<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bolivia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/bolivia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bolivian lawmaker caught on video allegedly raping an unconscious woman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/bolivian_lawmaker_caught_on_video_allegedly_raping_an_unconscious_woman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/bolivian_lawmaker_caught_on_video_allegedly_raping_an_unconscious_woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evo Morales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The footage is from December 20, but it was recently made public when it was leaked to YouTube]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolivian lawmaker Domingo Alcibia Rivera was caught on camera allegedly raping a colleague on the floor of Parliament. After an alcohol-fueled holiday luncheon, security cameras appear to have captured Rivera approaching the unconscious woman and, after the lights in the room go dark, sexually assaulting her.</p><p>The woman is clearly intoxicated and limp in her chair as Rivera moves her to the floor and assaults her. He is interrupted when the lights go back on and people re-enter the room. Rivera then props the woman back up in her chair and sits down beside her.</p><p>The footage is from December 20 but was recently made public after it was leaked to YouTube.</p><p>According to <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.es%2Finternacional%2F20130118%2Fabci-video-violacion-bolivia-201301181718.html&amp;act=url" target="_blank">ABC.es</a>, the guards who were on duty that night were dismissed after the incident, and the victim of Rivera's assault was given another post.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/bolivian_lawmaker_caught_on_video_allegedly_raping_an_unconscious_woman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/bolivian_lawmaker_caught_on_video_allegedly_raping_an_unconscious_woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bolivian president: Men, lose the chicken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/20/lt_bolivia_chicken_virility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/20/lt_bolivia_chicken_virility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/04/20/lt_bolivia_chicken_virility</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evo Morales warns his countrymen that they risk their virility by eating hormone-injected poultry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolivian President Evo Morales said Tuesday that men should stay away from chicken if they want to maintain their hair and virility.</p><p>Morales told an environmental conference that chicken producers inject the birds with female hormones "and because of that, men who consume them have problems being men." He also suggested eating too much chicken for too long could make men go bald.</p><p>Morales' warning may be out of date: Chicken producers in Europe, the United States and many other countries say they abandoned the use of hormones in poultry several decades ago and many if not most Western nations ban them outright.</p><p>The president also blasted Coca-Cola, saying, "It is harmful. ... Imagine what it contains."</p><p>Morales blamed "the west," a reference to industrial countries such as the U.S., which he said "bring us more and more poison."</p><p>The secret ingredient in Coca-Cola is widely rumored to be something Morales himself once grew as leader of a coca-producers union -- a version of the plant with the psychoactive substances removed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/20/lt_bolivia_chicken_virility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/20/lt_bolivia_chicken_virility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strong retail sales boost economy hopes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/return_of_the_amazing_american_consumer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/return_of_the_amazing_american_consumer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/04/14/return_of_the_amazing_american_consumer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mystery alert: We're buying more stuff and paying down our debt, without seeing any increase in wages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American consumer is a redoubtable beast. Unemployment is high, and wage growth has been essentially flat for a year, but according <a href="http://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf">to the latest statistics from the U.S. Census,</a> retail spending -- the backbone of the U.S. economy -- grew a robust 1.6 percent in March, compared to February. Any way you slice the data -- with or without gasoline sales, with or without auto sales -- the numbers beat economist expectations. Calculated Risk, possibly the least-prone-to-hype economic commentator on the Web, says without qualification: <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/04/retail-sales-increase-sharply-in-march.html">"this is a strong report."</a> The Dow and the S&amp;P 500 promptly hit new highs (since the height of the financial crisis.)</p><p>The past week has been full of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_16/b4174028669540.htm">bright-eyed</a> and <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/236190">bushy-tailed</a> economic optimism, and this latest news offers some of the strongest support yet for the pollyanna brigade. But there's a mystery here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/return_of_the_amazing_american_consumer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/return_of_the_amazing_american_consumer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs runs for governor of California</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/meg_whitman_and_goldman_sachs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/meg_whitman_and_goldman_sachs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/04/12/meg_whitman_and_goldman_sachs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meg Whitman once served on the vampire squid's board of directors. Should that disqualify her for public office?