<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/blanche_l_lincoln_d_ark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln joins conservative lobby in fight against EPA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the party and the White House failed to save her Senate seat, the ostensible Democrat aids polluters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, then-Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Walmart) was facing a tough primary fight from a more liberal Democrat. With labor and progressive groups aligned against her, the White House and the Democratic Party jumped in to defend Lincoln. Bill Clinton himself campaigned for Lincoln, and the effort paid off: She lost to a Republican in the general election. And then she joined a right-wing interest group. And now she's fighting the EPA's plan to regulate greenhouse gases.</p><p>The National Federation of Independent Business is generally treated in the press as the official practically apolitical voice of American small business (and the press treats the word of "small business" with almost as much reverence as that of military generals) but it is, in fact, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/22/AR2007012201182.html">a conservative lobbying organization</a> that has spent decades fighting for anti-labor, anti-environmental and anti-consumer policies, all in the name of protecting our cherished "independent businesses."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/29/blanche_lincoln_epa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP on Kagan: Will she fight for civil rights of rich, powerful?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Supreme Court nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans worry that Justice Kagan might not always rule on the side of corporations and the military]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Republican members of the Senate Judicial Committee opened the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings by, perhaps unwisely, putting Thurgood Marshall on trial. Today, they're laying off Marshall, but they're making it clear that they believe the court's job is to always defend the rights of the powerful.</p><p>Republicans <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/thurgood-marshall-takes-center-stage-at-kagan-hearings.php">brought Marshall up 35 times yesterday</a>, with <a href="http://wonkette.com/416347/vile-racist-scumbag-jeff-sessions-its-his-day-to-shine">unrepentant racist scumbag</a> Jeff Sessions and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/scocca/archive/2010/06/28/not-what-i-would-consider-mainstream-day-one-of-the-thurgood-marshall-impeachment-hearing.aspx">Arizona's Jon Kyl</a> leading the charge against that terrible activist liberal judge who hated the Constitution. (Later, asked to name any single Marshall decision or opinion they disagreed with, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/thurgood-who-republicans-hard-pressed-to-disagree-with-marshall.php">Sessions and Orrin Hatch and Tom Coburn could not, really.</a> Because that would've given away the game.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National progressives are wrong about Blanche Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/17/blanche_lincoln_progressives_national/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/17/blanche_lincoln_progressives_national/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/06/16/blanche_lincoln_progressives_national</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lincoln's surprise win in last week's runoff looked a lot different in Arkansas than outside of it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln can survive a challenge from GOP Rep. John Boozman in November, her primary win over Lt. Gov. Bill Halter has surely set off a slanging match among Democrats. The pecking party was touched off by a morning-after comment by an anonymous White House official.</p><p>"Organized labor just flushed $10 million of their members&#8217; money down the toilet on a pointless exercise," the official told Politico. "If even half that total had been well-targeted and applied in key House races across this country, that could have made a real difference in November."</p><p>"We are not an arm of the White House or the DNC or a political party," an AFL-CIO spokesman huffed. "We work on issues. And if we feel like someone is standing up for working families, we support them, and if they don't, we won't.&#8221;</p><p>Halter&#8217;s out-of-state Internet backers reacted furiously. Salon&#8217;s indispensable Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of Accountability Now, which helped recruit Halter, argued that the "Democratic Party establishment" had abandoned its constituents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/17/blanche_lincoln_progressives_national/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/17/blanche_lincoln_progressives_national/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unsinkable Blanche Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/15/the_unsinkable_blanche_lincoln/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/15/the_unsinkable_blanche_lincoln/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/06/15/the_unsinkable_blanche_lincoln</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite endless whining from the lobbyists, the Arkansas senator's derivatives reform proposal keeps moving along]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what's happening with <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/blanche_lincoln/index.html">Blanche Lincoln's</a> infamous <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/bank_reform/index.html">derivatives regulatory proposal,</a> popularly referred to among the cognoscenti as "Section 716," adored by progressives (who never liked Lincoln), despised by Wall Street (who thought they could trust Lincoln to serve their interests), and supposedly <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/14/obamas-treasury-dept-work_n_611205.html">opposed by the Treasury?