an apocalyptic twilight; Barbara Boxer as the new Herbert Hoover]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em><br />       <strong>Adam Hanft dissects and deconstructs political advertising at <a href="http://www.spinseason.com/">Spin Season</a>, where this originally appeared</strong><br />     </em>   </p><p>Somebody&#8217;s been spending some time researching Google images and the bleak 1930s iconography of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothea_Lange">Dorothea Lange</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_Evans">Walker Evans</a>.</p><p>     <img class='wp-image-10008154' src='http://media.salon.com/2010/10/pix.jpg' />   </p><p>Carly Fiorina&#8217;s new attack on Barbara Boxer goes for the depression jugular, with a stark series of graphic, high-contrast black-and-white shots that paint a eschatological picture of California. One photograph, depicting the liquidation of a retail store, could have been lifted from a Walker Evans retrospective at the San Francisco MOMA</p><p>Check out that opening scene. Grim-faced farmers standing on a barren field, a Grapes of Wrathian image if ever there was one. During this, the equally ominous announcer intones:</p><p>&#8220;After 28 long years of Washington partisanship, this is Barbara Boxer&#8217;s California. Trillions in reckless wasteful spending. Destroying small business. Killing jobs. Crushing hopes.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/not_morning_in_california/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/not_morning_in_california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are GOP midterm expectations oversold?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/doom_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/doom_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Jack Conway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/09/28/doom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Democratic doom" narrative is meant to demoralize, but even Scott Rasmussen believes Dems will hold the Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating the universal premonition of Democratic doom is always among the most useful elements of Republican strategy. A broad feeling of foreboding demoralizes the party base, repels independent voters who prefer the winning side, and strikes emotional chords that are at least as important in electoral behavior as ideologies and issues. So Republican leaders and pundits regularly issue outlandish predictions of crushing victory, echoed across the media spectrum until they become self-fulfilling.</p><p>This year's real conditions for Democrats are certainly threatening, but there are indications that the impending repudiation will not be as devastating as suggested by the current narrative. Whatever ultimately happens in the House, where a Republican takeover appears likely if not inevitable, the Senate will probably remain under Democratic control -- despite <a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/09/wave_of_thirdpa.php#more">enormous spending by "independent" groups</a> such as the Club for Growth, the voice of Wall Street conservatives; American Crossroads, the Karl Rove outfit; and the Chamber of Commerce.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/doom_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/doom_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday link dump: Drone doom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/wednesday_link_dump_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/wednesday_link_dump_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/08/wednesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our "secret" war continues, Obama antitrust failure, and Mike Castle signs on with the repealers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul> <li>Our secret drone war with Pakistan continues apace! <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/2010/09/08/no-let-up-in-secret-drone-war.html?from=rss#">There were three separate drone attacks today</a>. Somewhere around two-dozen people who may or may not have been "militants" may or may not have been killed.</li> <li>Maybe the Ticketmaster fees on that Glenn Beck/Sarah Palin 9/11 death-porn festival wouldn't be so steep if Obama's Justice Department <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/2010/09/08/no-let-up-in-secret-drone-war.html?from=rss#">bothered to pursue antitrust cases.</a></li> <li>Dianne Feinstein may be chairing the No on 19 campaign, but her colleague Barbara Boxer apparently <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/41897.html#ixzz0yyKkflbl">has aides just bring her herb to the office.</a> (J/k, Boxer fired this poor schmuck who tried to bring marijuana to the Capitol.)</li> <li>The ICE is cracking down on <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/96858/ice-cracks-down-on-restaurants-employing-illegal-workers">undocumented restaurant workers</a>, which means, uh, I guess that's it for restaurants.</li> <li>Don't you dare accuse Mike Castle <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/245988/castle-correction-michael-tanner">of not signing on to whatever idiot teabagger nonsense</a> the rubes are riled up about!</li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/wednesday_link_dump_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/wednesday_link_dump_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea party, GOP, primed for November wins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/us_senate_stakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/us_senate_stakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn, R-Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/05/us_senate_stakes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate races are among the most hotly contested as Republicans attempt to change the Washington power dynamic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the turbulent year of the tea party, Republican Rep. Mike Castle of Delaware set out to jangle no nerves as he ran for a Senate seat long held by Vice President Joseph Biden. It's the way Republican strategists originally envisioned 2010, a roster of seasoned politicians pointing the party toward significant gains in the Senate.