<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Big Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/big_question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Facebook&#8217;s growth slowing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/facebook_growth_slowing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/facebook_growth_slowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/13/facebook_growth_slowing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social network lost users in the U.S., Canada and Britain, but its dominance won't dwindle any time soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, for the first time in the past year, Facebook lost users in the U.S. According to research from <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2011/06/12/facebook-sees-big-traffic-drops-in-us-and-canada-as-it-nears-700-million-users-worldwide/">InsideFacebook.com</a>, 6 million U.S. users left the social network in May, bringing the number of monthly active users down from 155.2 million to 149.4 million.</p><p>Similarly, in other countries where the social network first gained purchase, user numbers dropped. As <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-is-losing-users-in-the-countries-where-it-took-off-first-2011-6#ixzz1PB2K9p5E">Business Insider</a> notes:</p><blockquote> <p>It also lost 1.52 million users in Canada, dropping to 16.6 million -- that's an 8% drop -- and 100,000 each in the U.K., Norway, and Russia. Total Facebook users were still up 1.7% thanks to growth in countries where the service got popular later, like Mexico and Brazil.</p> </blockquote><p>Both April and May saw Facebook's growth slowing, prompting questions as to whether the online leviathan might actually reach a saturation point. According to Inside Facebook, once 50 percent usage is reached in a given country, growth tends to stop (suggesting, perhaps, that Facebook can take over just half the world).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/facebook_growth_slowing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/facebook_growth_slowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the U.S. striking Yemen?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports that covert American drone strikes targeting al-Qaida in Yemen have resumed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?ref=yemen">New York Times</a> reported Wednesday evening that the U.S. is intensifying a "secret campaign" of air strikes in Yemen:</p><blockquote> <p>The Obama administration has intensified the American covert war in Yemen, exploiting a growing power vacuum in the country to strike at militant suspects with armed drones and fighter jets, according to American officials.</p> </blockquote><p>U.S. attacks in Yemen are nothing new. <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/29/wikileaks_yemen_revelations">A diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks</a> in last December's cache dump revealed that Yemen had been covering up U.S. drone strikes targeting al-Qaida suspects within Yemeni borders. According to the Times, these covert air strikes were paused for most of the past year, owing to "concerns that poor intelligence had led to bungled missions and civilian deaths." Attacks resumed in recent days, as the Times reports:</p><blockquote> <p>American jets killed Abu Ali al-Harithi, a midlevel Qaeda operative, and several other militant suspects in a strike in southern Yemen. According to witnesses, four civilians were also killed in the airstrike. Weeks earlier, drone aircraft fired missiles aimed at Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical American-born cleric who the United States government has tried to kill for more than a year. Mr. Awlaki survived.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/u_s_yemen_airstrikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Facebook&#8217;s facial recognition tool as creepy as it seems?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/facebook_facial_recognition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/facebook_facial_recognition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/08/facebook_facial_recognition</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social network has been learning our faces. Rep. Ed Markey joins European regulators in expressing concern]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(Updated below: U.S. lawmaker reaction</strong>)</p><p>Facebook may have just surpassed itself in the creep-stakes. On Tuesday, security firm <a href="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/06/07/facebook-privacy-settings-facial-recognition-enabled/">Sophos issued an alert</a> that Facebook has been activating facial recognition technology on accounts without fully informing users.</p><p>In December the social media leviathan announced the technology, which is designed to learn&#160; faces as they are tagged in photos. The site then makes tagging suggestions if it recognizes your face on your friends' photos in the future. Users are by default opted in to the Tag Suggestion tool and have to choose to opt out. The technology is not new -- and has been in the U.S. for months -- but the fact that it has been gradually rolled out to accounts across the world for months without users getting full warning has perturbed critics.</p><p>According to I.T. news site <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/08/facebook_admits_should_have_been_clearer_on_facial_recognition_tech/">the Register,</a> Facebook responded to Sophos' warning, admitting:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/facebook_facial_recognition/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/facebook_facial_recognition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t Obama get his own nominees approved?