<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/brain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:44:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How can the brain understand itself?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_can_the_brain_understand_itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_can_the_brain_understand_itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television interview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The host of the new show "Brain Games" tells Salon the organ's biggest mystery, and how to make yours work better ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From studies about the spiraling <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/08/alzheimers-cost-health-medicare-expensive_n_1328986.html">costs</a> of diseases like Alzheimer's to headlines about President Obama's recent <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/Obama-Kicks-Off-100-Million/138241/">push for more neurological research</a>, the brain has been in the news a lot lately. So tonight's premiere of the new show <a href="http://braingames.nationalgeographic.com">"Brain Games"</a> on the National Geographic Channel (which, full disclosure, recently made a miniseries based, in part, on my book) is well timed. Hosted by Jason Silva, the program is a "Sesame Street" for adults, employing entertaining exercises and experiments that encourage viewer to explore their own minds in real time.</p><p>I talked to Silva about the new show, President Obama's research push and what we still do not know about the human mind.</p><p><strong>Your show is predicated on the idea that many people do not really understand how their own brain works. Why do you think that is?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_can_the_brain_understand_itself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_can_the_brain_understand_itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s BRAIN gets hammered</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/obamas_brain_gets_hammered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/obamas_brain_gets_hammered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Swanson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telling neuroscientists to stop criticizing a big government research project is not how science should be done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only we had access to technology that would allow us to accurately map all the brain activity going on at a single moment inside the skull of a particular human. Such technology would allow us to conduct some fun and instructive neuroscience experiments. For example, we could compare the changes in synaptic action in the brains of neuroscientists before and after they read <a href="http://www.firstnerve.com/2013/04/society-for-neuroscience-president-shut.html">a letter sent April 12 by Larry Swanson,</a> the president of the Society for Neuroscience, to all 42,000 members of his association. (Hat tip to science writer extraordinaire, Ed Yong, <a href="https://twitter.com/edyong209/status/323795288215150592">for the news.</a>)</p><p>BEFORE: Your everyday snapshot of the neurochemical and electrical activity in the brain of a scientist going about her or his normal business. Incredibly complicated, yes, but nothing particularly out of the ordinary.</p><p>AFTER: All hell breaks loose! <em>We've got damage reports pouring in from every sector, captain!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/obamas_brain_gets_hammered/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/obamas_brain_gets_hammered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cocoa could be the new brain drug</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/cocoa_could_be_the_new_brain_drug_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/cocoa_could_be_the_new_brain_drug_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocoa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Studies show that high levels of a natural compound in raw cocoa called flavanol lead to greater cognitive function]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a></p><p><strong>Cognition-Boosting Compounds</strong></p><p>It's news chocolate lovers have been craving: raw cocoa may be packed with brain-boosting compounds. Researchers at the University of L'Aquila in Italy, with scientists from <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=mars">Mars</a>, Inc., and their colleagues, published findings last September that suggest cognitive function in the elderly is improved by ingesting high levels of natural compounds called flavanols found in cocoa. The study included 90 individuals with mild cognitive impairment, a precursor to Alzheimer's disease. Subjects who drank a cocoa beverage containing either moderate or high levels of flavanols daily for eight weeks demonstrated greater cognitive function than those who consumed low levels of flavanols on three separate tests that measured factors that included verbal fluency, visual searching and attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/cocoa_could_be_the_new_brain_drug_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/cocoa_could_be_the_new_brain_drug_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Football&#8217;s death spiral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/footballs_death_spiral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/footballs_death_spiral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Sandusky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jovan belcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13189097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corroded by scandal and undermined by shocking new science, America's killer sport may be nearing collapse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If baseball is, or at least used to be, a languidly paced sport played on an asymmetrical greensward that recalls America’s agrarian past, football is an industrial product of the modern age. Confined to a precisely measured rectangle that mimics the electronic screen, football plays out in staccato bursts of violence, interrupted by commentary and meta-commentary, near-pornographic slow-motion replays and scantily clad young women selling you stuff. Though I’m not sure that the commercials during the Super Bowl, or any lesser football game, really have much to do with consumer products as such. Instead, they’re selling an idea, the idea of the sort of person you must be if you’re watching the game: Funny, alert, sexually alive, a bit self-mocking, surrounded by friends and endlessly loyal to football, to America and to television.