</p><p>"He brings our style of civility and independence to Washington and works to develop solutions," is the soothing, even quaint message on the 71-year-old lawmaker's campaign website, which shows him in a suit and tie, working alone at his desk. Experience "is hugely important," he said in an interview.</p><p>After two terms as governor and nine as the state's lone congressman, Castle appears better positioned than other veterans who faced a tea party-backed challenge this year. If he prevails over Christine O'Donnell on Sept. 14 -- he and GOP officials have launched a fierce counterattack -- he would join more than a half-dozen other veteran Republican officeholders on the ballot in Senate races.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/us_senate_stakes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/us_senate_stakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schwarzenegger: Allow same-sex marriages to resume</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/07/us_gay_marriage_trial_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/07/us_gay_marriage_trial_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/08/07/us_gay_marriage_trial_4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a role reversal, the California governor exhorts a judge to sign off on gay weddings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who twice vetoed legislation that would have legalized same-sex marriage, has surprised gay rights supporters by urging a federal judge to allow gay couples to resume marrying in the state without further delay.</p><p>Lawyers for Schwarzenegger, Attorney General Jerry Brown, two gay couples and the city of San Francisco all filed legal motions Friday asking Chief U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker to implement his ruling striking California's voter-approved same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional.</p><p>"The Administration believes the public interest is best served by permitting the court's judgment to go into effect, thereby restoring the right of same-sex couples to marry in California," the Republican governor's lawyers said on his behalf. "Doing so is consistent with California's long history of treating all people and their relationships with equal dignity and respect."</p><p>In his 136-page decision overturning Proposition 8 Wednesday, Walker said he was ordering the state to cease enforcing the 22-month-old ban. But he agreed to suspend the order until he could review the briefs submitted Friday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/07/us_gay_marriage_trial_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/07/us_gay_marriage_trial_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Carly Fiorina supporters have the exact same handwriting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/fiorina_signs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/fiorina_signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/07/08/fiorina_signs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Various "handwritten" anti-Boxer signs across California bear a remarkable resemblance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a little tip for all you candidates out there, from your friendly War Room blogger: If you're going to <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/poli_sci/the_curious_case_of_carly_fiorinas_protesters_166960.asp">mass-produce</a> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/poli_sci/the_curious_case_of_carly_fiorinas_protesters_part_two_166991.asp">handwritten-looking</a> campaign signs for (paid?) supporters to hoist all across the state, why not try having different staffers write each one, so they don't look identical? Also, why not just print actual professional signs? No one actually has anything against professional signs.</p><p>Also, if you're called on it, because your campaign's Twitter account posts pictures of people with identical signs on the same day on opposite ends of the state, as Carly Fiorina's campaign did, you should come up with <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/poli_sci/fiorina_camp_emails_fbla_166993.asp">a better excuse than "Office Max and Staples carry the same paper and markers."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/fiorina_signs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/08/fiorina_signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara, Carly, Meg and Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/06/11/fiorina_boxer_whitman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday's election results keep having fascinating aftershocks. Plus: The Alvin Greene story is just sad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Carly Fiorina is history. Her catty, clueless, on-camera hot mic conversation about Barbara Boxer's hair and other topics created a perfect indelible picture of her persona, which should have been sealed in public opinion by the way she de-souled Hewlett Packard as CEO, and then set private investigators on dissident members of her board before she went down (with her $21 million golden/leaden parachute).</p><p>But I have to say, it's disappointing the focus has been on Fiorina's diss of Boxer's hair. The real political story was insulting her female GOP "colleague" Meg Whitman for going on right-winger Sean Hannity's show the day after Whitman's primary win in the governor's race. It highlighted the Whitman/Fiorina feud -- we can't have TWO female Republican Silicon Valley CEOs running for top state offices in California; they must scratch one another's eyes out! And if it's up to Fiorina, she might.