<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Breaking Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/breaking_bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vince Gilligan on last episodes of &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: &#8220;It’s going to be polarizing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Gilligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The show's creator admits that even he is not sure how the series is going to end]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince Gilligan and his writers are about two episodes away from writing the series finale of one of the best shows on television, "Breaking Bad," whose final half-season will air this summer on AMC.</p><p><a href="http://www.vulture.com/2013/01/vince-gilligan-on-writing-breaking-bad-finale.html">Vulture interviewed Gilligan</a> to find out what the writing team is thinking about in this "schizophrenic" time. “It’s going to be polarizing no matter how you slice it," he said. "But you don’t want 10 percent to say it was great and 90 percent to say it sucked ass. You want those numbers to be reversed.”</p><p>Gilligan didn't reveal any plot twists, but he did share what the writers are thinking about when writing the show's final episodes:</p><p>1. Even Gilligan doesn't know how the show is going to end, yet, but he's hoping to create something that will mix the element of surprise with a sense of inevitability:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/vince_gilligan_on_last_episodes_of_breaking_bad_it%e2%80%99s_going_to_be_polarizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow TV Awards: Willa Paskin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/top_10_tv_of_2012_%e2%80%94_and_a_preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/top_10_tv_of_2012_%e2%80%94_and_a_preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Blue Glow TV Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Willa Paskin is  Salon&#8217;s TV critic.  Willa&#8217;s top 10 (because she couldn&#8217;t resist adding five more): 1. &#8220;Homeland&#8221; (Showtime). For the purposes of this list, I am using “best” as a synonym for “shows I most loved to watch,” which explains why “Homeland,” even with it’s deeply ferkockte final stretch, is here. Did the whole show kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Willa Paskin is </em><strong> <a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/willa_paskin/">Salon's TV critic</a>. </strong></p><p><strong>Willa's top 10 (because she couldn't resist adding five more):</strong></p><p><strong>1. "Homeland"</strong> (Showtime). For the purposes of this list, I am using “best” as a synonym for “shows I most loved to watch,” which explains why “Homeland,” even with it’s deeply <em>ferkockte</em> final stretch, is here. Did the whole show kind of implode, selling out its realpolitik premise for a schmaltzy present? For sure. Did I always want to see next week’s episode desperately? For sure. As implausible and downright ridiculous as the last three episodes were, there was a good five-week span when “Homeland” tore through plot and expectations faster, more satisfyingly and with better acting — Claire Danes, the best of the best — than any show this year. “Homeland” couldn’t maintain its own momentum, but I wouldn’t have missed an out-of-control minute.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/top_10_tv_of_2012_%e2%80%94_and_a_preview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/top_10_tv_of_2012_%e2%80%94_and_a_preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow Awards: The Salon TV Critics&#8217; Poll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_awards_the_salon_tv_critics_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_awards_the_salon_tv_critics_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon tv awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best tv of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[that's so raven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue glow awards 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue glow awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best TV critics rank 2012's best TV. Terrorists, Targaryens, toe-points -- and a ton of redheads]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style> .articleContent a img:hover { opacity: .5; } </style><p>Way before your favorite show was ever recapped -- or you signed an online petition after it was kneecapped -- Salon bet big on TV writing. Beginning with the first piece by Salon founder Joyce Millman and her pioneering Blue Glow column -- on through Carina Chocano, Heather Havrilesky, Matt Zoller-Seitz and Willa Paskin -- sharp thinking and dazzling writing on the most obsessive and obsessing of mediums has been a crucial part of our mix.  We're lucky enough to be living in a golden age of TV writing now, so we've canvassed the best in the business to help create a definitive list and awards for the year's best in show. And we're naming it after our own early effort, which beamed an early signal out to a new and enthusiastic audience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_awards_the_salon_tv_critics_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_awards_the_salon_tv_critics_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: The Lifetime special</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/breaking_bad_the_lifetime_special/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/breaking_bad_the_lifetime_special/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifetime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Brought to you by Sudafed"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This clip at <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2012/12/06/breaking-bad-lifetime/">Entertainment Weekly</a> splices Walter White's universe into a very different kind of family drama.