<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bobby Jindal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/bobby_jindal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal doesn&#8217;t understand birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana governor tries to moderate his party's contraception stance, but gets his facts completely wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call off the culture war over birth control, left and right! Bobby Jindal has an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html">elegant solution</a> to rise above the fray. Or so he thinks.</p><p>Seizing on recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that some hormonal birth control be available over the counter, the Louisiana governor and presumed presidential hopeful seeks to play them against the Affordable Care Act. He claims that Obama's big government is actually making it harder for women to access birth control, despite the fact that the ACOG recommendations would work best in tandem with the Affordable Care Act birth control provisions, not instead of them.</p><p>Making birth control more accessible in any way possible is generally a good idea. But in Jindal's haste to find "the end of birth control politics," he ignores some crucial benefits of the Affordable Care Act as well as the deep-seated opposition to many forms of birth control, not just insurance coverage of it, among his own allies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal: GOP &#8220;stupid&#8221; on birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The likely 2016 presidential candidate argues for the sale of contraception over the counter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana and a possible 2016 GOP presidential candidate,<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html"> endorsed the sale of over-the-counter contraception without a prescription Friday. </a></p><p>In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jindal tried to put an anti-big-government spin on his position, while also moving away from the social conservative wing of the party and addressing a gender gap which hurt Mitt Romney and likely cost Republicans Senate seats in Indiana and Missouri.</p><p>Jindal wrote that Republicans have been "stupid to let the Democrats demagogue the contraceptives issue," while embracing the  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists call for over-the-counter sales and seeking to push the issue out of the "political arena.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the GOP ever get serious?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans' big-idea guys and policy wonks outlined their 2016 platforms this week. They sound a lot like 1980]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again.</p><p>We just managed to get through a campaign in which the Republican candidate’s idea of innovation was to hold a convention themed around an out-of-context quote from his opponent. But we knew Mitt Romney was at his heart a manager, not a policy innovator. So maybe it will be better next time, with new candidates such as Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan. Right?</p><p>Yeah, I didn’t think so.</p><p>Of course, there’s still plenty of time for innovative conservative ideas. Hey, don’t laugh. Ronald Reagan campaigned on a whole book full of policy options, and as recently as 2000, George W. Bush really did feature new ideas in his campaign.</p><p>But neither John McCain nor Mitt Romney had any interest in such things – and judging from the three proto-candidates who rolled out their “ideas” this week, it looks as if Republican politicians these days don’t even remember what actual policy ideas look like.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will win the Adelson primary?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several GOP 2016 hopefuls have met with the wealthy casino mogul, but keep an eye on Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney may still be grieving his loss (mostly by <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/15-people-who-just-saw-mitt-romney">eating pizza</a>, it seems), but 2012 is <em>sooo</em> last month and 2016 is just around the corner. Politico’s Ken Vogel reports today that potential candidates of both parties have <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/2016-contenders-courting-mega-donors-84497.html?hp=t1_3">already started courting potential donors</a>, including Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. Adelson is the top prize for any GOP White House hopeful, with pockets deep enough and political instincts dull enough to single-handedly fund a presidential campaign. He spent, we learn today, an absolutely astonishing <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/03/sheldon-adelson-2012-election_n_2223589.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">$150 million</a> backing Republicans this year, including $20 million on Newt Gingrich's failed bid. So the stakes are high for the suitors, but to whom will Adelson give his rose?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Democrats have a permanent Electoral College advantage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nominate Jeb Bush or Bobby Jindal. It doesn't matter: The Electoral College now favors the Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have the Democrats opened up a real Electoral College advantage over the Republicans?</p><p>I’m not talking about the illusion of an advantage that comes with winning consecutive elections. That might be the result of a streak in which the party is helped by favorable fundamentals, or it can be, as with Democratic majorities in the New Deal era, simply part of a national advantage. In either case, a party might win the same states every time, but -- as Republicans discovered in 1992 -- when those favorable conditions end, the apparent electoral “lock” disappears, too.