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open mic catches Fiorina on Boxer&#8217;s hair: &#8220;So yesterday&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Senate race gets off to an awkward start, as the Republican mocks her Democratic opponent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the first day was any indication, the California campaign between Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer and Republican ex-CEO&#160;Carly Fiorina is going to be nasty.</p><p>Fiorina was caught on an open mic and camera feed Wednesday, mocking Boxer's hair. A friend of Fiorina's, it seems, had seen Boxer on TV earlier in the morning. And she "said what everyone says," Fiorina blurted. "God, what is that hair? So yesterday!"</p><p>That's about four minutes into the video. Boxer shouldn't feel too bad, though, because Fiorina spent the vast majority of the time the camera was rolling bashing her fellow Republican, Meg Whitman, for going on Sean Hannity's Fox News Channel show on the first day of the general election campaign for governor.</p><p>Watch here:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/carly_fiorina_open_mic_barbara_boxer_hair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orly Taitz receives thousands more votes than Mickey Kaus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/kaus_taiz_vote_count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/kaus_taiz_vote_count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/kaus_taiz_vote_count</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Birther Queen is an order of magnitude more popular than the contrarian blogger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 100% of precincts partially or fully reporting, War Room can officially declare Orly Taitz more popular and credible than Mickey Kaus. By a lot.</p><p>In her race for the GOP nomination for California secretary of state, Birther Queen Taitz, a dentist/attorney whose pet cause is filing frivolous lawsuits challenging the president's natural-born status, <a href="http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/sec/59.htm">received 372,490 votes.</a></p><p>In his race to unseat Democratic US Senator Barbara Boxer, Kaus, a longtime blogger whose pet cause is hating unions and immigrants, <a href="http://vote.sos.ca.gov/returns/ussen/59.htm">received 94,298 votes.</a></p><p>Both, sadly, lost by wide margins. (Though Taitz received more votes than Republican Senate candidates Tom Campbell and Chuck DeVore.)</p><p>(Credit <a href="http://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/15758180910">Dave Weigel</a> for first deciding to compare the vote totals of our favorite insurgent politicians.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/kaus_taiz_vote_count/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/kaus_taiz_vote_count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new threat to the GOP&#8217;s Senate chances</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Senate Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray, D-Wash.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Jack Conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illinois Republican's fibbing about military record catches up with him, possibly costing the party a key race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what's going to be fun? When the GOP doesn't do as well as expected this November, and everybody starts blaming everybody else. Shouldn't have got your hopes up so high, guys.</p><p>Now, there's no way that Republicans aren't going to have a good November in absolute terms. But a sign here and a sign there are starting to suggest that it might not be the stellar midterm that the minority party has been dreaming of and getting ready for. The president can point to some successes, with healthcare, financial reform and signs of economic recovery, for one thing. For another, it looks like we can count on Republicans to figure out a way to screw it up for themselves.</p><p>The latest example of Republicans finding an opportunity to miss an opportunity comes in Illinois. The Senate seat once held by Barack Obama is a major prize, and Republicans badly want to win. Everything seemed to line up just right. Democrats nominated a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/02/03/giannoulias_kirk_illinois">damaged candidate</a> in state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, and scandal was hanging over the incumbent party anyway thanks to the collapse of the Rod Blagojevich administration. Republicans, meanwhile, got their dream nominee: Rep. Mark Kirk, from the Chicago suburbs, is the rare true suburban centrist Republican to survive the collapse of his wing of the party. He's staved off a couple of tough Democratic challenges, managing to become one of only seven Republicans to represent a district carried by John Kerry in 2004. In a state where moderate Republicans have thrived, but conservatives have been trounced repeatedly by mediocre Democratic hacks like Blagojevich, Kirk seemed to be just the ticket.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mickey Kaus is honest!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/mickey_kaus_deception_lies_scandal_lovechild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/mickey_kaus_deception_lies_scandal_lovechild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/28/mickey_kaus_deception_lies_scandal_lovechild</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the blogger-candidate mislead Californians about how much he was paid by the lamestream media? No, he didn't!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <strong>(updated below)</strong>   </p><p>Blogger-who-always-thinks-the-opposite-of-whatever-he-thinks-you-expect-him-to-think and pretend Democrat Mickey Kaus <a href="http://kaus.sitebuilder.completecampaigns.com/sbcc/blog.php">is mounting a primary challenge to Senator Barbara Boxer</a>. No one is entirely sure why. But Salon War Room has obtained his financial disclosure form, and it reveals a man with no concern for telling people the truth about how much he was paid to blog.