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/executive_appointments_confirmation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/executive_appointments_confirmation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/07/executive_appointments_confirmation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem may have more to do with the president and his priorities than with GOP obstructionism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Nobel Prize in economics wasn't enough to secure Peter Diamond a spot on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And the M.I.T. professor's decision to <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/federal_reserve/index.html?story=/tech/htww/2011/06/06/peter_diamond_federal_reserve">withdraw from the Senate confirmation process</a> earlier this week has set off a new wave of debate about the dearth of executive appointments under the Obama administration. Who deserves more blame: Republicans on Capitol Hill, for their antagonistic posture toward Obama nominees; or the White House, for not pushing hard enough and making the nominees more of a priority?</p><p>We put that question and others to Dr. Jonathan Bernstein, a political scientist and author of "<a href="http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/">A Plain Blog About Politics</a>":</p><p>     <strong>First, could you explain for the lay person a little bit about how the confirmation process actually works, and how it's tripped up appointees? Why is it that so many positions continue to lay vacant?</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/executive_appointments_confirmation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/executive_appointments_confirmation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primer: Should we be happy about Yemen?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/yemen_future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/yemen_future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/06/yemen_future</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will President Saleh's celebrated departure be short-lived?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front page of British newspaper <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/arab-spring-claims-its-third-despot-2293476.html">the Independent</a> Monday morning proclaimed: "The Arab Spring claims its third despot." It may, however, have spoken too soon.</p><p>On Saturday, Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh departed the country for Saudi Arabia to be treated for injuries incurred during an attack on his presidential palace; powers were transferred to his vice president. Tens of thousands of Yemenis took to the street Sunday to celebrate Saleh's departure after 33 years of ruling: they chanted celebratory chants and held signs hailing a "New Yemen," <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/05/sannaa-celebrates-yemenis-tyrant">the Guardian</a> reported. But Yemeni government officials are already promising Saleh's return within days.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2075827,00.html">Time's Jeb Boone</a> reports from Yemen's capital city, Sana'a:</p><blockquote> <p>       <em>Yemeni officials are now insisting that Saleh's visit to Riyadh is only a temporary one and he will return once he is healthy enough to resume work. "The president will return to Sana'a after he has recovered from his medical procedures. There is no doubt in this," said one Yemeni government official, speaking on the condition of anonymity.</em>     </p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/yemen_future/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/yemen_future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could flooding move the Mississippi?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/mississippi_flooding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/mississippi_flooding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/12/mississippi_flooding</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Army Corps of Engineers have been preparing for it for years. But they may not be able to stop nature's course]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since its formation ages ago, the Mississippi River has shifted course <a href="http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa222/Barefootontherocks/20110506MsDeltas.jpg?t=1304728524">many times</a>. At one point it emptied into the Gulf of Mexico from Texas; at another, from the Florida panhandle. Both natural and man-made events have altered the face of the river basin considerably in the last few hundred years. And, in its current configuration, the so-called "Great River" (from the Ojibwe word, "misi-ziibi") is the beating heart and lifeblood of Louisiana. But that might not always be the case.</p><p>The river basin is currently grappling with historic levels of flooding, from Missouri down through the Gulf. The Mississippi crested at a near-historic height of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/10/us_mississippi_river_flooding_1/index.html">48 feet</a> in Tennessee on Tuesday. Yesterday morning it rose to <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mississippi-flooding-louisiana-20110511,0,7633046.story">58 feet</a> in Natchez, Miss. -- a record -- and appears likely to swell to 64-feet before topping out. By the time the crest reaches Red River Landing in northern Louisiana, probably on May 22, it could eclipse previous records there&#160;<a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1798">by more than 3 feet</a>, according to Jeff Masters at Weather Underground. Red River is significant, because it's the site of a major floodgate system called the Old River Control Structure that helps keep the Mississippi on its current course. If the ORCS fails in the face of this month's floods, <a href="http://www.americaswetlandresources.com/background_facts/detailedstory/LouisianaRiverControl.html">some worry</a> it could cause epochal shift in the path of the river -- one that would irrevocably alter the face of Louisiana.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/mississippi_flooding/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/mississippi_flooding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the world might end next Saturday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of Christian activists believe the apocalypse is May 21. We look at the evidence, and the man behind it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spring is finally here -- but apparently, the apocalypse will be fast on its trail. That's the word from a slight but outspoken group of spiritual devotees who believe that the world as we know it is coming to an end.