</p><p>Enjoy:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MOf4xB7TyqI" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/breaking_bad_the_lifetime_special/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/breaking_bad_the_lifetime_special/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Homeland&#8217;s&#8221; plausibility problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/homelands_plausibility_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/homelands_plausibility_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Episode 2, the coincidences start coming fast and furious. Is it a bad sign for things to come?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[Lots of spoilers about Sunday night’s episode of “Homeland” ahead.]</em></p><p>Last night’s episode of “Homeland” contained two pulse-racing scenes, both of which hinged on big, fat coincidences, raising the specter of the damned “P” word for the season to come. I’m talking about “plausibility.” “Homeland” is not exactly a realistic series — prisoners of war turned terrorists don’t often get tapped to be vice-presidential candidates and have twisted love affairs with the mentally unstable CIA agents who suspect their real motivations — and yet plausibility is an issue, and I suspect will only become more of one as the season goes on.</p><p>As with the past season of “Breaking Bad,” which got hounded with “plausibility” questions — how realistic is it that Walt and Jesse would have done that train heist? Is leaving that incriminating book of poetry on his toilet something Walter White would really do? — it’s not whether the story lines could really happen (because none of them could really happen), but whether the story lines seem like they could really happen in the totally fake world we’ve already bought into. It’s a head-scratching dynamic (and, when you don't find the coincidence in question that glaring, it can be a frustratingly nit-picky one). Here are two series founded on myriad, bedrock implausiblities that only set off audience bullshit alarms with the misuse of relatively small-time coincidences. And yet, they sure do. With the suspension of disbelief stretched to the limit, every request for further suspension better be on point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/homelands_plausibility_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/homelands_plausibility_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Mitt Romney is like Walter White</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/how_mitt_romney_is_like_walter_white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/how_mitt_romney_is_like_walter_white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He might not cook meth, but Romney has a lot in common with the "Breaking Bad" character]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the surface of things, patrician Mitt Romney doesn't have much in common with Bryan Cranston’s iconic "Breaking Bad" character, Walter White, a high school chemistry instructor. First of all, Walter probably has less of a desire to bust teachers' union strikes. Plus, Romney has better hair, wouldn’t need to cook meth to support his family in the wake of a lung cancer diagnosis, and is (maybe?) less of a sociopath</p><p>But go beyond the surface, and the two men — one an unbelievable fictional creation, and the other Walter White — have much in common. Spoilers ahead for "Breaking Bad" and probably November’s election results.</p><p><strong>Unshakable confidence: </strong>Romney wrote a book titled "No Apology<em>,</em>" and has stuck by that motto in his campaign. For example, when Mother Jones leaked a video of him blasting half of Americans as government-dependent parasites, he didn't roll the sentiment back; he just called it an "inelegant" way of blasting half of Americans as government-dependent parasites.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/how_mitt_romney_is_like_walter_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/how_mitt_romney_is_like_walter_white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emmy&#8217;s best moments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/emmys_best_moments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/emmys_best_moments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Gervais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Emmy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13020148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The winners were obvious, but there were still some genuine laughs: Chicken sandwich with two pickles, anyone?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a night that was dominated by lackluster bits – let's never speak of that lame Tracy Morgan Twitter "prank" again -- and few surprises. "Modern Family" won and Jon Hamm lost as usual. But for those viewers who had the patience and fortitude to stick with this year's broadcast (which mercifully wrapped up not one minute overtime), there were a few moments of genuine levity and warmth among the forced smiles and awkward patter. The best theme of the night? Nominees who showed they know how to play well with each other. Herewith our picks for the evenings brightest highlights.</p><p><strong>Eric Stonestreet's pitch-perfect acceptance</strong></p><p>Acknowledging his sitcom husband, Stonestreet said, "I wouldn't be standing here without Jesse Tyler Ferguson. There is no Cam without Mitch." Then he continued, beautifully, "We get the awesome opportunity to play these two characters on TV and show America and the world what a loving couple we can be, just like everybody else, and it's an honor to do that," and added, "I never knew I'd be on TV as a gay man, but I love the pictures of hairy chests you guys are sending me." Sweet and touching and very funny.