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will California voters care that Meg Whitman, the former eBay CEO and Republican candidate for governor, boasts numerous ties to <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/goldman_sachs/index.html">Goldman Sachs,</a> the investment bank that everyone loves to hate? Lance Williams and Carla Marinucci <a href="http://californiawatch.org/money-and-politics/whitmans-fortune-entwined-goldman-sachs">trace the web of connections</a> in a detailed new piece for the independent non-profit investigative reporting outfit California Watch.</p><blockquote> <p>Whitman's relationship with the giant Wall Street firm -- as investor, corporate director and recipient of both insider stock deals and campaign donations -- could pose conflicts of interest if the Republican front-runner is elected governor of California, critics say.</p> </blockquote><p>Goldman underwrites millions of dollars worth of California state bonds, is expected to be involved with the financing of a big water bond, and wants to get involved in California's nascent cap-and-trade market. However, if California voters <em>do</em> decide that they'd rather steer clear of the vampire squid's tentacles, they will find (cue fiendish cackle) that it's just not so simple. Democratic candidate (and former governor) Jerry Brown's sister, Kathleen Brown, is a Goldman executive in Los Angeles, report Williams and Marinucci. Steve Poizner, another GOP candidate, once borrowed $500,000 from Goldman when he ran for the state assembly a few years ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/meg_whitman_and_goldman_sachs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/meg_whitman_and_goldman_sachs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crews search mine for missing in West Virginia blast</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/us_mine_explosion_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/us_mine_explosion_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/04/08/us_mine_explosion_3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four remain unaccounted for as rescuers enter site of the worst U.S. mining disaster in two decades]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rescue crews began working their way by rail car and on foot through a West Virginia coal mine early Thursday in search of four miners missing since a blast killed 25 colleagues in the worst U.S. mining disaster in more than two decades.</p><p>Gov. Joe Manchin said crews entered the Upper Big Branch mine, about 30 miles south of Charleston, at 4:55 a.m. EDT and hoped to reach the area where they might find the missing miners sometime before noon.</p><p>"They are advancing," Manchin told an early morning news briefing. "They'll move as rapidly as they possibly can."</p><p>Rescuers had to wait to enter the mine until crews drilled holes deep into the earth to ventilate lethal carbon monoxide, highly explosive hydrogen, as well as methane gas, which has been blamed for the explosion. The air quality was deemed safe enough for four teams of eight members each to go on what officials were still calling a rescue mission.</p><p>Officials and townsfolk alike admitted they didn't expect to find any of the four missing miners alive more than two days after the massive explosion. Poisonous gases have filled the underground tunnels since Monday afternoon's blast</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/us_mine_explosion_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/08/us_mine_explosion_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Summers is no big deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/larry_summers_is_no_big_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/larry_summers_is_no_big_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Summers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/04/07/larry_summers_is_no_big_deal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will he stay or will he go? Are his feelings hurt? Who will replace him? Why should we care?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knew April would see a bull market in Larry Summers kremlinology bust out? The future career plans of the director of the National Economic Council have been the talk of the blogosphere all week -- or, at least, that portion of the blogosphere that finds endless speculation about potential Obama administration staffing changes irresistible.</p><p>Maybe it's because Congress is out of session and it is exceedingly difficult to find new and interesting things to say about financial reform that will sate the hunger of the blog-reading masses. Or maybe "Larry Summers" is just a potent keyword for search engine-optimized content delivery. But everyone's got a theory:</p><p>Fox Business News' Charlie Gasparino kicked off the gossip on March 26 when he reported that Summers <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/update-obama-adviser-summers-quit-year--fox-businesss-gasparino/">"has been telling associates that he may be looking to leave the administration."