</p><p>Maybe you've already encountered the literature: pamphlets, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21/subwayad.JPG">subway ads</a>, <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/life/nigh+come+billboard+campaign+proclaims/4735624/story.html">billboards</a> on the side of the highway. "Judgment Day is coming" reads one billboard, which features a man praying in silhouette against a sunset backdrop.&#160;These are the works of a peculiar breed of Christian activists who've taken to the road to preach their belief in the fast-approaching End of Days. The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40885541/ns/us_news-life/t/end-days-may-believers-enter-final-stretch/">self-appointed harbingers</a> are not tied to any particular church -- they claim organized religion has been <a href="http://legacy.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20030123-0904-ca-apocalypseradio.html">corrupted by the devil</a> -- but rather to Internet- and radio-based ministries. And their lone mission is to tell anyone and everyone that the end of days is May 21. That's when, they insist, God's true believers will be lifted into heaven and saved, during a biblical event widely referred to as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapture">Rapture</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/rapture_may_21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we powerless against high gas prices?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/high_gas_prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/high_gas_prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/05/high_gas_prices</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much can you actually do about pain at the pump?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Operation Geronimo might grab most of the headlines, the price of gasoline is the real political football. You'd be hard-pressed to find a pundit or politician in the country who doesn't have a theory about the cause of surging crude prices. President Obama and congressional Democrats blame oil companies, whose <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/05/05/house-democrats-try-ending-a-tax-break-for-big-oil/?mod=google_news_blog">soaring profits</a> contrast uneasily against a static economy and the price of petrol. Meanwhile, Glenn Beck is one of many on the right who <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/glenn-beck/transcript/beck-why-are-gas-prices-so-high">blame the EPA</a>. Many are even speculating that pain at the pump could <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/03/09/could_gas_prices_sink_obamas_reelection_2012_study_president_approval_gas_price_109157.html">sink President Obama's reelection effort</a>.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/high_gas_prices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/high_gas_prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Earth sustain 10 billion people?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/global_population_projections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/global_population_projections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/04/global_population_projections</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's our possible population by 2100, though a writer who predicts a "population crash" says not to panic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demographers estimate that the human population will eclipse 7 billion by the end of October -- only 12 years since we crossed the&#160; 6 billion-person threshold. And while experts long predicted that the global population would level out at 9 billion by mid-century, the United Nations has now <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/africa/articles/2011/05/04/un_forecasts_global_population__to_reach_101_billion_by_2100/">adjusted those projections upward</a>. According to a new report, we can expect 10.1 billion people on Earth by 2100.&#160;</p><p>The U.N. attributes the additional billions in part to faster-than-expected growth in Africa -- whose population could triple in the next 90 years -- even as fertility rates in the developed world continue to decline. The figures raise questions once more about the sustainability of such a massive population growth.</p><p>English journalist Fred Pearce argues in his recent "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Coming-Population-Crash-Planets-Surprising/dp/0807001228/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1304544432&amp;sr=8-1">The Coming Population Crash: And Our Planet's Surprising Future</a>" that the world's population is peaking -- and that the "population bomb"&#160; has been defused. (He argued the merits of his theory in <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/04/19/population_crash_ext2010">an interview with Salon</a> last April.) And despite the U.N.'s new theories, Pearce is sticking by his thesis. We spoke to him by phone Wednesday afternoon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/global_population_projections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/global_population_projections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is al-Qaida still relevant in a post-bin Laden world?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/al_qaida_future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/al_qaida_future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/03/al_qaida_future</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What becomes of the terror network now that its longtime leader is dead?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The international face of terrorism is gone, but what happens next? With Osama bin Laden now dead, a gaping hole exists at the top of the al-Qaida hierarchy. Many are speculating about what comes next for the terror network. More wonder if it's even still relevant.