<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bill O'Reilly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/bill_oreilly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP reprises &#8217;90s scandal playbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Nuland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With zero self-awareness, Beltway conservatives and journalists are salivating over a return to Clinton scandals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never said “Who cares?” about how four Americans died in Benghazi. Sen. John McCain either misspoke or flat-out lied about that on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.</p><p>“Remember when she said, ‘well who cares how this happened,’ in a rather emotional way?” McCain asked guest host Martha Raddatz. “A lot of people care.” It’s too bad Raddatz didn’t tell the senator that no, she didn’t remember that – because Clinton never said it.</p><p>Remarkably, I’ve seen no one follow up on McCain’s misstatement today either. (I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong.) Instead, reporters are breathlessly parsing each new GOP charge on Benghazi (while also decrying the very real abuse of the IRS overscrutinizing the tax-exempt status of conservative groups.)  The National Journal’s Ron Fournier tweeted “<a href="   https://twitter.com/ron_fournier/status/333976318981062656">Welcome to the 90s,”</a> with no apparent irony or self-awareness about the role of the media in ginning up that decade of phony scandals that paralyzed our last popular second-term Democratic president, Bill Clinton.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly responds to David Sirota column, calls him a &#8220;loon&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/bill_oreilly_responds_to_david_sirota_column_calls_him_a_loon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/bill_oreilly_responds_to_david_sirota_column_calls_him_a_loon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Sirota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative commentator attacked the Salon columnist for hoping the Boston Marathoner is white American]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News anchor Bill O'Reilly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/i_still_hope_the_bomber_is_a_white_american/">does not seem to agree</a> with Salon columnist David Sirota, after all. Sirota's post, "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/">Let's Hope the Boston Marathoner is a White American</a>," made the rounds on social media on Tuesday, prompting O'Reilly call the writer a "loon" on the "O'Reilly Factor" last night:</p><p> <div class="video-player-wrapper-div"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=2308458037001&w=466&h=263&p=eyAiY29yZV9hZF9wbGF5ZXJfbmFtZSI6ICJzbWFsbGlucGFnZSIsICJjb3JlX29tbml0dXJlX3BsYXllcl9uYW1lIjoic21hbGxpbnBhZ2UiIH0="></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/">FoxNews.com</a></noscript></div> </p><p>O'Reilly blasted David Sirota again at the 5:12 mark in the segment below, saying Sirota hopes it's a "right wing militia, neo-nazi nut" who perpetrated the bombings to push Sirota's own personal political agenda:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=D8P4TT3CLK4DC5WT&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/bill_oreilly_responds_to_david_sirota_column_calls_him_a_loon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/bill_oreilly_responds_to_david_sirota_column_calls_him_a_loon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phil Jackson: I&#8217;ve never seen homosexuality in the NBA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/phil_jackson_ive_never_seen_homosexuality_in_the_nba_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/phil_jackson_ive_never_seen_homosexuality_in_the_nba_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Lakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former coach brushes off the notion that players need to be more welcoming to gay athletes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.outsports.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/outsports_logo_new-e1364588625853.jpg" alt="Outsports" align="left" /></a></p><p id="paragraph0">In honor of the <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/nba/teams/los-angeles-lakers">Los Angeles Lakers</a> retiring Shaquille O'Neal's No. 34 tonight, <a href="http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/shaquille-oneal-phil-jackson-lakers-retire-jersey/5154a7f32b8c2a10f30000fd" target="_blank">HuffPost Live hosted a conversation today</a> with Shaquille O'Neal, <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/nba/players/98759/kurt-rambis">Kurt Rambis</a> and The Big Aristotle himself. About halfway through the conversation, a viewer posed a question about homosexuality in sports:</p><p id="paragraph1">"I'm wondering if you think that organizations and players and athletes could be or need to be more inclusive of gay athletes and more welcoming to the gay community in general."</p><p id="paragraph2">Host Marc Lamont Hill, best known for playing Bill O'Reilly's foil on Fox News, tried to distance himself from the question with a dismissive, "Who wants to take<em> that</em> one?"</p><p id="paragraph3"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/02/phil-jackson-gay-basketball-players_n_3000925.