</a></p><p>As originally described, Section 716 was supposed to force banks to "spin off" their derivatives trading operations. As the conferencing process reconciling the varying House and Senate versions of regulatory reform rumbles forward, the proposal is going through a process of "clarification." Depending on who you trust, that means the proposal is either being weakened or made more sensible.</p><p>The key aspects of the clarification are that instead of spinning their derivatives operations off entirely, banks will be allowed to move them into subsidiary operations that are required to reserve significantly larger amounts of capital against potential trading losses than before. Community banks -- defined as holding under $50 billion worth of assets -- will be exempted from the requirement. And everyone will get two years of breathing room to implement the provisions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/15/the_unsinkable_blanche_lincoln/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/15/the_unsinkable_blanche_lincoln/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lincoln scorns Clinton&#8217;s pleas to save planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/blanche/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/blanche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/06/10/blanche</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rescued by Bill Clinton's support, the Arkansas Democrat votes with Big Oil against carbon regulation -- and him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than Al Gore &#8211; or perhaps Barack Obama &#8211; there are few major American politicians who speak out more passionately about global warming and the need to change our civilization&#8217;s energy economy than Bill Clinton. His concern dates back before the unanimous rejection of the first Kyoto treaty by the U.S. Senate &#8211; which he had endorsed as president -- and he has devoted the &#160;resources of the Clinton Foundation to reducing carbon emissions and saving forests around the world.</p><p>Which raises profound questions about Clinton's &#160;dogged campaigning for Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., whose comeback victory in a bitter primary last Tuesday was attributed to his support. Today, Lincoln rewarded him by joining with Republicans in <a href="http://views.washingtonpost.com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/06/obama_threatens_to_veto_murkowski_amendment.html">a landmark vote</a> to block the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases. Indeed, Lincoln was one of three conservative Democratic senators (along with Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska) to co-sponsor the resolution authored by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/blanche/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/blanche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serious political analysis of yesterday&#8217;s election results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/political_analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/political_analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/political_analysis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters are mad at incumbents, unless Bill Clinton is there, and Tea Parties won big, except where they didn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, before polls closed in a few states, everyone knew that America's angry voters hated incumbents, Harry Reid was doomed in November, and the radical fringes of both party bases were revolting against the mainstream. Today some of those things are still true, sometimes, but others are not.</p><p>According to Mike Allen, <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/">unions suck, and Bill Clinton rules, and also Sarah Palin rules.</a> The mood is not "anti-incumbent," it is "anti-establishment," which means anti-big business and anti-special interests and anti-Congress and anti-White House.</p><p>That is why two former representatives of big business won big in California, of course. (Sorry, wait, that is <a href="http://bit.ly/boHq7x">because of Sarah Palin</a>.) Also, apparently "anti-special interests" (unions) trumps anti-Congress (Blanche Lincoln).</p><p>TAKEAWAY: "GOP way more divided than Dems," except that Blanche Lincoln barely beat Bill Halter and everyone more or less came around to Whitman, Fiorina and Haley.</p><p>Also, <a href="http://politi.co/by7AKO">USA Today says</a> it was a tough night for political insiders (except, again, Bill Clinton and Blanche Lincoln). (Sarah Palin is an honorary "outsider.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/political_analysis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/political_analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats to organized labor: drop dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/lincoln_halter_labor_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/lincoln_halter_labor_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/09/lincoln_halter_labor_democrats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When an incumbent came under fire, a rebranded Democratic Party saved the day -- by turning on labor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an entity that's supposedly the bought-and-paid-for servant of organized labor, the Democratic Party sure has a hell of a way of showing it. When it looked like Arkansas Lt. Gov. Bill Halter's labor-backed <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/lincoln_halter_arkansas_senate/index.html">challenge</a> to Sen. Blanche Lincoln in the Democratic primary was going to succeed, Lincoln's backers in the Democratic establishment tried to turn the race into a referendum on organized labor. And it worked. Lincoln <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/index.html">won</a> her primary last night. Then her allies turned on the unions for not toeing the party line. In other words, the critics have it backward: it's not Democrats who are supposed to act like labor's servants, it's labor that's expected to act like it belongs to the party, with no reciprocal obligations.