</p><p>No, I’m talking about an Electoral College edge above and beyond the national vote. That’s not defined by which states went for which candidate; it’s found by looking at what would have happened in the Electoral College if an election had been tied in the national vote. To calculate it, assume uniform swing – that is, if swing state Ohio moves toward the Democrats, then liberal Vermont and conservative Utah will also move toward the Democrats by the same amount. In reality, the states don’t swing quite that equally, but they’re <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/20/1163090/-Don-t-Overthink-the-2012-Election-Why-One-Equation-Seems-to-Explain-Almost-All-Of-It">very close to it</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney, punching bag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susana Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican excoriations of their defeated nominee suggest the terms of debate within the party may be broadening]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes electoral defeats radicalize political parties. This was the case with the Republican Party after the 2008 election, when the right convinced itself that Barack Obama had been elected only because George W. Bush had violated conservative principles, given the ideology a bad name, and left voters susceptible to the deceptive charms of the Democratic nominee and his Trojan horse agenda. The solution: Enforce a strict code of ideological purity within the party and fight the new president’s radical policies relentlessly.</p><p>This reading of the ’08 results was reinforced by the first few years of Obama’s presidency, when his approval rating fell to under 50 percent and Republicans won a massive midterm victory.  That Obama was the second coming of Jimmy Carter became an article of faith on the right, and a GOP White House restoration in 2012 was taken as a given. Which is why their resounding defeat last week has been so traumatic for Republicans. And this loss seems to be having a different effect on the party: This time, it’s shifting the party away from the purity obsession and absolutist rejectionism that defined its conduct in Obama’s first term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: Mitt&#8217;s just wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is "dividing American voters," the Louisiana governor said of Romney's "gifts" remark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal denounced Mitt Romney's comments on Obama's "gifts" to minority voters, <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/jindal-absolutely-reject-romneys-explanation-of-loss/article/2513539/?page=2&amp;referrer=/politics/beltway-confidential#.UKT7r7vFnTp">telling reporters</a> that "I absolutely reject that notion, that description."</p><p>“That is absolutely wrong,” Jindal said at the Republican Governors Association meeting in Las Vegas. “Two points on that. One, we have got to stop dividing American voters. We need to go after 100 percent of the votes, not 53 percent — we need to go after every single vote. And second, we need to continue to show that our policies help every voter out there achieve the American dream, which is to be in the middle class, which is to be able to give their children the opportunity to get a great education, which is for their children to have even better-paying jobs than their parents.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of false GOP rebranding efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Bobby Jindal says Republicans must change their ways, he doesn't mean change their policies or anything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives with an eye on the future are rolling out their post-election loss "we must remake the party to save it" pitches. In Politico, Louisiana governor and perennial fantasy presidential candidate Bobby Jindal <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=98F00774-4282-4951-9569-EC459F9223D5">weighs in</a>, getting some positive press for saying, "We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything." One would think some major policy changes would be required to make the Republican Party cease being the party of big business. One would be wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s running mate distraction campaign reaches its zenith</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/romneys_running_mate_distraction_campaign_reaches_its_zenith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/romneys_running_mate_distraction_campaign_reaches_its_zenith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12972430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time Romney runs into trouble, he starts spreading rumors about his veep pick. Prepare to be underwhelmed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever the news starts getting a little rough for Mitt Romney, there are suddenly rumors that he's just about to pick his running mate. So it is not particularly surprising that we are suddenly hearing more about Romney's potential vice president than, say, his tax returns. Romney <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/other-news/241837-head-of-romney-vp-search-on-hand-for-rally-with-jindal-mcdonnell">says he is going to announce the selection to his supporters soon, with an "app"</a> (he will announce the selection the traditional way, by leaking it to the press just before making the announcement).</p><p>The selection itself isn't completely meaningless: If Romney's elected, the vice president may end up having some influence over policy, especially in an administration headed by someone known for his fungible ideology. There's even a chance Romney could make a currently little-known politician into a future presidential contender, though Republican V.P. picks after Bush I haven't really gone on to much glory.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/romneys_running_mate_distraction_campaign_reaches_its_zenith/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/romneys_running_mate_distraction_campaign_reaches_its_zenith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visualizing the flooding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/missisippi_flooding_images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/missisippi_flooding_images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/16/missisippi_flooding_images</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mississippi River has inundated large swaths of the Midwest and South. Here are dramatic images from the scene]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="slide c"> <p>It's been two days since the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/15/us_mississippi_river_flooding_4/index.html">opened up the Morganza Spillway</a> in northern Louisiana to mitigate the threat of historic flooding in New Orleans and Baton Rouge. The event marked just the second time in history that the floodgates were opened, a reflection of the severity of the situation in the Mississippi River basin.