<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Biggest story you missed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/biggest_story_you_missed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s aboriginal protest movement explodes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/canadas_aboriginal_protest_movement_explodes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/canadas_aboriginal_protest_movement_explodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle no more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriginal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idle No More has galvanized marches, flashmobs and railway blockades in the fight for indigenous rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month a protest movement exploded across Canada, but little has been made of it by the media below the border. The reason for this, perhaps, is that the issues underpinning the movement are  -- quite literally -- indigenous to Canada.</p><p>Under the banner Idle No More, thousands of Canada's aboriginal peoples (First Nations, Inuit and Métis) and their allies have staged mass demonstrations in cities and towns all around the country in protest of the abusive treatment of indigenous people in Canada by the Canadian government. Mass marches have peacefully taken over the streets in Ottawa, while Round Dance flashmobs (nodding to both traditional indigenous dances and social media-fueled protest practices of late) have popped in around Canada and even in a <a href="http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/article/idle-no-more-sees-multiple-flash-mobs-and-round-dances-today-146630">handful of U.S. cities </a>in solidarity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/canadas_aboriginal_protest_movement_explodes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/canadas_aboriginal_protest_movement_explodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House ponders strike over Libya attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/white_house_ponders_strike_over_libya_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/white_house_ponders_strike_over_libya_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strike forces and drones are readied, but in need of a target]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House, under political pressure to respond forcefully to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, is readying strike forces and drones but first has to find a target.</p><p>And if the administration does find a target, officials say it still has to weigh whether the short-term payoff of exacting retribution on al-Qaida is worth the risk that such strikes could elevate the group's profile in the region, alienate governments the U.S. needs to fight the group in the future and do little to slow the growing terror threat in North Africa.</p><p>Details on the administration's position and on its search for a possible target were provided by three current and one former administration official, as well as an analyst who was approached by the White House for help. All four spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the high-level debates publicly.</p><p>In another effort to bolster Libyan security, the Pentagon and State Department have been developing a plan to train and equip a special operations force in Libya, according to a senior defense official.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/white_house_ponders_strike_over_libya_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/white_house_ponders_strike_over_libya_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. fears weapons proliferation in Syria puts weapons in wrong hands</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/u_s_fears_weapons_proliferation_in_syria_puts_weapons_in_wrong_hands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/u_s_fears_weapons_proliferation_in_syria_puts_weapons_in_wrong_hands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. involvement is Syria is becoming more complicated. “We have broad-based concerns about the conflict in Syria, period,” said Pentagon chief spokesman George Little. The pipeline runs from the Persian Gulf states, and is currently used to provide humanitarian aid to Syrian rebels, but it&#8217;s possible that  it could help the opposition, as well. “We have concerns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. involvement is Syria is becoming more complicated. “We have broad-based concerns about the conflict in Syria, period,” said Pentagon chief spokesman George Little. The pipeline runs from the Persian Gulf states, and is currently used to provide humanitarian aid to Syrian rebels, but it's possible that  it could help the opposition, as well. “We have concerns about weapons proliferation inside Syria and yes, we do have concerns that some of those weapons could fall into the wrong hands," said Little.</p><p>Wired explains the threat that the open pipeline creates:</p><blockquote><p>That proliferation fear illustrates the dilemma that the Obama administration’s Syria policy has created for itself. The CIA helps keep the pipeline to the rebels open, while seeking to gather intelligence on the Syrian opposition itself. But the official line is that the U.S. isn’t providing any rifles, rockets, mortars, missiles or spy tools to the rebels directly, partially out of concern that the U.S. doesn’t sufficiently know whom it’s arming. Critics, like Sen. John McCain, argue that President Obama is “AWOL” on Syria, allowing Iran-backed dictator Bashar Assad to slaughter civilians, and call for greater U.S. support for the rebels. But that could lead to a situation where the U.S. inadvertently arms its regional adversaries, as it did in Afghanistan in the 1980s, or unleashes weapons whose ultimate destination spreads far beyond the battlefield, as occurred in Libya during last year’s war.</p></blockquote><p>However, Little said, “I’m not going to speculate on prospective changes in policy." For now, the pipeline remains open.</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/syria-weapons-spread/">Wired</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/u_s_fears_weapons_proliferation_in_syria_puts_weapons_in_wrong_hands/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/u_s_fears_weapons_proliferation_in_syria_puts_weapons_in_wrong_hands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama campaign deputy adds to Libya partisanship</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/obama_campaign_deputy_adds_to_libya_partisanship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/obama_campaign_deputy_adds_to_libya_partisanship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Cutter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephanie Cutter joins "political circus" over embassy attack, which she blames Romney and Ryan for creating]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a furthering of partisan politicking over September's Libya consulate attack, Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for President Obama, blamed Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan for making the attacks in Benghazi a "political topic."