</p><p>Kaus is not blogging professionally while he campaigns. According to a December 2008 Kausfiles post, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2008/12/31/kf-sees-seeds-of-recovery-in-its-own-suffering.aspx">Kaus accepted a 10% paycut from Slate at the very end of 2008.</a></p><p>Asked, in early 2010 what Slate paid him, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/magazine/14fob-q4-t.html">Kaus said:</a></p><blockquote> <p>I had been making in the mid-90s, and then I had to take a pay cut along with everyone else, and I was making in the 80s.</p> </blockquote><p>Seems simple enough, right? But! <img class='wp-image-10013747' src='http://media.salon.com/2010/05/kaus01.jpg' /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/mickey_kaus_deception_lies_scandal_lovechild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/mickey_kaus_deception_lies_scandal_lovechild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party could cost GOP nine Senate races this fall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/tea_party_senate_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/tea_party_senate_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Jack Conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/28/tea_party_senate_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uprisings by the GOP base could produce weak Republican candidates in some of this year's biggest races]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't get me wrong: Republicans are still on course to perform well in November's midterm elections. But it's starting to look like they'll leave some money on the table -- maybe a lot of it.</p><p>The reason is simple: The Tea Party movement -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/03/27/tea_party_is_a_republican_movement">also known as the GOP base</a> -- isn't that interested in working with the Republican Party establishment. In one key race after another, this could result in the GOP fielding candidates in the fall who are ideologically pure but electorally deficient.</p><p>The prime example of this is in Kentucky, a conservative state that never much cared for Barack Obama in 2008 and that has turned even more sharply against him, and against the national Democratic Party, since his presidency began. This, coupled with the feeble economy and the basic buyer's remorse nature of midterm elections, should make the contest to replace retiring Sen. Jim Bunning a cakewalk for the GOP.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/tea_party_senate_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/tea_party_senate_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Party candidate Chuck DeVore, &#8220;military reservist,&#8221; was not &#8220;shot at&#8221; in Lebanon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/chuck_devore_military/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/chuck_devore_military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/21/chuck_devore_military</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Partiers' favorite California Senate candidate jumps on the "exaggerating your military record" bandwagon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The race to lose to California Sen. Barbara Boxer is one of the most heated and amusing in the nation. Carly Fiorina is the candidate with the most national name recognition, thanks to a stint as a McCain campaign surrogate that was almost as disastrous as her term as CEO of Hewlett-Packard. She's locked in a tight race with two other guys: former Rep. Tom Campbell and Assemblyman Chuck DeVore. Except DeVore doesn't want to be called "Assemblyman." On the ballot, he'll be referred to as "military reservist." Oh, he also maybe slightly misled people about (guess what) his military service.</p><p>It is true that DeVore has been in the Army Reserve and the California Army National Guard (and now the Army Reserve again) for 24 years. <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/20/local/la-me-devore-20100521">He's also basically a career politician.</a></p><p>Chuck DeVore worked in the Reagan administration, then for Chris Cox's campaign, and in Cox's congressional office. He ran for office multiple times. While in the private sector, working for an aerospace consulting firm, he was also an Irvine city commissioner and on the Irvine Community Services Commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/chuck_devore_military/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/chuck_devore_military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blumenthal drama a reminder that GOP can still win the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is volatility in three Senate races that Democrats have long assumed they'd win]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just a few weeks ago that Democrats let loose a collective sigh of relief. With the news that George Pataki and Tommy Thompson would both be passing on Senate campaigns, it <a href="http://politifi.com/news/Senate-Forecast-Update-Little-Chance-of-GOP-Takeover-but-Dem-Position-Remains-Precarious-514357.html">seemed just about impossible</a> mathematically for the GOP to win control of the Senate this fall.</p><p>But this week's Richard Blumenthal drama in Connecticut is bringing some apprehension back to the surface.