<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New U.C. logo: A sad sign for higher education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/new_uc_logo_a_sad_sign_for_higher_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/new_uc_logo_a_sad_sign_for_higher_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The University of California's rebranding shows the institution as a start-up hub rather than a place of learning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It's not only ugly because it looks like a Swedish flag being flushed down the toilet," <a href="http://thenewinquiry.com/blogs/zunguzungu/let-us-eat-cake/">wrote </a>New Inquiry blogger and University of California doctoral candidate Aaron Bady of his university's brand-new logo, "it’s ugly because it so perfectly crystallizes everything that’s been going wrong with the University of California for years."</p><p>U.C. recently unveiled its new logo. Gone is the traditional arrangement, centering on an open book adorned with the institution's founding date. The new logo features instead a simple yellow, almost Comic Sans style "C" -- or perhaps it's a swish? -- on a sky blue "U" background. An 11-person team spent three years developing the logo, which aimed to project a "forward-looking spirit" according to U.C. officials <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-uc-logo-20121211,0,7650237.story">cited in the L.A. Times.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/new_uc_logo_a_sad_sign_for_higher_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/new_uc_logo_a_sad_sign_for_higher_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilbo Baggins says, &#8220;Buy this!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold the onslaught of Hobbit action figures. Hobbit Legos. Hobbit meals. If only they did this to "Anna Karenina"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Peter Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” ruled the megaplexes for most of the early years of this century, it was inevitable that “The Hobbit” would follow. What was perhaps also inevitable — given the way the film industry and popular culture, in general, operates these days — is that after turning J.R.R. Tolkien’s massive three-book fantasy trilogy into a massive three-film fantasy trilogy, Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema would turn the slender folk-tale prequel into … another massive three-film fantasy trilogy.</p><p>That Hollywood is driven more by market forces than by artistic ones is a cliché so old it’s almost become axiomatic. Blame the collapse of the studio system in the 1960s. Hollywood did just fine when all the major studios were in the business of creating, as well as financing, the films bearing their logos; they even went so far as to seek out new talent, nurture it, and develop it over the course of years. Today, studios are just the money men, and projects are developed by independent production companies — every actor and director has his or her own — and then brought to MGM or Fox or Disney in supplication with the hope of a big, fat bankroll.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How consumer brainwashed are you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perfect marketing campaign: A free game app that tests our recognition of corporate branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For his 15th birthday, I gave my son an iPod Touch, a piece of technology that would have seemed like the purest magic to me when I was his age. He likes it, a lot, and I like to watch him use it a lot, because paying attention to how teenagers interact with modern consumer technology is an endlessly fruitful way to learn about where the intersecting forces of capital and entertainment will push society next. But even with long experience at this voyeuristic style of technology journalism, I was a little taken aback when I saw what he was doing with his new favorite toy last Sunday.</p><p>He was playing <a href="http://aticod.com/portfolio/logosQuiz/">Logos Quiz,</a> a game that is based primarily on the ability to identify corporate logos.</p><p>I was appalled and amazed. We've all become quite used to product placement in our entertainment, to living in a world in which TV shows like, say, "Hawaii 5-0" don't even try to hide their primary function as vehicles for Victoria's Secret and Microsoft Surface marketing campaigns. But to make the ability to recognize a brand into the product itself -- that's pure genius. A 15-year-old's attention span in 2012 is perhaps the most fickle thing to ever exist on this planet -- to see my son trying to guess whether a certain squiggle signified BMW or Mercedes Benz was astonishing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brand USA takes a hit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/brand_usa_takes_a_hit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/brand_usa_takes_a_hit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Brand Index]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study assessing international perception of countries as brands finds US in increasingly poor global standing ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Country Brand Index (CBI) compiled by brand consultants FutureBrand annually looks at nation-states through the lens of consumer perceptions. If every country is and has a "brand," how do these brands fare against each other? According to the 2012-2013 CBI report, due for release Wednesday, brand USA is on the decline.</p><p>Listed in eighth place in the CBI top 25 country brands this year, the U.S. has fallen eight places since 2009, when the U.S. took the top spot and FutureBrand found some truth in the jingoistic chant "USA, number one." The CBI Index this year found Switzerland to have the top country brand, while the U.K.'s brand enjoyed a two-place leap to eleventh place, likely due to London Olympics attention.</p><p>In a release, FutureBrand explained how country brand perception is measured for their annual report:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/brand_usa_takes_a_hit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/brand_usa_takes_a_hit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brainwashed by junk food</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brainwashed_by_junk_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brainwashed_by_junk_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chain Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that fast-food logos are "imprinted" on children's minds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Do your children light up when they see those golden arches?</p><p>Well, they’re surely not alone. A new study released this week showed that brain activity in areas connected to rewards and appetite control increased in children when they were shown well-known fast food logos.</p><p>Researchers from the University of Missouri-Kansas City and the University of Kansas Medical Center showed children, ages 10-14, 120 popular company logos — 60 food and 60 non-food logos. During this process, researchers used MRI technology to scan the children’s brains and monitor their activity. The study found that fast-food logos triggered an increase in brain activity compared to the non-food logos.</p><p>Researcher Dr. Amanda Bruce <a href="http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/lifestyle/archives/2012/09/20120924-172809.html">said</a> that while viewing fast food logos, the children’s increased brain activity was not that much different than when the children saw actual food. She said children’s interest and familiarity with food logos is “concerning,” as the logos are marketing food that is unhealthy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brainwashed_by_junk_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brainwashed_by_junk_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>