&#160;For now, it appears as if Louisiana's major cities are safe, as water levels <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/mississippi-river-flood-round-up-sacrificing-louisiana-countryside-to-save-cities/2011/05/16/AFVfZy4G_blog.html">remain stable</a>. But tens of thousands living in rural portions of the state -- specifically the Atchafalaya River basin, into which the Morganza Spillway empties -- have been forced to <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/16/us_mississippi_river_flooding_6/index.html">evacuate their homes</a>.</p> <p>We've collected a series of dramatic photos and videos to help you visualize the situation along the mighty Mississippi.</p> </p> <p>CNN has gripping video of water pouring through the Morganza Spillway.</p> </p> <p>ABC's "Nightline" surveys the damage from flooding on the Mississippi River basin.</p> <div class="slide c">       <img class='wp-image-10045822' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/05/imagemiss2_copy.jpg' /></p> <p class="credit">AP</p> </p></div> <p>A mother comforts her daughter as they both watch floodwaters rise around their home in Vicksburg, Miss., Monday.</p> <p>       <img class='wp-image-10045824' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/05/flickr_flood_1.jpg' />     </p> <p class="credit">       <span><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdagov/with/5725832532/" target="_blank">U.S. Dept. of Agriculture</a> / <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" rel="license" target="_blank">CC BY 3.0</a></span>     </p> </p></div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/missisippi_flooding_images/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/missisippi_flooding_images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where will the birthers strike next?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/arizona_birther_law_texas_oklahoma_louisiana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/arizona_birther_law_texas_oklahoma_louisiana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/28/arizona_birther_law_texas_oklahoma_louisiana</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama released his long-form, but "birther bills" are still alive in state houses across the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama's disclosure of his long-form birth certificate this week has <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/28/birther_poll/index.html">yet to deter</a> many birthers -- including the ones elected to public office.</p><p>Less than 24 hours after the president's press conference on&#160;Wednesday, for instance, Oklahoma's House of Representatives passed a <a href="http://www.kjrh.com/dpp/news/state/Oklahoma-House-approves-%27birther%27-bill-for-US-presidents-to-appear-on-OK-ballot">bill</a> requiring presidential candidates to provide proof of identity and U.S. citizenship in order to appear on the state's ballot. In all, about a dozen similar bills have been introduced in legislatures across the country. (In Arizona, a birther bill actually passed earlier this month, only to be vetoted by Gov. Jan Brewer.) Some of the proposed laws have some interesting twists -- including one that would declare any voter who cast a ballot for an ineligible candidate guilty of a crime.</p><p>Here are a look at the five most notable birther bills that are still pending:</p><p>     <strong>Oklahoma</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/arizona_birther_law_texas_oklahoma_louisiana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/arizona_birther_law_texas_oklahoma_louisiana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal&#8217;s wife&#8217;s charity key to doing business with Louisiana</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/jindal_charity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/jindal_charity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/03/jindal_charity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donate money to the governor's wife's foundation, win a contract or a permit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a major corporation that wants to do business with the state of Louisiana? The bad news is you can only donate $5,000 directly to Gov. Bobby Jindal. The good news is, you can give an unlimited amount of money to his wife's charity, the Supriya Jindal Foundation for Louisiana's Children.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/us/politics/03jindal.html?pagewanted=all">The New York Times reported last night</a> that corporations including Marathon Oil, AT&amp;T, Northrup Grumman, Dow Chemical, Alon USA and various state contractors have donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the foundation. All of those companies have business with the state. All of them received permits or evaded fines or won contracts.</p><p>Everyone involved in this pay-to-play-ish venture claims nothing untoward is going on. The major corporations simply love children. And if, following an oil company's donation, "state environmental officials [ease] requirements for the company to check for spills of oil, ammonia or other contaminants in waterways," well, that's just a coincidence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/jindal_charity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/jindal_charity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal changes his Katrina story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/jindal_book_katrina_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/jindal_book_katrina_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/16/jindal_book_katrina_story</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His new book features a new version of an anecdote that landed him in some hot water last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evidence is growing that Gov.&#160;Bobby Jindal embellished a story of heroism in the face of bureaucracy during Hurricane Katrina to put himself in the middle of the action.