</p><p>It remains to be seen whether Blumenthal, who entered his state's Senate race as a white knight poised to save his party from Chris Dodd's collapse, will sustain much permanent damage from a New York Times story that suggested he's embellished his military record. Blumenthal has mounted a vigorous defense and video has now emerged that shows him properly characterizing his service. The story may fizzle out and Blumenthal could return to his dominant position in the polls relatively unscathed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Boxer&#8217;s secret weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/barbara_boxer_secret_weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/barbara_boxer_secret_weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/24/barbara_boxer_secret_weapon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poll numbers are shaky for the three-term California liberal. But she's still in good shape to survive in November]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a series of recent polls, Barbara Boxer, one of the Senate&#8217;s preeminent liberals, has found herself virtually tied with her Republican challengers. These surveys show that a troublingly large segment of California voters view the senator unfavorably, leading to concerns in Democratic circles that she could lose in the fall.</p><p>But despite these tepid poll numbers, Boxer actually remains a fairly safe bet for another term. The reason, ironically enough, has to do with the anti-Democratic national political climate. Let me explain.&#160;</p><p>With Democrats potentially facing deep losses in the House and Senate in November, Republicans are staring at an appetizing menu of races in which to invest their resources. It is this abundance of electoral opportunity that could save Boxer. Funding a campaign in California against a deep-pocketed incumbent probably won&#8217;t be as attractive an option as the many other winnable races in less expensive media markets.</p><p>Just consider the Senate targets Republicans will be choosing from. Currently, they have a good chance to pick up Democratic-held open seats in Delaware, Illinois, Indiana and North Dakota. Similarly, in Arkansas, Colorado, Nevada and Pennsylvania the GOP has reasonable odds of ousting sitting Democrats. And don&#8217;t forget that the party must also defend open seats in Florida, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/barbara_boxer_secret_weapon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/24/barbara_boxer_secret_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats&#8217; Senate majority at risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/senate_races_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/senate_races_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Bayh, D-Ind.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael F. Bennet, D-Colo.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/16/senate_races</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The electoral map is filled with weak Democratic candidates struggling to keep up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats have plenty of reasons to be mad at Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind. As he announced yesterday, he won&#8217;t be seeking reelection -- despite his huge war-chest, his lead in the polls and his apparent youth and good health. Given the current national scene, it seems like Bayh is just <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/02/15/evan_bayh_quits/index.html?source=rss&amp;aim=/news/feature">sticking to his usual routine</a>: Kicking his fellow Democrats while they&#8217;re down.</p><p>In recent months, the bottom seems to have fallen out of the electoral prospects of the Democratic caucus in the Senate. Polls from across the country show Democratic challengers falling behind lackluster opponents, once-safe senators struggling and open seats that the party may not even be able to contest. The new vacancy in Indiana is just one more major headache for the already beleaguered majority.</p><p>It&#8217;s been clear for some time that Democrats would lose seats in the Senate this November. But --for all the good it's done them -- they do have a rather overwhelming majority, and it&#8217;s been widely assumed that come next year, they'd still be in control. Does the conventional wisdom need some rethinking? <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/02/thoughts-on-bayh.html">Pundits</a>, at least, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/evan-bayh-to-retire.html?wprss=thefix">demand to know</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/senate_races_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/senate_races_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerry: US leadership at stake in climate debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/us_climate_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/us_climate_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2009/10/27/us_climate_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators tussled over the cost of climate legislation Tuesday with the leading author of the bill maintaining that while energy prices will increase, inaction on global warming would cause even worse economic and security problems. &#8220;Are there some costs? Yes sir, there are some costs,&#8221; said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.. But of the array of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senators tussled over the cost of climate legislation Tuesday with the leading author of the bill maintaining that while energy prices will increase, inaction on global warming would cause even worse economic and security problems.</p><p>"Are there some costs? Yes sir, there are some costs," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.. But of the array of studies that show restricting greenhouse gases will lead to higher energy prices, he said, "none of them factor in the cost of doing nothing."</p><p>Kerry was the leadoff witness as the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee began a series of marathon hearings this week on a bill that would cap greenhouse gas pollution from power plants and large industrial facilities. The bill aims to reduce emissions 80 percent by mid-century. Kerry is an author of the legislation.</p><p>Republican members of the panel were in lock step in their criticism of the so-called "cap-and-trade" legislation, characterizing it as a huge energy tax on average Americans.