</p><p><strong>Julia Louis-Dreyfus' win … for Amy Poehler</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/emmys_best_moments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/emmys_best_moments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Emmy wins: &#8220;Homeland,&#8221; &#8220;Modern Family&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/big_emmy_wins_homeland_modern_family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/big_emmy_wins_homeland_modern_family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emmys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire Danes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13019885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Mad Men" and "Breaking Bad" are pushed aside, as Claire Danes, Julie Bowen and "Game Change" are honored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Homeland," which puts the battle against terrorism on American soil, was honored as best drama series at Sunday's Emmys and earned trophies for stars Claire Danes and Damian Lewis. "Modern Family" was named best comedy.</p><p>"We feel so lucky, lucky not only to have jobs in these challenging times, but to have jobs that we love with people we love," said Steven Levitan, co-creator of "Modern Family."</p><p>The drama "Homeland" stopped "Mad Men" in its tracks, denying the show a record-setting fifth trophy and kept Bryan Cranston from his fourth consecutive best drama award for "Breaking Bad" and "Mad Men" star Jon Hamm an also-ran once more.</p><p>The Emmys refused to play it predictably Sunday, with Jon Cryer of "Two and a Half Men" earning a best actor award and Jimmy Kimmel proving a game but uneven host.</p><p>"I'm one of those pesky Brits, I apologize," said Lewis, who plays an American in the espionage thriller. "I don't really believe in judging art, but I thought I'd show up just in case."</p><p>Danes, eye-catching in a bright yellow dress that gracefully draped the pregnant actress, was effusive.</p><p>"My husband, my love, my life, my baby daddy, this doesn't mean anything without you," she said to her spouse, actor Hugh Dancy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/big_emmy_wins_homeland_modern_family/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/big_emmy_wins_homeland_modern_family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emmys: Is it finally Jon Hamm&#8217;s year?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/five_emmy_categories_to_watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/five_emmy_categories_to_watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downton Abbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Hamm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emmys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don Draper has been shut out, despite "Mad Men's" awards. Now there's competition from "Homeland" and "Downton"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if there were not enough <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/television/">going on in the TV universe right now</a>, the Emmy Awards air this Sunday night, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel. This year’s nominations were<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/19/emmys_shocker_they_get_it_right/"> pretty forward thinking </a>("Louie"! Lena! Schmidt!), but will the awards themselves be? Or will it be “Modern Family” and “Mad Men” all over again? (Not that I’m complaining about "Mad Men.") Here are some category-specific story lines to look out for on Sunday night.</p><p><strong>1.) Best drama, or can “Mad Men” hold off “Downton Abbey” and “Homeland”?</strong></p><p>There’s a story in the New York Times today all about how psyched PBS is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/21/arts/television/emmy-anticipation-runs-high-for-pbs.html?ref=arts ">on “Downton Abbey’s” Emmy hopes</a>. Objectively, Season 2 of the British costume drama was inconsistent — Matthew’s vanishing paralysis! Bates turning into a whiny maybe-murderer! That amnesiac heir covered in bandages!— but it’s got momentum, more viewers than “Mad Men” and an audience <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2012/02/why-it-doesnt-matter-that-the-second-season-of-downton-abbey-was-mediocre.html">who doesn’t really care how bad it can be</a>. Moreover, “Mad Men” has won best drama four years in a row, and no show has ever won five in a row. If “Downton’s” not the show to upset “Mad Men," there’s always Showtime’s far more deserving “Homeland."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/five_emmy_categories_to_watch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/five_emmy_categories_to_watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Gothic on meth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/american_gothic_on_meth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/american_gothic_on_meth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13014220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new take on Grant Wood's classic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illustrator <a href="http://society6.com/BrianDeYoungIllustration/The-Heisenbergs_Print">Brian DeYoung</a> has created one of the best variations of the oft-parodied "American Gothic" yet: "The Heisenbergs." The painting features Walter and Skyler White from "Breaking Bad," and they are about as happy-go-lucky in this crop of the painting as they are on the show:</p><p><img class="size-lg_horizontal wp-image-13014307" title="1092503_13941333_lz" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/09/1092503_13941333_lz2-400x307.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="307" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/american_gothic_on_meth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/17/american_gothic_on_meth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: White supremacist fable?