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voices" target="_blank">Jackson responded</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/phil_jackson_ive_never_seen_homosexuality_in_the_nba_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/phil_jackson_ive_never_seen_homosexuality_in_the_nba_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly defends gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/bill_oreilly_defends_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/bill_oreilly_defends_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The other side hasn’t been able to do anything but thump the Bible," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On "The O'Reilly Factor" on Tuesday, host Bill O'Reilly came out in support of allowing gays and lesbians to marry, saying that they've made a "compelling" case, while opponents "[haven’t] been able to do anything but thump the Bible.”</p><p>“The compelling argument is on the side of homosexuals,” O’Reilly said. “That is where the compelling argument is. We’re Americans, we just want to be treated like everybody else.” He continued: “That’s a compelling argument, and to deny that you’ve got to have a very strong argument on the other side. And the other side hasn’t been able to do anything but thump the Bible.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/bill_oreilly_defends_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/bill_oreilly_defends_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly slams Bachmann on Obama &#8220;perks&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News host said Bachmann is "playing small ball" and making "trivial attacks"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Fox News on Wednesday, Bill O'Reilly criticized Michele Bachmann for her attacks on President Obama's "lifestyle of excess" (which mostly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/michele_bachmann_runs_away_from_reporter/">turned out</a> to be false), and for avoiding follow-up questions about it - first from CNN reporter Dana Bash, then from O'Reilly himself.</p><p>"Now, this would be much ado about nothing, if not for the fact that trivial attacks on President Obama are obscuring serious problems in this country," O'Reilly said, also noting that "every other president in history has lived in comfort, and it looks like President Bush the younger had a bigger White House budget than Barack Obama does."</p><p>"This is a trivial pursuit, and Michelle Bachmann made a mistake pursuing it," he added.</p><p>Bachmann had slammed Obama last week in her CPAC speech for his presidential "perks" that waste taxpayer money, specifically citing the Secret Service, the White House dog-walker, and movie nights.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/bill_oreilly_slams_bachmann_on_obama_perks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Hayes to replace Ed Schultz in prime-time slot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up With Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC announced their latest move as it struggles to dominate the 25 to 54 demographic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Hayes is ready for his close-up.</p><p>The hip, bespectacled journalist is preparing to take over the covetable 8 p.m. time slot vacated by Ed Schultz's "The Ed Show" — network executives have moved Schultz to Saturday and Sunday evenings. Hayes has hosted "Up With Chris Hayes" since September 2011, and established quite a following in less than two years of carrying a show.</p><p>"Chris has done an amazing job creating a franchise on weekend morning," network president Phil Griffin said in a statement. "He’s an extraordinary talent and has made a strong connection with our audience. This is an exciting time for MSNBC."</p><p>Griffin is banking on Hayes -- and possible Hayes's morning slot replacement Ezra Klein -- to make MSNBC a household name. Well, a <em>liberal</em> household name, at least. “Our awareness level, people who can define who we are, is much lower than Fox and CNN,” Mr. Griffin <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/business/media/msnbc-its-ratings-rising-gains-ground-on-fox-news.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0%22" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Times. The network president has been building out a brand identity through the steady recruitment of ever-younger, ever-more progressive on-air talent. Of the network's gravitation to the left, former President Bill Clinton remarked, “Boy, it really has become our version of Fox.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s next book will be about the death of Jesus Christ</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/bill_oreillys_next_book_will_be_about_the_death_of_jesus_christ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/bill_oreillys_next_book_will_be_about_the_death_of_jesus_christ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[killing jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Killing Jesus: A History" follows the political commentator's best-sellers "Killing Lincoln" and "Killing Kennedy"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox star and makeshift historian Bill O'Reilly has unveiled the subject of his next book, "Killing Jesus: A History," which in December he teased would be "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/">a blockbuster of epic proportions</a>." O'Reilly, who has clearly developed a formula for his best-selling historical "thrillers," will follow up his "Killing Lincoln" and "Killing Kennedy."