<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bobby Jindal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/bobby_jindal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: IRS officials should &#8220;go to jail&#8221; for targeting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans...and keep your own freedom"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican, reportedly argued that the IRS officials responsible for targeting tea party and other conservative groups deserve jail time.</p><p>“Anyone who participated in this targeting of Americans for their political beliefs, anyone who knew about it, anyone who simply looked the other way, and anyone under whose watch this occurred needs to be fired,” <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/18/jindal-irs-offenses-worthy-of-jail-time/">CNN</a> reports Jindal planned to say in a speech before Virginia Republicans on Saturday, according to his prepared remarks.</p><p>“But in this instance, it is the IRS, people in a position of public trust, who have violated the Constitution of the United States of America. You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans, whether you disagree with them or not, and keep your own freedom. When you do that, you go to jail,” he continued.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal: I&#8217;m fine with teaching creationism in public schools</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bobby_jindal_im_fine_with_teaching_creationism_in_public_schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bobby_jindal_im_fine_with_teaching_creationism_in_public_schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Students should be taught “the best science,” Jindal said, including evolution, creationism and intelligent design]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal says that he wouldn't mind if public school students were taught creationism and intelligent design in addition to evolution, as long as it's “the best science."</p><p>In an interview on NBC, Jindal, a Republican, said: “Bottom line, at the end of the day, we want our kids to be exposed to the best facts. Let’s teach them about the big bang theory, let’s teach them about evolution - I’ve got no problem if a school board, a local school board, says we want to teach our kids about creationism, that people, some people, have these beliefs as well, let’s teach them about ‘intelligent design.’”</p><p>He added that students should be allowed to question “controversial issues” like climate change and global warming. “What are we scared of?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bobby_jindal_im_fine_with_teaching_creationism_in_public_schools/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bobby_jindal_im_fine_with_teaching_creationism_in_public_schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial hazards force communities to consider relocation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/industrial_hazards_force_communities_to_consider_relocation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/industrial_hazards_force_communities_to_consider_relocation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Center for Public Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Brine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sinkhole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sinkholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belle Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sinkholes and severe pollution are forcing some communities to consider relocating. Part one of a two-part series]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/center-500px-logo-e1365812656958.jpg" alt="The Center for Public Integrity" align="left" /></a> BELLE ROSE, La. – Tim Brown eases his john boat from his back yard dock into his daily therapy: The Bayou Corne that courses through this patch of southern Louisiana like a lifeline. Brown powers past the Tupelo Gum, Cypress Moss and Swamp Maple trees that drape the bayou in a frame, and steers to the spot where he reels catfish and collects thoughts.</p><p>“If I had to actually leave this place and go back to a house on dry land, I’d probably be dead in two years,” says Brown, 65 and retiring next year. “I guess you can say it’s a totally different life out here.”</p><p>But now that life, for Brown and 350 other residents in a neighborhood with “Crawfish Crossing” signs and roads named Gumbo, Jambalaya and Crawfish Stew Street, has been shattered by discovery of a 14-acre sinkhole that fractured the community’s calm and may bury its dreams.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/industrial_hazards_force_communities_to_consider_relocation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/industrial_hazards_force_communities_to_consider_relocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal kills controversial tax plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since announcing the plan, Jindal's approval ratings in Louisiana have dropped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal scrapped a plan to replace income and corporate taxes with a new sales tax, following public outcry and a precipitous drop in his approval ratings.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/jindal_gives_up_on_tax_swap_pl.html#incart_big-photo">New Orleans Times-Picayune</a> reports that Jindal announced that he will pull his plan in a speech opening this year's legislative session, telling state lawmakers that he will not "pout" or "take his ball and go home." From the Times-Picayune:</p><blockquote><p>The speech is a major concession that Jindal's proposal, a complicated plan contained in a total of 11 bills, is unpopular both within and outside the Legislature. The proposal has come under increasingly heavy fire in recent weeks as business groups and advocates for the poor have assailed its effects and think tanks have questioned whether the math in the proposal adds up.</p> <p>Jindal acknowledges the strong opposition to the proposal in his prepared remarks.