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/footballs_death_spiral/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/footballs_death_spiral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>251</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 ways the brain dictates sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/10_ways_the_brain_dictates_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/10_ways_the_brain_dictates_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think size matters? That's just the preoptic area of your hypothalamaus talking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>Remember the Seinfeld episode where <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WyojQFJY1w" target="_blank">Jerry’s penis has an argument with his brain and loses</a>? It’s a classic: We’ve all been torn between love/lust and logic. (If you haven't, check for a belly button because this isn’t your home world.) This brilliant bit of comedy is totally relatable but a little misleading in one way: The brain is the one that sends signals to the penis in the first place. It’s pretty reliably running things, IMing the other body parts like crazy, regulating chemicals, making calculations and responding to stimuli, half the time without you even knowing about it. There’s a reason “the brains of the outfit” denotes someone who is really in charge.</p><p>So why does the brain sometimes signal us to do stupid things, especially in regard to sex and relationships? Isn’t that a little like one conjoined twin punching the other in the mouth? How does the brain decide who attracts us? What is it doing behind our backs, and how do we change as we mature?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/10_ways_the_brain_dictates_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/10_ways_the_brain_dictates_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is an Alzheimer&#8217;s vaccine on the way?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/is_an_alzheimers_vaccine_on_the_way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/is_an_alzheimers_vaccine_on_the_way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13172836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests we may be one step closer to treating -- and preventing -- the degenerative brain disease ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers from Université Laval, CHU de Québec and pharmaceutical firm GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has discovered a way to stimulate the brain's natural defense mechanisms in people with Alzheimer's disease, opening the door to the development of a treatment for the degenerative brain illness -- and a vaccine to prevent it.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130115143852.htm" target="_blank">reported</a> by Science Daily:</p><blockquote><p>One of the main characteristics of Alzheimer's disease is the production in the brain of a toxic molecule known as amyloid beta. Microglial cells, the nervous system's defenders, are unable to eliminate this substance, which forms deposits called senile plaques.</p> <p>The team led by Dr. Serge Rivest, professor at Université Laval's Faculty of Medicine and researcher at the CHU de Québec research center, identified a molecule that stimulates the activity of the brain's immune cells. The molecule, known as MPL (monophosphoryl lipid A), has been used extensively as a vaccine adjuvant by GSK for many years, and its safety is well established.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/is_an_alzheimers_vaccine_on_the_way/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/is_an_alzheimers_vaccine_on_the_way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much alcohol is safe for expectant mothers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/how_much_alcohol_is_safe_for_expectant_mothers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/how_much_alcohol_is_safe_for_expectant_mothers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childbirth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The odd drink is unlikely to harm most infants, but we can't fully measure alcohol's effect on the developing brain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> On the night of my 32nd birthday, my husband and I enjoyed a delicious dinner while on vacation in Orvieto, Italy. To complement my pasta, I enjoyed a single glass of red wine, my first since learning I was pregnant four months earlier. Even now my indulgence inspires periodic pangs of guilt: Did I stunt my son’s potential by sipping that Sangiovese?</p><p>Nobody questions the notion that heavy drinking during pregnancy is harmful. It can cause facial abnormalities, central nervous system problems and stunted growth. But evidence regarding the effects of light or occasional drinking is mixed. In <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjo.2012.119.issue-10/issuetoc">five epidemiological studies</a> published in 2012, medical psychologist Erik Mortensen of the University of Copenhagen and his colleagues <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-daily-glass-of-wine-is-okay-durin">found</a> that five-year-old children born to women who had one to four drinks a week during pregnancy displayed no deficits in general intelligence, attention or other types of higher-order thinking. On the other hand, in 2011 psychiatrist Nancy Day of the University of Pittsburgh and her colleagues <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042714/">reported</a>that teens born to women who averaged more than one drink a week during pregnancy were twice as likely as those born to nondrinkers to have conduct disorder, a condition characterized by theft, deceit or violence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/how_much_alcohol_is_safe_for_expectant_mothers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/how_much_alcohol_is_safe_for_expectant_mothers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music gets you high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endorphins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research on endorphins finds people have higher pain thresholds immediately after singing, dancing and drumming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Jealous of the “runner’s high” serious athletes feel after an intense, vigorous workout? Well, newly published research reveals three alternative ways you can release those mood-enhancing endorphins:</p><p>Singing, dancing, and drumming.