<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Barney Rosset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/barney_rosset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lena Dunham&#8217;s absurd advance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/can_lena_dunham_be_a_bossypants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/can_lena_dunham_be_a_bossypants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Rosset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bossypants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan Arthur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Girls" creator nabbed a staggering advance for an advice book. And we wonder why big publishers struggle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Lena Dunham. But her $3.7 million book deal with Random House, after a bidding war involving all of the major publishers, is emblematic of what is wrong with corporate publishing today.</p><p>My first publishing job, in 1987, was at Random House. Bennett Cerf’s publishing company, the home of Faulkner, Capote and Dr. Seuss, is now only one of a handful of “major” publishers, by which I mean publishers who are corporate, bottom-line-driven, freighted with massive overhead and generally reactionary. The Dunham deal smacks of a search for the "Barton Fink" touch -- as in, "get me the next 'Bossypants,' stat." I realize that Dunham is an easy target — she's only 26, from an artsy New York family and the creator, star and director of her own HBO show. And there is an element of sexism in the backlash — a young, strong, independent female scores a big deal — but I have no problem with her agent, Kim Witherspoon, shaking down the dinosaurs on her client’s behalf. It's what the market will bear. I imagine Dunham’s book will kick ass, yet it will also get its critical ass handed to itself because of the advance. If Random House is already hucking it as the next Tina Fey meets Nora Ephron meets David Sedaris (no pressure, Lena), then the critics will be expecting Fey meets Ephron meets Sedaris.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/can_lena_dunham_be_a_bossypants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/can_lena_dunham_be_a_bossypants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