</p><p>The most likely choice to succeed bin Laden is Ayman al-Zawahiri, longtime al-Qaida second in command. The Egyptian surgeon is often considered the "<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gNnp_6uucIXYlIPIRm8w95Z0dYTQ?docId=CNG.ff8151f843080218558f596b5569b74a.581">real mastermind</a>" behind al-Qaida, the man who urged bin Laden to <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/121139569.html">adopt suicide attacks</a> against Western targets. A 2009 State Department report stated that bin Laden had been effectively rendered a figurehead by years in hiding, and that Zawahiri -- though also in hiding since Sept. 11 -- emerged as the network's "<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/04/30/2009-04-30_al_qaeda_no_2_calls_the_shots.html">strategic and operational planner</a>." Zawahiri's whereabouts remain unknown, but in the days following bin Laden's death, he's already assumed the mantle of world's most wanted terrorist -- with a <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/03/113618/with-bin-laden-dead-egyptian-becomes.html">$25 million bounty</a> on his head.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/al_qaida_future/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/al_qaida_future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primer: Why release this birth certificate now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/obama_birth_certificate_rationale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/obama_birth_certificate_rationale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/27/obama_birth_certificate_rationale</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was it really just to end the "silliness," as the president says -- or a canny move to make the GOP look "crazy"?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama battled a steady stream of falsehoods -- about his religion, about ACORN, about his wife's alleged use of the pejorative "whitey" -- which led to his campaign's launch of its <a href="http://www.fightthesmears.com">Fight the Smears</a> website in June, to combat some of the <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/06/12/4437950-obama-camp-tries-to-fight-the-smears">more virulent rumors</a>. On the site, it posted an item about Obama's <a href="http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate">birth certificate</a> -- which included the short-form document -- along with a brief message:</p><blockquote> <p>Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn't have a birth certificate aren't actually about that piece of paper -- they're about manipulating people into thinking Barack Obama is not an American citizen. The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States. Next time someone talks about Barack's birth certificate, make sure they see this page.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/obama_birth_certificate_rationale/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/obama_birth_certificate_rationale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 year later: Just how bad was Gulf spill?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Mother Nature just swallow the oil back up -- or is the worst yet to come?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the immediate aftermath of the <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/18587367?story_id=18587367">Deepwater Horizon rig explosion</a> -- which killed 11 workers and spawned an oil slick the size of Kansas -- it seemed clear that the event would be remembered as perhaps the worst environmental calamity in U.S. history. Now, one year later, arguments for the magnitude of the disaster are less self-evident.</p><p>The BP oil spill flushed upwards of 4 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico between April and July, 2010. But by August, the once-vast sheen of rust-colored muck had mostly disappeared from the ocean's surface. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378679/BP-oil-spill-Day-scientists-hail-recovery-Gulf-Coast-pictures-real-damage.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">Official reports</a> claim that marine life is returning to normal.</p><p>According to an optimistic <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/04/20/135566376/weekly-standards-mucky-lessons-of-the-bp-oil-spill">Weekly Standard</a>:</p><blockquote> <p>If there was an unexpected hero to the story, it was Mother Nature...The Gulf oil spill is, indeed, much less of a calamity than most people expected. Said one environmental scientist in late July: "Mother Nature is doing what she is supposed to be doing and we're losing most of [the spilled oil] to microbial degradation in the open ocean."</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How common is Alzheimer&#8217;s disease, really?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/how_prevalent_is_alzheimers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/how_prevalent_is_alzheimers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/19/how_prevalent_is_alzheimers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diagnoses of the illness could double under new clinical guidelines. But what does that actually mean?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those opening up the science section of their newspapers this morning may have been shocked to read that <a href="http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/brain-and-behavior/articles/2011/04/19/alzheimers-cases-could-double-with-new-guidelines--expert">diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease could double</a> under new guidelines approved today by the Alzheimer's Association and U.S. National Institute of Aging. But there's little reason to worry about the potential spike in diagnosis, and several reasons for optimism.</p><p>Under the newly issued criteria, Alzheimer's classification now exists as a spectrum, where dementia marks the acute, terminal stage of the disease. A second, less severe stage now included under the Alzheimer's umbrella is a condition called Mild Cognitive Impairment -- a disease that sometimes, but not always, signals Alzheimer's. Finally, at the earliest stage of the disease is something called the pre-clinical phase. During this phase, biological markers could signify a nascent presence of the disease, even though no outward symptoms exist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/how_prevalent_is_alzheimers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/how_prevalent_is_alzheimers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How meaningful is the &#8220;family of four&#8221; tax stat?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/family_of_four_tax_payers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/family_of_four_tax_payers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/18/family_of_four_tax_payers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four-person families paid historically low income taxes this year. But how does that family compare to ones past?