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/bobby_jindal_kills_controversial_tax_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC&#8217;s 10 craziest moments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pamela Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing ideologues gathered from all corners of the country last week, and they didn't disappoint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> At the Conservative Political Action Conference, the large annual gathering of right-wing activists and followers, people say a lot of crazy things -- too many, in fact, for me to cram into a single story. So I’ve picked a random 10 -- random insofar as they were among those I came across both in my own time at this enormous conference in Oxon Hill, Md., at the Gaylord National Harbor Convention Center just outside of Washington, D.C., and in reading the work of my fellow journalists and muckrakers. The conference took place March 14 - 16.</p><p>Presented, in no particular order, are 10 statements worthy, at least, of an eyeroll.</p><p><strong>1. Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana: Torture is funny. </strong>A featured speaker on CPAC's main stage, Jindal chose to make light this way of the barrage of political rhetoric CPAC attendees signed up to subject themselves to:</p><blockquote><p>If the choice was to hear 70 political speeches or to go<strong>waterboarding</strong>, well, I’d have to think about that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/cpacs_10_craziest_moments_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching the Sunday shows so you don&#8217;t have to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, some centrist pundits and legislators solved the sequester by demanding "balance" and "leadership"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I learned this morning on "the Sunday shows," the three network news panel programs that define the parameters of the national debate for elite Washington: No one wants the sequester to happen, if the sequester happens it will be because Barack Obama failed to show leadership, what we need is a "balanced approach" to deficit reduction, the sequester should happen but in a smarter way, video games may not cause violence but they are gross, and "Zero Dark Thirty" is the best film of the year in part because John McCain disliked it.</p><p>I don't watch the Sunday shows. Basically ever. I watch clips if something particularly stupid happened, but for the most part, you can get everything you need to know about what happens on these shows by reading <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/24/sunday-morning-liveblog_n_2753278.html?utm_hp_ref=eat-the-press">the brilliant liveblog by the Huffington Post's Jason Linkins</a>, America's foremost Sunday show interpreter. While no one <em>should</em> pay attention to these shows, as long as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/">millions of Americans watch them under the mistaken impression that they're seeing serious discussions of our most pressing issues with our wisest media observers and most influential political leaders</a>, they should probably be monitored.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio’s charm has its limits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/rubio%e2%80%99s_charm_has_its_limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/rubio%e2%80%99s_charm_has_its_limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the union 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The supposed future of the GOP is completely unready for the task assigned to him by the media and his party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio charmed the morning shows Wednesday, making light of his Big Gulp moment during his State of the Union rebuttal. “I needed water, what am I going to do?”<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/marco-rubio-i-needed-water-87577.html#ixzz2Knwk8gXv"> he told ABC’s “Good Morning America,”</a> with a winning chuckle. “God has a funny way of reminding us we’re human.” Rubio showed a little bit of the personality that led Republican leaders, but most important, the media, to declare him “the Republican savior,” in the embarrassing words of Time magazine. (Embarrassing for Time magazine, I mean.)</p><p>The contrarian in me wanted to minimize Rubio’s sad grope for water. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/recognizing_american_privilege/">Just as my friend Michael Tomasky empathized with the president</a> last week on the tough issue of drone policy, I empathized with Rubio: I’m always looking for ways to unobtrusively slip in a sip of water while speaking. So I wouldn’t cast the first stone at the Florida senator for his case of dry mouth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/rubio%e2%80%99s_charm_has_its_limits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/rubio%e2%80%99s_charm_has_its_limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Obama is unraveling Reagan Republicanism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/how_obama_is_unraveling_reagan_republicanism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/how_obama_is_unraveling_reagan_republicanism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal's "stop being the stupid party" speech suggests the modern GOP is cracking up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon after President Obama’s second inaugural address, John Boehner <a href="http://www.riponsociety.org/news_1-22-13.htm" target="_blank">said</a> the White House would try “to annihilate the Republican Party” and “shove us into the dustbin of history.”</p><p>Actually, the GOP is doing a pretty good job annihilating itself. As Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal put it, Republicans need to “stop being the stupid party.”</p><p>The GOP crackup was probably inevitable.  Inconsistencies and tensions within the GOP have been growing for years – ever since Ronald Reagan put together the coalition that became the modern Republican Party.</p><p>All President Obama has done is finally found ways to exploit these inconsistencies.</p><p>Republican libertarians have never got along with social conservatives, who want to impose their own morality on everyone else.</p><p>Shrink-the-government fanatics in the GOP have never seen eye-to-eye with deficit hawks, who don’t mind raising taxes as long as the extra revenues help reduce the size of the deficit.