<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bill Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/bill_clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton handicaps Obama&#8217;s 2012 chances</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/bill_clinton_handicaps_obamas_2012_chances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/bill_clinton_handicaps_obamas_2012_chances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10742281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton sat down for an <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/1338638373001/raw-oreillys-full-interview-with-bill-clinton/?playlist_id=86923">long interview</a> with Bill O'Reilly last night on Fox News, where the two discussed everything from economic and immigration policy, to the horse-race politics of the 2012 election. Clinton issued a favorable forecast for Barack Obama's re-election -- saying his prospects were better than 50/50 -- and commented that the president's current, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/a_blue_christmas_for_john_boehner/">tougher political posture</a> would help him in the long run.</p><p>"[Obama's] out there running against himself now," Clinton said. "Soon as he gets an opponent, it will be about the next four years -- who do you think is going to take us in the right direction."</p><p>Clinton also weighed in a few of the Republican candidates, saying of one-time nemesis Newt Gingrich that he respected the man's ability to "think and do." The former president was, however, momentarily lost for words when O'Reilly followed up by asking if he respected Gingrich "as a man." Clinton tip-toed around the answer, then spent the next few moments criticizng the former speaker's "scorched-earth" political approach.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/bill_clinton_handicaps_obamas_2012_chances/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton sat down for an <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/1338638373001/raw-oreillys-full-interview-with-bill-clinton/?playlist_id=86923">long interview</a> with Bill O&#8217;Reilly last night on Fox News, where the two discussed everything from economic and immigration policy, to the horse-race politics of the 2012 election. Clinton issued a favorable forecast for Barack Obama&#8217;s re-election &#8212; saying his prospects were better than 50/50 &#8212; and commented that the president&#8217;s current, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/a_blue_christmas_for_john_boehner/">tougher political posture</a> would help him in the long run.</p><p>&#8220;[Obama's] out there running against himself now,&#8221; Clinton said. &#8220;Soon as he gets an opponent, it will be about the next four years &#8212; who do you think is going to take us in the right direction.&#8221;</p><p>Clinton also weighed in a few of the Republican candidates, saying of one-time nemesis Newt Gingrich that he respected the man&#8217;s ability to &#8220;think and do.&#8221; The former president was, however, momentarily lost for words when O&#8217;Reilly followed up by asking if he respected Gingrich &#8220;as a man.&#8221; Clinton tip-toed around the answer, then spent the next few moments criticizng the former speaker&#8217;s &#8220;scorched-earth&#8221; political approach.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/bill_clinton_handicaps_obamas_2012_chances/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/bill_clinton_handicaps_obamas_2012_chances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should liberals be more thankful for Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10249603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I got to debate Jonathan Chait about his much-discussed New York magazine piece, "<a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/liberals-jonathan-chait-2011-11/">When Did Liberals Become So Unreasonable?</a>" on "Hardball" Tuesday night. He's aiming at President Obama's liberal critics, but in fact his article proves that criticism is nothing new. Apparently, we've always been unreasonable, because Chait's survey of Democratic presidents going back to FDR finds that the left has always found a reason to squawk. But he seems to think we're particularly unreasonable when it comes to Obama. With Thanksgiving ahead, I found myself wondering whether liberals should be more grateful to the president.</p><p>First, let's take in the list of Obama's accomplishments as Chait describes them. They're considerable:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>301</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton&#8217;s alternate, unbelievable reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10186134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As Democrats survey the political wreckage of the last three years, the temptation to imagine more pleasant alternate realities is irresistible. What if Hillary Clinton had been elected president instead of Obama? Would events have played out any differently? Or, even more tantalizingly (albeit technically impossible), what if the Big Dog himself, Bill Clinton, had been in charge the last three years? Would he have done a better job fixing the economy? Been more effective knocking heads with the Tea Party? Established himself as a better bet to win a second term?</p><p>These are questions that obviously can't be answered with any certainty. We'll never know how a Clinton (or a McCain, for that matter) would have tackled the recession or jousted with John Boehner, just as we'll never know what would have transpired if there had been no stimulus at all, or if Obama had taken a more confrontational stance against his Republican opposition from the get-go, rather than pursue a doomed strategy of bipartisan cooperation. We're stuck with the world we've got.