</p><p>First of all, though, maybe we all got a little ahead of ourselves in imagining that Halter had this thing sewn up. He was never ahead by more than <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/ar/10-ar-sen-dempr.php">a few points in a few polls</a>. So it might be that Lincoln's comeback doesn&#8217;t need that much analysis at all. These things happen all the time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/lincoln_halter_labor_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/lincoln_halter_labor_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln stuns Bill Halter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 03:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defying expectations, the two-term Democrat prevails in a runoff. But she'll be a prohibitive underdog in the fall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when it looked like the powers-that-be in Congress would have to start setting aside meeting space for another group besides just Democrats and Republicans -- call it the lame duck caucus -- Sen. Blanche Lincoln defied the anti-incumbent odds Tuesday night.</p><p>Lincoln narrowly escaped becoming became the fifth member of a not-so-illustrious club of incumbents who lost primary challenges Tuesday, beating Lieutenant Gov. Bill Halter in a runoff election for the Democratic nomination for the job she holds now. It was a defeat for progressives, who had longed to dump the moderate-to-conservative Lincoln; unions spent millions supporting Halter -- and attacking Lincoln for voting for NAFTA, opposing the Employee Free Choice Act and wavering on healthcare reform, among other perceived heresies. MoveOn.org kicked in another few million, and groups like the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Daily Kos readers sent <a href="http://www.actblue.com/entity/fundraisers/23963">several hundred thousand dollars each</a>. (The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, meanwhile -- which almost always supports Republicans -- spent $300,000 on <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/04/27/chamber_of_commerce_tv_ad_supports_blanche_lincoln">ads for Lincoln</a>, though labor officials noted that the Chamber more or less let Lincoln go once the race went to a runoff.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/09/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primary night live: Super Tuesday 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/super_tuesday_primary_2010_live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/super_tuesday_primary_2010_live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/08/super_tuesday_primary_2010_live</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lincoln pulls it out. Angle on pace to face Harry Reid. Fiorina and Whitman cruise -- and so do the Lakers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>11:46 p.m.</strong>: We're going to call it a night here. It looks like Angle is pulling away and will be the Republican nominee in Nevada -- Harry Reid's dream scenario. (Of course, given what a dreadful campaign she waged, you could argue that Lowden might be just as beatable.) We'll have plenty of all of tonight's fallout tomorrow on Salon.</p><p><strong>11:27 p.m.</strong>: The fun now shifts to Nevada and&#160;California. Although California looks academic already; with four percent of the vote in, Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have both opened enormous leads -- more than 100,000 votes -- in their respective GOP primaries. The Nevada GOP Senate primary is the real barn-burner. With 15 percent of the vote in, Sharron&#160;Angle is three points ahead of Sue Lowden, who (at least early on) is faring better than most expected.&#160;Danny Tarkanian, who had overtaken Lowden for second in some pre-primary polls, is a distant third, with about 20 percent.</p><p><strong>11:07 p.m.</strong>: As you've probably seen by now, Blanche Lincoln has been declared the winner. (Keith Olbermann actually made the announcement by interrupting a guest who was trying to say that there were still lots of votes outstanding and that Halter still had a chance.) Lincoln will clearly be the underdog in November against Republican John Boozman. But who knows now? No one thought she'd survive tonight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/super_tuesday_primary_2010_live/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/super_tuesday_primary_2010_live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to watch in tonight&#8217;s primary elections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharron Angle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halter vs. Lincoln, Sharron Angle, Nikki Haley and other highlights of a wild day of primaries in 12 states]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political world hasn't seen a primary day like today since the 2008 presidential election. By the end of the night, Republicans will have chosen a challenger to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in Nevada; Democrats will have finally settled a nasty civil war in Arkansas; and the world will know whether we'll still have <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/06/02/nikki_haley_husband_ad">Nikki Haley</a> to kick around any longer.</p><p>With closely watched elections in California, Nevada, Arkansas and South Carolina (and less well-known contests in eight other states), here's a guide -- in chronological order -- of what to watch for as the returns come in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/june_8_primaries_to_watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Bill Halter should beat Blanche Lincoln Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lower turnout than in last month's primary could be bad news for Sen. Blanche Lincoln, the incumbent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Blanche Lincoln could be the next incumbent to lose a party primary on Tuesday, when she faces Lieutenant Gov. Bill Halter in a run-off for the Arkansas Democratic nomination.</p><p>The first round of voting last month left Lincoln short of the 50 percent threshold needed to win the nod outright -- as a surprising 13 percent of votes went to D.C. Morrison, seen as a protest candidate -- and set up Tuesday's election. Turnout next week could be far lower than in the first round, though, which probably doesn't bode well for Lincoln. The most committed voters are likely to be the ones who want a change; that probably means they're backing Halter.