</p><p>But both came under serious fire. As former Salon politics editor Jefferson Morley <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/oreillys_jfk_assassination_fib/">pointed out</a>, O'Reilly fabricated a story in "Killing Kennedy," saying he heard an associate of Lee Harvey Oswald commit suicide when, in fact, O'Reilly did not. And Justin Elliott has noted that O'Reilly's Lincoln assassination account was so grossly inaccurate that the historic site, the Ford Theater, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/fords_theatre_flunks_oreillys_lincoln_book/">refused to sell the book</a> on its premises “because of the lack of documentation and the factual errors within the publication.”</p><p>It remains to be seen how O'Reilly will spin what publisher Henry Holt and Co. describes as the retelling of "the story of Jesus of Nazareth as a beloved and controversial young revolutionary brutally killed by Roman soldiers," adding that "O’Reilly will recount the seismic political and historical events that made his death inevitable, and the changes his life brought upon the world for the centuries to follow.”</p><p>The book is due to hit shelves on Sept. 24.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/bill_oreillys_next_book_will_be_about_the_death_of_jesus_christ/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/bill_oreillys_next_book_will_be_about_the_death_of_jesus_christ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove is now going after Ashley Judd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/karl_rove_is_now_going_after_ashley_judd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/karl_rove_is_now_going_after_ashley_judd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our favorite former know-it-all emits a stench of desperation with everything he does now -- like Ashley bashing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a bigger set of brass cojones in American punditry right now than those belonging to Karl Rove? While his Fox News colleague Geraldo Rivera  is using his network platform to publicly drum up support for <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/02/08/geraldo-rivera-reiterates-that-he-will-remain-o/192583">a possible Senate campaign</a> (side note: <em>shudder</em>) Rove is busily finding new ways to burn through large sums of money – this time by going after Ashley Judd.</p><p>Persistent rumors have surfaced recently that Judd, a woman whose career highlights include humanitarian work in the Congo, campaigning for Barack Obama and making a movie <a href="http://youtu.be/nVvuoz2HjwM">with Dwayne Johnson</a>, is mulling a run against Kentucky Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2014. She reportedly met recently with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and has begun privately researching campaign strategy. Last month, she told reporters the people of Kentucky <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/onpolitics/2013/02/06/ashley-judd-senate-kentucky-karl-rove/1895559/">"need a fighter."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/karl_rove_is_now_going_after_ashley_judd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/karl_rove_is_now_going_after_ashley_judd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s JFK assassination fib</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/oreillys_jfk_assassination_fib/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/oreillys_jfk_assassination_fib/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly Killing Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JFK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox host fabricated a story about hearing a shady associate of Lee Harvey Oswald commit suicide ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill O'Reilly's bestselling book on the JFK assassination, "Killing Kennedy," partly follows the travails of O'Reilly himself as a young reporter trying to uncover the truth behind the president's death. As author and former Salon politics editor Jefferson Morley <a href="http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/news/reporters-tape-exposes-bill-oreillys-jfk-fib/#more-2557">highlighted this week</a>, however, O'Reilly's firsthand accounts appear lacking in the truth department.</p><p>In an incident detailed in the book (and flagged by media outlets including USA Today) O'Reilly claims he was tracking down an interview with George de Mohrenschildt, a Russian expat with possible CIA connections who was friends with Lee Harvey Oswald. Investigators looking into the JFK assassination were seeking information for de Mohnrenschildt when he reportedly committed suicide in 1977. According to "Killing Kennedy," O'Reilly was on the Russian's doorstep when he heard "the shotgun blast that marked the suicide."