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news this Tax Day is that, for the second year in a row, a family of four earning the median income is paying less in federal income taxes than at any time since at least 1955, according to the <a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=226">Tax Policy Center.</a></p><p>But does this actually mean anything? After all, since 1955, a multiplicity of family types has proliferated, with many different earning situations. Does "family of four" mean anything like what it meant back then?</p><p>In 1955 "family of four" described a single-earner nuclear unit: a married man and woman with two children.</p><p>"We're certainly more heterogeneous these days," New York University's Wayne Professor of Taxation, Daniel Shaviro, told Salon.</p><p>Yet, look to the footnotes of the Census Bureau information, and you will note that despite demographic changes, a "family of four" today still means the very same thing it did over 60 years ago: Mommy, Daddy and two kids.</p><p>"All calculations are for a married couple and income is assumed to be earned by one spouse," the Tax Policy Center website notes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/family_of_four_tax_payers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/family_of_four_tax_payers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Japan&#8217;s nuclear crisis really as severe as Chernobyl?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/japan_chernobyl_fukushima_daiichi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/japan_chernobyl_fukushima_daiichi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Earthquake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/12/japan_chernobyl_fukushima_daiichi</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japan's government has assigned the emergency the highest possible severity rating. How bad could it get?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japanese authorities increased the "<a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/04/12/135353240/fukushima-vs-chernobyl-what-does-level-7-mean">severity rating</a>"of the emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan today, raising it from a level-five to a level-seven accident. Historically, the only other nuclear incident to garner that distinction has been the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.&#160;</p><p>This has prompted a barrage of questions about the possible consequences of the continuing crisis. We turned to&#160; <a href="http://www.ploughshares.org/about-us/joseph-cirincione">Joseph Cirincione</a>, president of the Ploughshares Fund, a nonprofit organization focused on nuclear security issues, to understand the severity of the current situation, and potential end-game scenarios in Japan.</p><p>     <strong>I think it alarmed a lot of people that now suddenly the Japanese government is saying the nuclear crisis is on par with Chernobyl. Is that characterization accurate?</strong>   </p><p>I think the Japanese authorities finally were forced to publicly recognize the severity of this disaster. They were trying to keep the public calm, to preserve some credibility for the nuclear power industry, so they tried to use reassuring language in their statements, and were hesitant to compare what was going on at Fukushima to Chernobyl. And, of course, it's not Chernobyl. It's different.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/japan_chernobyl_fukushima_daiichi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/japan_chernobyl_fukushima_daiichi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What actually happens if the U.S. hits the federal debt ceiling?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/debt_ceiling_what_happens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/debt_ceiling_what_happens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/11/debt_ceiling_what_happens</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Treasury would surely step in -- but colossal problems would still be sure to follow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you just now recovering from the migraine induced by months of partisan feuding over the 2011 federal budget? Looking forward to a lengthy reprieve before Congress tackles next year's budget? Sorry, but you're in for a rude awakening. (And you might want to reach for some aspirin.) Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704587004576243121742467598.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">warned Congress last week</a> that the United States -- currently liable for more than $14 trillion of debt -- will collide with the federal debt ceiling around May 16. Once the government hits the current limit of $14.3 trillion it will be legally prohibited from incurring any additional debt; problematic since the U.S. only takes in around 60 cents for each dollar it spends.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/debt_ceiling_what_happens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/debt_ceiling_what_happens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is radioactive food dangerous?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Earthquake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crippled Japanese power plant is contaminating food. What are the health risks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even short of a catastrophic meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor, serious questions remain about the ongoing crisis's effect on health, particularly with food exposed to radioactive material. Officials have warned about contaminated <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/techbiz/2011/03/19/D9M25KTO0_as_japan_earthquake/index.html">spinach and milk</a>. Now, hauls of fish pulled in by commercial fishermen near the plant are showing amounts of radioactive iodine-131 double current standards -- prompting the Japanese government to <a href="http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/04/05/japans-gonna-need-some-bigger-regulations/">regulate radiation levels in seafood</a>. How worried should people be?