</p><p>During a CNN appearance Thursday, Cutter said that "the entire reason that this has become the, you know, political topic it is is because of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan ... It's a big part of their stump speech." She went on to lambaste Ryan for making the tragedy a "political circus."</p><p>Critical responses emerged on Twitter within minutes. Fox News analyst Monica Crowley <a href="https://twitter.com/MonicaCrowley/status/256471601032331265">tweeted,</a>  "can't get much lower than the despicable [Cutter]." RNC Spokesman Tim Miller <a href="https://twitter.com/Timodc/status/256464093714714624">wrote</a> that Cutter's comment belonged "in the annals of people believing their own BS." Meanwhile, journalist and author Jeremy Scahill lambasted "partisan cogs" in general:</p><p>[embedtweet id="256471120541253633"]</p><p>For weeks now, as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/partisan_spats_at_hearing_on_libya/">Salon has noted</a>, partisan spats have characterized the discourse in Washington over the embassy attack in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/obama_campaign_deputy_adds_to_libya_partisanship/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/obama_campaign_deputy_adds_to_libya_partisanship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taliban shoot 14-year-old female activist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/taliban_shoot_14_year_old_female_activist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/taliban_shoot_14_year_old_female_activist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malala Yousufzai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taliban have taken vengeance on a girl who spoke out against them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Taliban gunman walked up to a school bus and shot a 14-year-old girl, Malala Yousufzai, in the head and neck and wounded another girl in Pakistan's Swat Valley. It seems that Yousufzai was the Taliban's target: She was an outspoken activist against the Taliban, penning a blog under a pseudonym for the BBC about life under their rule, and she had spoken out in support of women's education. The <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_PAKISTAN?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2012-10-09-14-24-57">AP</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>In her BBC blog, Malala wrote about not wearing her uniform to school after officials warned it might attract the Taliban's attention, and how many other students moved out of the valley after the Taliban issued an edict banning girls from school. She wrote about how the Taliban movement had kept her family from going out after sunset.</p> <p>While chairing a children's assembly supported by UNICEF in the valley last year, the then-13-year-old championed a greater role for young people.</p> <p>"Girl members play an active role," she said, according to an article on the U.N. organization's website. "We have highlighted important issues concerning children, especially promoting girls' education in Swat."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/taliban_shoot_14_year_old_female_activist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/taliban_shoot_14_year_old_female_activist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assange supporters to pay £93,500 after WikiLeaks founder flees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/assange_supporters_to_pay_93500_after_wikileaks_founder_flees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/assange_supporters_to_pay_93500_after_wikileaks_founder_flees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A British court has ruled that Julian Assange's supporters have failed in their duty to ensure Assange's capture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is wanted in Sweden where he faces allegations of rape and sexual assault, instead broke his bail conditions and fled to London's Ecuadorean embassy in June and was granted political asylum. Now, nine of his supporters are being ordered to pay £93,500 for not fulfilling their promise to "guarantee Assange would abide by bail conditions."</p><p>The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/oct/08/julian-assange-supporters-ordered-forfeit-bail">reports:</a></p><blockquote><p>A court ruled on Monday that the payments must be made within a month by nine friends and backers who in 2010 pledged £140,000 to guarantee Assange would abide by bail conditions during a failed legal challenge to extradition proceedings brought by authorities in Sweden, where he faces allegations of rape and sexual assault.</p></blockquote><p>Chief magistrate at Westminster magistrates court Howard Riddle said of the ruling that, "I accept that they trusted Mr Assange to surrender himself as required." He added, "I accept that they followed the proceedings and made necessary arrangements to remain in contact with him. However, they failed in their basic duty, to ensure his surrender."</p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/oct/08/julian-assange-supporters-ordered-forfeit-bail">The Guardian</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/assange_supporters_to_pay_93500_after_wikileaks_founder_flees/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/assange_supporters_to_pay_93500_after_wikileaks_founder_flees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monsanto crops cause tumors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/monsanto_crops_cause_tumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/monsanto_crops_cause_tumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corn Crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetically modified food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A French study finds rats fed GMO corn die prematurely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <div>A study released Wednesday found that rats fed Monsanto’s genetically modified corn or exposed to the biotech giant’s herbicide, Roundup, developed tumors and organ damage. As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/monsanto-corn-study-france_n_1896115.html?utm_hp_ref=green">Reuters reported</a>, “The researchers said 50 percent of males and 70 percent of females [in the test group] died prematurely, compared with only 30 percent and 20 percent in the control group.” The lead researcher of the French study is an outspoken Monsanto critic, which, according to Reuters, “may make other experts wary of drawing hasty conclusions.” However, the findings will no doubt fuel the controversy already surrounding Monsanto and GMO crops. As Think Progress’ Aviva Shen <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/09/19/873431/monsanto-tumors-organ-damage-rats/">noted</a>, the study “may hurt efforts by ... Monsanto, to defeat a California ballot initiative that would require labels on genetically modified foods.” The study may also buoy anti-Monsanto protests -- food activists acting under the banner “Occupy Monsanto” organized <a href="http://occupy-monsanto.com/">65 protests </a>this past week at Monsanto facilities across the country.