</p><p>That’s the conclusion of a <a href="http://www.epjournal.net/articles/performance-of-music-elevates-pain-threshold-and-positive-affect-implications-for-the-evolutionary-function-of-music/" target="_blank">study</a> by University of Oxford psychologist <a href="http://www.neuroscience.ox.ac.uk/directory/robin-i-m-dunbar/" target="_blank">Robin Dunbar</a>. He and his colleagues report people who have just been playing music have a higher tolerance for pain—an indication their bodies are producing <a href="http://www.vitaminstuff.com/articles/healthfitness/articles-healthfitness-1.html" target="_blank">endorphins</a>, which are sometimes referred to as natural opiates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can we learn from freestyle rappers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/what_can_we_learn_from_freestyle_rappers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/what_can_we_learn_from_freestyle_rappers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freestyle Rap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new brain study reveals they may hold the key to enhanced creativity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> My hometown, Minneapolis, may not have been the cradle of hip-hop, but by the late 90s, when I hit high school, it was a Mecca for indie rappers and DJs. More than a few of my friends kept “rhyme books” stashed in their lockers and spent weekends pawing through vinyl at Fifth Element, the local record store. I remember Brad Hartung, a youth leader and beat-box extraordinaire, picking up a microphone at a church retreat and just about blowing the roof off the sanctuary. I remember, too, a short-lived after-school rap group that recorded freestyle sessions in Pat Jarosch’s attic. Most of those friends are in law school now, but back then, they wanted nothing more than to become the next hip-hop hero from the Heartland.</p><p>Freestyling is to rap as improvisation is to jazz. Rather than reciting a pre-written rhyme, or reading off pages of sheet music, the artist stands up onstage and channels the Muse directly, no filter: whatever comes up, comes out. There are some rules, of course. Trumpet players have to stay in the right key and follow, say, a 12-bar count; emcees have to keep time with the beat, and recycling old material is frowned upon. Aside from that, it’s an artistic free-for-all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/what_can_we_learn_from_freestyle_rappers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/what_can_we_learn_from_freestyle_rappers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are neuroscientists the next great architects?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture thinks so, and it's spending thousands of dollars to find out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> <strong>ARCHITECTS HAVE BEEN</strong> talking for years about “biophilic” design, “evidence based” design, design informed by the work of psychologists. But last May, at the profession’s annual convention, John Zeisel and fellow panelists were trying to explain neuroscience to a packed ballroom.</p><p>The late-afternoon session pushed well past the end of the day; questions just kept coming. It was a scene, Zeisel marveled—all this interest in neuroscience—that would not have taken place just a few years earlier.</p><p>Zeisel is a sociologist and architect who has researched the design of facilities for Alzheimer’s patients. Architects, he explains, “understand about aesthetics; they know about psychology. The next depth to which they can go is understanding the brain and how it works<em> </em>and<em> why</em> do people feel more comfortable in one space than another?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the secret to learning a second language?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/whats_the_secret_to_learning_a_second_lanuage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/whats_the_secret_to_learning_a_second_lanuage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Studies reveal it's more than just a matter of memory. A look at what the science of recall can teach us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><strong> A FEW YEARS AGO,</strong> Captain Emmanuel Joseph decided to learn Arabic before his deployment to Iraq. “At first it was easy,” he told me. At his base in the U.S., he explains, “we had native speakers teaching us basic things like greetings; imperatives like <em>stop</em>, <em>go</em>, <em>walk</em>; and some numbers and nouns. It was very much survival-level.” In Iraq, Joseph (not his real name) continued trying to learn Arabic with <em>Al-Kitaab</em>, the main textbook used by American universities and the military. But he struggled.</p><p>“I was forgetting more than I was learning,” he said. “With every chapter in the textbook came a hundred more vocabulary words. The language and the culture were accessible, but I also had a job to do. So I didn’t—and couldn’t—spend all my time studying.” Joseph cast about online for help and came across LinguaStep,<strong> </strong>an online Arabic-language program that quizzes a user in vocabulary and adapts to a user’s specific rate of learning.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/whats_the_secret_to_learning_a_second_lanuage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/whats_the_secret_to_learning_a_second_lanuage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution and the mind: An author&#8217;s response</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/evolution_and_the_mind_an_authors_response/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/evolution_and_the_mind_an_authors_response/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferris Jabr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Yorker contributor and former executive editor of the Economist Anthony Gottlieb answers his critic ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does evolution stop at the neck? Anyone who is skeptical about the details of popular forms of evolutionary psychology is liable to be charged with thinking so. Thus Ferris Jabr, commenting on my critique of the hubris of some of evolutionary psychology, writes that, “Every cell in our brains — every moment of our mental lives — is intimately connected to the entire history of life on this planet” — as if this were something that I, and other skeptics, must have failed to appreciate.