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/6/4/872884/-AR-Sen:-Halter-maintains-narrow-lead,-49-45">new poll out Friday</a> by Research 2000 for the Daily Kos showed Halter leading, 49-45 -- slightly up from last week's result. Among people who voted for Morrison who plan to turn out again, Halter led by 10 points.</p><p>Lincoln's campaign has been pushing harder and harder on the idea that Halter is the candidate of outside interests, not Arkansans, playing up his support from MoveOn.org and big labor unions (which, though they have members in Arkansas, aren't wildly popular there).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/bill_halter_blanche_lincoln_runoff_tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln named to bank reform conference</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/lincoln_named_to_wall_street_reform_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/lincoln_named_to_wall_street_reform_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/25/lincoln_named_to_wall_street_reform_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The move may or may not help keep tough language on derivatives alive -- or help Lincoln fend off Bill Halter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can't say Senate Democratic leaders aren't trying to help Blanche Lincoln survive a runoff against Bill Halter.</p><p>Lincoln was named Tuesday morning to the conference committee that will try to reconcile the House and Senate versions of bank reform legislation. That could give her another shot at keeping alive her tough language on derivatives trading, which most of Washington expects to be dropped before the bill is passed. (Democrats tried to drop it last week, but Lincoln's inability to get to 50 percent against Halter in the Arkansas primary meant they revived it to protect her in the runoff.)</p><p>Lincoln's campaign didn't have an immediate statement on the news, though they did flag it on her <a href="http://twitter.com/senatus/status/14698102320">Twitter feed</a>. <strong>UPDATE:</strong> Lincoln's camp sent over this statement: "I look forward to working with my Senate and House colleagues to enact much-needed reforms to Wall Street in the coming weeks. As we move forward with the conference negotiations, I will continue to advocate for legislation that will help families save for college, protect retirees, ensure small businesses can get loans and create jobs on Main Street. The Senate passed bill includes provisions that will bring a $600 trillion unregulated market out of the dark and into the light of day, ending the days of backroom deals on Wall Street. These provisions will serve as a strong starting point for these negotiations."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/lincoln_named_to_wall_street_reform_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/lincoln_named_to_wall_street_reform_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halter only one of the &#8220;replacements&#8221; who could save Dems</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/democrats_2010_secret_weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/democrats_2010_secret_weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/24/democrats_2010_secret_weapon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a handful of races, the party has replaced doomed incumbents on the ballot. And the results are encouraging]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's one simple way for Democrats to enjoy a better-than-expected November: throw out their own incumbents before the voters get the chance to. In some of this year's marquee races, the party has done just that, and the early results are encouraging.</p><p>Take the crucial Pennsylvania Senate contest, where Republican Pat Toomey essentially spent the last year running ahead of Arlen Specter, who had been the presumed Democratic nominee. The Democrats who were propping up Specter <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/29/rendell-sestak-would-get_n_209285.html">insisted he would be the party's best general election bet</a>, even though his 30 years in the Senate seemed to clash with the public's anti-incumbent mood. Specter, of course, lost last week's Democratic primary to Joe Sestak -- and Sestak has, at least in the initial post-primary polling, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-13600-Philadelphia-Opinion-Polls-Examiner~y2010m5d21-Poll-Sestak-leads-Toomey-4642-in-first-major-survey-since-Tuesday-primaries">opened a small lead</a> over Toomey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/democrats_2010_secret_weapon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/24/democrats_2010_secret_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing is working out for Blanche Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/lincoln_derivatives_runoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/lincoln_derivatives_runoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/19/lincoln_derivatives_runoff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arkansas incumbent seemed to have a good plan for reelection, until yesterday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., thought he was so clever. As usual, the Connecticut senator has been trying to straddle the line between the reformist liberal he imagines himself to be and the servant of special interests that he actually is. So he waited until what seemed like just the right moment <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/05/18/banking_reform_comes_down_to_the_wire/index.html">to kill off</a> the strict derivatives reform proposed by Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark.: her primary day.</p><p>Lincoln was clearly -- ahem -- banking on this idea to shore up her populist credentials. So Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, couldn't shut it down until her primary challenge had run its course, despite the hatred directed at the proposal by Washington and Wall Street's wise men. Otherwise, he'd be pulling the plug on the reelection campaign of a fellow incumbent Democrat.