</p><p>Salon talked to Stephen Frantz, director of the Reed College Research Reactor, about the threat.</p><p>     <strong>What does radiation in food do to people?</strong>   </p><p>When you ingest radioactive material, as the material decays, some of the radiation will hit the cells in your body and perhaps do damage and increase the chances of cancer -- if there's a sufficient amount of materials. "Radioactive" does not mean it's deadly or dangerous. We've been eating radioactive materials all our throughout human history. It's the levels you have to worry about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did a Quran burning really cause Afghan violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/afghan_quran_burning_protests_taliban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/afghan_quran_burning_protests_taliban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/04/afghan_quran_burning_protests_taliban</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many blame a Florida pastor's desecration for dozens of deaths in Afghanistan. Is it more complicated than that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little more than two weeks ago, Florida pastor Terry Jones orchestrated a bizarre mock-trial against the Quran in his Gainesville church. At its conclusion, Jones set fire to the holy book. In a different era, the episode would probably have been little more than an afterthought. And, to be sure, it's just one example among many acts of fringe Islamaphobia in a post-9/11 America. However -- driven in large part by the power of the Internet -- video of the burning has triggered <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/04/quran-burning-protests-continue-afghanistan">days of mass protests across Afghanistan</a>. Thus far, at least 20 people -- including several United Nations officials -- have been killed.</p><p>The reports of violence have triggered a strong U.S. response. <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20050372-503544.html">Gen. David Petraeus</a> said Sunday that Jones' actions have compromised U.S. operations in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/afghanistan/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/04/04/free_speech">Senate leaders</a> on both sides of the aisle have suggested that formal action be taken against Jones.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/afghan_quran_burning_protests_taliban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/afghan_quran_burning_protests_taliban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 5 best and worst states to be unemployed in</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/unemployment_best_worst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/unemployment_best_worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/29/unemployment_best_worst</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan just slashed aid to the jobless. How does it compare to the rest of the country?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's state isn't the only one with labor pains. Michigan, for example, faces the longest ongoing stretch of double-digit unemployment in America. And the state's governor, Rick Snyde, has just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/us/politics/29michigan.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">signed a bill into law</a> that slashes the total number of weeks the jobless can collect unemployment benefits from 26 to 20.</p><p>Since nearly every state has long offered 26 weeks of coverage, the move makes Michigan one of America's stingiest states when it comes to helping the unemployed. But when you look at the whole picture -- including the amount of money recipients are eligible for, which varies widely by state -- it isn't actually the stingiest. Several states offer far less to recipients than the $362 per week maximum that Michigan offers its laid-off workers. (Thus, an unemployed worker in&#160;Michigan receiving the top amount can collect a total of $7,240 over the 20 weeks of coverage that the state guarantees.)</p><p>Here, then, is a list of the five least generous states in America when it comes to aiding the jobless:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/unemployment_best_worst/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/unemployment_best_worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the men&#8217;s rights movement growing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/scott_adams_mens_rights_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/scott_adams_mens_rights_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/29/scott_adams_mens_rights_movement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dilbert creator Scott Adams caused a furor around the subject. Here's a closer look at it -- and what he got wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cartoonist Scott Adams ran into some hot water recently for a <a href="http://tinysprout.tumblr.com/post/3713649989/scott-adams-dilbert-deleted-post">blog post</a> he penned that nominally took aim at something calling the "men's rights movement" -- but also denigrated women, comparing them to children and handicapped persons. The episode led to a whole series of responses (including a <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/2011/03/28/sylvia_on_dilbert/">couple</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/03/28/liza_donnelly_scott_adams_dilbert/index.html">here</a> at Salon), most of which were incensed rebuttals of Adams' bizarre, uncouth statements. &#160;</p><p>Still, we wondered, just how big is the men's rights movement?</p><p><a href="http://ttp://creativepromotionsagency.com/mk/index.htm">Michael Kimmel</a> is a professor of sociology at Stony Brook University and author of such books as "Against the Tide: Pro-Feminist Men in the United States, 1776-1990" and "Manhood in America: A Cultural History." We spoke to Kimmel today about the men's rights movement -- its origins, central tenets and current role in the debate over American gender roles.</p><p>     <strong>So what's the background behind the men's rights movement?</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/scott_adams_mens_rights_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/scott_adams_mens_rights_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