</p><p>The GOP’s big business and Wall Street wing has never been comfortable with the nativists and racists in the Party, who want to exclude immigrants and prevent minorities from getting ahead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/how_obama_is_unraveling_reagan_republicanism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/how_obama_is_unraveling_reagan_republicanism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shame that is Bobby Jindal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/the_shame_that_is_bobby_jindal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/the_shame_that_is_bobby_jindal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospice care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posing as the man to remake the GOP, he’s just a Southern Paul Ryan, balancing budgets at the expense of the needy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s rare that I think my colleague Alex Pareene isn’t tough enough on a Republican. Actually, it’s never happened. But while his column on Bobby Jindal’s plan to remake the GOP by liking people <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/bobby_jindals_controversial_new_proposal_for_conservatives_be_more_popular/">captured its saccharine emptiness</a>, I think it's crucial to contrast Jindal’s rhetorical faux boldness with his same-old-GOP policies as Louisiana’s governor.</p><p>The man hailed by the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza for his readiness to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/24/bobby-jindal-speaking-truth-to-gop-power/?hpid=z4">“speak truth to GOP power”</a> in a tedious speech to the Republican National Committee Thursday night is anything but a rebel or renegade. One night before his big 2016 star turn, Jindal was forced by national outrage to reverse himself on what is one of the ugliest GOP policy decisions in an ugly decade: cutting Medicaid funding for hospice care. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/candlelight-vigil-set-to-protest-gov-bobby-jindals-elimination-of-medicaid-hospice-program/2013/01/23/b0f445ec-6598-11e2-889b-f23c246aa446_story.html">His health secretary actually announced the decision Wednesday night</a> as hospice backers gathered for a mournful candlelight vigil.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/the_shame_that_is_bobby_jindal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/the_shame_that_is_bobby_jindal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal&#8217;s controversial new proposal for conservatives: Be more popular</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/bobby_jindals_controversial_new_proposal_for_conservatives_be_more_popular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/bobby_jindals_controversial_new_proposal_for_conservatives_be_more_popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A copy of a forthcoming speech from the Louisiana governor reveals just how bankrupt of new ideas the GOP really is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post ace reporter Chris Cillizza <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/24/bobby-jindal-speaking-truth-to-gop-power/?hpid=z4">has a scoop</a>: Bobby Jindal is going to deliver a speech! Jindal, the governor of Louisiana and <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/05/bobby-jindal-exorcised-his-college-girlfriend">former exorcist</a>, is going to give a speech to the Republican National Committee that will, in the words of the person who wrote Cillizza's headline, "speak truth to GOP power." Cillizza and his co-author Aaron Blake scored an advance copy of the speech -- presumably smuggled out of Jindal's office in the dead of night by a terrified whistle-blower and delivered to the reporters at a secretive "dead drop" in a suburban parking garage -- and it's a real doozy. Some real revolutionary truth-speaking from Jindal.</p><blockquote><p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal will deliver a forceful denunciation of his party’s Washington-centric focus in a speech to the Republican National Committee on Thursday evening, arguing that the GOP is fighting the wrong fight as it seeks to rebuild from losses at the ballot box last November.</p> <p>“A debate about which party can better manage the federal government is a very small and short-sighted debate,” Jindal will tell the RNC members gathered in Charlotte, N.C. for the organization’s winter meeting, according to a copy of the speech provided to The Fix. “If our vision is not bigger than that, we do not deserve to win.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/bobby_jindals_controversial_new_proposal_for_conservatives_be_more_popular/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/bobby_jindals_controversial_new_proposal_for_conservatives_be_more_popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bold new conservative ideas still mostly involve screwing the poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/bold_new_conservative_ideas_still_mostly_involve_screwing_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/bold_new_conservative_ideas_still_mostly_involve_screwing_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal and Jim DeMint exemplify an ossified movement with no new answers for poverty or anything else]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans, we're told, are going to have to start making some big changes if they want to start winning elections again. (Besides all the congressional elections they handily win.) Americans are tired of their stale rhetoric and old, white standard-bearers. The party needs fresh blood and bold ideas. It needs people like Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a GOP rising star and highly regarded "ideas" guy.</p><p>After the election, Jindal <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/">told Politico that the Republicans had to totally rebrand themselves</a> to escape being known as "the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything." And so Bobby Jindal's big new idea for Louisiana is ... <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/bobby-jindal-income-tax_n_2452331.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">eliminating all income taxes.</a> And shifting the tax burden onto poor and working people.