</p><p>Well, you know what they say about best-laid plans. Dodd <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/bank_reform/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban">announces</a> that he is, effectively, killing the Lincoln reform on her primary day, and she goes and ends up underperforming expectations and getting dragged into a runoff. So now what?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/lincoln_derivatives_runoff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/lincoln_derivatives_runoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Tuesday&#8217;s results mean (and what they don&#8217;t)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/super_tuesday_2010_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/super_tuesday_2010_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter vs. Joe Sestak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Trey Grayson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/18/super_tuesday_2010_primary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arlen Specter is done, Rand Paul is a step closer to the Senate, and Blanche Lincoln is in trouble. What it means]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This wasn't about the White House</strong>: Sure, President Obama endorsed Arlen Specter and (though you heard a lot less about it in Arkansas than in Pennsylvania) Blanche Lincoln. And no, it didn't help.</p><p>But don't read Tuesday night's results as a rebuke to the White House. In Arkansas, where Obama won only 38 percent of the vote in the 2008 elections, he never figured into the race. And in Pennsylvania, Specter -- who spent his career as a Republican -- was a flawed vehicle for the White House's message. A primary election in which only the most dedicated Democrats turned out hardly means a rejection of Obama.</p><p>All the support the party establishment gave Specter, after all, was mostly just payback. Specter's switch a year ago gave Democrats the 60th vote they needed to overcome Republican filibusters (after Al Franken was finally seated), and his support before that had helped pass the economic stimulus. By now, though, Specter isn't the 60th vote anymore; Obama didn't even care enough about whether he won or lost to risk a late campaign appearance on his behalf. Sestak -- who stubbornly resisted entreaties to quit the race -- hammered Specter constantly for cutting a deal for the White House help. But he also said he wants to be Obama's "closest ally" if he makes it to the Senate. That doesn't exactly sound like an anti-White House message.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/super_tuesday_2010_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/super_tuesday_2010_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Dodd effectively kills Blanche Lincoln&#8217;s derivatives proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the Senate at its finest: Everyone gets to vote for a compromise that sounds good but does nothing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's Chris Dodd's face-saving solution to the Blanche Lincoln derivatives reform pickle: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/18/AR2010051804100.html?hpid=topnews">say we'll still ban banks from trading derivatives</a>, but not until after a "review" by a council of regulators. And then, in two years, we kill the whole thing and pretend it never happened. Everyone wins! (In the traditional US Senate sense of everyone winning, which means no one has to take a tough vote and nothing is accomplished.)</p><p>Polls in Arkansas don't close until 8:30 pm ET, but most observers are already predicting that a June 8 runoff election between Senator Blanche Lincoln and challenger Bill Halter will be necessary. Meanwhile, Lincoln's left-pleasing derivatives-regulating amendment to the Senate bank overhaul bill was supposed to bolster her support with the Democratic base, so it couldn't be killed until she won or lost her primary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/18/dodd_kills_derivatives_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Arkansas, Blanche Lincoln&#8217;s enemy is the runoff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/15/lincoln_halter_arkansas_polls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/15/lincoln_halter_arkansas_polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Numerologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/05/14/lincoln_halter_arkansas_polls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's going to get the most votes on Tuesday. But that doesn't mean she'll win]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three big contested Democratic Senate primaries on Tuesday, and two of them -- in Pennsylvania and Kentucky -- are looking like tossups. But in Arkansas, where two-term incumbent Blanche Lincoln is being challenged from the left by Lt. Gov. Bill&#160;Halter, one candidate seems to have a clear advantage: Lincoln.</p><p>Lincoln's lead in the most recent polls tends to be in the 10-point ballpark. She was ahead of Halter 46-37 percent in a <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/5/12/AR/496">Research 2000</a> poll this week and 44-32 in a <a href="http://www.swingstateproject.com/diary/6869/arsen-runoffs-look-possible-but-dems-in-poor-shape-for-general">Mason-Dixon</a> survey two weeks ago. Her real challenge on Tuesday, though, isn't to outpoll Halter -- it's to clear the 50 percent mark, in order to avoid a runoff. (Arkansas is one of 10 states, almost all located in the South, that requires the top two finishers in a primary to go to a runoff if nobody breaks a certain percentge.)</p><p>In a two-person race, the winner would, naturally, break 50 percent. However, unbeknownst to many national observers, this is a three-person race: The other candidate is D.C. Morrison, who&#8217;s been running to Lincoln&#8217;s right and employing a variety of Tea Party-ish talking points. Morrison polled at 6 percent in the Research 2000 survey and at 7 in Mason-Dixon's.