</div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/monsanto_crops_cause_tumors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/monsanto_crops_cause_tumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama fights for indefinite detention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/obama_fights_for_indefinite_detention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/obama_fights_for_indefinite_detention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hedges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13014590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The administration's lawyers seek to appeal a judge's injunction against NDAA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, it looked like a controversial provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would be struck down -- namely, the ability to indefinitely detain American citizens. In January, a group of seven renowned journalists, activists and thinkers including Chris Hedges, Daniel Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky sued the president over the provision and gained an ostensible victory last week. U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest made a permanent injunction of the provision. "In short," as Hedges noted in his recent <a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/we_won_--_for_now_20120917/">Truth Dig column</a>, "she <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/105811287/Chris-Hedges#fullscree">declared</a> the law unconstitutional." However, the issue of indefinite detention of U.S. citizens is far from closed. The Obama administration instantly challenged Judge Forrest's decision.</p><p>Hedges:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/obama_fights_for_indefinite_detention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/obama_fights_for_indefinite_detention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/police_throng_tampa_with_gop_convention_in_town/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/police_throng_tampa_with_gop_convention_in_town/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/police_throng_tampa_with_gop_convention_in_town/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoards of policemen, FBI, and servicemen in riot gear bring an eerie, oppressive air to the RNC convention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — They seem to be on every street corner. Police officers riding bicycles, horses and golf carts that look like baby Humvees. Metal barricades surround all of Tampa's government buildings. State police, FBI, the Secret Service — some in riot gear — throng the city's streets surrounding the Republican National Convention.</p><p>Some, from visitors to downtown business owners, wonder if the convention security is all a little too much.</p><p>"I think it's overwhelming," said Ellen Brown, the owner of a bookstore in downtown Tampa. "It seems oppressive to me."</p><p>"It's overdone," said Tom Neal, a guest of the Texas GOP delegation. "Once you go this far, you're only a step away from becoming a police state."</p><p>During a normal August, downtown Tampa is a bit sleepy. Workers shuffle from air-conditioned offices into the steamy outdoors, past palm trees that sag under the oppressive humidity and through the city's lush green parks.</p><p>But with the convention in town, the city looks somewhat like it's under siege. Helicopters fly almost constantly overhead and packs of police cruise by on bicycles. Fast boats whiz by the region's three bridges, looking for unseen threats. Tall chain-link fences shield the pretty parks along the Hillsborough River from view. The main library is closed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/police_throng_tampa_with_gop_convention_in_town/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/police_throng_tampa_with_gop_convention_in_town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big story you missed: China&#8217;s missiles could thwart U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/big_story_you_missed_chinas_missiles_could_thwart_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/big_story_you_missed_chinas_missiles_could_thwart_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12992250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American defenses may not be able to stand up to China's new advances, analysts say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/world/asia/chinas-missile-advances-aimed-at-thwarting-us-defenses-analysts-say.html?hp">The New York Times</a> reports that the United States may be falling behind China when it comes to weapon technology, according to military analysts. China is developing new and more capable intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched missiles.</p><p>Global Times, a newspaper directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, reported Wednesday that China was developing the capability to put multiple warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles.</p><p>According to Larry M. Wortzel, who sits on the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, China has been developing the capability to put up to 10 nuclear warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles, though dummy warheads could be substituted for some of the nuclear warheads.</p><p>“The bigger implication of this is that, as they begin to field a force of missiles with multiple warheads, it means everything we assume about the size of their nuclear arsenal becomes wrong,” Wortzel said.</p><p>In addition, China has tested submarine-launched missiles within recent weeks, Wortzel said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/big_story_you_missed_chinas_missiles_could_thwart_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/24/big_story_you_missed_chinas_missiles_could_thwart_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/big_story_you_missed_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/big_story_you_missed_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12990847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. household income has dropped sharply since the recession]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Household income has declined in the three years since the recession. According to a report by <a href="http://www.sentierresearch.com/">Sentier Research</a>, a firm headed by two former Census Bureau executives, from June 2009 to June 2012 the inflation-adjusted median household income fell 4.8 percent to $50,964.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/household-income-is-below-recession-levels-report-says/2012/08/23/aa497460-ec80-11e1-a80b-9f898562d010_story.html">The Washington Post </a>reports that the study provides "another sign of the stubborn weakness of the economic recovery," adding that incomes have dropped more since the beginning of the recovery than they did during the recession itself, when they declined 2.6 percent. Median income is now 7.2 percent below its December 2007 level and 8.1 percent below where it stood in January 2000.