</p><blockquote><p>NEW ORLEANS, Jan 10 (Reuters) - Republican Governor Bobby Jindal said on Thursday he wants to eliminate all Louisiana personal and corporate income taxes to simplify the state's tax code and make it more friendly to business.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/bold_new_conservative_ideas_still_mostly_involve_screwing_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/bold_new_conservative_ideas_still_mostly_involve_screwing_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Republicans winning on diversity?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/are_republicans_winning_on_diversity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/are_republicans_winning_on_diversity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP offers a bevy of ethnic presidential candidates in 2016. Its strategists? Well, that's another story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Writing for ABC News, Amy Walters <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/politics/t/blogEntry?id=18179367">notes</a> that for all the criticism of Obama’s traditional cabinet—which, thus far, is heavy on white men—the bigger problem for Democrats is that their presidential hopefuls lean heavily on the conventional side:</p><blockquote><p>For all the hand-wringing over the lack of diversity in the Obama Administration’s second term Cabinet, Democrats should really be more depressed about the fact that their potential 2016 field is a lot less diverse than the GOP’s. Take away Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic bench looks more like that picture in the New York Times than it does the picture of Obama’s 2012 voting coalition.</p></blockquote><p>It’s true that if there’s anything you can say about the GOP’s likely field for 2016, it’s that it’s pretty diverse—for which the party deserves real credit.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/are_republicans_winning_on_diversity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/are_republicans_winning_on_diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal doesn&#8217;t understand birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana governor tries to moderate his party's contraception stance, but gets his facts completely wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call off the culture war over birth control, left and right! Bobby Jindal has an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html">elegant solution</a> to rise above the fray. Or so he thinks.</p><p>Seizing on recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that some hormonal birth control be available over the counter, the Louisiana governor and presumed presidential hopeful seeks to play them against the Affordable Care Act. He claims that Obama's big government is actually making it harder for women to access birth control, despite the fact that the ACOG recommendations would work best in tandem with the Affordable Care Act birth control provisions, not instead of them.</p><p>Making birth control more accessible in any way possible is generally a good idea. But in Jindal's haste to find "the end of birth control politics," he ignores some crucial benefits of the Affordable Care Act as well as the deep-seated opposition to many forms of birth control, not just insurance coverage of it, among his own allies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal: GOP &#8220;stupid&#8221; on birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The likely 2016 presidential candidate argues for the sale of contraception over the counter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana and a possible 2016 GOP presidential candidate,<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html"> endorsed the sale of over-the-counter contraception without a prescription Friday. </a></p><p>In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jindal tried to put an anti-big-government spin on his position, while also moving away from the social conservative wing of the party and addressing a gender gap which hurt Mitt Romney and likely cost Republicans Senate seats in Indiana and Missouri.</p><p>Jindal wrote that Republicans have been "stupid to let the Democrats demagogue the contraceptives issue," while embracing the  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists call for over-the-counter sales and seeking to push the issue out of the "political arena.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_gop_stupid_on_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the GOP ever get serious?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans' big-idea guys and policy wonks outlined their 2016 platforms this week. They sound a lot like 1980]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again.</p><p>We just managed to get through a campaign in which the Republican candidate’s idea of innovation was to hold a convention themed around an out-of-context quote from his opponent. But we knew Mitt Romney was at his heart a manager, not a policy innovator. So maybe it will be better next time, with new candidates such as Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan. Right?</p><p>Yeah, I didn’t think so.</p><p>Of course, there’s still plenty of time for innovative conservative ideas. Hey, don’t laugh. Ronald Reagan campaigned on a whole book full of policy options, and as recently as 2000, George W. Bush really did feature new ideas in his campaign.</p><p>But neither John McCain nor Mitt Romney had any interest in such things – and judging from the three proto-candidates who rolled out their “ideas” this week, it looks as if Republican politicians these days don’t even remember what actual policy ideas look like.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will win the Adelson primary?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several GOP 2016 hopefuls have met with the wealthy casino mogul, but keep an eye on Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney may still be grieving his loss (mostly by <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/15-people-who-just-saw-mitt-romney">eating pizza</a>, it seems), but 2012 is <em>sooo</em> last month and 2016 is just around the corner. Politico’s Ken Vogel reports today that potential candidates of both parties have <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/2016-contenders-courting-mega-donors-84497.html?hp=t1_3">already started courting potential donors</a>, including Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. Adelson is the top prize for any GOP White House hopeful, with pockets deep enough and political instincts dull enough to single-handedly fund a presidential campaign. He spent, we learn today, an absolutely astonishing <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/03/sheldon-adelson-2012-election_n_2223589.