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/bill_clintons_alternate_unbelievable_reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico runs dumbest &#8220;running mate swap&#8221; piece yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10122664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Politico knows it must keep innovating in the field of political horse-race fanfic in order to maintain its position as the nation's leader in inane presidential campaign speculation. Last week, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-14/hillary-clinton-over-joe-biden-in-2012-possible-jonathan-alter.html">Bloomberg published</a> Jonathan Alter jumping on the "Obama might replace Biden with Hillary Clinton even though everyone involved has said in no uncertain terms that that will never ever happen" bandwagon. That was Politico's beat! Rather than complain, though, Politico has decided to move on. They are now way beyond the Hillary chatter.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/66096.html">Take it away, former Virginia Democratic Party chairman Paul Goldman and George Mason professor Mark J. Rozell:</a></p><blockquote><p>We like Joe and respect Hillary. But if President Barack Obama decides to follow the path of his favorite president, Abraham Lincoln, and change running mates, the insiders are buzzing about the wrong Clinton.</p>
<p>That’s right: a Barack-Bubba ticket is the way to go. True, if elected, Bill Clinton would become our first vegetarian veep — since he’s no longer the fast-food guy. Can a real Bubba eat tofu? And yes, he would be the first former president to hold the job, too.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/17/politico_runs_dumbest_running_mate_swap_piece_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton to protesters: Get some goals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/clinton_to_protesters_get_some_goals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/clinton_to_protesters_get_some_goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10110376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Add Bill Clinton to the long list of public figures who support Occupy Wall Street in principle, but insists they need specific goals in order to achieve anything. The former president was on "Letterman" last night, discussing the conditions of anxiety and frustration that spurred the nationwide protests. After issuing a critical appraisal of the movement, he voicing cautious optimism about the potential for change:</p><blockquote><p>I think that, on balance, this could be a positive thing. But they're going to have to transfer their energies at some point to making some specific suggestions or bringing in people who know more to try to put the country back to work.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/clinton_to_protesters_get_some_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add Bill Clinton to the long list of public figures who support Occupy Wall Street in principle, but insists they need specific goals in order to achieve anything. The former president was on &#8220;Letterman&#8221; last night, discussing the conditions of anxiety and frustration that spurred the nationwide protests. After issuing a critical appraisal of the movement, he voicing cautious optimism about the potential for change:</p><blockquote><p>I think that, on balance, this could be a positive thing. But they&#8217;re going to have to transfer their energies at some point to making some specific suggestions or bringing in people who know more to try to put the country back to work.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/clinton_to_protesters_get_some_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/clinton_to_protesters_get_some_goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens when Bill Clinton talks to Newsmax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton probably wasn't trying to undermine Barack Obama this week. But that's pretty much the effect that one particular interview he sat for during his annual Clinton Global Initiative mediathon had.</p><p>By now it's <a href="http://gawker.com/5273634/mellow-bill-clinton-now-bff-with-ex+smearer-still-pissed-at-ted-kennedy">old news</a> that Clinton has struck up a friendly relationship with some of his old right-wing tormentors. Perhaps his most notable rapprochement has been with Christopher Ruddy, who <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/showold.shtml">gave life</a> to Vince Foster and Ron Brown conspiracy theories in the 1990s and went on to found the far-right site Newsmax, which once <a href="http://archive.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/3/31/03452">proudly announced</a> that James Carville had labeled Ruddy the Clinton White House's top antagonist.</p><p>Ruddy, the story goes, changed his tune a few years ago, concluding that Clinton's actual record as president -- free trade, welfare reform, budget surpluses -- didn't warrant the hysteria that the right had whipped up while he was in office. And Clinton, happy to win over a key component of the right-wing noise machine, was ready and willing to bury the hatchet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/clinton_newsmax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Obama pull a Clinton on the GOP?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>This was originally published on Robert Reich's <a href="http://robertreich.org/">blog</a></em>