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/15/lincoln_halter_arkansas_polls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/15/lincoln_halter_arkansas_polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln to the rescue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/lincoln_derivatives_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/lincoln_derivatives_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/05/12/lincoln_derivatives_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arkansas senator's proposal for derivatives reform is better than anything else out there]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, the biggest battle in bank reform is over a provision introduced by Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas that would force the giant Wall Street banks to give up their lucrative derivative trading businesses if they want the government (i.e. taxpayers) to continue insuring their commercial deposits.</p><p>The five biggest Wall Street banks have had the derivatives market (derivatives are bets on whether the price of certain assets will rise or fall, bets thereby "derived" from asset prices) almost entirely to themselves. Last year their revenues from derivatives trading totaled a whopping $22.6 billion. Their advantage comes from their large size, plus government insurance of their commercial deposits that allows them to raise money more cheaply than other financial institutions.</p><p>Derivatives lie at the point where the basic saving-and-lending function of commercial banking meets the private casino of Wall Street investment banking. You and I subsidize the biggest players in the casino who, precisely because we subsidize them, have grown too big to fail. The Glass-Steagall Act once prevented the casino from using commercial deposits, but since 1999, when Glass-Steagall was repealed, the game has exploded. That&#8217;s part of the reason the giants on Wall Street could make wild bets that ended up threatening the entire economy, costing millions of Americans their jobs and savings, and requiring a massive taxpayer-financed bailout.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/lincoln_derivatives_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/lincoln_derivatives_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Bill Halter even force a runoff against Blanche Lincoln?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/blanche_lincoln_bill_halter_arkansas_senate_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/blanche_lincoln_bill_halter_arkansas_senate_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/11/blanche_lincoln_bill_halter_arkansas_senate_democrats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Bill Halter entered the Arkansas Senate primary in early March, progressive activists around the country got excited about the possibility he would take out Blanche Lincoln. A week before the election, though, the only real drama seems to be whether Halter can even force a runoff. Word from Arkansas is that private polls continue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Bill Halter entered the Arkansas Senate primary in early March, progressive activists around the country got excited about the possibility he would take out Blanche Lincoln. A week before the election, though, the only real drama seems to be whether Halter can even force a runoff.</p><p>Word from Arkansas is that private polls continue to show Lincoln flirting with the 50 percent mark that she'd need to win next Tuesday's primary outright, without getting into a runoff. Halter allies hope all the people who say they're backing businessman D.C. Morrison (running as a sort of "pox on both their houses" longshot) in polls actually do show up, because that could help hold Lincoln's total down. But the relentlessly negative tone of the TV ads in the campaign, coupled with Lincoln's realization that she actually had a fight on her hands, appears to have helped her consolidate her base while alienating people from Halter a bit.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/blanche_lincoln_bill_halter_arkansas_senate_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/11/blanche_lincoln_bill_halter_arkansas_senate_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blanche Lincoln tacks left, opponent raises fortune</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/04/blanche_lincoln_primary_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/04/blanche_lincoln_primary_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/04/blanche_lincoln_primary_money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberals send Bill Halter $100K as Lincoln belatedly fights the banks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Progressive Change Campaign Committee <a href="http://tolbertreport.com/2010/05/04/actblue-raised-100k-for-billhalter-arsen/">has raised $100,000 for Arkansas' Lt. Gov. Bill Halter</a>, who is mounting a primary challenge against Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Walmart. No one's quite sure if that's good news or bad news for Democrats.</p><p>Lincoln's reelection in an increasingly conservative state <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/3/24/AR/465">looks like a long shot.</a> Her negatives are horrible. <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/30/blanche_lincoln_primary_challenge_halter">Halter may benefit from general anti-incumbent fervor</a>, but a more liberal candidate probably won't do much better with the Arkansas electorate than a "moderate" like Lincoln. So are liberals throwing away their only shot at keeping a Senate seat in a conservative state?</p><p>I don't know. But the more Halter raises, the better off we'll all be. After she killed the public option and came out against the Employee Free Choice Act, the threat of a credible primary challenge delivered Lincoln's vote on healthcare and even got her to take <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/techbiz/2010/04/21/D9F7I8H01_us_financial_overhaul_derivatives/index.html">a hard line on derivatives in financial reform.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/04/blanche_lincoln_primary_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/04/blanche_lincoln_primary_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