</p><p>In his new book, "Leadership and Crisis," Jindal repeats a favorite story that first drew scrutiny when he told it last year. And subtle but telling shifts in the way Jindal recounts the story suggest that the original version was less than accurate.</p><p>This gets a bit complicated, so bear with us. The story of the story begins in February 2009, when Jindal was selected for the plum assignment of giving the Republican response to President Obama's first State of the Union address. A central anecdote in that speech involved Jindal, at the height of Katrina in 2005, supposedly helping the sheriff of Jefferson Parish in suburban New Orleans to beat back an unnamed bureaucrat who was trying to block boats from rescuing stranded citizens because the boats lacked proof of registration. Here is the video of that bit of the speech, with transcript below:&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/jindal_book_katrina_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/jindal_book_katrina_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: No plans to run for president in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_jindal_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_jindal_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/15/us_jindal_president</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["No ifs, ands or buts, no caveats," he says; will run for governor again next year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, now promoting his new book "Leadership and Crisis," says he doesn't plan to run for president in 2012.</p><p>Republicans are seeking hopefuls to challenge President Barack Obama, but the 39-year-old governor said Monday his only political ambition is to run for governor again next year.</p><p>"I'm not being coy at all. I'm not running for president in 2012. Period. No ifs, ands or buts, no caveats," Jindal told The Associated Press in an interview. "We have made great progress in Louisiana, but we've got a lot more work to do."</p><p>Jindal's book charts the rise of the 39-year-old son of Indian immigrants to the Louisiana governor's office, while criticizing the Obama administration. It's silent on any national ambitions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_jindal_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_jindal_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Indian-American pols, the &#8220;What are you?&#8221; test</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/indian_americans_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/indian_americans_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/08/19/indian_americans_politics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How "American" do you need to be to win an election?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She Anglicized her name, became a Christian, and was heralded as a Mama Grizzly by Sarah Palin -- and now Nikki Haley is the overwhelming favorite to be the next Republican governor of South Carolina.</p><p>"You learn to try and show people how you&#8217;re more alike than you are different," Haley, who was born Nimrata Randhawa into an Indian Sikh family, admitted to the New York Times earlier this year.</p><p>Bobby Jindal, raised in an Indian Hindu family in Baton Rouge, changed his name and converted to Catholicism. Now, Louisiana&#8217;s Republican governor is regarded as a potential candidate for his party&#8217;s presidential nomination.</p><p>When asked by "60 Minutes" last year if they follow any Indian traditions, Jindal and his wife insisted that "we were raised as Americans, we were raised as Louisianans, so that&#8217;s how we live our lives."</p><p>There&#8217;s no doubt that the religious conversions of Haley and Jindal, the two most prominent Indian-American politicians, have powerful personal and spiritual roots. But it&#8217;s also inarguable that being Christians with Anglicized names has made it easier for them to create bonds with the overwhelmingly white and deeply religious voters who dominate Republican politics in the South.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/indian_americans_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/indian_americans_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal&#8217;s oil spill crisis of faith</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/bobby_jindal_s_oil_spill_crisis_of_faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/bobby_jindal_s_oil_spill_crisis_of_faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/04/30/bobby_jindal_s_oil_spill_crisis_of_faith</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The principled stimulus foe changes his mind about the evils of accepting government assistance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's nothing like a good old-fashioned disaster hitting you right in the pocketbook to make you rethink your opposition to government assistance. Remember when Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal briefly became a right-wing hero for threatening to refuse stimulus money that would boost unemployment payments? He even made criticism of the stimulus the keynote of his <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/sotn.jindal.speech/index.html">response to President Obama's first congressional address.</a></p><blockquote> <p>"In the end, it comes down to an honest and fundamental disagreement about the proper role of government. We oppose the national Democratic view that says the way to strengthen our country is to increase dependence on government. We believe the way to strengthen our country is to restrain spending in Washington, to empower individuals and small businesses to grow our economy and create jobs."</p> </blockquote><p>This week, Jindal is singing a different tune. As one of the greatest oil spills in U.S. history starts lapping at the shores of Louisiana, Gulf shrimpers and oyster fisheries are shutting down shop -- possibly for months. The total cost to Gulf state economies could run into the billions. So Jindal wants help.