  </p><p>After a bruising midterm election, the president moves to the political center. He distances himself from his Democratic base. He calls for cuts in Social Security and signs historic legislation ending a major entitlement program. He agrees to balance the budget with major cuts in domestic discretionary spending. He has a showdown with Republicans who threaten to bring government to its knees if their budget demands aren't met. He wins the showdown, successfully painting them as radicals. He goes on to win re-election.</p><p>Barack Obama in 2012? Maybe. But the president who actually did it was Bill Clinton. (The program he ended was Title IV of the Social Security Act, Aid to Families with Dependent Children.)</p><p>It's no accident that President Obama appears to be following the Clinton script. After all, it worked. Despite a 1994 midterm election that delivered Congress to the GOP and was widely seen as a repudiation of his presidency, President Clinton went on to win re-election. And many of Mr. Obama's top aides -- including Chief of Staff Bill Daley, National Economic Council head Gene Sperling and Pentagon chief Leon Panetta -- are Clinton veterans who know the 1995-96 story line by heart.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>This was originally published on Robert Reich&#8217;s <a href="http://robertreich.org/">blog</a></em>
  </p><p>After a bruising midterm election, the president moves to the political center. He distances himself from his Democratic base. He calls for cuts in Social Security and signs historic legislation ending a major entitlement program. He agrees to balance the budget with major cuts in domestic discretionary spending. He has a showdown with Republicans who threaten to bring government to its knees if their budget demands aren&#8217;t met. He wins the showdown, successfully painting them as radicals. He goes on to win re-election.</p><p>Barack Obama in 2012? Maybe. But the president who actually did it was Bill Clinton. (The program he ended was Title IV of the Social Security Act, Aid to Families with Dependent Children.)</p><p>It&#8217;s no accident that President Obama appears to be following the Clinton script. After all, it worked. Despite a 1994 midterm election that delivered Congress to the GOP and was widely seen as a repudiation of his presidency, President Clinton went on to win re-election. And many of Mr. Obama&#8217;s top aides &#8212; including Chief of Staff Bill Daley, National Economic Council head Gene Sperling and Pentagon chief Leon Panetta &#8212; are Clinton veterans who know the 1995-96 story line by heart.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/robert_reich_can_obama_pull_a_clinton_with_the_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton quizzed on &#8220;My Little Pony&#8221; trivia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While it's not unusual to hear the voice of President Clinton on National Public Radio, listeners would probably expect to hear that Arkansas drawl during an interview with Scott Simon, or on "Talk of the Nation," answering questions about globalization. But this weekend Clinton was on NPR being grilled about an entirely different type of topic: namely, his knowledge of My Little Pony.</p><p>As part of Peter Sagal's "Wait Wait ... Don't Tell Me!" quiz show, Clinton was asked three questions about the cartoon in a segment called "<a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/06/25/137386121/bill-clinton-plays-not-my-job">Not My Job.</a>" He totally nails it, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/27/bill_clinton_my_little_ponies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Secretary of State Warren Christopher dies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When he took over as secretary of state in the Clinton administration at age 68, Warren M. Christopher said he didn't expect to travel much. He went on to set a four-year mark for miles traveled by America's top diplomat.</p><p>The attorney turned envoy tirelessly traveled to Bosnia and the Middle East on peace missions during his 1993-1996 tenure -- including some two dozen to Syria alone in a futile effort to promote a settlement with Israel.</p><p>After his work finished carrying out the Clinton administration agenda abroad, the longtime Californian returned home for an active life in local and national affairs and with his law firm.</p><p>Late Friday, the 85-year-old statesman died at his home in Los Angeles of complications from bladder and kidney cancer, said Sonja Steptoe of the law firm O'Melveny &amp; Myers, where Christopher was a senior partner.</p><p>As he prepared to step down in 1996 as secretary "for someone else to pick up the baton," he said in an interview he was pleased to have played a role in making the United States safer.</p><p>Along with his peace efforts, he told The Associated Press that his proudest accomplishments included playing a role in promoting a ban on nuclear weapons tests and extension of curbs on proliferation of weapons technology.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When he took over as secretary of state in the Clinton administration at age 68, Warren M. Christopher said he didn&#8217;t expect to travel much. He went on to set a four-year mark for miles traveled by America&#8217;s top diplomat.</p><p>The attorney turned envoy tirelessly traveled to Bosnia and the Middle East on peace missions during his 1993-1996 tenure &#8212; including some two dozen to Syria alone in a futile effort to promote a settlement with Israel.</p><p>After his work finished carrying out the Clinton administration agenda abroad, the longtime Californian returned home for an active life in local and national affairs and with his law firm.</p><p>Late Friday, the 85-year-old statesman died at his home in Los Angeles of complications from bladder and kidney cancer, said Sonja Steptoe of the law firm O&#8217;Melveny &amp; Myers, where Christopher was a senior partner.