<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Brain development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/brain_development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Racial stereotyping linked to creative stagnation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/study_racial_stereotyping_linked_to_creative_stagnation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/study_racial_stereotyping_linked_to_creative_stagnation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People prone to racial essentialism are more closed-minded, and less creative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an article published in Psychological Science, researchers at Tel Aviv University found that racial stereotyping and creative stagnation have something big in common: categorical thinking.</p><p>"Although these two concepts concern very different outcomes, they both occur when people fixate on existing category information and conventional mindsets," wrote lead researcher Carmit Tadmor. As it turns out, having an essentialist mind-set about a broad category of people usually means that you're equally narrow in <em>all </em>of your thinking.</p><p>As Science Daily <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130107130937.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmost_popular+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Most+Popular+News%29" target="_blank">reported</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/study_racial_stereotyping_linked_to_creative_stagnation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/study_racial_stereotyping_linked_to_creative_stagnation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Alzheimer&#8217;s linked to brain changes at birth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests prenatal brain development may be an important factor in psychiatric risk in adults]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers at the University of North Carolina school of Medicine have found that certain brain patterns in adults with Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and autism can also be seen in the brain scans of infants.</p><p>"These results suggest that prenatal brain development may be a very important influence on psychiatric risk later in life," <a href="http://news.unchealthcare.org/news/2013/january/risk-genes-for-alzheimers-and-mental-illness-linked-to-brain-changes-at-birth" target="_blank">said</a> lead author of the study and assistant professor of psychiatry at UNC, Rebecca C. Knickmeyer. In addition to early detection, the study may also lead to early intervention breakthroughs in the degenerative brain disorder.</p><p>According to the report on UNC's website:</p><blockquote><p>The study included 272 infants who received MRI scans at UNC Hospitals shortly after birth. The DNA of each was tested for 10 common variations in 7 genes that have been linked to brain structure in adults. These genes have also been implicated in conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorders and depression.</p> <p>For some polymorphisms – such as a variation in the APOE gene which is associated with Alzheimer's disease – the brain changes in infants looked very similar to brain changes found in adults with the same variants, Knickmeyer said. "This could stimulate an exciting new line of research focused on preventing onset of illness through very early intervention in at-risk individuals."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does self-awareness require a complex brain?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12990441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neuroimaging studies reveal that a wrinkly cerebral cortex is what distinguishes human thinking from other animals']]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The computer, smartphone or other electronic device on which you are reading this article has a rudimentary brain—kind of.* It has highly organized electrical circuits that store information and behave in specific, predictable ways, just like the interconnected cells in your brain. On the most fundamental level, electrical circuits and neurons are made of the same stuff—atoms and their constituent elementary particles—but whereas the human brain is conscious, manmade gadgets do not <em>know</em> they exist. Consciousness, most scientists argue, is not a universal property of all matter in the universe. Rather, consciousness is restricted to a subset of animals with relatively complex brains. The more scientists study animal behavior and brain anatomy, however, the more universal consciousness seems to be. A brain as complex as the human brain is definitely not necessary for consciousness. On July 7 this year, a group of neuroscientists convening at Cambridge University <a href="http://fcmconference.org/" target="_blank">signed a document</a> officially declaring that non-human animals, “including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses” are conscious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/brainwaves_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