</p><p>"Cap and trade is very expensive. This is something the American people can't tolerate and I don' think they will," said Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the panel's ranking Republican and a vocal skeptic of climate chance science.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/us_climate_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/27/us_climate_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate finally taking up cap-and-trade bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/30/captrade</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long delay, legislation to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions is announced; passing it might not be easy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the summer of our healthcare discontent, the issue global warming was largely pushed to the backburner in Washington. The House <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454">passed</a> cap-and-trade legislation designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions and hopefully slow the process, but that was back in June. Only now, at the end of September, is the Senate finally taking up a similar bill.</p><p>At an event on Capitol&#160;Hill Wednesday, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/09/30/30greenwire-boxer-kerry-launch-campaign-to-pass-senate-cap-29235.html?pagewanted=all">announced</a> their version of the cap-and-trade legislation.</p><p>"We know clean energy is the ticket to strong, sustainable economic growth," Boxer said. Kerry echoed Boxer's optimism about the measure. "Ultimately, this bill is about keeping Americans safe," he said. President Obama lauded the tandem, saying in a prepared statement,&#160;"With the draft legislation they are announcing today, we are one step closer to putting America in control of our energy future and making America more energy independent."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/30/captrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous tip: Barbara Boxer is a bullying shrew!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/23/boxer_bully/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/23/boxer_bully/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/07/23/boxer_bully</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unnamed sources claim personal flaws will keep the senator from passing a climate change bill. (Sotomayor, anyone?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard the one about the powerful Democratic woman with the temperament problem?&#160;She hates being called &#8220;ma&#8217;am&#8221; rather than her official title. Colleagues say she's condescending, thin-skinned and moralizing. Anonymous snipers say she's a bully, and "her way is the only way."</p><p>So we're talking about Sonia Sotomayor here, right? Or at least, Sen. Lindsey Graham&#8217;s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/07/14/is-sotomayor-overly-aggressive-on-the-bench-or-just-one-of-the-guys/">version</a> of her, delivered in a lecture on how she could improve her personality so she'd stop being a "terror" and "difficult"?</p><p>Nope. The criticisms I quoted above are actually all anonymous attacks on Sen. Barbara Boxer in an <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25309.html">article</a> running today in Politico. Funny how all these prominent Democratic women seem to need anger management.</p><p>The Politico piece claims that Democrats -- all anonymous -- don&#8217;t trust Boxer to shepherd climate change legislation through the Senate. Says one Democratic aide, &#8220;People don&#8217;t look at her as the person who&#8217;s going to make a deal and bring both sides to the table. Her way is the only way.&#8221; Says another, &#8220;You can&#8217;t just do this by guilting folks. It has to be an orderly process where every member has their say.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/23/boxer_bully/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/23/boxer_bully/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On warming, relations between GOP, Dems stay cool</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/warming_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/warming_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/04/warming_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no era of post-partisanship to be found in the Senate's debate over global warming. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- If you didn&#8217;t get the hint that the &#8220;post-partisan&#8221; era hasn&#8217;t quite arrived when every single House Republican voted against the stimulus bill despite glad-handing by President Obama, just check out global warming.</p><p>Democrats on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held a press conference on Tuesday stressing the need for bi-partisan support for global-warming legislation.</p><p>&#8220;We are working with the minority side, painstakingly, one Senator at a time,&#8221; said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who chairs the committee.</p><p>Boxer and her colleagues outlined their &#8220;principles&#8221; for legislation to fight global warming. Boxer gave few specifics about the content of the legislation, but did say that it would adhere to cap-and-trade principles to combat carbon emissions. The California Democrat said that she believed bipartisan support was possible for this new version of a cap-and-trade bill that failed to pass the Senate last year.</p><p>Not a single GOP member of the committee attended. Sen. Frank Lautenberg&#8217;s (D-N.J.) remarks may have shown why. &#8220;It is in this very room where skepticism prevailed, where it was said that global warming was the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people,&#8221; Lautenberg said, referring to Republicans on the committee. &#8220;What an outrage.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/warming_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/warming_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