</p><p>As he prepared to step down in 1996 as secretary &#8220;for someone else to pick up the baton,&#8221; he said in an interview he was pleased to have played a role in making the United States safer.</p><p>Along with his peace efforts, he told The Associated Press that his proudest accomplishments included playing a role in promoting a ban on nuclear weapons tests and extension of curbs on proliferation of weapons technology.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/19/us_obituary_warren_christopher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, centrism and the Clinton myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This piece originally appeared at</em> <a href="http://www.robertreich.org"><em>Robert Reich's blog</em></a></p><p>In the next week the action moves from Wisconsin to Washington, where the deadline looms for a possible government shutdown over the federal budget. President Obama has to take a more direct and personal role in that budget battle -- both for the economy's sake and for the sake of his reelection. But will he? Don't count on it.</p><p>Worried congressional Democrats say the President needs to use his bully pulpit to counter defections in Democatic ranks, such as the ten Democrats and one allied Independent who on Wednesday voted against a Senate leadership plan to cut $6.2 billion from the federal budget over the rest of fiscal year 2011. They want Obama to grab the initiative and push a plan to eliminate tax breaks for oil companies and for companies that move manufacturing facilities out of the country, and a proposal for a surtax on millionaires.</p><p>Most importantly, they're worried the President's absence from the debate will result in Republicans winning large budget cuts for the remainder of the fiscal year -- large enough to imperil the fragile recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This piece originally appeared at</em> <a href="http://www.robertreich.org"><em>Robert Reich&#8217;s blog</em></a></p><p>In the next week the action moves from Wisconsin to Washington, where the deadline looms for a possible government shutdown over the federal budget. President Obama has to take a more direct and personal role in that budget battle &#8212; both for the economy&#8217;s sake and for the sake of his reelection. But will he? Don&#8217;t count on it.</p><p>Worried congressional Democrats say the President needs to use his bully pulpit to counter defections in Democatic ranks, such as the ten Democrats and one allied Independent who on Wednesday voted against a Senate leadership plan to cut $6.2 billion from the federal budget over the rest of fiscal year 2011. They want Obama to grab the initiative and push a plan to eliminate tax breaks for oil companies and for companies that move manufacturing facilities out of the country, and a proposal for a surtax on millionaires.</p><p>Most importantly, they&#8217;re worried the President&#8217;s absence from the debate will result in Republicans winning large budget cuts for the remainder of the fiscal year &#8212; large enough to imperil the fragile recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/11/robert_reich_budget_showdown_obama_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton sent emails while president &#8212; 2 of them!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill Clinton did many things while president. He enacted the North American Free Trade Agreement. He reformed the nation's welfare policy. He got impeached. He created a budget surplus. And then he left office with a higher approval rating than any president since World War II.</p><p>Bill Clinton did not send many emails during this period of time. In fact he sent only two, according to a <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1728309/bill-clinton-wired-for-change-surprise-visit">surprise talk</a> he gave at today's Wired for Change conference at the Ford Foundation in New York:</p><blockquote>
<p>I sent a grand total of two emails as president: one to our troops in the Adriatic, and one to John Glenn when he was 77 years old in outer space. I figured it was OK if Congress subpoenaed those.</p>
</blockquote><p>Here's the "electronic message" Bubba <a href="http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/i-asked-83-year-old-lady-what-she-thought-your-trip">sent</a> to John Glenn. It's now printed in a <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=CUWALQP2kWMC&amp;pg=PA2004&amp;dq#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">book</a>.</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10049775' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/02/img_clinton_email-1.png' />
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/bill_clinton_2_emails_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war that made Bill Clinton president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Gulf War that began 20 years ago this past week ended with America's political class in nearly universal agreement on one point: The Democrats were screwed in 1992.</p><p>In the months before the war, as he'd dispatched hundreds of thousands of troops to the Persian Gulf in response to Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, there had been widespread fear among Americans that President George H.W. Bush was leading them into another Vietnam. But as wars go, Operation Desert Storm proved surprisingly tidy: The verdict was quick and decisive and American casualties were low. It was everything Vietnam hadn't been, and when Bush declared a cease-fire on Feb. 28, a months-long national celebration ensued, complete with parades, prime-time television specials -- and, of course, soaring popularity for the commander in chief, whose leadership was hailed by even his harshest critics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/">http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/clinton_gulf_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton to campaign in Chicago for Emanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Former President Bill Clinton is coming to Chicago Tuesday to campaign for mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel, but his visit is the cause of some controversy.