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/bobby_jindal_s_oil_spill_crisis_of_faith/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/bobby_jindal_s_oil_spill_crisis_of_faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP picks its man for response to Obama speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/08/boustany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/08/boustany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/08/boustany</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Louisiana congressman and heart surgeon will respond to the president's address to Congress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time the GOP had to pick someone to deliver a national televised response to a presidential address, it was February, and the president was riding his post-inaugural wave of popularity. Concerned about who could match up against this fresh and exciting new leader, the Republicans ordered up a speech from a rising star -- not coincidentally, the party&#8217;s most prominent non-white politician -- Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. The speech Republicans got from Jindal wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://gawker.com/5159908/bobby-jindal-channels-kenneth-the-page-in-gop-response">exactly what they were hoping for</a>.</p><p>Now the president&#8217;s going in front of Congress <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/2009/09/02/D9AFCJ200_us_obama_health_care_overhaul/">again</a>, and the opposition gets to choose another of its members to offer a rebuttal. Yet again, the Republicans are <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/08/2057623.aspx">going with</a> a Louisianan, albeit one without Jindal's high profile: Rep. Charles Boustany.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/08/boustany/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/08/boustany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal, Pawlenty getting ready for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/06/16/2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two Republican governors have some preparation for a presidential run in the works]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for all of us, these days it's never too early to start thinking about and preparing for a presidential campaign. So now, two big names in the potential Republican field for 2012 appear to be laying the groundwork for a run, though -- as is typical for these situations -- they're not getting directly involved yet.</p><p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is one of those who might be gearing up for a campaign. He's long been discussed as a contender, and though the hype diminished in the wake of his lackluster response to President Obama's big speech to Congress this year, he's still going to have some momentum behind him. Now he might have some money too. Some of his supporters are forming a political action committee that would help his cause, <a href="http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-7/1244870560257610.xml&amp;coll=1">according to</a> the New Orleans Times-Picayune. (Hat-tip to <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2009/06/15/fundraising_begins_for_a_jindal_presidential_bid.html">Political Wire.</a>) Jindal's people, unsurprisingly, say he doesn't have anything to do with the effort, and doesn't even support it. But that denial rings just a bit hollow, since his wife's uncle is involved.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even Bobby Jindal&#8217;s criticizing Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/jindal_cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/jindal_cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/17/jindal_cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don't think we should question President Obama's patriotism," the Louisiana governor says. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Vice President Dick Cheney just can't catch a break. First, a poll comes out <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/04/13/poll/index.html">showing</a> that a large majority of Americans disagree with his contention that President Obama's policies have put the country at greater risk of a terror attack. And now, a rising star in his own party has come out to publicly castigate him.</p><p>&#8220;I don't think we should question President Obama's patriotism or his intentions,&#8221; Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21321.html">said</a> Thursday. "I think Democrat or Republican, we should all agree that our current president, our former president would obviously want to do everything they could to keep us safe. Let's give the new administration a chance. Let's not question their intentions. Let's have a real debate on their policies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/jindal_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/jindal_cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal gets his presidential campaign book deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/13/jindal_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/13/jindal_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/13/jindal_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana governor has agreed to a deal with conservative publisher Regnery; could this be yet another sign of national ambitions?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has agreed to write -- well, "write" -- a book for the conservative publisher Regnery. There's no contract yet, but the book, which will largely be written by a co-author, Peter Schweizer, is due out sometime in 2010, <a href="http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/04/jindal.html">according to</a> the Times-Picayune.</p><p>At the very least, this book shouldn't throw any cold water on the speculation that Jindal's going to run for president, something many conservatives would welcome. These days, a tome of some sort is de rigeur for anyone planning a campaign. (You can read our reviews of all the 2008 candidates' books <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/10/18/candidate_books/">here.</a>)</p><p>Admittedly, 2010 is a little early for the book to come out, at least in comparison with the release dates for the books penned by the last cycle's hopefuls. Most of them timed their books for just a year before the election, though there are a couple notable exceptions, including now-President Obama's "The Audacity of Hope," which was released in 2006.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/13/jindal_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/13/jindal_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>