</p><p>Well, aside from the hyperbole (“entire”?), I’m happy to agree with him about the cells in our brains and to affirm that evolution doesn’t stop at the neck. But let’s remember that particle physics doesn’t stop at the neck, either. So does this mean that psychologists ought to be paying a lot more attention to quarks and leptons? Presumably not. The point here is that, although psychology needs to be consistent with the facts of particle physics or of evolution, just how much any branch of science can reveal about our minds is always an open question, to be decided on a case by case basis. In the case of physics, the answer is probably not all that much. In the case of evolution, I believe it is rather more. But not as much, I suspect, as Jabr thinks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/evolution_and_the_mind_an_authors_response/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/evolution_and_the_mind_an_authors_response/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t some of us relax?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/18/why_cant_some_of_us_relax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/18/why_cant_some_of_us_relax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Develpment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTSD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13015068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New experiments with mice offer telling clues about the neurobiology of fear]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear, like fire, is our friend when it isn’t raging out of control. Awareness of a potential threat activates the famous fight-or-flight impulse, facilitating a quick response. Once we realize the fright was actually a false alarm—that wasn’t a burglar you heard downstairs, just the cat—we rapidly return to a state of repose.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> But too often, people suffering from anxiety disorders fail to respond to the all-clear signal. This leaves them in an ongoing state of heightened tension, which—if it lasts long enough, or gets triggered often enough—can take a severe physical and mental toll. Why are some of us able to relax, while others stay on guard long after any danger has passed?</p><p>An answer that could point the way toward breakthrough therapies is emerging from complementary studies of humans and mice. But <a href="http://www.genome.duke.edu/directory/faculty/hariri/" target="_blank">Ahmad Hariri</a>, a neurobiologist at Duke University, crystallizes the idea with a different animal altogether. He refers to the amygdala, which has been called “the fear center of the brain,” as a sort of watchdog. “A watchdog responds reflexively to threat,” he notes. It’s up to its owner to say ‘That’s enough. I heard you bark. I checked it out. It’s okay.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/18/why_cant_some_of_us_relax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/18/why_cant_some_of_us_relax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can children&#8217;s brains explain mental illness?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/can_childrens_brains_explain_mental_illness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/can_childrens_brains_explain_mental_illness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Develpment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13008365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Child Mind Institute hopes to pinpoint the origins of autism, depression and psychosis, among other disorders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> In a room tucked next to the reception desk in a colorful lobby of a Park Avenue office tower, kids slide into the core of a white cylinder and practice something kids typically find quite difficult: staying still. Inside the tunnel, a child lies on her back and looks up at a television screen, watching a cartoon. If her head moves, the screen goes blank, motivating her to remain motionless. This dress rehearsal, performed at <a href="http://www.childmind.org/" target="_blank">The Child Mind Institute</a>, prepares children emotionally and physically to enter a real magnet for a scan of their brain. The scan is not part of the child’s treatment; it is his or her contribution to science. What scientists learn from hundreds to thousands of brain scans from children who are ill, as well as those who are not, is likely to be of enormous benefit to children in the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/can_childrens_brains_explain_mental_illness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/can_childrens_brains_explain_mental_illness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Touring the brain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/touring_the_brain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/touring_the_brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Our brains are rather like a city that has existed since ancient times"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution has created a staggering range of organisms, each with features cleverly honed for its environmental niche. But while evolution is a fantastic creator, adding almost whatever is needed, it is surprisingly lazy at tidying up after itself, at pruning what is no longer required. In the bacterial world, where margins for survival may be razor sharp, things are more efficient. But most animals carry with them a surplus of obsolete features, such as the astronomical quantities of pathological DNA interlopers that sit in every cell in our bodies. But there are also more large-scale examples of detritus we endure. For instance, whenever we get cold, our hair duly stands on end to create a buffer of trapped air around our skins, as if such an action would make any difference to keep us cocooned from the cold—it doesn’t (unlike other primates, we simply don’t have enough hair to make this automatic response functional).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/touring_the_brain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/touring_the_brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Artificial limbs, controlled by thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/artificial_limbs_controlled_by_thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/artificial_limbs_controlled_by_thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12997112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea that paralyzed people might one day control their limbs just by thinking is no longer a fantasy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2014, billions of viewers worldwide may remember the opening game of the World Cup in Brazil for more than just the goals scored by the Brazilian national team and the red cards given to its adversary. On that day my laboratory at Duke University, which specializes in developing technologies that allow electrical signals from the brain to control robotic limbs, plans to mark a milestone in overcoming paralysis.