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">$150 million</a> backing Republicans this year, including $20 million on Newt Gingrich's failed bid. So the stakes are high for the suitors, but to whom will Adelson give his rose?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/who_will_win_the_adelson_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Democrats have a permanent Electoral College advantage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nominate Jeb Bush or Bobby Jindal. It doesn't matter: The Electoral College now favors the Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have the Democrats opened up a real Electoral College advantage over the Republicans?</p><p>I’m not talking about the illusion of an advantage that comes with winning consecutive elections. That might be the result of a streak in which the party is helped by favorable fundamentals, or it can be, as with Democratic majorities in the New Deal era, simply part of a national advantage. In either case, a party might win the same states every time, but -- as Republicans discovered in 1992 -- when those favorable conditions end, the apparent electoral “lock” disappears, too.</p><p>No, I’m talking about an Electoral College edge above and beyond the national vote. That’s not defined by which states went for which candidate; it’s found by looking at what would have happened in the Electoral College if an election had been tied in the national vote. To calculate it, assume uniform swing – that is, if swing state Ohio moves toward the Democrats, then liberal Vermont and conservative Utah will also move toward the Democrats by the same amount. In reality, the states don’t swing quite that equally, but they’re <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/20/1163090/-Don-t-Overthink-the-2012-Election-Why-One-Equation-Seems-to-Explain-Almost-All-Of-It">very close to it</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/do_democrats_have_a_permanent_electoral_college_advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney, punching bag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susana Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican excoriations of their defeated nominee suggest the terms of debate within the party may be broadening]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes electoral defeats radicalize political parties. This was the case with the Republican Party after the 2008 election, when the right convinced itself that Barack Obama had been elected only because George W. Bush had violated conservative principles, given the ideology a bad name, and left voters susceptible to the deceptive charms of the Democratic nominee and his Trojan horse agenda. The solution: Enforce a strict code of ideological purity within the party and fight the new president’s radical policies relentlessly.</p><p>This reading of the ’08 results was reinforced by the first few years of Obama’s presidency, when his approval rating fell to under 50 percent and Republicans won a massive midterm victory.  That Obama was the second coming of Jimmy Carter became an article of faith on the right, and a GOP White House restoration in 2012 was taken as a given. Which is why their resounding defeat last week has been so traumatic for Republicans. And this loss seems to be having a different effect on the party: This time, it’s shifting the party away from the purity obsession and absolutist rejectionism that defined its conduct in Obama’s first term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/mitt_romney_punching_bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: Mitt&#8217;s just wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He is "dividing American voters," the Louisiana governor said of Romney's "gifts" remark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Jindal denounced Mitt Romney's comments on Obama's "gifts" to minority voters, <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/jindal-absolutely-reject-romneys-explanation-of-loss/article/2513539/?page=2&amp;referrer=/politics/beltway-confidential#.UKT7r7vFnTp">telling reporters</a> that "I absolutely reject that notion, that description."</p><p>“That is absolutely wrong,” Jindal said at the Republican Governors Association meeting in Las Vegas. “Two points on that. One, we have got to stop dividing American voters. We need to go after 100 percent of the votes, not 53 percent — we need to go after every single vote. And second, we need to continue to show that our policies help every voter out there achieve the American dream, which is to be in the middle class, which is to be able to give their children the opportunity to get a great education, which is for their children to have even better-paying jobs than their parents.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/jindal_romneys_gifts_remark_absolutely_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of false GOP rebranding efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Bobby Jindal says Republicans must change their ways, he doesn't mean change their policies or anything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives with an eye on the future are rolling out their post-election loss "we must remake the party to save it" pitches. In Politico, Louisiana governor and perennial fantasy presidential candidate Bobby Jindal <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=98F00774-4282-4951-9569-EC459F9223D5">weighs in</a>, getting some positive press for saying, "We’ve got to make sure that we are not the party of big business, big banks, big Wall Street bailouts, big corporate loopholes, big anything." One would think some major policy changes would be required to make the Republican Party cease being the party of big business. One would be wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/beware_of_false_gop_rebranding_efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