</a> Why? Because, according to some unnamed Wall Street executives, he is "unhappy" in his job. The Atlantic's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/04/is-larry-summers-leaving/38461/">Marc Ambinder</a> followed up on Tuesday with the news that "the big rumor was that Rahm Emanuel himself was making a secret list of people who might be potential replacements for Summers," but concluded that he wasn't about to leave, because he's got a lot of stuff on his plate, like riding "herd over the administration's huge infrastructure renewal program."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/larry_summers_is_no_big_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/larry_summers_is_no_big_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eight early childhood factors that may drive life-long obesity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/early_childhood_factors_in_obesity_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/early_childhood_factors_in_obesity_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/04/05/early_childhood_factors_in_obesity_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why new-mom obsession with baby weight percentile and eating for two while pregnant are misguided]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em>A version of this post first appeared on Dr. Ayala's Open Salon <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/dr_ayala">blog</a>.</em>   </p><p>It wasn't that long ago when I had newborns -- they're now a tween and teens -- and the unspoken competition between new moms was how well our babies gain weight, how high they plot on the percentile charts and how quickly they outgrow their clothes. Chubby was cute, and -- it's embarrassing to say -- many breastfeeding moms were encouraged by medical personnel to add on some formula if the baby wasn't gaining weight at a remarkable pace.</p><p>I was already a pediatrician when I had my first son. I knew better, yet I was still in tears -- like many new moms I found tears weren't hard to come by -- when a well-meaning nurse suggested I might not have enough breast milk, as my baby was on the 25th <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentile">percentile</a>, and hadn't gained much weight in the previous week. I didn't heed her advice to add formula; I knew that a happy, content baby, who is growing at his own pace, probably needs nothing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/early_childhood_factors_in_obesity_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/early_childhood_factors_in_obesity_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to decipher Obama&#8217;s offshore oil puzzle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/obama_offshore_oil_strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/obama_offshore_oil_strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/04/01/obama_offshore_oil_strategy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Progressives complain about "hippie punching." Conservatives roll their eyes. Business as usual for the president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two contrasting takes on <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-energy-security-andrews-air-force-base-3312010">President Obama's announcement</a> that the administration "will consider potential areas for [offshore oil] development in the mid and south Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico."</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1976928,00.html#ixzz0js0oq8PR">Brendan Cummings,</a> senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity:</p><blockquote> <p>"Short of sending Sarah Palin back to Alaska to personally club polar bear cubs to death, the Obama administration could not have come up with a more efficient extinction plan for the polar bear."</p> </blockquote><p>     <a href="http://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/11376698405">A tweet from Sarah Palin:</a>   </p><blockquote> <p>Rep.Boehner spot-on Obama goal=cram thru job-killing, energy-depleting, burdensome Cap &amp; Tax scheme on heels of Obama's new"pro-drilling"msg</p> </blockquote><p>Sound-bite craftsmanship bridges the partisan divide! "Cram-thru job-killing, energy-depleting, burdensome Cap &amp; Tax scheme" is a marvel of compressed negativity. Meanwhile, Cummings' "more efficient extinction plan for the polar bear" is brilliantly nasty, albeit ludicrous overkill. Personally, I think it would be much more efficient to shoot polar bears from airplanes, but what do I know?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/obama_offshore_oil_strategy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/obama_offshore_oil_strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death &#8212; and life &#8212; of art-house cinema</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/new_directors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/new_directors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Directors/New Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tilda Swinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/03/30/new_directors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York festival's lineup captures the likely outsider hits of 2010 -- and most are headed your way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as I've been doing this job, one of its requirements has been issuing ritual pronouncements that the end of days was upon us: Independent and art-house cinema -- "specialty releases," to use industry jargon -- was doomed, and we're all about to drown in a rising ocean of comic-book action flicks and reality TV.</p><p>Sure, it's been a long time since films by Kurosawa and Fellini were must-see cultural touchstones, but if you look back honestly at the pseudo-high-culture pretension of that era, it wasn't good for filmmakers or their audiences. Yes, the future (not to say present) of art-house and indie film is a bewildering muddle of mix-and-match formats with melting boundaries: digital download, video-on-demand, simultaneous DVD and theatrical release, and so on. Companies come and go, new release strategies are adopted and just as promptly abandoned, and inevitably some good films disappear into the maelstrom.