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/breaking_bad_white_supremacist_fable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/breaking_bad_white_supremacist_fable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methamphetamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The series is just the latest Hollywood offering to get the drug trade wrong--and provide a dicey racial narrative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you judged by TV and movies alone, you’d think “pure” drugs were seeping out of American society’s every pore, along with hot doctors and secret agents gone rogue. Even if suburban 15-year-olds don’t ask their dealers for THC percentages after seeing Oliver Stone’s <em>Savages</em>  — and smart money says some of them are — craft beer isn’t the only boutique intoxicant buzzing around the nation’s subconscious. In the shadow of the high-fructose-corn-syrup backlash, everyone from the Olive Garden to the proverbial Brooklyn popsicle startup is trying to cash in on craftsmanship. Meanwhile, screenwriters (clever advertisers in their own right) have found that the easiest way to hook viewers on drug-dealer protagonists is to sell crack as small-batch artisanal rock cocaine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/breaking_bad_white_supremacist_fable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/breaking_bad_white_supremacist_fable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vince Gilligan does not want &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221; to end</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/vince_gilligan_does_not_want_breaking_bad_to_end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/vince_gilligan_does_not_want_breaking_bad_to_end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Gilligan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13003529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview with Salon, "Breaking Bad" creator Vince Gilligan looks ahead to the last eight episodes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince Gilligan clearly enjoys the decompression process. A few days after Season 5.1 of “Breaking Bad” ended, I had a chance to briefly catch up with him, as he was deep into a round of exit interviews.</p><p>One thing that strikes me is how much Gilligan is the anti-Walter White. Unlike his fictional creation, Gilligan is generous in recognizing the contributions of his fellow workers, and has a very accurate perception of where he is, why he is there, and where he is going. But as you will see, this sets up a problem that is mirrored in the drama of “Breaking Bad.” Gilligan and his team are stuck with their characters, their actions and the consequences of those actions. In some profound way, Walter White and his extended family have achieved a life of their own, and in the case of Season 5.1, as you will see, this led to some dilemmas that were not totally solved.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/vince_gilligan_does_not_want_breaking_bad_to_end/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/vince_gilligan_does_not_want_breaking_bad_to_end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real Walter White</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/the_real_walter_white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/the_real_walter_white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methamphetamine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13003273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet Donna Nelson, a chemistry professor at the University of Oklahoma and "Breaking Bad's" lead meth consultant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad news, entrepreneurial fans of <em>Breaking Bad</em>, the hit AMC series about a middle-aged chemistry teacher turned drug kingpin: you cannot actually learn to cook crystal meth by watching the show. “They deliberately put in faulty steps. They’ll start with one method of synthesizing methamphetamine but then switch to another,” says <a href="http://chem.ou.edu/djndjnhtml" target="_blank">Donna Nelson</a>, professor of chemistry at the University of Oklahoma. “It’s like watching a video of someone starting out on a trip to Dallas and ending up in Chicago.” The abundant “meth” that appears on-screen is actually cotton-candy-flavored sugar crystals, she promises.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Nelson isn’t just a well-informed observer; she’s been consulting on the Emmy-winning drama since its second season, helping to ensure that the show’s writers make the chemistry of illegal drug-making credible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/the_real_walter_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/the_real_walter_white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8217;s&#8221; Czech scheme work?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/would_breaking_bads_czech_scheme_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/would_breaking_bads_czech_scheme_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13001500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two lessons for Walter White: European meth users are locavores, and there’s not that many of them anyway]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fans of the critically-adored <em>Breaking Bad</em>, the story of a high-school chemistry teacher who becomes a Southwest narcotics kingpin, know that Sunday night’s cliffhanger turned on a successful scheme to export methamphetamine from New Mexico to the Czech Republic. It’s fiction. Most studies of global drug use suggest Europeans <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18368604">don’t use methamphetamine</a> in large numbers.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Why not? What do Europeans know about keeping meth use at bay, while North America gets slammed by the drug, straining health systems, clogging the courts, and converting rural homes into <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/27/portable-meth-lab-explodes-in-oklahoma-man-pants-police-say/">chemical bombs</a>?