</p><p>While the former White House chief of staff hopes Clinton can persuade voters to cast their ballots for him Feb. 22, a former mayoral contender has warned that Clinton is risking his popular standing with the African American community by backing Emanuel rather than a black candidate.</p><p>Clinton is scheduled to appear with Emanuel at the Chicago Cultural Center Tuesday morning. The candidate touted the visit in his campaign mailings over the weekend, mixed with an appeal for campaign donations.</p><p>"I'm honored to have President Clinton's support," Emanuel told supporters in the e-mail on Sunday. "I'm excited to show President Clinton the great Chicagoans who've made this campaign possible."</p><p>Emanuel is among about a dozen names on the mayoral ballot. Three of his rivals, former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, former schools president Gery Chico and City Clerk Miguel del Valle, have emphasized their deep city roots while claiming Emanuel is more of a Washington insider. Braun has the support of many black leaders in the city, while Chico picked up the endorsement of Congressman Luis Gutierrez this month.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former President Bill Clinton is coming to Chicago Tuesday to campaign for mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel, but his visit is the cause of some controversy.</p><p>While the former White House chief of staff hopes Clinton can persuade voters to cast their ballots for him Feb. 22, a former mayoral contender has warned that Clinton is risking his popular standing with the African American community by backing Emanuel rather than a black candidate.</p><p>Clinton is scheduled to appear with Emanuel at the Chicago Cultural Center Tuesday morning. The candidate touted the visit in his campaign mailings over the weekend, mixed with an appeal for campaign donations.</p><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m honored to have President Clinton&#8217;s support,&#8221; Emanuel told supporters in the e-mail on Sunday. &#8220;I&#8217;m excited to show President Clinton the great Chicagoans who&#8217;ve made this campaign possible.&#8221;</p><p>Emanuel is among about a dozen names on the mayoral ballot. Three of his rivals, former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, former schools president Gery Chico and City Clerk Miguel del Valle, have emphasized their deep city roots while claiming Emanuel is more of a Washington insider. Braun has the support of many black leaders in the city, while Chico picked up the endorsement of Congressman Luis Gutierrez this month.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/17/us_chicago_mayor_clinton_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Bill Clinton&#8217;s Oklahoma City speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made of the parallel between last weekend's carnage in Tucson and the April 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people. As President Obama prepares to address a memorial service tonight, we thought we'd look back at Bill Clinton's memorable address in the wake of that '95 tragedy:</p><p>
    <object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5DgXx_evi6Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5DgXx_evi6Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made of the parallel between last weekend&#8217;s carnage in Tucson and the April 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people. As President Obama prepares to address a memorial service tonight, we thought we&#8217;d look back at Bill Clinton&#8217;s memorable address in the wake of that &#8217;95 tragedy:</p><p>
    <object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5DgXx_evi6Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5DgXx_evi6Q?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/bill_clinton_oklahoma_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do people keep fainting around Bill Clinton?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An old video is making the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2011/01/post-287.html?wprss=44">rounds</a> today of <a href="http://blog.littlesis.org/2011/01/04/obama-considering-chamber-of-commerce-insider-for-top-white-house-post/">Bill Daley</a>, the former Clinton commerce secretary who may become President Obama's chief of staff, fainting at a press conference in the 1990s.&#160;</p><p>Then-President Bill Clinton was on the scene and promptly declared that Daley was probably fine. As it turns out, there have been at least four episodes of Clinton-related fainting captured on film and preserved for posterity on the Internet. Without further ado:&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/">http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/bill_clinton_makes_people_faint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we&#8217;ve grown up since 1994</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We give Michael Barone, who was once the gold standard for intelligent political analysis,&#160; <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/23/hack_list_16">plenty of grief</a> around here for rebranding himself as a predictable, paint-by-numbers conservative ideologue, but sometimes he gets it just right -- like in <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/255946/obama-looks-ok-2012-michael-barone">his newest column</a>, in which he makes a smart, sober case for why Barack Obama is fairly well-positioned to win a second term in 2012:</p><blockquote>