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/new_directors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/new_directors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green shoots alert: State budgets start to stabilize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/broad_based_recovery_in_state_economies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/broad_based_recovery_in_state_economies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/03/30/broad_based_recovery_in_state_economies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A consumer confidence boost: California isn't the only big state to report rising tax revenues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As California gets off the gurney, so does the nation? I first noted in February that California's <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/02/11/california_gets_off_the_gurney">tax receipts were rising faster</a> than had been forecast, a signal that the state's economic collapse might have hit bottom. Now comes confirmation, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2uOm.T_YrmU&amp;pos=5">via Bloomberg,</a> that California is not alone. Other large state economies, including New York and New Jersey are recording similar revenue bumps.</p><blockquote> <p>The 15 largest states by population forecast a 3.9 percent gain in tax revenue in fiscal 2011, budget documents show. The 50 states on average may increase collections by about 3.5 percent, the first time in two years the figure is expected to grow, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com.</p> </blockquote><p>The economic picture is by no means rosy -- revenues aren't forecast to return to 2008 levels until as late as 2013 -- but the change in direction goes a long way towards relaxing some of the pressure felt by state legislators as they watched their budgets implode.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/broad_based_recovery_in_state_economies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/broad_based_recovery_in_state_economies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How computers will save economics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/computers_and_economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/computers_and_economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/03/29/computers_and_economics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Downfall of the ivory tower theorists: A laptop on every graduate student's desk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the computer save the profession of economics? In <a href="http://www.nationalinterest.org/PrinterFriendly.aspx?id=21274">"The Last Tempation of Risk,"</a> U.C. Berkeley economist Barry Eichengreen explores why his profession failed to anticipate a disaster on the scale of the Great Recession.</p><p>It's a good read, albeit covering some familiar ground. It's no surprise, at this point, that business schools churned out graduates trained to the specifications of J. P. Morgan, or that theoreticians cherry picked models that supported their own ideological predispositions, or that it is simply psychologically difficult to be a non-conformist and buck the conventional wisdom.</p><p>It's a grim litany -- not least because at first glance it's hard to imagine the prospect for any change in the fundamental dynamics at play. But near the end of his essay, to be published in the May/June issue of The National Interest, Eichengreen suddenly takes an unexpected turn and proposes that the changes in the tools of the trade may lead to a more realistic appraisal of the world, economically speaking.</p><p>Call it the triumph of the empiricist: Today's economists have more access to data and the computing power to process it than ever before. The age of the theorist is over.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/computers_and_economics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/computers_and_economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s Internet answer: More pay walls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/rupert_murdoch_retreats_from_the_internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/rupert_murdoch_retreats_from_the_internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/03/26/rupert_murdoch_retreats_from_the_internet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corp. accelerates its withdrawal from the free Net. Can the mighty mogul reverse the online tide?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As legend has it, King Canute's real goal, when he famously ordered the tide to halt, was to demonstrate to his subjects how powerless even the mighty were before God. Rupert Murdoch, however, appears determined to do Canute one better: As far as he is concerned, <em>the tide will stop.</em></p><p>Numerous media outlets are reporting that as of June, News Corp. will <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/27/business/media/27paper.html">start charging for online access</a> to the Times and Sunday Times of London. Not too surprising -- Murdoch's been talking for months about his plans to charge for content at all his newpaper properties, and plenty of other news organizations have plans to wall themselves off as well. But <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody/status/11091602640">a tweet from Glyn Moody</a> alerts us to a news item reporting that Murdoch is also <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-news-corps-uk-titles-to-pull-out-of-nexis/">pulling his U.K. titles</a> out of the Nexis half of the Lexis/Nexis news aggregation database. As Moody describes it, "Rupert invents Black Hole Net publishing: nothing ever comes out."