</p><p>Nothing. Europeans just don’t like the stuff.</p><p>“It’s a very American question, isn’t it? Why hasn’t something happened?” said Laurent Laniel, an analyst with the <a href="http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/" target="_blank">European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction</a>, in Lisbon. “In Europe we don’t ask ourselves this.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/would_breaking_bads_czech_scheme_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/would_breaking_bads_czech_scheme_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: Unsinkable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bad_unsinkable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bad_unsinkable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13000136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The show goes into hiatus with a brilliantly crafted episode that disappoints on plot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eight weeks ago, I concluded my first recap by quoting Winston Churchill. “Now, this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” Or, more to the point, as an astute <a href="http://www.salon.com/user/agore">commentator</a> pointed out, “Walt's fundamental problem is that he finds himself in season five of a four-season story arc.”</p><p>This is the dilemma that Vince Gilligan and his cohorts have grappled with. How do you sustain interest in a lead character who becomes more and more repellant as time goes on? How many different ways can the people around this lead character express their revulsion without contaminating the viewing audience? Ultimately, in a time-tested cliché heard by every writer of every drama at one time or another, who are we supposed to <em>root</em> for?</p><p>Who indeed?</p><p>Vince Gilligan is an admitted Stanley Kubrick fanatic. And this entire season reflects that fanaticism. There are great Kubrick movies, and not-so-great Kubrick movies, but even his lesser films are brilliantly crafted. And they all contain what Kubrick called “non-submersible units” – scenes that are so powerful they overpower any flaws in story, dialog, plotting and casting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bad_unsinkable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bad_unsinkable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8217;s&#8221; finale showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bads_final_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bads_final_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking bad finale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13000022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the season finale, Walter White almost gets away with all of it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those “Breaking Bad” fans somehow still hoping that Walter White and his family might be able to walk away unscathed from the sociopath he’s become, the season finale was a sort of tease. As in, here is what Walter White getting away with it would look like. Please be sure to take an extra close look. Because Hank Schrader is going to spend all next season, “Breaking Bad’s” last, making sure that exactly this does not happen.</p><p>As is the fashion for serious dramas these days (see:<em> </em>“Mad Men,” “Game of Thrones”), the “Breaking Bad” finale was not nearly as amped up or grueling as the penultimate episode, in which <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bads_fated_death/">Walt killed the loveable, phlegmatic Mike</a>. Walt’s transformation into a horrible, amoral man is now so complete that the aftermath of Mike’s death— what to do with Mike’s car, Mike’s body, and Mike’s 10 chatty associates— could be dealt with quickly and calmly, no fuss, no emotion. Walt has broken so bad his decision to hire some neo-Nazis to mastermind the grisly, simultaneous deaths of 10 imprisoned men took up less than five minutes of last night’s episode. The murders went down to the jarringly smooth sound of “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EFPJL1uQbs">Pick Yourself Up</a>,” a song with lyrics about getting to “start all over again,” because that is exactly what the murders were for Walt: a smooth way to begin anew, stabbings and burnings having become as breezy a thing to Walt as Frank Sinatra's crooning.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bads_final_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/breaking_bads_final_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: New depths</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bad_new_depths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bad_new_depths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things go from very bad to much, much worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not sure if this extends to the rest of the country, but my cable provider still lists “Breaking Bad” as a “Comedy-Drama.” They might want to take another look at that. It is hard at this point to see where any comedy, black or otherwise, is going to emerge from these characters, caught in this ongoing death spiral.</p><p>“Say My Name” is another massive dose of rancid, as the curdled dreams of Walter White drag a major character into dignified oblivion. How “Breaking Bad” is going to go for nine more hours, without a mass suicide of its loyal viewers is beyond me, but I’m here for the ride.