</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> If we succeed in meeting still formidable challenges, the first ceremonial kick of the World Cup game may be made by a paralyzed teenager, who, flanked by the two contending soccer teams, will saunter onto the pitch clad in a robotic body suit. This suit—or exoskeleton, as we call it—will envelop the teenager's legs. His or her first steps onto the field will be controlled by motor signals originating in the kicker's brain and transmitted wirelessly to a computer unit the size of a laptop in a backpack carried by our patient. This computer will be responsible for translating electrical brain signals into digital motor commands so that the exoskeleton can first stabilize the kicker's body weight and then induce the robotic legs to begin the back-and-forth coordinated movements of a walk over the manicured grass. Then, on approaching the ball, the kicker will visualize placing a foot in contact with it. Three hundred milliseconds later brain signals will instruct the exoskeleton's robotic foot to hook under the leather sphere, Brazilian style, and boot it aloft.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/artificial_limbs_controlled_by_thoughts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/artificial_limbs_controlled_by_thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside a 20-something&#8217;s brain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/inside_a_20_somethings_brain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/inside_a_20_somethings_brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12996086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New studies suggest structural changes into our third decade, but it may be too soon to tell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the opening scene of Lena Dunham’s HBO series <em>Girls</em>, the Horvaths tell their 24-year-old daughter Hannah that they will no longer support her—or, as her mother puts it: “No. More. <em>Money</em>.” A recent college graduate, Hannah has been living in Brooklyn, completing an unpaid internship and working on a series of personal essays. The Horvaths intend to give Hannah “one final push” toward, presumably, a lifestyle that more closely resembles adulthood. Hannah protests. Her voice quavers. She tells her parents that she does not want to see them the following day, even though they are leaving town soon: “I have work and then I have a dinner thing and then I am busy—trying to become who I am.”</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> Across the United States—and in developed nations around the world—twenty-somethings like Hannah are taking longer to finish school, leave home, begin a career, get married and reach other milestones of adulthood. These trends are not just anecdotal; sociologists and psychologists have gathered supporting data. Robin Marantz Henig summarizes the patterns in her 2010 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/magazine/22Adulthood-t.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank"><em>New York Times Magazine </em>feature</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/inside_a_20_somethings_brain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/inside_a_20_somethings_brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does self-awareness require a complex brain?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12990441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neuroimaging studies reveal that a wrinkly cerebral cortex is what distinguishes human thinking from other animals']]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The computer, smartphone or other electronic device on which you are reading this article has a rudimentary brain—kind of.* It has highly organized electrical circuits that store information and behave in specific, predictable ways, just like the interconnected cells in your brain. On the most fundamental level, electrical circuits and neurons are made of the same stuff—atoms and their constituent elementary particles—but whereas the human brain is conscious, manmade gadgets do not <em>know</em> they exist. Consciousness, most scientists argue, is not a universal property of all matter in the universe. Rather, consciousness is restricted to a subset of animals with relatively complex brains. The more scientists study animal behavior and brain anatomy, however, the more universal consciousness seems to be. A brain as complex as the human brain is definitely not necessary for consciousness. On July 7 this year, a group of neuroscientists convening at Cambridge University <a href="http://fcmconference.org/" target="_blank">signed a document</a> officially declaring that non-human animals, “including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses” are conscious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our self-cleansing brain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/brains_drain_neuroscientists_discover_cranial_cleansing_system_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/brains_drain_neuroscientists_discover_cranial_cleansing_system_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington's Disease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12984307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fluids coursing through the nervous system could help clear the brain of toxic detritus that leads to Alzheimer's ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brain can be a messy place. Thankfully, it has good plumbing: Scientists have just discovered a cleansing river inside the brain, a fluid stream that might be enlisted to flush away the buildup of proteins associated with Alzheimer's, Huntington's and other neurodegenerative disorders.</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> The researchers, based at the University of Rochester (U.R.), University of Oslo and Stony Brook University, describe this new system in the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/stm.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748">journal</a><em><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/stm.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748"> Science Translational Medicine</a></em> today. The study adds to the evidence that the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blogs.scientificamerican.com/brainwaves/2012/05/18/know-your-neurons-meet-the-glia">star-shaped cells called astrocytes</a> play a leading role in keeping the nervous system in good working order.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/brains_drain_neuroscientists_discover_cranial_cleansing_system_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/16/brains_drain_neuroscientists_discover_cranial_cleansing_system_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