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/rupert_murdoch_retreats_from_the_internet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/rupert_murdoch_retreats_from_the_internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney was right about the deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/dick_cheney_was_right_about_deficits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/dick_cheney_was_right_about_deficits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/23/dick_cheney_was_right_about_deficits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politically, it doesn't matter, and when Democrats fight it, they fall into a Republican trap]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Dick Cheney right about deficits? In 2002, a month before he gave George W. Bush's first treasury secretary, Paul O'Neill, the news that he was fired, then-Vice President Dick Cheney is supposed to have told O'Neill, "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter. We won the midterms." Cheney was not making an economic case that deficits don't matter. He was making a political case, with his reference to the midterm elections of 2002.</p><p>Polls show that many Republicans favor tax cuts, even if that means higher deficits. Ever since Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980, the Republican answer to every policy question has been tax cuts. Democrats and the dwindling number of Republican fiscal conservatives think that Republican conservatives are crazy. And they are crazy -- crazy like a fox.</p><p>Republican strategy is based on the fact that the American public is deeply confused. Americans may be against big government in the abstract, but they favor more spending on most government programs that are specified by name, except for foreign aid. At the same time, majorities favor cutting taxes and balancing the budget. This might be called the Budgetary Trilemma. When asked whether they favor higher spending, lower taxes or a balanced budget, Americans answer "Yes."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/dick_cheney_was_right_about_deficits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/dick_cheney_was_right_about_deficits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Kinsley&#8217;s hyperinflation imagination</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/michael_kinsley_hyperinflation_hyperventilation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/michael_kinsley_hyperinflation_hyperventilation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/03/17/michael_kinsley_hyperinflation_hyperventilation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pundit can't cite any evidence or economists for his thesis, but that doesn't stop him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/03/kinsleys-transcendental-deduction-of-hyperinflation.php">Matthew Yglesias</a> does such a scintillating job of eviscerating Michael Kinsley's bizarre <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/03/my-inflation-nightmare/7995/">hyperinflation hyperventilation</a> in the April issue of The Atlantic that it would be unsportsmanlike to pile on and offer my own line-by-line exegesis of his confounding nervous-nellyism. I'll just note that it requires some very clever rhetoric to explain how you can't sleep at night because of your inflation fears, even as you acknowledge that there is no evidence that your nightmare is something to worry about right now, and all the economists you respect don't see it as a significant problem. Kinsley is a heck of a writer, but he's not <em>that</em> good.</p><p>The timing of the piece's online publication could not be worse. On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm">Producer Price Index</a>, which shows prices for finished goods (not including food and energy) inching up at 0.1 percent rate. If you add food and energy into the mix, falling gas prices actually pushed the index <em>down</em> by 0.6 percent. As Ryan Avent notes, with the <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2010/03/inflation_0">help of a nice chart,</a> the chances for deflation seem at least as likely as inflation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/michael_kinsley_hyperinflation_hyperventilation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/michael_kinsley_hyperinflation_hyperventilation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waterboarding for dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/waterboarding_for_dummies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/waterboarding_for_dummies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/09/waterboarding_for_dummies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internal CIA documents reveal a meticulous protocol that was far more brutal than Dick Cheney's "dunk in the water"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-proclaimed waterboarding fan Dick Cheney called it a no-brainer in a 2006 radio interview: Terror suspects should get a "a dunk in the water." But recently released internal documents reveal the controversial "enhanced interrogation" practice was far more brutal on detainees than Cheney's description sounds, and was administered with meticulous cruelty.</p><p>Interrogators pumped detainees full of so much water that the CIA turned to a special saline solution to minimize the risk of death, the documents show. The agency used a gurney "specially designed" to tilt backwards at a perfect angle to maximize the water entering the prisoner's nose and mouth, intensifying the sense of choking &#8211; and to be lifted upright quickly in the event that a prisoner stopped breathing.