</p><p>But as Morley pointed out this week, this was pretty much dramatic baloney:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/oreillys_jfk_assassination_fib/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/oreillys_jfk_assassination_fib/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parenthood&#8221; bravely tackles abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/parenthood_takes_on_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/parenthood_takes_on_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason katims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fnl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBC drama "Parenthood" tackles a subject that's often too scary for network TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they happen with such rarity, I feel obliged to take note when they do: There was an abortion on prime-time television last night. On “Parenthood,” shy, quiet high-schooler Drew and his increasingly manly eyebrows found out that his girlfriend Amy was pregnant. Amy decided to have an abortion, Drew decided to be supportive even though a part of him, he tearfully confessed to his sister, wanted to keep it. Amy went through with her plan and the episode ended with Drew sobbing in his mother’s arms. It was all very quiet and understated — no histrionics, no one had a last-minute change of heart. (Bill O'Reilly, who fulminated that "<a href="http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/03/bill-oreilly-slams-nbcs-parenthood-what-we-are-about-to-show-you-is-very-explicit.html">the consequences were not shown</a>" when the Drew and Amy first had sex, many episodes ago, can now fulminate about those consequences.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/parenthood_takes_on_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/parenthood_takes_on_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood loves Bill O&#8217;Reilly?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/hollywood_loves_bill_oreilly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/hollywood_loves_bill_oreilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Killing Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom hanks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Hanks lends a strange veneer of credibility as the Fox News host's presidential histories head to TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having learned the lesson of the <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/05/31/hatfield-and-mccoys-breaks-new-ratings-record/">History Channel's stratospheric success with "Hatfields and McCoys</a>," National Geographic Channel is going scripted -- and adapting the histories of Bill O'Reilly to do so.</p><p>The channel, better-known for nature documentaries, will <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/01/03/killing-lincoln-trailer/?cnn=yes">debut "Killing Lincoln" next month, and has released a trailer</a>; it's a close-up of what happens after the bulk of Steven Spielberg's recent biopic "Lincoln," and is based on O'Reilly's account of the 1865 assassination. Tom Hanks, who is both a longtime producer of acclaimed historical films for highbrow HBO and <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/hanks_family_tie_to_lincoln_movie_B2lErxwo7OlpHmADf3XtJM">a cousin of Abraham Lincoln through his mother</a>, serves as narrator.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/hollywood_loves_bill_oreilly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/hollywood_loves_bill_oreilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean Hannity lost half his TV audience after the election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repuiblicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being wrong has consequences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative mouthpiece Sean Hannity lost about half of his TV audience in the weeks after the election while his colleague Bill O'Reilly's viewership only dropped by about a third, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/sean-hannity-big-loser-2012-election-article-1.1228269">the Daily News reported</a>:</p><p>The Daily News:</p><blockquote><p>So what happened to Hannity?</p> <p>The going wisdom is that viewers who basked in his preelection anti-Obama rhetoric tuned him out when they were stunned to wake up on Nov. 7 and discover that the President had won a second term — a scenario that Hannity had all but promised could never happen.</p> <p>Before the election, Hannity was riding high in the ratings and topped thought leaders on the right, like Dick Morris, Ann Coulter, Peggy Noonan and talk radio bulldog Mark Levin, who predicted Obama would lose in a landslide. </p></blockquote><p>Hannity performed even worse in the "money-demo" of viewers aged 25-54. More than half of them deserted his show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/sean_hannity_lost_half_his_tv_audience_after_the_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bill O&#8217;Reilly America&#8217;s most popular historian?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Kennedy to Lincoln, Bill O'Reilly has been pumping out nonfiction bestsellers -- and has no plans to slow down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans associate Bill O'Reilly with his perch on "The O'Reilly Factor," the most-watched show on cable television. But the conservative commentator is making a name for himself elsewhere, too: The New York Times bestseller list.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/24/books/bill-oreilly-has-top-2-spots-on-hardcover-best-seller-list.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">New York Times </a>notes that his recently published presidential biographies, "Killing Lincoln: The Shocking Assassination That Changed America Forever" and "Killing Kennedy: The End of Camelot," have been the top two books on the list for the past full week, with the latter having sold about one million copies.