<p>Several factors will likely work less strongly against Obama in 2012 than against the Obama Democrats in 2010. Turnout will be different, for one thing. We may see again the record turnout of blacks we saw in 2008. Young people who pretty much shunned the polls in the midterms may turn out and vote &#8212; though the 34-point margin they gave to Obama was halved to 17 points for congressional Democrats in 2010.</p>
<p>The balance of enthusiasm favored Republicans and conservatives in 2010, as it had favored Democrats in 2006 and 2008. It could conceivably shift and favor the Democrats once again.</p>
<p>Another factor is that polls show that most Americans have favorable personal feelings toward the president. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both happened to have personal characteristics that people on the other side of the cultural divide absolutely loathed. Obama doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>His reliance on his teleprompter, his secret smoking, his irritability when not adored &#8212; these are pretty minor failings. People like his family and his obvious devotion to them. They don&#8217;t mind that he likes to get away and play golf or shoot hoops from time to time.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/">http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/obama_2012_1994/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman to Clinton: Stay out of Chicago politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congressman Danny Davis has a message for former President Bill Clinton: Don't take sides in the Chicago mayor's race -- or else.</p><p>Davis, a longtime friend of Clinton, warned the ex-president on Tuesday that he could jeopardize his "long and fruitful relationship" with the black community if he campaigns for former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel instead of one of the two black candidates running -- Davis or former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun.</p><p>The warning highlights the stakes in what is gearing up to be a contentious race for mayor in the nation's third-largest city. About a dozen people have made it on to the ballot to replace retiring Mayor Richard M. Daley, who is bowing out after more than 20 years in office, giving candidates their first real shot at Chicago's top job for the first time in two decades.</p><p>In a news release, Davis, a Democrat from Chicago's West Side, said Clinton's relationship with the black community may be "fractured and perhaps even broken" if he comes to town to stump for Emanuel, who moved back to Chicago this fall to run for mayor and is leading in the polls.</p><p>Davis later told The Associated Press that he intended the news release to be a personal appeal to Clinton, friend to friend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressman Danny Davis has a message for former President Bill Clinton: Don&#8217;t take sides in the Chicago mayor&#8217;s race &#8212; or else.</p><p>Davis, a longtime friend of Clinton, warned the ex-president on Tuesday that he could jeopardize his &#8220;long and fruitful relationship&#8221; with the black community if he campaigns for former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel instead of one of the two black candidates running &#8212; Davis or former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun.</p><p>The warning highlights the stakes in what is gearing up to be a contentious race for mayor in the nation&#8217;s third-largest city. About a dozen people have made it on to the ballot to replace retiring Mayor Richard M. Daley, who is bowing out after more than 20 years in office, giving candidates their first real shot at Chicago&#8217;s top job for the first time in two decades.</p><p>In a news release, Davis, a Democrat from Chicago&#8217;s West Side, said Clinton&#8217;s relationship with the black community may be &#8220;fractured and perhaps even broken&#8221; if he comes to town to stump for Emanuel, who moved back to Chicago this fall to run for mayor and is leading in the polls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/us_chicago_mayor_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Bush&#8217;s book sales so great?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Crown Publishing Group, George W. Bush's lightly plagiarized memoir "Decision Points" has already sold more than 2 million copies -- counting e-books -- since it went on sale in November. That's a lot! As Glynnis MacNicol points out, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/george-w-bushs-memoir-sells-more-copies-in-2-months-than-bill-clintons-sold-in-5-years-2010-12">that's almost as much as Bill Clinton's book has sold since it was released six years ago.</a></p><p>But ... why? Clinton left office with good approval ratings and was largely remembered fondly, especially as the Bush years dragged to their depressing end. Bill's also smart and articulate, and his administration's scandals tended to be more personal in nature than Bush's. In addition to being an awful communicator, Bush is famously reticent to reflect on his decisions, and in his book he's obviously relying on other people's written accounts of his presidency, which is ... a bit odd, to say the least.</p><p>But people are apparently eating it up, or at least they are paying money for it. Here are my theories:</p><p>