</p><p>The documents also lay out, in chilling detail, exactly what should occur in each two-hour waterboarding "session." Interrogators were instructed to start pouring water right after a detainee exhaled, to ensure he inhaled water, not air, in his next breath. They could use their hands to "dam the runoff" and prevent water from spilling out of a detainee's mouth. They were allowed six separate 40-second "applications" of liquid in each two-hour session &#8211; and could dump water over a detainee's nose and mouth for a total of 12 minutes a day. Finally, to keep detainees alive even if they inhaled their own vomit during a session &#8211; a not-uncommon side effect of waterboarding &#8211; the prisoners were kept on a liquid diet. The agency recommended Ensure Plus.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/waterboarding_for_dummies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/waterboarding_for_dummies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>152</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stupak: 12 Dems ready to oppose health care bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/us_health_care_overhaul_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/us_health_care_overhaul_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Stupak, D-Mich.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/03/04/us_health_care_overhaul_13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stupak says that a dozen House Democrats will not support the health care bill unless abortion language is changed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A congressman who has played a key role in the long-running health care debate says he and 11 other Democrats will vote against the overhaul unless a provision subsidizing abortion is removed.</p><p>Rep. Bart Stupak argued Thursday that the provision in the Senate-passed version has language that would permit the federal government to "directly subsidize abortions."</p><p>The Michigan Democrat said he supports health care change, but he said several Democrats who voted for it the House would oppose it next time around in the absence of change. Stupak said on ABC's "Good Morning America" that "we're not going to bypass some principles that we believe strongly about." The administration argues that Obama's bill would retain existing restrictions on federally-financed abortions.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- A congressman who has played a key role in the long-running health care bill debate says he and 11 other Democrats will vote against the overhaul bill unless a provision subsidizing abortion is removed.</p><p>Rep. Bart Stupak argued Thursday that the provision in the Senate-passed version has language that would permit the federal government to "directly subsidize abortions."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/us_health_care_overhaul_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/us_health_care_overhaul_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuisine or death: The real chef&#8217;s motto</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/laiskonis_cuisine_or_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/laiskonis_cuisine_or_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes from the Kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chefs and Cooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/03/03/laiskonis_cuisine_or_death</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the world's best pastry chefs explains what drives him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You have to be so earnestly devoted that if you were any more devoted it would be perverse, and any less, it would not be enough. --</em> Charlie Trotter, "Becoming a Chef"</p><p>When I fell into this thing, this <em>cosa nostra</em> of cuisine, it was by accident. I had a background in fine art, and I was seduced by the creative process of cooking and the satisfaction of making things with my hands. Fifteen years later, I've been a baker, a line cook, a sous chef, now a pastry chef, and I can't imagine doing anything else. But back then, I never planned to make a career out of it, and the "foodie" culture we know today was still in its infancy. Back then, people still craved what came out of kitchens more than access into them.</p><p>Now, fueled by cooking shows and the Web, we have a culture of cuisine-as-entertainment. We're barraged by food porn, coffee-table cookbooks, and gritty tell-alls of the professional kitchen. Customers are constantly looking for what's new, the next big thing. As a professional, I've seen this culture make certain cooks hungry for stardom, hoping to be on TV shows and in magazines. But I've also seen that interest in cuisine shrink the world, making exotic ingredients more accessible, and push us to keep discovering new flavors and learning new techniques. It's a truly exciting time to be a chef, but it's always taken certain kinds of personalities to excel in cuisine, to have that geeky kind of masochism that drives us to aspire, impossibly, to perfection in both art and athleticism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/laiskonis_cuisine_or_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/laiskonis_cuisine_or_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP cage-match strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/gop_in_corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/gop_in_corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/03/gop_in_corner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are relying on media complicity and public ignorance to paralyze government. It's brazen, and risky]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's get one thing straight, as the nation's esteemed TV news networks appear determined to obscure simple facts for ratings-building melodrama. The U.S. Senate has already passed the Obama administration's healthcare reforms by a filibuster-proof majority. If Speaker Nancy Pelosi can persuade a majority of House Democrats to pass the Senate bill, that's the ballgame. There's nothing complicated about it.