</p><p>The Post spoke with Gary Burtless, a Brookings Institution economist, who said “the character of the recovery has been one that has benefited businesses more than it has workers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/big_story_you_missed_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/big_story_you_missed_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/biggest_story_you_missed_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/biggest_story_you_missed_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12976141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil rights activists are battling a section of the NDAA that could allow the indefinite detention of Americans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday morning, civil rights lawyers representing Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, Naomi Wolf, Daniel Ellsberg and three other activists argued for a permanent injunction against a section of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, which would theoretically allow the indefinite detention of American citizens by the military.</p><p>The lawsuit, filed in January, specifically targets a vague paragraph that identifies potential detainees as: "A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces."</p><p>The government argued that the law had not granted any new powers to the military, the Village Voice reported. It had only reiterated what Congress had authorized shortly after 9/11.</p><p>Judge Katherine Forrest, who granted a temporary injunction against the disputed section earlier this year, did not seem convinced, <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/08/ndaa_suit_argue.php">according to the Voice</a>. Even though Forrest ended the hearing by saying she had not made up her mind, the government has already appealed in a higher court.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/biggest_story_you_missed_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/biggest_story_you_missed_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12974949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies are set to pay $8 billion to settle charges of ripping off the government. No CEOs have been charged]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, military contractors, banks, pharmaceutical companies and other corporations might end up spending more than $8 billion in settlements with the government, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/08/business/more-fraud-settlements-for-companies-but-rarely-individuals.html?_r=1&amp;hp">reports</a>. Though the lawsuits include accusations of overbilling, drug marketing, selling "dangerous and defective" equipment to the military, and price and security fraud, thus far no individual within the corporations involved has been held accountable.</p><p>The Justice Department does not rule out charging executives. However, a government enforcer official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told the Times that in many cases it's too expensive and difficult to gather the evidence needed to prosecute high-positioned individuals.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/biggest_story_you_missed_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/biggest_story_you_missed_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12974143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what appears to be the highest-level defection to date, Syria's Prime Minister has fled the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While reports about the alleged Oak Creek killer's troubled past surfaced in the U.S. media, Syria's Prime Minister Riyad Farid Hijab escaped the war-ravaged country, according to opposition and official Syrian sources. Mr. Hijab, the highest ranked official to defect since the conflict began, fled to Jordan with several ministers and military officers, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/world/middleeast/syrian-state-tv-reportedly-attacked-as-propaganda-war-unfolds.html?_r=2&amp;hp">reported</a>, citing opposition figures in the country.</p><p>The defection might mark yet another turning point in the ongoing conflict, according to White House press secretary. During today's press briefing, Carney <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/08/06/press-briefing-press-secretary-jay-carney-862012">told reporters</a> that there was no reason to doubt reports about the defection. "The momentum is with the opposition and with the Syrian people," he added. "It's clear that these defections are reaching the highest levels of the Syrian government and Assad cannot restore his control over the country because the Syrian people will not allow it.  The quickest way to end the bloodshed and suffering of the Syrian people is for Assad to step aside to enable a peaceful political transition to a government that is responsive to the aspirations of the Syrian people."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/biggest_story_you_missed_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/biggest_story_you_missed_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/biggest_story_you_missed_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/biggest_story_you_missed_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pussy Riot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12972520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russian punk rockers Pussy Riot are on trial for criticizing Vladimir Putin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While droves of Americans exercised their right to eat Chick-fil-A this week, three Russian women sat jailed in a glass cage and longed for a proper democracy. Maria Alyokhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Yekaterina Samutsevich, members of the punk rock collective Pussy Riot, are being charged with “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred” and face seven years in prison if convicted, The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/03/pussy-riot-trial-russia">reported</a>. Along with being caged for up to 10 hours per day in court, the women have been denied food and sleep, claims their infuriated lawyer Violetta Volkova.</p><p>The trouble started in February when five members of the collective performed an anti-Putin song inside a Moscow church – for just 30 seconds. Security guards quickly booted the women, and within two weeks, three of the women had been arrested, Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/5930925/the-know+nothings-guide-to-pussy-riot-the-realest-punks-alive">reported</a>. Despite the judge’s denial of nearly all of the defense team’s objections, there is hope: This week Putin said that the women mustn’t be “judged ‘too harshly.'”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/biggest_story_you_missed_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/biggest_story_you_missed_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>