    <strong>His publisher is lying</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Crown Publishing Group, George W. Bush&#8217;s lightly plagiarized memoir &#8220;Decision Points&#8221; has already sold more than 2 million copies &#8212; counting e-books &#8212; since it went on sale in November. That&#8217;s a lot! As Glynnis MacNicol points out, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/george-w-bushs-memoir-sells-more-copies-in-2-months-than-bill-clintons-sold-in-5-years-2010-12">that&#8217;s almost as much as Bill Clinton&#8217;s book has sold since it was released six years ago.</a></p><p>But &#8230; why? Clinton left office with good approval ratings and was largely remembered fondly, especially as the Bush years dragged to their depressing end. Bill&#8217;s also smart and articulate, and his administration&#8217;s scandals tended to be more personal in nature than Bush&#8217;s. In addition to being an awful communicator, Bush is famously reticent to reflect on his decisions, and in his book he&#8217;s obviously relying on other people&#8217;s written accounts of his presidency, which is &#8230; a bit odd, to say the least.</p><p>But people are apparently eating it up, or at least they are paying money for it. Here are my theories:</p><p>
    <strong>His publisher is lying</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton: Veganism&#8217;s unlikely best friend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegetarianism and veganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When you think of vegans, the popular image tends to run toward the fragile-looking, vaguely smug person with the hemp tote and the mung beans in front of you at the checkout line. Maybe you think of a w<a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/28/natalie_portman_vegan">ell-paid young actress</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/28/natalie_portman_vegan">who compares meat-eating to rape</a>, or the kind of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nas51x3ZQCg">trying-too-hard electronica musician</a> Eminem would pick a fight with. You probably don't picture a notorious voluptuary, a man who just last year was <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/07/brain-food-bill-clinton-chows-on-double-burger-onion-rings-french-fries-milkshake-on-eve-of-obesity-.html">chowing on double burgers</a> right before a conference on obesity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/">http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/bill_clinton_vegan_warrior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Imperfect tax deal worth it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/11/us_obama_18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/11/us_obama_18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/11/us_obama_18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama calls his tax-cut agreement with Republicans far from perfect but a good deal overall for Americans, while acknowledging that many fellow Democrats aren't happy about what he negotiated with the GOP.</p><p>Pressing for passage by year's end, he told lawmakers in his radio and Internet address Saturday that "our recovery will be strengthened or weakened based on the choice that now rests with Congress."</p><p>The deal would extend for all earners cuts in income tax rates that are set to expire next month. It would renew jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and trim Social Security taxes for one year.</p><p>Republicans support the plan because it would not impose higher taxes on the wealthiest, as Obama long had wanted to do. Democrats object to the pact on grounds that it is too generous to the rich.</p><p>Obama said the agreement will require that both parties accept some things they don't like. But he said the agreement will help the middle-class families that he and others have argued should be spared further economic hardship.</p><p>"The opportunity for families to send their kids to college hinges on this debate," Obama said. "The ability of parents to put food on the table while looking for a job depends on this debate."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/11/us_obama_18/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama calls his tax-cut agreement with Republicans far from perfect but a good deal overall for Americans, while acknowledging that many fellow Democrats aren&#8217;t happy about what he negotiated with the GOP.</p><p>Pressing for passage by year&#8217;s end, he told lawmakers in his radio and Internet address Saturday that &#8220;our recovery will be strengthened or weakened based on the choice that now rests with Congress.&#8221;</p><p>The deal would extend for all earners cuts in income tax rates that are set to expire next month. It would renew jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and trim Social Security taxes for one year.</p><p>Republicans support the plan because it would not impose higher taxes on the wealthiest, as Obama long had wanted to do. Democrats object to the pact on grounds that it is too generous to the rich.</p><p>Obama said the agreement will require that both parties accept some things they don&#8217;t like. But he said the agreement will help the middle-class families that he and others have argued should be spared further economic hardship.</p><p>&#8220;The opportunity for families to send their kids to college hinges on this debate,&#8221; Obama said. &#8220;The ability of parents to put food on the table while looking for a job depends on this debate.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/11/us_obama_18/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/11/us_obama_18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