</p><p>In fact, the Times suggests that O'Reilly might be "the most popular history author in America" in part due to his television fame, and partially due to the sheer volume of work he has pumped out over the years:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/is_bill_oreilly_americas_most_popular_historian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There really is a war on Christmas!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/there_really_is_a_war_on_christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/there_really_is_a_war_on_christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And it's being fought by some of the bravest atheists in the country, nonbelievers in rural areas and the heartland]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times Square billboard is not shy about its war on Christmas: "Keep the merry, dump the myth," it reads, juxtaposing an image of jolly St. Nick with one of Christ's agony on the cross. Sponsored by Cranford, N.J.-based American Atheists, the sign is funded in significant part by small-town nonbelievers nationwide.</p><p>"In New Jersey and the New York area, you don't have as much of a feeling of oppression. We have a very diverse population," says American Atheists managing director Amanda Knief, explaining the group's backing in rural and small-town America. She points out that their 2010 national convention in Newark, which included an Easter Sunday trip to the American Museum of Natural History, attracted few local participants. By contrast, the 2011 850-person Des Moines gathering drew more than half of its attendees from inside the state. "It was the first opportunity in Iowa for people who were non-religious to come together. And it was the first time where it was safe to do so."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/there_really_is_a_war_on_christmas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/there_really_is_a_war_on_christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war on Christmas movies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fitzgerald Family Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyler Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the awfulness of most Yule-themed movies tell us about the reality of our so-called favorite holiday?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is there really a “war on Christmas” being waged by pinko, lefty, pro-choice, sexually bewildered heathens, as Bill O’Reilly proclaims around this time every year? Well, I don’t know about that, but there’s definitely a war on Christmas <em>movies</em> in that nobody seems capable of making good ones and the list of unwatchably crappy ones grows longer every year. Admittedly, it’s hard for any movie of any kind to be more painful than Tim Allen’s “Santa Clause” series. (There are three of them. <em>Three!</em>) But then, you probably haven’t seen either the 1977 remake of “It’s a Wonderful Life” starring Marlo Thomas or whatever the “Christmas Carol” knockoff from the '90s was called in which Vanessa Williams played Ebony Scrooge.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/the_war_on_christmas_movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill O&#8217;Reilly agrees: Roots of the War on Christmas are gay rights and abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just "grouchy misanthropic heathen atheists" who hate Christmas, a Fox News guest says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill O'Reilly agreed with "Imus in the Morning" producer Bernard McGuirk last night that the "roots" of the War on Christmas are not just atheists, but also "abortion and the gay rights agenda, because Christianity is against those things."</p><blockquote><p>MCGUIRK: The war on Christmas is very, very real, and if you ask me, in addition to some grouchy misanthropic heathen atheists it has to do — at the root of it — it has to do with two things — abortion and the gay rights agenda, because Christianity is against those things. It’s subtle but that’s why it’s so pronounced in recent years, in my opinion.</p> <p>O’REILLY: Hundred percent agree. I absolutely agree 100 percent that it's the diminishment of Christianity is the target and Christmas is the vehicle because the secularists know the opposition to their agenda -- legalized drugs is in there as well -- comes primarily from the Judeo-Christian traditionalist people.</p></blockquote><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3lxmQATcWb8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/12/07/1301451/bill-oreilly-blames-fabricated-war-on-christmas-on-fabricated-gay-rights-agenda/">ThinkProgress</a>/<a href="http://www.towleroad.com/2012/12/mcguirk.html">Towleroad</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bill_oreilly_agrees_roots_of_the_war_on_christmas_are_gay_rights_and_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When will Ailes rein in O&#8217;Reilly?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ailes put Karl Rove on a short leash after his election night meltdown, but lets Bill lie about Ann Coulter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/">I wrote earlier today</a> about Fox boss Roger Ailes' humiliation of longtime "contributor" Karl Rove. After Rove's embarrassing meltdown on election night, when he tried to stop Fox from calling Ohio for President Obama, Ailes told his staff that any booker who wanted to use Rove had to get permission from a higher-up. Ailes apparently woke up and realized that peddling his audience self-soothing falsehoods is probably not the way to build a GOP majority coalition in this country any time soon. And it might even be bad for business, too.