</p><p>Few series do desert standoffs better than “Breaking Bad.” The gang that argues too much to shoot straight meets their rivals in yet another tense face-off. And in this episode teaser, we get one of the most fantastic yet illogical confrontations ever. That is, if you think, as I did, that Walter’s argument about the purity and excellence of his product is reason enough for a network to program – wait – sorry – for a rival gang to distribute it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bad_new_depths/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bad_new_depths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: Mike&#8217;s reckoning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bads_fated_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bads_fated_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Ehrmantraut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking bad death]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest episode proves that even the most careful criminals are fated to slip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second episode of "Breaking Bad" this season, Mike Ehrmantraut explained to Walter White why he had no interest in getting back into the meth business with him: “You are trouble … A time bomb. Tick-tick-ticking. And I have no intention of being around for the boom." Well, after last night’s episode we know Mike won’t be around for the boom, but only because he was around for a pop. Poor Mike, who knew the fate barreling toward him, and still wasn’t able to swerve out of the way.</p><p>Last night’s episode, the penultimate episode of the series’ penultimate season, was suffused with a feeling of inexorability. As the episode closed in around Mike, the outcome took on a preordained feeling that precluded surprise. Unlike with Gus Fring’s death, which was a shock in almost every particular, by the time Walt and Mike were meeting at the river the proceedings had the stench of tragedy, that feeling one gets when reading “Romeo and Juliet” and — even knowing what is about to happen — begins to hope that this time, maybe somehow, Friar John will get to Romeo in time. He never does.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bads_fated_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/breaking_bads_fated_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8217;s&#8221; Anna Gunn: Skyler might kill Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/26/breaking_bads_anna_gunn_skyler_might_kill_walt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/26/breaking_bads_anna_gunn_skyler_might_kill_walt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anna gunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Gilligan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12991065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Breaking Bad" is nearing the end -- and the actress who plays Skyler tells Salon she's imagining Walter's end]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are pretty bleak for "Breaking Bad's" Skyler White, played by Anna Gunn. Trapped in her marriage to Walt, her increasingly malevolent, manipulative meth-lord husband, she's terrified for the safety or her children, but unable to see a way out. With just two episodes left in the first half of "Breaking Bad's" fifth season, it is simultaneously hard to imagine how things could get much worse for Skyler, and even more difficult to think that they could get better.</p><p>Gunn spoke to Salon about Skyler, her predicament, her depression and the possibility of her killing Walter White.</p><p><strong>I’m extremely worried about Skyler. It’s getting really stressful to watch her. Was it stressful to be her?</strong></p><p>It was. It really was. There were days on set where it was like, “Wow, it’s hard to live in this place.” And thank God for Bryan Cranston being so hilarious and great, and pretty much our whole cast and crew, so we have a lot of levity. But I had to dig deep into some pretty black stuff this year. As an actor you wait for this kind of material, but it can also be very emotionally exhausting.</p><p><strong>There have been a number of scenes that have been totally skin crawling. Every time Walt touches Skyler, I get the most serious heebie-jeebies. </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/26/breaking_bads_anna_gunn_skyler_might_kill_walt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/26/breaking_bads_anna_gunn_skyler_might_kill_walt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221;: Mike blows it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/breaking_bad_mike_blows_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/breaking_bad_mike_blows_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter White]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12987157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exit strategies go very, very wrong as "Breaking Bad" takes a dramatic turn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In which Our Hero speeds by the Last Exit on the Highway To Hell, and we learn a new reason for his haste in passing. </em></p><p>Vince Gilligan has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/vince_gilligan_ive_never_googled_breaking_bad/">admitted</a> that he and his writers view writing “Breaking Bad” as a game of Vulcan three-dimensional chess. If so, last week’s “Dead Freight” was a sacrifice move, that allowed all of the pieces to arrange on that game board in precisely the right fashion. Make no mistake. The precision and plotting of “Buy-Out” redeems the excesses of “Dead Freight,” and (almost) makes that last move worthwhile. Last week’s overblown heist plot turns in on itself in “Buy-Out.” Something is not pulled off, but rather, an attempt is made to pull <em>out</em>, in this case, via a brilliant exit strategy that would clearly allow all of our players to escape with their lives and a nice pocket o’ change. What could possibly go wrong? Of course.</p><p>Walter.</p><p>The rollercoaster of doom crests the top and begins its final 10-episode plunge into the darkness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/breaking_bad_mike_blows_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/breaking_bad_mike_blows_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>