</p><p>All this scare talk about Democrats using the "nuclear option" or launching a "kamikaze mission" is the crudest kind of partisan propaganda. Using the Senate's reconciliation process to make fiscal changes to a bill already passed was standard operating procedure under President Bush. It's grimly amusing watching Senate Republicans, who spent years telling Democrats to get over the suspect 2000 presidential election, now pitching hissy fits over the prospect of a simple majority vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/gop_in_corner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/04/gop_in_corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren Buffett: The risk stops here</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/buffett_letter_to_shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/buffett_letter_to_shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/03/01/buffett_letter_to_shareholders</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his annual letter to shareholders, the Berkshire-Hathaway CEO delivers a message to his Wall Street peers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you think Warren Buffett's <a href="http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2009ltr.pdf">annual letter to the shareholders of Berkshire-Hathaway</a> is refreshingly plainspoken or deceptively homespun, the missive is always an interesting read, if only because of the strong sense that there is an actual real person behind the words, rather than a highly paid team of public relations agents.</p><p>For example, the following passage, in which Buffett delivers a not-so-implied criticism of your average financial institution CEO, rings true with some heartfelt disgust.</p><blockquote> <p>Charlie [Munger] and I believe that a CEO must not delegate risk control. It's simply too important. At Berkshire, I both initiate and monitor <em>every</em> derivatives contract on our books... If Berkshire ever gets in trouble, it will be <em>my</em> fault. It will not be because of misjudgments made by a Risk Committee or Chief Risk Officer.</p> <p>In my view a board of directors of a huge financial institution is <em>derelict</em> if it does not insist that its CEO bear full responsibility for risk control. If he's incapable of handling that job, he should look for other employment. And if he fails at it -- with the government thereupon required to step in with funds or guarantees -- the financial consequences for him and his board should be severe.</p> <p>It has not been shareholders who have botched the operations of some of our country's largest financial institutions. Yet they have borne the burden, with 90 percent or more of the value of their holdings wiped out in most cases of failure. Collectively, they have lost more than $500 billion in just the four largest financial fiascos of the last two years. To say these <em>owners</em> have been "bailed-out" is to make a mockery of the term.</p> <p>The CEOs and directors of the failed companies, however, have largely gone unscathed. Their fortunes may have been diminished by the disasters they oversaw, but they still live in grand style. It is the behavior of these CEOs and directors that needs to be changed: If their institutions and the country are harmed by their recklessness, they should pay a heavy price -- one not reimbursable by the companies they've damaged nor by insurance. CEOs and, in many cases, directors have long benefitted from oversized financial carrots; some <em>meaningful</em> sticks now need to be part of their employment picture as well.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/buffett_letter_to_shareholders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/01/buffett_letter_to_shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full autopsy for actor Brittany Murphy released</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/us_people_brittany_murphy_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/us_people_brittany_murphy_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brittany Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/2010/02/25/us_people_brittany_murphy_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pneumonia, anemia, prescription medications along with menstrual period led to her death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brittany Murphy's autopsy report details how pneumonia, severe anemia and prescription medications killed the "8 Mile" actress.</p><p>The report released Thursday states the 32-year-old actress' menstrual period left her in a weakened state after contracting pneumonia. The report states prescription medications found in Murphy's system were consistent with treatment of a cold or respiratory illness, but contributed to her death.</p><p>The actress had been complaining of severe abdominal pain for seven to 10 days before her death. But the report states the actress' husband and mother thought it was related to Murphy's period, which they told investigators was often severe.</p><p>Murphy died Dec. 20 and her death has been ruled accidental.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/us_people_brittany_murphy_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/26/us_people_brittany_murphy_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