</p><p>But what about Bill O'Reilly? He had his own meltdown on election night, blaming Obama's reelection on the disappearance of "traditional America" and "the white establishment." A few days later he began an ongoing jihad against "secular progressives" and the "far left" that was as fact-free as it was vicious. I wrote at the time that <a href="   http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/bill_oreilly_channels_glenn_beck/">O'Reilly seemed to be going the way of Glenn Beck</a>, who lost his Fox show after his paranoia and anti-Obama vitriol became too much even for Ailes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly lies about Fordham</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one "banned" Ann Coulter from Fordham. Why would O'Reilly besmirch a Catholic school like that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lies came thick and fast when <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/2008785183001/">Bill O'Reilly took on the Ann Coulter at Fordham University story</a>, one month late, on Monday night.</p><p>"I didn't know this, but Fordham University banned Ann Coulter," O'Reilly began breathlessly. In fact, the reason O'Reilly "didn't know this" is that it didn't happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/fordham_head_blasts_ann_coulter/">Here's what happened</a>: Fordham College Republicans invited Coulter to speak. Fordham president Joseph McShane wrote a letter lamenting their choice but supporting their right to make it. The College Republicans wrote a letter announcing they'd earlier "rescinded" the Coulter invitation, before McShane's rebuke, and lamenting that he hadn't spoken to them before going public with his reservations. Dissident Fordham College Republicans wrote letters complaining that their club had canceled Coulter, but none of them claimed she'd been "banned." <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/fordham_head_blasts_ann_coulter/">I wrote about all of this Nov. 9 when it happened</a>, but it was a Friday night, and O'Reilly was probably otherwise occupied.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When right-wing blather killed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/when_right_wing_blather_killed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/when_right_wing_blather_killed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish famine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Graves Are Walking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irish Catholics peddling nonsense about "dependency on government" need to read a new history of the Great Famine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking a break from 24/7 politics after the election, I finally read John Kelly's troubling <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/080509184X/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Graves Are Walking: The Great Famine and the Saga of the Irish People."</a> Our problems feel small. Ireland lost one in three people in the late 1840s. At least a million died in the famine and its related illnesses; another two million fled for England, Canada, the United States or other ports of refuge.</p><p>But I kept coming back to U.S. politics anyway. Hauntingly, Kelly repeats the phrase that drove British famine relief (or lack of it): they were so determined to end Irish "dependence on government" that they stalled or blocked provision of food, public works projects and other proposals that might have kept more Irish alive and fed. The phrase appears at least seven times, by my count, in the book. "Dependence on government:" Haven't we heard that somewhere?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/when_right_wing_blather_killed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/when_right_wing_blather_killed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for strangers, heathens, wastrels!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans counted on tried-and-true class warfare like never before. This time, "outsiders" were the majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get to the persistence of class warfare in our politics, let’s talk about Skinch Painter. In 1900, when the San Francisco Examiner tracked him down, he was 78, “hale, hearty, and contented.” He hadn’t inherited a penny, but neither had he worked a day in his life. “He has never borrowed a dollar, nor stolen one,” the column read. “He has never been a tramp nor a beggar. He has never done a day’s work in exchange for money ... Yet he has lived.”</p><p>One day, when he was in his teens, he said to himself, “Look here, Skinch Painter, this old world owes you a living, and all you’ve got to do is collect it.” Wandering the Ozarks of Missouri, he inhabited a cave and relied on nature for his food and clothing. He hunted, fished and gathered nuts and berries, wearing only animal skins and going barefoot.</p><p>“Labor is a useless sin,” said Skinch. “The time a man spends working is just so much time lost from living.”</p><p>We can just about see Fox News sending a camera crew out to interview Skinch, and one of its handsomely paid straight men wrapping up the piece with an offhand, “See, you don’t need government handouts. If you don’t want to work, you can do what this guy does. At least he’s not a taker. The rest of us in this country, we’ll continue to work for a living.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
